Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone - Example from Sweden

2003-10-02 Thread Sterling K. Webb

Hi, Robert,

The point of the Swedish paper was that at this geological period there
were a lot more meteorites in the limestone than there should be, based on
today's fall rate. There were so many more meteorites that the authors proposed
a period of intense meteorite falls, a veritable rain of meteorites.
So, if you have a limestone exposure of the same age, presumably a high
density of meteorites is possible. I'd go look if I were you. (All of my local
limestone peters out more than 120,000,000 years shy of the date.)
There were a lot of very odd things going on in the solar system at this
point in time, around a half billion years ago, with which a huge rain of
meteroites would fit right in.
There was an earth ice age that came very close to covering the entire
planet with ice right down to the equator, causing a really super mass
extinction (544 mya). There was also an odd period during which the earth's
axis flipped over in less than 10 million years (530 mya).
The surface of Venus was completely 100% re-surfaced with an entirely new
crust at the same time (~500 mya). And several major asteroid families seem
to date their initial breakup from the same period.
Seems like everybody was having a bad day...


Sterling K. Webb
-



Robert Szep wrote:

 Hello Paul and list...

 I have found IRON NODULES in ~500 million year old limestone and know where
 to find more.
 They are rather smooth and not, repeat NOT badly 'rusted'.

 The limestone surrounding the small pocket left behind after removing the
 metal-object shows some discoloration but only in very close proximity to
 where the nodule was.
 The metal in this limestone is far from abundant but then again I didn't
 hammer my way through any major amount of host material. At the time I
 thought the dense, roughly 1/2 inch nuggets might be meteorites but figured
 the odds were slim.
 After reading your posting I realized the odds might not be nearly as slim
 as I originally considered them to be.

 Here is my question to you and the 'list'...
 When a small metal object is found in ~500 million year old limestone, what
 are the chances of that object being a meteorite?

 Replies to this posting, if any, should be interesting.
 If the consensis is better than 50/50 I might collect a few specimens this
 weekend.

 Best regards, Robert Szep.

 - Original Message -
 From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:40 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Unconventional Meteorite Hunting - Example from
 Sweden

 
  It seems like there are some unconventional places
  that people can look for meteorites. For example,
  ancient meteorites have been found in the carbonate
  rocks of Sweden as discussed in:
 
  Schmitz, B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Lindstrom, M., and
  Tassinari, M., 1997, Accretion Rates of Meteorites
  andCosmic Dust in the Early Ordovician. Science.
  vol. 278, no. 5335, pp. 88-90.
 
  In this paper they discussed Abundant fossil
  meteorites that were found in ...marine,
  condensed Lower Ordovician limestones...
 
  They note:
 
  1. A 4-inch in diameter meteorite discovered
  middle Ordovician Limestone in 1951, which was
  described by Thorslund and Wickman (1981).
 
  2. a swedish meteorite , called Osterplana 1, which
  was discovered in 5-million year older Lower Ordovician
  limestone about 300 miles away from the above by Hansen
  and Berstrom (1997).
 
  Twelve more meteorites have been found at the Thorsberg
  Limestone Quarry. Hansen and Berstrom (1997, pp. 3)
  stated:
 
  A 10-foot-thick section of the
  Holen (Orthoceratite) Limestone,
  of Early Middle Ordovician age, is
  extracted at the Thorsberg quarry
  and sawed into thin slabs that are
  used for windowsills and floor tile.
  Quarry workers discarded slabs with
  impurities, such as the meteorites,
  until Professor Maurits Lindstrom
  of the University of Stockholm
  alerted them to save such slabs.
  The 12 specimens were recovered
  between 1992 and 1996. Ten of the
  specimens were recovered from a
  2-foot-thick bed of limestone and
  may represent a single meteorite
  fall. The other three specimens were
  recovered from two separate levels
  above this layer. Seven of the
  specimens, collected between 1993 and
  1996, are from a quarried limestone
  volume of no more than about 127,000
  cubic feet. Most of the specimens are
  now on display at the Stiftelsen Paleo
  Geology Center in Lidkoping, Sweden.
 
  The meteorites found in the Thorsberg Quarry meteorites
  range in size from about 0.5 to 3.5 inches in diameter.
  They have been almost completely replaced by calcite and
  barite. The meteorite masses are dark reddish brown and
  look like iron nodules surrounded by a zone of lighter
  colored limestone.
 
  It would be fun to look at correlative condensed sections,
  in the United States and elsewhere for similar fossil
  

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone

2003-10-02 Thread Edward Hodges
Dear list- I have found a few iron oxide nodules in layers of Cambrien age 
shale while digging trilobites in Nevada. I didn't think much of it at the 
time. I'll have to dig them up from the garage and do a nickel test. It's 
and interesting subject, and there are known meteorites recovered from 
limestone. I'll try to list specific examples, I know I read about it 
recently, but cannot recall where I read it right now.The Hoba meteorite was 
discovered in limestone in 1928, uncertain whether it impacted a limestone 
strata, or has been there since before it became limestone. The was an 
immense halo surrounding it. Is it possible given it's size that it's been 
there for hundreds of million of years?  I frequently find nodules of one 
sort or another on digs, usually mineralization similar to cave pearls. It 
would make sense since the Earths surface is cover by more than 75% water. 
I'm sure meteorites landed in coral reefs on a regular basis. Thermal vents 
could be another possibility. These iron- oxide nodules are quite similar to 
the Canyon Diablo shale, or the thick shale covering a very rusted 
Nantan. If anyone has further information, please post it. - Edward

