>What was it?
I didn't ask the obvious followup. It took ages to get a simple yes or
no answer to the first question. All I know is that it wasn't a
meteorite.
CDevine
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
htt
Finally got an answer: It was not a meteorite.
CDevine
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Elton wrote:
>"We don't know what it is so it must
>be a meteorite", implying we on the
>dig are all knowing except for what
>we don't know otherwise.
Hello Elton,
Actually, Ron Barsted told me he based his
visual identification on "having seen and handled hundreds of meteor
--- Charlie Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are the 2 photos I posted last week, should
anyone care to comment based on photos alone:
Yeah I'll bite. The photos don't exclude this from
being a meteorite and the empty depressions might be
missing condrules. This doesn't look like an iron.
I spent 2 days at the dig, but was unable to view the "meteorite", as by
then it was in "safe keeping" in the Mayor's office and the mayor was
not to be found. Whether it turns out meteorite or meteorwrong, it
belongs to the city of Newport. I did make sure that Ron and Jan
Barsted, the organizer
I spent 2 days at the Newport Tower dig, but was unable to examine the
"meteorite", as by then it was in the mayor's office for "safe keeping",
and the mayor was nowhere to be found. Whether it be meteorite or
meteorwrong, it belongs to the city of Newport.
I did explain to Jan and Ron Barsted, th
http://www.turnto10.com/news/10392157/detail.html
NEWPORT, R.I. -- An archaeological dig at a mysterious Newport Tower turns up --
not much.
Archeologists spent a month digging at a structure called the Old Stone Mill.
The tower's origins are uncertain -- leading amateur historians to speculate i
7 matches
Mail list logo