Well, he's got it laid out nicely.
- John
- Original Message -
From: Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:58 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] LUNAR THIN SECTIONS
Hi, All,
Fans of thin section
I agree with Chris. Bear in mind that the source of the luminous phenomena we
see when we see a meteor, is not so much the meteoroid itself burning up: it's
the atmosphere around it becoming incandescend.
- Marco
There are only a limited number of meteor spectra, so the colors aren't
real
Thanks Sterling.
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message -
From: Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:58 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] LUNAR THIN SECTIONS
Hi, All,
Fans of thin section photos may
I love that word. I can't wait to try and get it into
casual conversation.
Cheeri
Rob McC
--- Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The most correct technical term would be the
jawbreaker
CRYOSILICATE object.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired
One of our own has been featured today in the Denver Post. Look in the
Denver and the West section B page 2, or go to:
http://www.denverpost.com/ranger/ci_4222465. Larry Johnson, a COMET member,
is profiled by the Rocky Mountain Ranger, Rick Tosches. The interview
evidently took place at the
Hi all -
While one might think that the difference in entry
spectra is simply a reflection of the neural function
of the eye, based on my observational experience, I
have to disagree. Both entries were bright, and there
was a distinct difference in spectra.
I think this could go the way of the
Hi Dirk, all -
The problem is that there are a whole lot more plutos
which are being discovered. A whole whole lot more.
I wonder what the public's reaction was when Ceres was
demoted back in the 1800's? It would make a good side
bar for someone.
good hunting,
Ed
--- drtanuki [EMAIL
Hello List, It appears that the only reason for dropping poor Pluto from the list of planets is an Americancultural bias in that SIZE COUNTS. Pluto, as do the rest of the planets, orbits the Sun in a somewhat regular manneras a planet; therefore leave its classification alone. Science may
Hello Moni, Suzi, John and List,
Just in case you haven't noticed, my JPEG is up on
Darren's website. He was kind enough to host it for
all of us to enjoy. Thank you Darren !
Best,
Bernd__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Thanks. I just got through talking to a person at the Utah Geological Society and he said pretty much the same thing. One thing did puzzle him that there was such a high concentration of iron stones in this area. Oh well, I knew it was too good to be true.
The Krachen
http://www.ladyofgreys.org
FYI, my report on our ground explorations of the
Slate Island impact structure may be viewed at:
http://www.ottawa.rasc.ca/articles/odale_chuck/earth_craters/slate_islands/index.html
Chuck
Charles O'DaleMeeting ChairOttawa
I have always prefered to think the West Branch would be easier to
locate more of, and there should be more laying around near someones
house. I have been to the area and think there is more there.
Best,
Dave F.
G. Nicula wrote:
I wasn't aware of the abundance of information available
Hi Michael!
There
is another explanation for the magnetism of a rock, than to be a meteorite: the
rock contains minerals which are magnetic. These minerals or ore minerals are
magnetic, because they are composed by iron or Ni! A typical mineral (you can
find in a lot of terrestrial
Wow, wow, wow! What a beautySuziJoseph Murakami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Joseph Murakami" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comDate: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:49:10 -1000Subject: [meteorite-list] Fukang Just a neat pix of Fukang pallasite I found on this
And when you are done with that site, it's time to dive into this treasure
trove:
http://cps.earth.northwestern.edu/cgi-bin/DPSC_Browse.pl
...thousands of slides from all the Apollo missions, searchable!
Have fun,
Jeff
Hi, All,
Fans of thin section photos may have already
found this
Ed,
Chris me do not dispute that meteors can have different colours.
What we point out is that these colours do not necessarily reflect the meteoroid
composition, such as was assumed earlier in the thread.
This is certainly the case for reported greenish colours, as we know from what
MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR IMAGES
August 17-23, 2006
The following new images taken by the Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) on
the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft are now available:
o Hole in Ground (Released 17 August 2006)
http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2006/08/17
o High Plains Ring (Released 18
Hello Bernd, Sonny and list members,
guess mine is not a CO3.2
Remember this one:
http://meteorite-recovery.tripod.com/co3/co3-01.htm
It is just a CO3.
Why is there no .something after the CO3.
Wouldn't this tell you the chondrule texture of the CO.
And I see many of them.
and I think it
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMOB7BUQPE_index_0.html
Close-up on Cuvier crater ridge
SMART-1
European Space Agency
22 August 2006
This high-resolution image, taken by the Advanced Moon Imaging
Experiment (AMIE) on board ESA's SMART-1 spacecraft, shows the young
crater Cuvier C on the Moon.
AMIE
Hi all:
I have been trying to stay out of the recent discussion until something really
happens at the IAU. For me, I am concerned with it becoming too personal.
However, two things. When we (DPS) spoke to Rick Binzel last week, the IAU
committee (Rick was on it) was concerned that world
Hello Sterling, why not throw Pluto a bone like they are trying to do?
On the other hand, nice word - but we've seen that nothing is most correct
in this business. Cryo- is Greek, by the way. What ever happened to TNOs
(Trans-Neptunian Objects).
My correct latinized preference, with nice
Sorry list,
guess if you click on the link you see Bob's CO3.
Actually we both found some.
He found the larger stone and I found 28 fragments.
The smaller ones on the images are the ones found by me.
Moni
Hello Bernd, Sonny and list members,
guess mine is not a CO3.2
Remember this one:
http://meteorite-recovery.tripod.com/co3/co3-01.htm
Moni kindly wrote:
It is just a CO3. Why is there no .something after the CO3.
Wouldn't this tell you the chondrule texture of the CO. And I
see many of them.
Hello Moni and List,
Some labs add this information, some don't. It may have to
Just came across this very interesting abstract that points to potential
pairings between these two beautiful meteorites. Also, it goes into a
brief discussion about the black lithology in Park Forest and Kunashak.
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:34:08 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
an object that is smaller than a planet but still spherical. I have no
particular attachment to this word, and would happily use any other that
seemed reasonable (but, please, not Pluton which is a word already in
use by geologists
Judging
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:13:37 -0600, you wrote:
Just came across this very interesting abstract that points to potential
pairings between these two beautiful meteorites. Also, it goes into a
brief discussion about the black lithology in Park Forest and Kunashak.
From: michael cottingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:18 PM
To: 'michael cottingham'
Subject: FW: TRADE OFFER #5
Hello Everyone!
I would like to trade this particular piece:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/23aug_mariner4.htm
Mariner Meteor Mystery, Solved?
NASA Science News
August 23, 2006
August 23, 2006: On July 14, 1965, Mariner 4 swooped over Mars. It was a
moment of high drama. Six other probes had already tried to reach the
red planet and failed.
Here's an interesting history of the first asteroids:
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/hilton/AsteroidHistory/minorplanets.html
For roughly 50 years until the 1850's, Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta
were all considered planets.
Ron Baalke
__
Meteorite-list
Hi, Doug and All,
1. Since it seems only right to declare your personal biases
first, I am a 12+ proponent and a firm believer (on the basis
of faith and a few numerical approximations) that an object
beyond Pluto and bigger than the planet Mercury exists and
will be discovered. (Then, the
Whoever originally came up with the title Astronomers Lean Towards Eight
Planets really should hang their head in shame for not coming up with
Astronoers Gravitate Towards Eight Planets.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
In a message dated 8/23/2006 4:38:36 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. I firmly agree with Ron Baalke (who's a Pro-Eight) that
the cultural component of this dispute is a major, maybe THE
major, consideration. This a great opportunity to make science
look silly to the
Hi all -
plutonians? I think not - pluton has a well defined
geological (planetary) usage. plutos, with Pluto
being the first of the class, and no new word to
remember, just add s and make the P a p -
easy enough, and clyde'ss friends can't be too upset
with it -
Hopefully this will all be
Welcome back, Walter
I'd like to point out that my original comment was
intended to desuggest copper in favor of nickel. We
who have done blowpipe mineral studies tend to think
in that framework.
Several years ago on my farm outside Ft Benning,
Georgia I saw 2 nearly identical fireballs in the
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:40:35 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
Here's an interesting history of the first asteroids:
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/hilton/AsteroidHistory/minorplanets.html
For roughly 50 years until the 1850's, Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta
were all considered planets.
Scandalous, how those
Hi Anne:
Please remember that many scientists [not me :0)] have something to make up
for their common sense ... their big EGOS. If you have any doubt about this,
ask Nancy.
It is the old my theory is better (bigger) than your theory. There are lots
of ways to define a planet (we have seen
Suspend Jugement. Hold the Count.
Let's await the technology to allow us to count #'s in Other Solar, errr,
Star Systems.
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, August
Hi, All,
There will be live streaming video of the final session
of the IAU General Assembly XXXVI, that is, the vote
on the planetary definition question, at this website:
http://www.astronomy2006.com/media-stream-live.php
at 2 PM local time (2:00 PM in Prague, or 14:00 hours CEST,
Central
That's agrivating
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Astronomers Lean Toward Eight Planets
Whoever originally came up with the title
The newest issue of Time magazine has quoted Michael Brown as saying, It's
a 'No Ice Ball Left Behind' policy, referring to the possibility of many
more solar system bodies suddenly gaining planetary status.
Who says astronomers don't have a since of humor.
Personally, I think the IAU is
40 matches
Mail list logo