[meteorite-list] Bad anniversary......

2003-09-11 Thread M come Meteorite Meteorites
Hello

Two years ago humanity underwent one of the worsts
made an attempt aside of a band of fanatical that use
the excuse that their God wanted this does killing
beyond 2000 innocent persons.  This infamy, like other
made always aside of this people, never will be
forgotten, in the hope that a day the same that did
this thing, will pay on their skin this infamy.  

Regards

Matteo


=
M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato
Via Triestina 126/A - 30030 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITALY
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sale Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.com Collection Site: 
http://www.mcomemeteorite.info
International Meteorite Collectors Association #2140
MSN Messanger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EBAY.COM:http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/mcomemeteorite/

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Cold hunting

2003-09-11 Thread mark ford


I suspect most meteorites bury themselves on impact to just below the
surface in soft sand/dirt so, I think the rate of 'soil covering' will
make the difference, a dry desert soil is generally eroded away by winds
to reveal them, and somewhere like tropical Britain (well this year at
least!) has a very high rate of soil covering, from rotting plant life
and water silting etc so any meteorites are more likely to be covered
with a thick layer of soil in just a few hundred years, sitting in deep
drier soil might actually preserve better them of course than sitting
out in the rain and air?

I suspect therefore that hunting meteorites in anything other than
desert or a strewnfield, will require you to dig deep!

The trouble with statistics is they imply a uniform distribution of
impacts, there could of course be a massive pile of meteorites in your
next door neighbors house and none in the rest of the country :)


... But then of course our very own Rob Elliot finds some laying on the
ground in the dampest erm.. I mean prettiest place on earth -
Scotland(!)  :)

Cheers,

Mark



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Dave Freeman's Rock Springs Meteorite

2003-09-11 Thread Robert Verish
Here's an image of the L6 that Dave is talking about:

http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/rocksprings/rckspr88.jpg

Happy Birthday, Dave!

And best wishes,
Bob V.

-
[meteorite-list] Cold hunting 
David Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:03:34 -0600 

Dear List;
One more point, I recognized my 53.7 gram meteorite at
about 40 feet away, and could confirm it to be
meteoritic at about 30 feet by the excellent crust.  I
would have not seen it at all probably if I were in 
a vehicle, or riding a four wheeler.  
My method is walk ten steps, scan left to the
comfortable sight range to see a golf ball sized black
item (about 100 feet in good light and clear 
skies), look across in front of me in a long sweep of
the eyes, and off to the right the same distance.  Ten
more steps (about 30 feet for long legged me) and do
it again.  Keep in mind, no rocks in my playa lake bed
but I am sorting through antelope droppings, sheep
droppings, and horse piles.  The main plan is to
discern the meteorites from the animal droppings.
Riding a four wheeler, or bicycle wouldn't work, as
there had been previous 4 wheeler tracks in a methodic
pattern running back and forth across the playa and
about 100 foot swaths and they failed to find the one,
and I am pretty sure it was one of my student
meteorite hunters that missed the golden opportunity
by traveling too fast.  Attention to 
detail was what helped me locate that fusion crust,
and handling  and looking at maybe a hundred pounds of
individual NWA's really imprinted that fusion crust in
my mind.  That was important to me...that and putting
down that remote control, the mouse, and getting out
to where the meteorites should be found. Time spent in
the field where the meteorites live is the most
important factor for my find. They don't 
usually come through the roof.
Best,
DAve F.



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Cold hunting

2003-09-11 Thread Zelimir Gabelica
I believe Mark is perfectly right by saying that most meteorites are lying
below the soil surface.
I did not make any compiling but I guess if you go through all the Met.
Bull's reporting meteorite FINDS, I am pretty sure that about (at least ?)
half of them were found through plowing some field. Not taking into account
those found by H.H. Nininger in due time on rock piles on the edges of the
wide Midwest fields, that probably stem from the same origin, namely from
somewhere under the surface where they were plowed from.
Just as a famous example, remember that the Esquel main mass (the only mass
?) was found, really by chance, through sinking a well...at a depth of about
7 meters! Up to you to go to remote Argentina, find out the exact place
(that is not in Esquel city) and dig 7 meters next to that well (if it still
ever exists) to find (perhaps) another mass...perhaps...
But this is an extreme example and I agree that most of (survived)
meteorites would be found at a reasonably small depth.
I imagine here a new rush towards Sahara or other deserts in search for new
NWA's burried in soil not often exposed to strong winds...but I can imagine
Rob is rather willing digging his damp soil around Milton of Balgonie...The
race is open...

