Re: [meteorite-list] TUCSON AUCTION BID RESULTS

2007-02-11 Thread Ma Lan
Hi Michael and List, Pity that three pieces of nantans (57, 58, 59) were sold for just 2.5 cent per gram, much cheaper than any other meteorites. I don't know whether it's cheaper than a piece of pure iron. Wondering why we still call them meteorites since they are equal to meteowrongs from the

Re: [meteorite-list] TUCSON AUCTION BID RESULTS

2007-02-11 Thread Howard Steffic
It sold cheap because Nantan is a well know ruster. Garbage in my book. Howard From: Ma Lan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael L Blood [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] TUCSON AUCTION BID RESULTS Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:20:21 -0800 (PST) Hi

Re: [meteorite-list] TUCSON AUCTION BID RESULTS

2007-02-11 Thread Dave Freeman mjwy
They are cheaper than pure iron because they are not pure iron. They are nantans. DF Ma Lan wrote: Hi Michael and List, Pity that three pieces of nantans (57, 58, 59) were sold for just 2.5 cent per gram, much cheaper than any other meteorites. I don't know whether it's cheaper than a piece of

Re: [meteorite-list] TUCSON AUCTION BID RESULTS

2007-02-11 Thread Michael L Blood
Hi Ma and all, I believe they sold cheaply because of the recent history of this particular fall: 1) Several (actually, many) years ago a very few American Dealers bought up a huge supply of Nan-Tans ranging I quality from exquisite irons with their internal matrix of Widmenschtaten

Re: [meteorite-list] TUCSON AUCTION BID RESULTS

2007-02-10 Thread Michael L Blood
Dear list members, Due to interest in auction results, a lack of resistance to same on the part of dealers and in the interest of accuracy, the on line catalog now lists ALL FINAL BID PRICES. (The list is just below the catalog photos and listed items). I am human and there could