Re: [meteorite-list] Important Announcement form the Nomenclature Committee

2015-02-15 Thread Jeff Grossman via Meteorite-list
No, the DCAs will simply require coordinates, like everywhere else. The proof condition is dropped. The NWA 9000s will be skipped. Believe it or not, nobody has submitted a request to reclassify Al Hag 001 or its siblings. Has there been a paper published on it? All I'm finding are

Re: [meteorite-list] Important Announcement form the Nomenclature Committee

2015-02-14 Thread Jeff Grossman via Meteorite-list
To amplify on Carl's response... For the past 15 years, any meteorite from this region (except falls) would get an NWA number unless there was compelling documentation of the coordinates of the find. This might include a photo of the meteorite in situ with an active GPS. But this was rarely

Re: [meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Update : New Type Classification (E-Melt)

2014-06-07 Thread Jeff Grossman via Meteorite-list
I wouldn't get too excited about this. Lots of enstatite meteorites (chondrites and achondrites) are melt rocks and melt breccias, and they've been described for decades by Alan Rubin and others, e.g. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703796003353