Jeff, list,
NWA 5133 has always been referenced in my database as K092, not K091... About
NWA 6435 as prov name that's the last news I obtained from the lab, but indeed
saw the status is very different on the database...
Between the data I submitted and what appears on the Bulletin, mistake
I know who:)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> Fabien, I think this is an error compounding another error. NWA 6435 was
> never assigned to your diogenite. It was assigned to the 444 g brachinite
> with field name K-134, now known as NWA 5435. K091 (235
Fabien, I think this is an error compounding another error. NWA 6435
was never assigned to your diogenite. It was assigned to the 444 g
brachinite with field name K-134, now known as NWA 5435. K091 (235 g)
was assigned the provisional number NWA 5133 in 2008 and was classified
by Ted Bunch in
Hello
... and to be clear, NWA 5435 is an official brachinite (in fact same material
as NWA 5363 meteorite group) :
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/index.php?sea=49152
NWA 6435 is now the provisionnal number of a unbrecciated diogenite,
metamorphic texture, purchased in 2006 and at this ti
Dear Friends and Custumers,
due to a typo at the Nom.Com. quite some confusion has arisen about the
NWA 5435.
This number was assigned to Ray Pickard for ROCKS ON FIRE by Dr.
Caroline Smith on 18-09-2008 as provisional number NWA 5435, but was
deleted from the database 3 Mar 2012 by J. Gross
5 matches
Mail list logo
