Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
PolandMET
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 00:01
An: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone Analogy
Dear list members.
Every meteorite is special.
For me is better to call meteorite
give me a
call :-)
My 3 lithologies,
Norbert
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
PolandMET
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 00:01
An: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone Analogy
Dear list
give me a
call :-)
My 3 lithologies,
Norbert
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
PolandMET
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 00:01
An: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone Analogy
Dear list
Hi Peter and List,
First, I do know why there is a problem here at all.
The stone in questions is different from the rest of
the Dhofar 908 stones as Norbert already pointed out.
I made it clear it was part of the Dhofar pairing
series from the beginning but, none the less, a very
special stone.
Hallo Adam,
thank you FYI...as I said before, I have nothing against these
nicknames.
I finally found some very good info on David's excellent site:
http://www.meteoritestudies.com/protected_DHOF908.HTM
It says that Dho 908 has - unlike most other stones that are paired
with Dho 908 -
An: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone
Analogy
Dear list members.
Every meteorite is special.
For me is better to call meteorite with his
official name even if
this is
ugly NWA 999 name, than create some unreal
marketing names
Auftrag von
PolandMET
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 00:01
An: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone
Analogy
Dear list members.
Every meteorite is special.
For me is better to call meteorite with his
official name even if
this is
ugly NWA 999 name
Hello Peter,
To be clear, I added that paragraph yesterday, paraphrased from what
Norbert told all of us in his post yesterday, so it contains nothing
special or different than what he said. I considered quoting him but
decided to use some of my own words in a reworked sentence instead.
Hello Peter,
To be clear, I added that paragraph yesterday, paraphrased from
what Norbert told all of us in his post yesterday, so it contains
nothing special or different than what he said. I considered
quoting him but decided to use some of my own words in a reworked
sentence instead.
Hi Peter, Adam, and All,
Adam is correct: I used this term to describe the 81g main mass of lunar
meteorite Dhofar 908 since March 2003 for its three distinct lithologies
which linked the various finds Dhofar 302, 303, 305, 306, 307, 309, 310,
311, 730, 731, and 489 together - most of them
Hi Norbert,
Thank you for explaining the history of this piece.
Here are some more images for viewers pleasure:
http://themeteoritesite.com/Dhofar908-a.jpg
http://themeteoritesite.com/Dhofar908-b.jpg
http://themeteoritesite.com/Dhofar908-c.jpg
BestRegards,
Adam
--- Norbert Classen
Dear list members.
Every meteorite is special.
For me is better to call meteorite with his official name even if this is
ugly NWA 999 name, than create some unreal marketing names that have
nothing to do with meteorites. I see only one reason for this, better sales
becouse of better name.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:00:34 +0200, you wrote:
For me is better to call meteorite with his official name even if this is
ugly NWA 999 name, than create some unreal marketing names that have
nothing to do with meteorites.
I don't see why calling it A Rosetta stone (not THE Rosetta stone) is
Hi Marcin,
I don't think Norbert was considering marketing when
he coined the term Rosetta Stone to discuss this
meteorite. What the hay? It seems to be working as the
pieces are selling fast. The two largest slices have
been spoken for.
Best Regards,
Adam
--- PolandMET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 00:01
An: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone Analogy
Dear list members.
Every meteorite is special.
For me is better to call meteorite with his official name even if this is
ugly NWA 999 name, than create some unreal marketing
on 6/3/07 3:16 PM, Darren Garrison at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see why calling it A Rosetta stone (not THE Rosetta stone) is a
marketing term, as much as a description of the significance of the find.
Now, hammer stone, THAT is just a marketing term to me, because where a
meteorite
16 matches
Mail list logo