Yeah it's a pretty riduculous argument when you think about it. If it didn't
touch/imbed itself in the ground??? C'mon! How about we skydive onto the
roof of the White House and see how they feel about that! Hey... we wouldn't
imbed ourselves in the ground! ;-)
Cheers,
Jeff
- Original
Spectacular... well done to you all and congratulations! A wonderful
discovery!
Cheers,
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Robert Ward ironfromthesky@gmail.com
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 11:54 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Springwater 52
Shawn,
Well-said -
But I can't emphasize enough the fact that such large bodies existed
in large numbers in the early solar system. That much is obvious from
the large numbers of ungrouped (and grouped) differentiated
achondrites that we have in our collections here on earth, as well as
from all
Listoids
Update/s tomorrow http://www.qmig.net/thinsection
Tonite I'm just gonna enjoy looking at the new image/s...
Youse better download any reference image/s of BARATTA MOSSGIEL
NARYILCO youse need - they'll be gone tomorrow
I have duplicate slides of HUCKITTA MOSSGIEL to upload and have
Huh, I found even a paper, which postulates, that the HEDs are from Mercury
and the angrites from Venus
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/otp2004/pdf/3012.pdf
;-)
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
Dear List Members,
I have some specimen for sale :
- Tamdakht H5, two specimen.
First 261 grams, with nice primary and secondary crust.
Second 114 gram specimen with also a nice crust.
http://picasaweb.google.pl/illaenus/Tamdakht02#
- NWA xxx 929 grams nice shape, fresh crust. Really lovely
Martin and Listers,
The paper you provided that postulates that HEDS are from Mercury and
Angrites are from Venus suggests that from the solar system zonation model that
would be the case which is in question, but not to suggest that those classes
are from Mercury or Venus but that the model
It's not my conclusion :-)
I'm happy and content with our (at least most of them) HEDs originating from
Vesta.
And I almost can't wait - until Dawn will finally arrive at Vesta next year!
Go Dawn, go!!
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
Yikes! Abstracts to meetings are not peer reviewed!
jeff
On 7/21/2010 10:05 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:
Hi Jason and List,
I do not refute Melinda Hutson's article that was never peer reviewed and
contains several errors according to the classifying scientists. I asked
scientists about the
I agree with Jeff completely. Same thing happens in Medicine. And even when the
data is peer reviewed, that doesn't mean that it is rock solid truth. It's a
process of continual evaluation and refinement.
David
-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
Hi Jason,
I just bought a NWA 4662 Angrite. The TKW is less than most Angrite
but I seldom heard of people talking about it.
Would you tell me any difference between these angrite.
Thank you.
Kai
__
Visit the Archives at
Listoids
Iz getting there - I've been unwell but I'm back into it again trying to
catch up on a few projects...
Duplicate slide of HUCCKITTA has been micrographed and uploaded
Tis 2244 aussie time so beddy byes for me now...
I'll upload McKINNEY and MOSSGIEL tomorrow !
The new micrographs
Hello Kai,
You might be interested to know that your specimen is paired to NWA
2836, 2999, 3164, and 6291.
http://www.catchafallingstar.com/nwa4662.htm
But I checked the Meteoritical Bulletin, and there are more pairings!
NWA 3158, 4569, 4662, 4931, and possibly 4877 are all part of the same
I am not disputing other crystals in angrites, my comments were to the
translucent slices like mine has.
While many chimed in and claimed to have seen such, still, nobody has shown
pictures of an angrite with back lit translucent crystals (like in a
pallasite) that are 1cm x 1cm in size.
NEWS RELEASE FROM THE PLANETARY SCIENCE INSTITUTE
SENT:
July 21, 2010
FROM:
Alan Fischer
Public Information Office
Planetary Science Institute
520-885-5648
fisc...@psi.edu
Research Yields Greater Precision in Determining Age of Meteorites
Researchers have aged dated a very important group
July 21, 2010
Contact:
Jon Weiner
+1 (626) 395-3226
jrwei...@caltech.edu
CALTECH TEAM FINDS EVIDENCE OF WATER IN MOON MINERALS
That dry, dusty Moon overhead? Seems it isn't quite as dry as it's
long been thought to be. Although you won't find oceans, lakes, or
even a shallow puddle on its
List:
I hope NWA 2999 is from Mercury - would be nice. Do we have rocks from Mars?
Didn't scientists determine the meteorites are from Mars by measuring the
isotopes and matched the atmosphere on Mars. Do we actually need samples from
Mercury to determine if these Angrites are from
There is a new website with information about the Gebel Kamil crater and the
geophysical survey conducted on it: http://www.mna.it/hosts/Kamil/index.htm
There are a lot of photographs of the region and of material recovered from the
area, including the largest mass to date, 80kg:
Martin, Jason, Shawn, c.,
The fly or flaw in the ointment, the paper, and the
responses is an unspoken but apparently universal
assumption that every sizeable body in the solar
system currently resides at the same address where
it accreted originally.
What about a body that accretes in the 0.50
Thank you Gary.
Nice site, and great pictures.
Now for a question:
Has the age of that crater been determined yet?
And, related question, is there any chance it could be connected to the
Libyan Glass?
I haven't seen this question been asked yet, and it it has, I am sorry, I
just missed it.
Hi Gary, Anne and List,
LDG has an accepted age of about 26 million years. This crater would
appear to be youthful example of a 26mya structure. I'd guess that
this crater is newer than that.
Of course, that is just my two cents. Actual worth may (and probably
does) vary.
Best regards,
Dear List,
We have a beautiful assortment of small-sized and VERY affordable Gebel
Kamil irons for sale. This is our entire inventory! Youll be quite pleased
with these very low prices:
http://historicmeteorites.com/HistoricMeteorites/Gebel-Kamil.html
When ordering, please specify several
Listoids
http://www.qmig.net/thinsection for the index webpage
Mossgiel is uploading as I type - these micrographs are from another slide
I own and I am particularly impressed by how gorgeous these micrographs
are !
As prev - my upload speed is pathetic today - serves me right for
downloading
Hello everyone,
Isn't 'science' just that, Science... Ever evolving as ground truth
comes in? Without open minds and hard work by many dedicated
individuals, 'science' would not get very far, especially in the world
of meteortitics! Much of the initial work and/or thoughts are educated
Hello to all,
(sorry if this is a double post, I didnt see the first attempt post)
I have just finished slicing and photographing some of the MendotaWrong
material. I have some new amazingly beautiful pieces available. Look at the
pieces on the following link:
Well said.
---
Melanie
IMCA: 2975
eBay: metmel2775
Known on SkyRock Cafe as SpaceCollector09
Unclassified meteorites are like a box of chocolates... you never know what
you're gonna get!
- Original Message
From: Greg Hupe gmh...@htn.net
To: Rose, David MD
Is there any chance that a list-member might have saved some (or even
all?) of the photos from the site?
It appears to have been taken down.
Thanks,
Jason
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Galactic Stone Ironworks
meteoritem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gary, Anne and List,
LDG has an accepted age
27 matches
Mail list logo
