RE: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-18 Thread mark ford
The other two (the real) reasons Nasa doesn't want anyone picking up shuttle debris are: 1.Risk of Radiolocial contamination. There are some nasty radioactive parts to the shuttle, Tritium/radium on the dials/indictors, emergency lighting etc. 2. It might be old, but its still has

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-18 Thread Tom aka James Knudson
at another crash site, Roswell. Hmmm? Thanks, Tom Peregrineflier The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 - Original Message - From: mark ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:03 AM Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-17 Thread Marcia Swanson
Mr. X wrote, maybe it was hot ashalt that boy burnt his hand on.. Dear List and Mr.X, Another thought, wouldn't the samples we've seen have been coated in that same melted asphalt, hot enough to melt divets in surface, supposedly landed on, if their story is accurate? Just another thought. I

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-17 Thread Tom aka James Knudson
, Tom Peregrineflier The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 - Original Message - From: Marcia Swanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:35 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High Mr. X wrote, maybe

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-17 Thread Ron Baalke
Just another thought. I was under naive understanding that meteorites did not burn hot to the touch, upon falling and could be picked right up, as in stories I read during the PF strewnfield incident and others? Most meteorites will have cooled off by the time they reach the ground, though in

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-17 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Tom wrote: Hello Marcie, you asked;Do they rapidly cool after initial impact ? Also, why, in the case ofthe "Columbia" retrieval, were people warned not to touch fragments, asthey were hazardous?I think the reason was two fold, the one they gave, Hazardous fuel from thetanks could of

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-17 Thread Rob Wesel
- Original Message - From: MARK BOSTICK To: Tom aka James Knudson ; Marcia Swanson ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Meteorite List Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High Tom wrote: Hello Marcie

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-17 Thread Walter Branch
, July 17, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High Mr. X wrote, maybe it was hot ashalt that boy burnt his hand on.. Dear List and Mr.X, Another thought, wouldn't the samples we've seen have been coated in that same melted asphalt, hot enough to melt

Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High

2003-07-17 Thread Kevin Fly Hill
of days. Our area is very wooded -- so, no telling? Fly Hill - Original Message - From: Walter Branch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marcia Swanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:01 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Apparent Meteorite Lands In Elma High Hi