[Metamath] Re: Denoting morphisms in set.mm

2020-04-19 Thread 'Alexander van der Vekens' via Metamath
... there are two topics in StackExchange contining such symbols: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/46678/what-are-usual-notations-for-surjective-injective-and-bijective-functions https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/20015/special-arrows-for-notation-of-morphism s Unfortunately,

Re: [Metamath] Re: Denoting morphisms in set.mm

2020-04-18 Thread Norman Megill
A scan is attached. On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 10:56:23 AM UTC-4, David Starner wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 7:14 AM Norman Megill wrote: > > > > Regarding: > > > > F : A -1-1-> > F : A >--> B > > F : A -onto-> > F : A -->> B > > F : A -1-1-onto->

[Metamath] Re: Denoting morphisms in set.mm

2020-04-18 Thread Norman Megill
Regarding: F : A -1-1-> > F : A >--> B F : A -onto-> > F : A -->> B F : A -1-1-onto-> > F : A >-->> B Do you have a textbook reference for the new symbols you propose? The current symbols we use are from Takeuti & Zaring. The are rendered

[Metamath] Re: Denoting morphisms in set.mm

2020-04-18 Thread Norman Megill
FL asked me to post this. Forwarded Message Subject: Arrows Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 13:56:36 +0200 (CEST) From:FL Hi Norm, I Hope you are fine. Can you post that I like BenoƮt's arrows annotated with a subscript (Grp etc.) but that the semantics of arrows like >-> is