[meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question

Sal list, in painting my specimen chits, I ask myself, how to denominate Mundrabilla correctly. Old Catalogue has simply IRANOM, 2000er Grady Catalogue says IIICD and anomalous, now with the finer Au-stuff and the subgroups, I read, that Mundrabilla and Waterville are close to sLL. Shall I write

Re: [meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question

Hello Martin, In my opinion it is best described at this point in time as Iron, IAB complex, Mundrabilla duo Regards, David __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Re: [meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question

Oviously David Weir's answer didn't made it through and because most have it listed as Iranom or IIICD: Hello Martin, In my opinion it is best described at this point in time as Iron, IAB complex, Mundrabilla duo Regards, David __ Meteorite-list

Re: [meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question

Hello List, My source from which I formed my opinion is the paper by J. T. Wasson and G. W. Kallemeyn, The IAB iron-meteorite complex: A group, five subgroups, numerous grouplets, closely related, mainly formed by crystal segregation in rapidly cooling melts, which was published in Geochimica

Re: [meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Martin Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question Hello List, My source from which I formed my opinion is the paper by J. T. Wasson and G. W

Re: [meteorite-list] Mundrabilla designation question

Hello Martin and List. According to Wasson and Kallemeyn (2002) Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 66, No. 13, pp. 24452473. The members of the Mundrabilla duo, Waterville (1.63) and Mundrabilla (1.64), are FeS-rich irons, closely related to each other in structure and composition. They