FWIW, I can also vouch for DitialOcean and Linode VMs. Both are hosts that my
employer makes liberal use of, and it sounds like our egress data distribution
is similar to that of us.metamath.org.
Norman Megill wrote:
> I got the response, " Open Source plans are only applicable for team
>
I got the response, " Open Source plans are only applicable for team
already having a website on Netlify." Looking over their description more
carefully, it seems that the only advantage of an Open Source plan is
"unlimited free team members" but otherwise you pay full price.
Norm
On
Thanks, Cris. I applied for an an Open Source Account via the link you
provided. We'll see what happens.
Norm
On Monday, June 14, 2021 at 9:31:02 PM UTC-4 Cris Perdue wrote:
> For what it's worth, I see that Netlify has an official form for
> requesting an "Open Source" account,
> at:
For what it's worth, I see that Netlify has an official form for requesting
an "Open Source" account,
at: https://opensource-form.netlify.com/.
Note: I write this without prejudice against other options, e.g.
DigitalOcean with free Cloudflare. It's just that I have no experience
with them.
It
On Saturday, June 12, 2021 at 11:57:47 AM UTC-4 David A. Wheeler wrote:
> All:
>
> Does anyone have recommendations for a better hosting site for the main
> site us.metamath.org and/or for the build/staging site us2.metamath.org?
> Personal experience (or close to it) preferred. Alternatively,
