4 -1000
From: Gary Fujihara
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech
meteorites
To: "Jan Woreczko - www.meteoritica.eu"
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Message-ID: <6e6a9f8f-96ef-43a4-bd5a-f4be936ce...@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; chars
;Gary Fujihara"
To: "Jan Woreczko - www.meteoritica.eu"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech
meteorites
Aloha Jan,
From just a cursory glance at the metbull entry for Benesov (a), I would
surmise a rea
Aloha Jan,
>From just a cursory glance at the metbull entry for Benesov (a), I would
>surmise a reason for the non-fall classification is due to the fact that much
>time had elapsed from the witnessed fireball on May 7, 1991 and the actual
>recovery of material on April 9, 2011. Because almost
Ha
Why are these findings are not classified as a falls?
Benešov (a) http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=54854
Benešov (b) http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=54855
http://translate.google.pl/translate?sl=pl&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=pl&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%
4 matches
Mail list logo
