ed to be able to classify
>> this meteorite from only a photo.
>>
>> But let me clarify again, the intention is to only the smallest possible
>> window cut to generate a sample big enough for classification.
>> You are also the first person to advise that classifying th
ion is to only the smallest possible
> window cut to generate a sample big enough for classification.
> You are also the first person to advise that classifying the meteorite
> will take it to very low value. Is this consistent advise from the
> community here?
> I have no intention of c
>
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Paul Gessler wrote:
>
>> Let’s see a picture of this Iron.
>> -Paul G
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> ---
>>
>>
>>
&
y some of the best known institutions. One place lost over a
> kilo of material from their lack of knowledge of the material.
>
> Good luck!
>
> --AL Mitterling
> Mitterling Meteorites
>
> Quoting John Pierce via Meteorite-list <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
gt; -Paul G
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: John Pierce via Meteorite-list
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 6:33 PM
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Cutting An Iron
>
>
> Hello All,
Hello All,
This is my first post here. I joined recently because I found a lovely
nickel-iron meteorite, and that has spurred my further interest in this
subject. My meteorite has been confirmed as the real thing by staff of the
Meteorite Lab at Portland State University, who would like to per
6 matches
Mail list logo