Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread Mr EMan
Jason wrote: Posting messages that were intended to be kept private to the list is wrong - unless they are necessary in proving a situation such as a deal gone wrong, or cheating having taken place, So Jason which of your listed situations applies to what you've just done? Were you drunk or

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread Jason Utas
Elton, Jason wrote: Posting messages that were intended to be kept private to the list is wrong - unless they are necessary in proving a situation such as a deal gone wrong, or cheating having taken place, So Jason which of your listed situations applies to what you've just done? You're

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread michael cottingham
Hey, There has to be some limmericks that you guys can right instead On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Jason Utas wrote: Elton, Jason wrote: Posting messages that were intended to be kept private to the list is wrong - unless they are necessary in proving a situation such as a deal gone wrong,

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread michael cottingham
Sorry, But limerick has only one m not two like my previous post... I won't make that mistake ever again! Best Wishes Michael Cottingham On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:16 PM, michael cottingham wrote: Hey, There has to be some limmericks that you guys can right instead On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:04 PM,

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread Darren Garrison
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:16:49 -0700, you wrote: Hey, There has to be some limmericks that you guys can right instead Yes, I suggest that a rule be instated that all personal attacks must be written in the form of limericks. An attack on Steve Arnold (as started this) would be handled thusly:

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread michael cottingham
Excellent.. I second the motion - Limerick Attacks- I like this idea. Since we all have to read these attacks, please from now on make them in limerick form. I think that is only fair. Michael Cottingham On Jul 23, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Darren Garrison wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:16:49

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread John Gwilliam
Jason, Sounds to me that you've taken several semesters of BLATHERING at Berkley. John Gwilliam...a man of few words At 01:04 PM 7/23/2009, Jason Utas wrote: Elton, Jason wrote: Posting messages that were intended to be kept private to the list is wrong - unless they are necessary in

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread Jason Utas
Regardless of how he contributes, he's wrong in this case. I don't care if he's a smart bully, because if he is a popular contributing member it means that he should set a better example for people, not a worse one. I've been here longer than most - since 1998. Steve, Elton, and most others are,

Re: [meteorite-list] [off-list]--NOT WHATS WITH THE ATTACKING

2009-07-23 Thread Jason Utas
Oh please, talk to Elton. He's the one who started this ridiculous psychological BS. Though your comment was a constructive one, in all certainty. The meteorite-list is the better for it. Hup - sample almost ready. Later. Jason On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:02 PM, John Gwilliamj...@cox.net wrote: