Seymchan much larger
Pallasite one piece is 3 metric tons alone.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Galactic Stone Ironworks
meteoritem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I am putting together a list of the largest known meteorites by type.
Here is what the list looks like so
Where is the 3 tonne Seymchan? Met Bull has mass at 323kg by the way.
Regards,
John
On 13/06/2013 12:22, Michael Farmer m...@meteoriteguy.com wrote:
Seymchan much larger
Pallasite one piece is 3 metric tons alone.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Galactic Stone Ironworks
It has been sitting in Tucson for years. Oriented nose cone. Now in China.
Met bulletin is decades behind. Seymchan now at least 15 tons.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Pict p...@pict.co.uk wrote:
Where is the 3 tonne Seymchan? Met Bull has mass at 323kg by the way.
than what is reported in the MetBull.
Mendy Ouzillou
From: Pict p...@pict.co.uk
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] World's Largest Meteorites by Type
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] World's Largest Meteorites by Type
Where is the 3 tonne Seymchan? Met Bull has mass at 323kg by the way.
Regards,
John
On 13/06/2013 12:22, Michael
I wish somebody would take the time to actually and truthfully certify the
weight on Kalahari 009. Weighing it on a bathroom scale and rounding it off is
disrespectful to such a piece! It may be the world's heaviest but we will
never know until somebody does the right thing and weighs it
Adam:
I entirely agree, but on the basis of this photo
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/stones/kalahari008.htm
and assuming a density of 2.6 g/cm^3, I'd say that rock was at least 13 kg.
Randy
At 01:32 PM 2013-06-13 Thursday, you wrote:
I wish somebody would take the time to actually
@meteoritecentral.com
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] World's Largest Meteorites by Type
Adam:
I entirely agree, but on the basis of this photo
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/stones/kalahari008.htm
and assuming a density of 2.6 g/cm^3, I'd say that rock was at least
Just to back up what Carl said, MetBull is not decades behind... it may
be decades out of date though. MetBull does not attempt to log new
discoveries of additional pieces of meteorites, so it is not behind in
this task. It is, in general, a one-time publication with a date on it,
like a
Yes
But some major new finds need to be updated. Springwater for example, seymchan,
etc.
Michael Farmer
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Jeff Grossman jngross...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to back up what Carl said, MetBull is not decades behind... it may be
decades out of date
@meteoritecentral.com
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] World's Largest Meteorites by Type
Yes
But some major new finds need to be updated. Springwater for example,
seymchan,
etc.
Michael Farmer
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13
11 matches
Mail list logo
