So, in the piece I referenced before on the ID-supporting meteorite collector, it has a photo of an etched iron meteorite with a large inclusion running through it (graphite surrounded by troilite?)
Just out of curiosity, anyone have a guess as to which iron it is? Maybe Gibeon? http://www.sas.org/E-Bulletin/2004-04-02/features2/art/TonysmeteoriteDSCN5203.JPG On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:03:41 -0400, Darren Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Wow, I just found a direct link between the Kansas ID debate and meteorite >collecting. In reading a >transcript of arguments from the public in support of ID, A man named Tony >Kostusik, who mentions >being a meteorite collector, gave a brief (and from what I can tell, utterly >incoherent and >apparenlty disproving evolution because there are no square clouds) speech at >the hearings. > >http://www.ksde.org/outcomes/schlagle.htm > > >"MR. KOSTUSIK: Thank you for your time this evening. My name is Tony >Kostusik, K-o-s-t-u-s-i-k, >concerned Kansas citizen, grandfather of four. I have a lumber business, and >I have been flying for >40-some years, and I have taken -- I have taken many thousands of pictures. >And the pictures that I >brought here tonight with questions on the back, I think, are unanswered by >evolution's answer. If >that's the case, I think there needs to be an overhaul of what they -- I am >not an educator, so >excuse my language. I think they need to have an overhaul of what they >consider scientific >evidence. If the questions on the back are unanswered by Evolution, there has >to be a change in >Evolution. It can be partly there, but I think there has to be other >alternatequestions brought up, >as it just happened. I've never seen a square cloud in the scientific. I >also collect meteorites. >In a current book that I have, it's 222 times, maybe, it's also possible, >could have come from, >there are probably, and probably, it goes on and on. I've highlighted 72 >different times. I think >it's about time we get some what science matches what we actually see. So >please consider that. >Thank you for your time." > >And here's an article about the guy and meteorites: > >http://www.sas.org/E-Bulletin/2004-04-02/features2/body.html >______________________________________________ >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
