Re: [meteorite-list] What is more important in classification?

2014-01-06 Thread Carl Agee
Hi Jim, The electron microprobe is the workhorse for classifications, and most of this can be done simply with a probe mount (epoxy mounted sample that has been polished). In general you don't need a thin section or a petrographic microscope, although I always use a reflected light petrographic

Re: [meteorite-list] What is more important in classification?

2014-01-06 Thread Alan Rubin
I always want a doubly-polished thin section to do classification of stony meteorites. To determine the petrologic type of a chondrite, it is useful to gauge the degree of recrystallization (best done in transmitted light) and look for the size of plagioclase grains (which can be done in an

Re: [meteorite-list] What is more important in classification?

2014-01-06 Thread Michel FRANCO
Carl Agee Envoyé : lundi 6 janvier 2014 18:10 À : Jim Wooddell Cc : meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Objet : Re: [meteorite-list] What is more important in classification? Hi Jim, The electron microprobe is the workhorse for classifications, and most of this can be done simply with a probe mount

Re: [meteorite-list] What is more important in classification?

2014-01-06 Thread Jim Wooddell
Hello Melinda, Alan and Carl, Thank you all very much for these explanations and the learning opportunity. You folks are great! I suppose I over worry about things when one person orders a mount and another a mount and thin section and another just a thin section. Sometimes a returned