I was just thinking about this, wondering if anyone has tried to compare average
sizes of craters across bodies in the solar system? I was thinking along the
lines that, since orbital velocity is higher the closer an object is to the sun,
then there should be more bang for the buck for impactors.
Hi Darren:
Lots of other factors going on:
Extra velocity caused by the gravity of the impacted body.
Composition of the surface being hit.
Composition/density (and thus mass) of the impactor.
Surface processes that will affect the loss of craters or their just
fading away.
At some point,
true, that is).
Sterling K. Webb
--
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Average size
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:41:40 -0600, you wrote:
Hi,
The biggest craters are multi-ringed; they are
big enough that they are called multi-ringed basins
or just basins. Properly, I suppose we should
call them impact features rather than craters.
Not so much the biggest craters, but I'm
4 matches
Mail list logo