Best to all,

Zelimir 


At 08:58 11/09/03 +0100, you wrote:


I suspect most meteorites bury themselves on impact to just below the
surface in soft sand/dirt so, I think the rate of 'soil covering' will
make the difference, a dry desert soil is generally eroded away by winds
to reveal them, and somewhere like tropical Britain (well this year at
least!) has a very high rate of soil covering, from rotting plant life
and water silting etc so any meteorites are more likely to be covered
with a thick layer of soil in just a few hundred years, sitting in deep
drier soil might actually preserve better them of course than sitting
out in the rain and air?

I suspect therefore that hunting meteorites in anything other than
desert or a strewnfield, will require you to dig deep!

The trouble with statistics is they imply a uniform distribution of
impacts, there could of course be a massive pile of meteorites in your
next door neighbors house and none in the rest of the country :)


... But then of course our very own Rob Elliot finds some laying on the
ground in the dampest erm.. I mean prettiest place on earth -
Scotland(!)  :)

Cheers,

Mark



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

**
Prof. Zelimir Gabelica
Groupe Sécurité et Ecologie Chimiques (GSEC) - ENSCMu
3, rue A. Werner
F-68093 MULHOUSE Cedex, FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 94
FAX: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 15
e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Cold hunting

2003-09-11 Thread mark ford
Zelmir,

Well put, given the potential value of a massive chunk of Esquel I am
supprised no one has sunk further holes around the site! If I lived near
by, I'd certainly do it myself! Maybe the use of a magnetometer would be
the way to go, these days there is a myriad of equipment designed to
locate buried metals...

One tactic of finding meteorites would be to mount very powerful magnets
onto a tractor Plough, and trawl over acres of farm land. Something I
have been trying a local farmer friend of mine to do for ages!


Mark
 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Mission to Meteor Crater

2003-09-11 Thread Ron Baalke


http://www.azdailysun.com/non_sec/nav_includes/story.cfm?storyID=72845

Mission to Meteor Crater
By SETH MULLER
Arizona Daily Sun
September 11, 2003

Although a manned mission to Mars remains in the realm of science fiction,
more than a dozen NASA scientists and contractors have been conducting
on-the-ground experiments with robotics, mapping and communication equipment
around Meteor Crater.

The data they have collected during the two weeks of experiments, which end
today, will help lay down the groundwork and identify challenges with
missions to Mars. But no date has been set for that next great space
adventure.

We are developing space suits, robotics systems and communications, said
Joe Kosmo, spokesman for NASA. None of what you see will go to Mars, but
the information we learn from it will be passed on.

One piece of equipment used in the experiments was a robot on four wheels
that could theoretically assist Mars astronauts as they surveyed the
terrain. The 400-pound prototype robot was designed by defense contractor
Titan, based in San Jose, Calif., and it costs $50,000 without the extras.
One extra is a $100,000, three-fingered robotic arm.

The robot was tested on the terrain around Meteor Crater while towing a
portable science lab, which also weighs 400 pounds, with the power of its
battery pack.

It's probably the only robot in the world with a trailer hitch, said Jeff
Graham, who works as a contractor for NASA and who noted that the robot was
being operated by three laptop computers.

Graham said Titan is trying to push the envelope with the development of
the robot, which they want to function and operate as an extension of the
astronaut. For example, Graham is looking at ways the robot can respond to
gestures made by the astronaut, instead of only verbal commands.

NASA also tested out some communication systems. They experimented as if
Arizona was Mars and Houston was Earth to see how communication and data
collection would fare. Communications expert Marc Seibert and other NASA
officials said the development of strong, interactive communication with a
manned Mars mission is a major challenge.

Seibert explained that, with the experiments going on at Meteor Crater, it
takes less than half-a-second to zap a link to a satellite, back to a ground
station in Cleveland and on to Houston. So, they can work in real time.

With Mars, you get a feel of what the distance is like when you realize it
will take five to 20 minutes for (the link) to travel, each way, Seibert
said. It severs the possibility of real-time interaction.

Seibert said that current technology does not allow communication to travel
any faster than the speed of light. There's a chance that scientists and
inventors may find a way to make it travel faster, but that's more in the
realm of science fiction than putting a man on Mars.

The tests are conducted at Meteor Crater and locations nearby because the
landscape closely resembles that of Mars and other planets. NASA has
historically used Meteor Crater, the best preserved meteor impact site in
the world, for training and experiments. Meteor Crater was the site of
training for the Apollo astronauts who went to the moon.

Impact craters and volcanos are common on planets throughout the solar
system, said Dean Eppler, a geologist with NASA. So when you test around
impact sites and volcanos, you can't go wrong. In Arizona, we can find
everything we need within a 35-mile radius.

As they tried to work on Tuesday, heavy bouts of precipitation moved through
as part of a cold front, creating some complications and delays for the NASA
workers.

At least on Mars, it won't rain, Kosmo said.

Reporter Seth Muller can be reached at 913-8607 or by e-mailing him at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you go:

On Friday, NASA will hold a public education program at Meteor Crater,
located 35 miles east of Flagstaff on Interstate 40. The program will take
place from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. and will involve demonstrations of the
equipment. Attendees will have to pay admission to Meteor Crater park to see
the programs. For more information, call (800) 289-5898.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] PURTARANO

2003-09-11 Thread Steve Arnold, Chicago!!!
Wow what a beautiful piece of earth rock.It is so hard to believe that
this is not a meteorite, in stead of meteorwrong.I want to thank matt
morgan for letting me purchase a piece of PURTARANO.I just got a 219 gram
slice.This thing is gorgeous.It looks so much like a stony iron.It looks
alot like morristown.Thanks again to matt for letting me have this great
looking slice.

steve arnold

=
Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120 
I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728 
Illinois Meteorites 
website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/illinoismeteorites/
 
 



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re [meteorite-list] Cold hunting/Esquel

2003-09-11 Thread Zelimir Gabelica
Mark,

Interesting comments. 
However I am not sure somebody still knows where exactly that well was sunk.
Esquel was supposed to be found back in 1951 (ref.: Meteorites from A to
Z). I know the finder kept the piece for long years before he made it
expertized as meteorite and again it took him even more time to sell it. He
probably passed away since and I doubt anybody now knows for the exact find
place, not even the first buyer (to my best knowledge). 
I will not argue whether or not it is better so, precisely because of its
potential value...

Regards,

Zelimir


At 15:15 11/09/03 +0100, you wrote:
Zelmir,

Well put, given the potential value of a massive chunk of Esquel I am
supprised no one has sunk further holes around the site! If I lived near
by, I'd certainly do it myself! Maybe the use of a magnetometer would be
the way to go, these days there is a myriad of equipment designed to
locate buried metals...

One tactic of finding meteorites would be to mount very powerful magnets
onto a tractor Plough, and trawl over acres of farm land. Something I
have been trying a local farmer friend of mine to do for ages!


Mark
**
Prof. Zelimir Gabelica
Groupe Sécurité et Ecologie Chimiques (GSEC) - ENSCMu
3, rue A. Werner
F-68093 MULHOUSE Cedex, FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 94
FAX: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 15
e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Mysterious Blast Shakes Nanaimo, Canada

2003-09-11 Thread Ron Baalke


http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030911.wnama0911/BNStory/National/

Mysterious blast shakes Nanaimo
Canadian Press
September 11, 2003

Nanaimo, B.C. -- Was it a sonic boom, a dynamite blast, or an 
asteroid hitting the earth?

Government and local emergency services were stumped Wednesday 
afternoon, unable to explain a powerful blast that shook 
Nanaimo from stem to stern.

The blast, which occurred around 1 p.m., was heard and felt as 
far south as Chemainus, and as far north as Nanoose.

Nanaimo RCMP say no damage or injuries had been reported.

One thing is fairly certain: it was not an earthquake, 
although it did register on a seismograph in Nanaimo.

From the signature of the wavelength, it does not look 
like an earthquake, it looks like an explosion, said Alison 
Bird, an earthquake seismologist with the Geological Survey 
of Canada.

There were reports of dynamiting on Mount Benson.

But dynamiting requires a permit, and the Ministry of Energy 
and Mines, the City of Nanaimo's public works department and 
the Regional District of Nanaimo all said there were no 
permits issued for any blasting Wednesday.

A Ministry of Forests spokesman in Port Alberni also said he 
was not aware of any blasting or road building going on Mount 
Benson.

A spokesperson with Comox air base said there were no jets 
in the area Wednesday that would have been capable of 
creating a sonic boom.

Nor was the army engaged in artillery practice.

A shock and blast expert at the University of Victoria says 
the weather patterns Wednesday were nearly perfect for 
sound wave refraction, which could mean the blast may have 
come from some distance.

You may get focusing of a blast, which may come from a lot 
further away than you think, says Dr. Alex van Netten of 
the University of Victoria's physics department.

Under certain weather conditions, sound can refract, and 
the focal point may be many miles away from the source.

The sound may actually be louder at the focal point (many 
miles away) than it is in the immediate vicinity of the 
explosion.

Today is a typical day, with clouds, when you'll get a 
temperature inversion, he said Wednesday. This is a 
classic situation where you have a focusing of sound. It 
might be further out than you think. It might even be in 
Vancouver. 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] meteorite ground movment

2003-09-11 Thread Tom aka James Knudson
Hello List,  How  much can a meteorite move?  Kingman's old airfield used
the outskirts of kingman as a shooting range during WW2 and I asked the
airfield museum how many 50 caliber bullets they shot on this range. The
airfield museum curator did not remember the exact number, but he remembered
it was close to a billion!
I decided to take my detector out to a large wash today to look for
gold. Gold in washes tends to concentrate in certain areas.  Every time I
checked these areas, I found hundreds if not thousands of these 50 caliber
slugs. I followed the trail back up to the desert floors and could see how
they were gathering together from all directions to end up in the wash. It
was clearly run off from our big monsoon storms that were moving these
slugs. This is exactly how the gold gets into the washes but a little easier
to see with almost a billion of these 41g slugs.
  Now the question has to be asked, are meteorites moving the same way? Are
they ending up in some lake or river somewhere?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Re: Recent Flash Floods

2003-09-11 Thread Robert Verish
Hello List,

Over the past several weeks I've had the opportunity
to visit 14 dry lakes in CA and NV.  I'm here to
report that I have some good news.  All of the 14 dry
lakes that I recon'd were in typically good shape
with only a couple having experienced marginal
flooding and minor resurfacing.  None of the lakes
experienced total inundation.  And only two lakes were
still wet with standing water (mostly pond-sized, and
close to the shore that is leeward of the summertime
predominant wind direction).

So, for those people who were changing their travel
plans, because of recent news reports about
flash-flooding, I hope this message lessens your
concerns.   

That's not to say that the news reports were
exaggerated.  Clearly, the inundation of Zzyzx was at
least a 25-year flood, caused by a cloudburst that
was localized over a single dry wash.  My original
message was a request for information in order to tell
whether any of these storms were producing 50-year, or
up to 500-year, flood effects in these basins.

Here are some images I took of large rocks on a dry
lake, the only evidence remaining of the catastrophic
effects of a 50- to 500-year flood surge:

http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/drylakes/ca030905.jpg

I've coined the term rock-garden to describe this
unique type of (boulder-sized) lag gravel.  The finer
clasts (pebbles, sand, silt, and mud) have long since
been dispersed across the lake by succeeding
high-water wave action:

http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/drylakes/ca030905b.jpg

Again, thanks to those who shared with me their pre- 
post-flood observations.

Bob V. 


[meteorite-list] Re: Recent Flash Floods 
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:25:55 -0700 (PDT) 

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT) 
Robert Verish

This most recent influx of moisture 
into the deserts has caused severe 
flash-flooding.  Up until now, the
dry lakes have been overly wet with 
standing water, but flash-flooding 
has the energy to bring large volumes 
of mud and rock with that water, out 
into the middle of these playas and 
bury any promising surface with a new 
layer of sediment. 

First, the flooding is not going to carry
any rock of any size into the playa. 
== message truncated ==




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Re: Recent Flash Floods

2003-09-11 Thread Robert Verish
Hello List,

Over the past several weeks I've had the opportunity
to visit 14 dry lakes in CA and NV.  I'm here to
report that I have some good news.  All of the 14 dry
lakes that I recon'd were in typically good shape
with only a couple having experienced marginal
flooding and minor resurfacing.  None of the lakes
experienced total inundation.  And only two lakes were
still wet with standing water (mostly pond-sized, and
close to the shore that is leeward of the summertime
predominant wind direction).

So, for those people who were changing their travel
plans, because of recent news reports about
flash-flooding, I hope this message lessens your
concerns.   

That's not to say that the news reports were
exaggerated.  Clearly, the inundation of Zzyzx was at
least a 25-year flood, caused by a cloudburst that
was localized over a single dry wash.  My original
message was a request for information in order to tell
whether any of these storms were producing 50-year, or
up to 500-year, flood effects in these basins.

Here are some images I took of large rocks on a dry
lake, the only evidence remaining of the catastrophic
effects of a 50- to 500-year flood surge:

http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/drylakes/ca030905.jpg

I've coined the term rock-garden to describe this
unique type of (boulder-sized) lag gravel.  The finer
clasts (pebbles, sand, silt, and mud) have long since
been dispersed across the lake by succeeding
high-water wave action:

http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/drylakes/ca030905b.jpg

Again, thanks to those who shared with me their pre- 
post-flood observations.

Bob V. 


[meteorite-list] Re: Recent Flash Floods 
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:25:55 -0700 (PDT) 

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT) 
Robert Verish

This most recent influx of moisture 
into the deserts has caused severe 
flash-flooding.  Up until now, the
dry lakes have been overly wet with 
standing water, but flash-flooding 
has the energy to bring large volumes 
of mud and rock with that water, out 
into the middle of these playas and 
bury any promising surface with a new 
layer of sediment. 

First, the flooding is not going to carry
any rock of any size into the playa. 
== message truncated ==




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Bad Anniversary

2003-09-11 Thread Maccers531
Matteo,
Thank You for remembering and commenting on the national tragedy that 
happened two years ago. No one here has forgotten it still is a sad day for 
many of us.
I live in a Chicago suburb and many people here are conducting fundraisers 
benefiting the people who lost so many in New York.
Hopefully one day everyone who was involved with that cowardly act will pay 
for it.

Regards,
Bob Evans

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Park Forest thin sections

2003-09-11 Thread Rob Wesel
Hello all-

I am gearing up to run some PF thin sections on eBay and I have one without
a cover slip for you microprobe folks out there. Best offer $40 or more come
Sunday takes it, otherwise it'll be on eBay too.
http://imagehost.vendio.com/preview/ra/rancor/PFTSNC.jpg
I also have 4 with cover slips for $40 each that have large surface area,
equal to or greater than the one pictured, and 3 with smaller area for $30
U.S. Priority shipping $3.85, Global Priority $5.50
Oh, and they come in a snappy little case with all the Park Forest info on
it.

--
Rob Wesel
--
We are the music makers...and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971





__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Cold hunting?

2003-09-11 Thread Matson, Robert
Hi Sterling and List,

Sterling wrote:

 Taking the area of the Earth to be 5.1 x 10^8 km^2 and the
 meteorite flux to be 23,930 yr^-1 (that's the figure from
 the MORP study), this yields the assumed collisional cross
 section of the earth to be 21,360 km^2 yr^-1. This rate
 means that one meteorite per year falls on an area of
 21,320 square kilometers.

 ... Of course, I think the MORP fall rate is too low and the
 real fall rate could be 3-4 times higher.

Yes -- the MORP study rate is definitely too low.  If there's
a researcher out there that would be interested in terrestrial
age-dating a representative sampling of my finds, we could
place a nice lower bound on the annual fall rate.

 A meteorite could fall on every square kilometer every
 6,000 years or so. In that case, if a meteorite lasted
 40,000 years and one fell every 6,000 years, they're be
 five or six on every square kilometer.

One of our list geologists could better assess the span of
time that southern California and southern Nevada playas
have been dry -- for example, up until about 15,000
years ago, Lake Manix covered a couple hundred square
miles of the region around Barstow.  Thus, I wouldn't
expect to find meteorites older than 15,000 years from
this zone.  The earthquake that drained Lake Manix sent
the water in the direction of Silver and Soda dry lakes
near Baker, so these areas remained wet even more recently.
On average, I wouldn't expect to find more than about
3 unpaired meteorites per square kilometer in these areas.

In well grid-searched areas, the Mojave recovery rate
approaches and occasionally exceeds 1 unpaired find per
square kilometer.  Walking at 5 km/hour with a maximum
detection range of +/- 10 meters, such an area can be
searched in 10 hours (though most people aren't likely
to walk over 30 miles in a single day!)  Choose your
search locations intelligently, and finding meteorites
is reduced to a problem of focus and perseverance.

--Rob


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Cold hunting question

2003-09-11 Thread Warren Zwanka
 

Just wondering who owns these areas you "cold hunters" are searching? Are areas like the Gold Basin and Bonneville Salt Flats publicly owned or do you make arrangements with individual land owners?
 
WarrenJoin Excite! - http://www.excite.comThe most personalized portal on the Web!


Re: [meteorite-list] PURTARANO

2003-09-11 Thread j . divelbiss
Steve and others,

A few months ago I posted a thread to the list that basically said that while 
the Putorana looks like a mesosiderite...that when I compared it to Vaca 
Muerta in thin section, they look nothing alike at all. Plain and simple the 
Putorana looks like the basalt that it has been identified as. 

My question to others is why did it take so long to figure that out when it 
seems so obvious to a novice like me...in thin section?. 

Are there other mesosiderites that look like basalt in thin section? If so, 
which ones? If not...were the researchers considering it to be a new type? 

Also noteworthy is that Ivan (finmet) is selling Putorana again, and his 
description is alluding to it being considered to be extraterrestrial again, 
because in his/others words...such a rock cannot exist on earth (native iron 
separated within a rock). Does anyone know what is going on with the research 
of this material. Is it really being considered to from out of this world 
again?

