Alain Farmer wrote:
P.S.: For what it is worth, and I realize that it
might sound like folly to you, I suggest that you
lessen your licencing grip, allow building custom
standalones for ALL licences, allow the Rev-based
authoring of tools that might 'compete' with Rev (it
is much more likely that they will *complement* it).
Alain, I fully agree.
With a target market of creative users, this may not be the best
thing to do.
At least Lego opted for the opposite approach and they apparently
never looked back.
http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2000110701304PSCYHW
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.02/lego.html
"When programmers started fooling around with the proprietary code
used in the microcomputers included with Lego Mindstorms robotic
kits, Lego had to decide whether they should batten down the data-
hatches or invite the hackers in to play."
Runrev, in contrast, bit by bit, is erasing more and more of the L in
pLay. I personally deeply regret this.
Marielle
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Marielle Lange (PhD), Psycholinguist
Alternative emails: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Homepage
http://homepages.widged.com/mlange/
Easy access to lexical databases http://
lexicall.widged.com/
Supporting Education Technologists http://
revolution.widged.com/wiki/
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
