Paul,
Interesting points here.
Falls a bit outside of the field of meteoritics but, still a fair use for old
strewnfield co-ords.
I wonder Paul. Has this data ever been used in such a way? I can think of one
example that this theory sorta works with.
As far as I know there has only been two
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; Paul Heinrich
oxytropidoce...@cox.net
Sent: Sun, March 14, 2010 10:03:23 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Why isnt documenting meteorites stressed enough?
(Diregard Previous Post)
Paul,
Interesting points here.
Falls a bit outside of the field of meteoritics
cdtuc...@cox.net wrote:
Interesting points here.
Falls a bit outside of the field of meteoritics but, still a
fair use for old strewnfield co-ords.
I wonder Paul. Has this data ever been used in such a way?
I do not know of meteorite strew fields being used this way
specifically. However, the
If they see that the Meteorite Men are at these secret locations, this
secrecy can perpetuates the lack of importance of documentation, they no
better and are only doing what is seen on TV.
I may be wrong, but it seemed to me that with each episode, there were
scenes of Geoff and Steve
Shawn,
During that episode in the dry lake bed you speak of.
Remember the part where they talk about the rocks moving around through the
years and how they appear in areas that have already been searched?
This has already been pointed out as another reason co-ords have little
relevance. because
From: cdtuc...@cox.net cdtuc...@cox.net
This has already been pointed out as another reason co-ords have little
relevance. because they do move around. Whether by wind,
rain , flood , whatever. The point is that they do move around after landing.
And based on our active planet they may
- Original Message
From: geo...@aol.com geo...@aol.com
I may be wrong, but it seemed to me that with each episode, there were
scenes of Geoff and Steve going over maps that showed individual finds or a
bunch of them. I got the impression without much brain twisting that these
Hi Shawn,
I agree that the public needs to be informed about how to recover
meteorites in the field and preserve scientific data.
Recovering meteorites and their coordinates is vitally imporant to the
science of meteorites. However the degree of importance is also based in
part on how long
, Meteorites USA e...@meteoritesusa.com wrote:
From: Meteorites USA e...@meteoritesusa.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Why isnt documenting meteorites stressed enough?
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 2:48 PM
Hi Shawn,
I agree that the public needs
Eric wrote:
Meteorite fragments found on dry lake beds or
anywhere on old ground, do in fact move. In
my opinion coordinate data is still valuable, but
not as valuable as say data from a fresh meteorite
fall.
As a geomorphologist, I would disagree. Such data
from either old ground or
Please disregard my previous post as the bottom part of
it was chopped off when I sent it
Eric wrote:
Meteorite fragments found on dry lake beds or
anywhere on old ground, do in fact move. In
my opinion coordinate data is still valuable, but
not as valuable as say data from a fresh meteorite
Hello List,
This has been a good topic and I can see the importance of people trying to
document finds of meteorites. If that be taking a photo and remembering where
you found it or explaining to your friends about the time you where in the
mountains and you found a strange rock. Each
12 matches
Mail list logo