Putorana sure looks like basalt to me...and it does not like any eucrite or 
diogentite that I've seen in thin section...which are the known rock parts of 
mesosiderites.

Puzzled again,

John
 Wow what a beautiful piece of earth rock.It is so hard to believe that
 this is not a meteorite, in stead of meteorwrong.I want to thank matt
 morgan for letting me purchase a piece of PURTARANO.I just got a 219 gram
 slice.This thing is gorgeous.It looks so much like a stony iron.It looks
 alot like morristown.Thanks again to matt for letting me have this great
 looking slice.
 
 steve arnold
 
 =
 Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120 
 I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728 
 Illinois Meteorites 
 website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com
 http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/illinoismeteorites/
  
  
 
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
 http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Cold hunting?

2003-09-11 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi, Rob,

Actually, I seem to recall that Phil Bland at the Natural History
Museum in London (formerly called The British Museum and always will be
in my head) did a study doing terrestial age-dating all the meteorites
from several given areas, just to get the age distribution and a figure
on how long meteorites survive in a surface location and to get a handle
on the fall rate.
Somewhere in the Meteorite List archives there's a summary article
on it...
As I recall, he came up with a terrestial fall rate about 2 to 2-1/2
times the MORP rate, survival times of 40,000 to 50,000 years in deserts
like the Sahara, and very short survival times for chondrites in squishy
Britain. About what you'd expect, in other words.
Part of his figure of a fall rate only 2-1/2 times the MORP rate in
his study is the assumption that the Sahara has always been as dry as it
is now. The wetter the Sahara actually was, the greater the fall rate
would have to be to produce the existing survivor stones.
I scrounged around and found a great deal of substantial geological
research done in the Sahara before World War II, when there was much
freer access to the area.
First, there are extensive surface traces of former waterways and
full riverene drainage systems still visible, enough so that fairly good
maps of the old wet Sahara can be drawn.
Then, there has been considerable research on the buried rivers of
the Sahara, where the water still flows, but hundreds of feet under the
surface. These buried rivers connect existing oasises and the pattern of
their interconnection can be determined by a comparison of the dozens of
species of fish that are found only in the buried rivers!
Now, that must have been interesting research, going fishing in the
Sahara! Amazingly, it turns out that the buried rivers of the Sahara are
(or were) apparently connected to or with similiar buried rivers in the
Middle East and northern East Africa in geologically recent time. (None
of the fish are blind fish as you find in cave ecosystems.)
Then, there's the neolithic art (12,000 to 16,000 years old) in the
depths of the Sahara, showing hunting scenes with a plentitude of game
animals that are now only found many hundreds of miles south of the
Sahara.
I was going to send all these references to Dr. Bland but I got lazy
(or stayed lazy) and never did it. Anyway, the point being that more
rocks have to fall on a wet Sahara to produce the existing age
distribution than on an eternally dry Sahara. About twice as many, a
fall rate of 4 to 5 times the MORP rate, because the Sahara wasn't ever
soaking wet. It was sort of like Nebraska, but without the winters.
I wonder if there isn't some way of factoring out the finder's
percentage and deriving not just a minimum fall rate but the actual
fall rate from such an area collection?


Sterling K. Webb

Matson, Robert wrote:

 Yes -- the MORP study rate is definitely too low.  If there's
 a researcher out there that would be interested in terrestrial
 age-dating a representative sampling of my finds, we could
 place a nice lower bound on the annual fall rate.



 --Rob




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re 2: [meteorite-list] PUTORANA not PURTARANO

2003-09-11 Thread j . divelbiss
List members,

I'll respond to my own thread by going one step further...recognizing that 
eucrites and terrestrial basalts are chemically about the same. However, 
looking at the few eucrites I have, they are much finer grained and less 
colorful than the Putorana basalt. The plagioclase needles are much larger 
and more prevalent in the Putorana sample I have when compared to the 
eucrites I have. Putorana looks something like the terrestrial basalt photo 
on page 154 of the Cambridge Encylcopedia of Meteorites by Norton. The 
Putorana is even more colorful and is loaded with twinnig plag needles and 
moderately sized pheoncrysts of pyroxene and olivine than that basalt picture 
on 154.

Putorana does look like a couple sections I have, but they are terrestrial 
gabbros...one being a plain old (but beautiful) diabase and the other is a 
modified(cooked) gabbro called metadiabase. The diabase and Putorana look 
very much alike in thin section ...minus the metal seen in Putorana. 

Even my Zagami section, a Mars basalt, looks nothing like Putorana in thin 
section. See 169 for sample of it.

