Meteorite Collectors Association)
--- Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com schrieb am Mo, 18.5.2009:
Von: Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Zacatecas (1792) on ebay
An: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
CC: Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
Datum: Montag, 18. Mai 2009
)
--- Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com schrieb am Mo, 18.5.2009:
Von: Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Zacatecas (1792) on ebay
An: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
CC: Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
Datum: Montag, 18. Mai 2009, 7:36
Thanks Jason,
Don Edwards
Hello Michael, Jason, Mirko and List,
Attached to my private mails you'll find a photo of
the Zacatecas 1792 iron from the Buchwald trilogy!
Reference:
BUCHWALD V.F. (1975) Handbook of Iron Meteorites, Volume 2, p. 1364.
Regards,
Bernd
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc:
Well that looks practically nothing like the piece on ebay, even given
the fact that the scale is clearly far larger in that image. The
brain-like schreibersite in the ebay auction is a fairly uncommon
occurrence in irons, and I see no similar inclusions in that large
section. Also, the pattern
Hi Bernd and Jason,
many thanks Bernd for your photo.
I think that looks absolutly same.
Jason,i think the black inclusions on the slice are also schreibersite!!
The etching quality are only strong different!
Thats all.
Many greetings Mirko
Mirko Graul Meteorite
Quittenring.4
16321
Hi Bernd,
There are only 2 people whose posts I read every time, no matter what
the subject. You are one and Sterling Webb is the other.
Thanks for forwarding the picture from Buchwald. Perhaps you are
being diplomatic in letting us form our own opinion as to whether the
sample on ebay
Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc: Michael Fowler mqfow...@mac.com
Sent: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:34 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Zacatecas 1792
Hi Bernd,
There are only 2 people whose posts I read every time, no matter what
the subject. You are one
I collect ungrouped irons, and am looking for a slice of Zacatecas
(1792) an ungrouped iron.
The specimen on ebay:
Hello Mike,
Indeed, that's not a piece of the more common Zacatecas (1969).
See here; that iron is clearly recrystallized:
http://www.nyrockman.com/museum/zacatecas-1462.htm
While I haven't been able to find a picture of the etch of the
Zacatecas (1792) iron, I was able to find this picture of
Thanks Jason,
Don Edwards has a photo in the encyclopedia of meteorites, but it is
not very clear. I was trying to decide if it was the re-crystalized
1969 Zacatecas or the 1792 one. I'm inclinded to think it is the 1792
Zacatecas, but there is room for confusion.
Hello Mike,
http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/test/Zacatecas1792_don_edwards.jpg
Clearly recrystallized, the piece on Don's site looks like a slice of
the 1969 individual. The trouble is that if that really is a piece of
the 1792 fragment, then the one on ebay isn't a piece of either
11 matches
Mail list logo