So, can anyone tell us that they have seen a eucrite that looks like Putorana 
in thin section? Maybe I'll get someone to post some of my pictures on their 
site to compare. I'll also contact Jeff Rowell for his take on this 
issue...he has a number of sections including Putorana and several eucrites.

John



 Steve and others,
 
 A few months ago I posted a thread to the list that basically said that while 
 the Putorana looks like a mesosiderite...that when I compared it to Vaca 
 Muerta in thin section, they look nothing alike at all. Plain and simple the 
 Putorana looks like the basalt that it has been identified as. 
 
 My question to others is why did it take so long to figure that out when it 
 seems so obvious to a novice like me...in thin section?. 
 
 Are there other mesosiderites that look like basalt in thin section? If so, 
 which ones? If not...were the researchers considering it to be a new type? 
 
 Also noteworthy is that Ivan (finmet) is selling Putorana again, and his 
 description is alluding to it being considered to be extraterrestrial again, 
 because in his/others words...such a rock cannot exist on earth (native iron 
 separated within a rock). Does anyone know what is going on with the research 
 of this material. Is it really being considered to from out of this world 
 again?
 
 Putorana sure looks like basalt to me...and it does not like any eucrite or 
 diogentite that I've seen in thin section...which are the known rock parts of 
 mesosiderites.
 
 Puzzled again,
 
 John
  Wow what a beautiful piece of earth rock.It is so hard to believe that
  this is not a meteorite, in stead of meteorwrong.I want to thank matt
  morgan for letting me purchase a piece of PURTARANO.I just got a 219 gram
  slice.This thing is gorgeous.It looks so much like a stony iron.It looks
  alot like morristown.Thanks again to matt for letting me have this great
  looking slice.
  
  steve arnold
  
  =
  Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120 
  I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728 
  Illinois Meteorites 
  website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com
  http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/illinoismeteorites/
   
   
  
  
  
  __
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
  http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
  
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Cold hunting

2003-09-11 Thread Matson, Robert
Hi All,

On the subject of met hunting, Dave P. replied to my remark:

Matson: If you want to reduce search time per (cold) meteorite
find (i.e. non-strewnfield), the #1 factor is survival time --
you must maximize it any way you can:

1.  Low deposition rate -- ideally a ~negative~ deposition rate: you'd
prefer a surface that is deflating
 
2.  Low annual precipitation
 
3.  Minimal human presence

-
with:

 There is yet another way.  Search a known strewn field - not one
 that has been picked over but one that has not.

Searching a known strewn field (picked over or not) will naturally
produce meteorites faster than any non-strewn field. (The discussion
thread was specific to cold hunting.) Certainly if anyone wanted to
find a meteorite as quickly as possible, I would direct them to
Holbrook, Gold Basin, Park Forest, Allende etc. as no large strewn
field is ever completely searched out, and you have the further
advantage of knowing exactly what you're looking for.  (Caveat on
Gold Basin:  this area has been searched for a long time by a very
large number of people, so the rate of new GB finds is perhaps
approaching the natural background rate of any good desert
locale. Just look at the number of non-GB finds that have been
made.)

On the same subject, Zelimir Gabelica wrote:

 I believe Mark is perfectly right by saying that most meteorites
 are lying below the soil surface.  I did not make any compiling
 but I guess if you go through all the Met. Bull's reporting
 meteorite FINDS, I am pretty sure that about (at least ?)
 half of them were found through plowing some field.

You're forgetting about NWA, and more importantly Antarctica.  The
number of buried meteorite finds is an insignificant fraction
compared to those found on the surface. 

Cheers,
Rob

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: Re 2: [meteorite-list] PUTORANA not PURTARANO

2003-09-11 Thread Matt Morgan
John:
For starters read the article at the bottom of the page here..
http://www.mhmeteorites.com/pubs/news.htm

This may help you see why and how things got strange with this rock.
Matt Morgan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Steve Arnold, Chicago!!!; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re 2: [meteorite-list] PUTORANA not PURTARANO


List members,

I'll respond to my own thread by going one step further...recognizing that
eucrites and terrestrial basalts are chemically about the same. However,
looking at the few eucrites I have, they are much finer grained and less
colorful than the Putorana basalt. The plagioclase needles are much larger
and more prevalent in the Putorana sample I have when compared to the
eucrites I have. Putorana looks something like the terrestrial basalt photo
on page 154 of the Cambridge Encylcopedia of Meteorites by Norton. The
Putorana is even more colorful and is loaded with twinnig plag needles and
moderately sized pheoncrysts of pyroxene and olivine than that basalt
picture
on 154.

Putorana does look like a couple sections I have, but they are terrestrial
gabbros...one being a plain old (but beautiful) diabase and the other is a
modified(cooked) gabbro called metadiabase. The diabase and Putorana look
very much alike in thin section ...minus the metal seen in Putorana.

Even my Zagami section, a Mars basalt, looks nothing like Putorana in thin
section. See 169 for sample of it.

So, can anyone tell us that they have seen a eucrite that looks like
Putorana
in thin section? Maybe I'll get someone to post some of my pictures on their
site to compare. I'll also contact Jeff Rowell for his take on this
issue...he has a number of sections including Putorana and several eucrites.

John



 Steve and others,

 A few months ago I posted a thread to the list that basically said that
while
 the Putorana looks like a mesosiderite...that when I compared it to Vaca
 Muerta in thin section, they look nothing alike at all. Plain and simple
the
 Putorana looks like the basalt that it has been identified as.

 My question to others is why did it take so long to figure that out when
it
 seems so obvious to a novice like me...in thin section?.

 Are there other mesosiderites that look like basalt in thin section? If
so,
 which ones? If not...were the researchers considering it to be a new type?

 Also noteworthy is that Ivan (finmet) is selling Putorana again, and his
 description is alluding to it being considered to be extraterrestrial
again,
 because in his/others words...such a rock cannot exist on earth (native
iron
 separated within a rock). Does anyone know what is going on with the
research
 of this material. Is it really being considered to from out of this world
 again?

 Putorana sure looks like basalt to me...and it does not like any eucrite
or
 diogentite that I've seen in thin section...which are the known rock parts
of
 mesosiderites.

 Puzzled again,

 John
  Wow what a beautiful piece of earth rock.It is so hard to believe that
  this is not a meteorite, in stead of meteorwrong.I want to thank matt
  morgan for letting me purchase a piece of PURTARANO.I just got a 219
gram
  slice.This thing is gorgeous.It looks so much like a stony iron.It looks
  alot like morristown.Thanks again to matt for letting me have this great
  looking slice.
 
  steve arnold
 
  =
  Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120
  I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728
  Illinois Meteorites
  website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com
  http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/illinoismeteorites/
 
 
 
 
 
  __
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
  http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Re: Recent Flash Floods

2003-09-11 Thread moni waiblinger-seabridge
Hi Bob,

nice images of the *rock garden*!

i am still trying to see which one of the images show the meteorites.
You seemed to forget to describe for us where to look for them!  :-)
Sternengruss, Moni

ps. i remember you sending this along with the Nevada Meteorite Picture of 
the Day.
Explanation: Can't find the meteorite? Here's a hint - look down directly 
beside the driver-side front door for a small black rock.




From: Robert Verish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite-list Meteoritecentral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [meteorite-list] Re: Recent Flash Floods
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Hello List,

Over the past several weeks I've had the opportunity
to visit 14 dry lakes in CA and NV.  I'm here to
report that I have some good news.  All of the 14 dry
lakes that I recon'd were in typically good shape
with only a couple having experienced marginal
flooding and minor resurfacing.  None of the lakes
experienced total inundation.  And only two lakes were
still wet with standing water (mostly pond-sized, and
close to the shore that is leeward of the summertime
predominant wind direction).
So, for those people who were changing their travel
plans, because of recent news reports about
flash-flooding, I hope this message lessens your
concerns.
That's not to say that the news reports were
exaggerated.  Clearly, the inundation of Zzyzx was at
least a 25-year flood, caused by a cloudburst that
was localized over a single dry wash.  My original
message was a request for information in order to tell
whether any of these storms were producing 50-year, or
up to 500-year, flood effects in these basins.
Here are some images I took of large rocks on a dry
lake, the only evidence remaining of the catastrophic
effects of a 50- to 500-year flood surge:
http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/drylakes/ca030905.jpg

I've coined the term rock-garden to describe this
unique type of (boulder-sized) lag gravel.  The finer
clasts (pebbles, sand, silt, and mud) have long since
been dispersed across the lake by succeeding
high-water wave action:
http://www.geocities.com/bolidechaser/drylakes/ca030905b.jpg

Again, thanks to those who shared with me their pre- 
post-flood observations.
Bob V.


[meteorite-list] Re: Recent Flash Floods
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Robert Verish
This most recent influx of moisture
into the deserts has caused severe
flash-flooding.  Up until now, the
dry lakes have been overly wet with
standing water, but flash-flooding
has the energy to bring large volumes
of mud and rock with that water, out
into the middle of these playas and
bury any promising surface with a new
layer of sediment.
First, the flooding is not going to carry
any rock of any size into the playa.
== message truncated ==


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
_
Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage.   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list