Edward R. Hodges
IMCA # 4173
www.meteoriteonline.com


From: Mark Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Szep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: meteoritelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone - Example from Sweden
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:11:55 -0700
Hi Robert
Not sure I have close to all the answers, but metal, free metal, in a
limestone, can only be from a few select sources. One, the first to mind, 
is
vents such as black smokers. But, here we have high temps, a corrosive
environment, and no discoloration of the limestone from other vent
chemicals. Not a likely source. Second to mind are some very nasty bacteria
which excrete free metals while digesting rock for nutrient, and are a
possible source for gold and silver crystals (least thats some peoples
thoughts). Next to mind is the free iron found in basalts, not basalt in 
the
limestone, doubtful then that is the source. Iron and nickel, which shows a
Widmanstätten pattern, cannot be from any of these sources and is not known
from any terrestrial souce to date. Best guess would be a impactor and the
metal nuggets are splash ejecta which landed on a reef or in a oolitic
environment and got encapsulated as the limestone was buried.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Robert Szep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:19 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone - Example from Sweden

 Hello Paul and list...


 I have found IRON NODULES in ~500 million year old limestone and know
where
 to find more.
 They are rather smooth and not, repeat NOT badly 'rusted'.

 The limestone surrounding the small pocket left behind after removing 
the
 metal-object shows some discoloration but only in very close proximity 
to
 where the nodule was.
 The metal in this limestone is far from abundant but then again I didn't
 hammer my way through any major amount of host material. At the time I
 thought the dense, roughly 1/2 inch nuggets might be meteorites but
figured
 the odds were slim.
 After reading your posting I realized the odds might not be nearly as 
slim
 as I originally considered them to be.

 Here is my question to you and the 'list'...
 When a small metal object is found in ~500 million year old limestone,
what
 are the chances of that object being a meteorite?

 Replies to this posting, if any, should be interesting.
 If the consensis is better than 50/50 I might collect a few specimens 
this
 weekend.


 Best regards, Robert Szep.


 - Original Message -
 From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:40 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Unconventional Meteorite Hunting - Example 
from
 Sweden


 
  It seems like there are some unconventional places
  that people can look for meteorites. For example,
  ancient meteorites have been found in the carbonate
  rocks of Sweden as discussed in:
 
  Schmitz, B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Lindstrom, M., and
  Tassinari, M., 1997, Accretion Rates of Meteorites
  andCosmic Dust in the Early Ordovician. Science.
  vol. 278, no. 5335, pp. 88-90.
 
  In this paper they discussed Abundant fossil
  meteorites that were found in ...marine,
  condensed Lower Ordovician limestones...
 
  They note:
 
  1. A 4-inch in diameter meteorite discovered
  middle Ordovician Limestone in 1951, which was
  described by Thorslund and Wickman (1981).
 
  2. a swedish meteorite , called Osterplana 1, which
  was discovered in 5-million year older Lower Ordovician
  limestone about 300 miles away from the above by Hansen
  and Berstrom (1997).
 
  Twelve more meteorites have been found at the Thorsberg
  Limestone Quarry. Hansen and Berstrom (1997, pp. 3)
  stated:
 
  A 10-foot-thick section of the
  Holen (Orthoceratite) Limestone,
  of Early Middle 

RE: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone

2003-10-02 Thread Charles R. Viau
I found some iron oxide nodules, or 'spheres' in limestone in the
Caribbean. At a certain layer in coastal cliffs of limestone strata that
looked different (darker, coarser material with an underlying whitish
substance, there were iron nodules embedded in the limestone. You could
see them exposed in the layer with a frequency of 1 or 2 every 10 feet
or so. I dug them out, along with some of the surrounding material. The
spheres broke in 2 pieces trying to pry them out, and they are heavy,
with a crystalline appearance, as if they went through some kind of
metamorphosis. I do not know the age of the strata, but there are
Jurassic and Cretaceous outcrops in those areas.
I have never had them analyzed.

CharlyV. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward
Hodges
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone 

Dear list- I have found a few iron oxide nodules in layers of Cambrien
age 
shale while digging trilobites in Nevada. I didn't think much of it at
the 
time. I'll have to dig them up from the garage and do a nickel test.
It's 
and interesting subject, and there are known meteorites recovered from 
limestone. I'll try to list specific examples, I know I read about it 
recently, but cannot recall where I read it right now.The Hoba meteorite
was 
discovered in limestone in 1928, uncertain whether it impacted a
limestone 
strata, or has been there since before it became limestone. The was an 
immense halo surrounding it. Is it possible given it's size that it's
been 
there for hundreds of million of years?  I frequently find nodules of
one 
sort or another on digs, usually mineralization similar to cave pearls.
It 
would make sense since the Earths surface is cover by more than 75%
water. 
I'm sure meteorites landed in coral reefs on a regular basis. Thermal
vents 
could be another possibility. These iron- oxide nodules are quite
similar to 
the Canyon Diablo shale, or the thick shale covering a very rusted 
Nantan. If anyone has further information, please post it. - Edward

Edward R. Hodges
IMCA # 4173
www.meteoriteonline.com



From: Mark Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Szep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: meteoritelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone - Example from
Sweden
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:11:55 -0700

Hi Robert
Not sure I have close to all the answers, but metal, free metal, in a
limestone, can only be from a few select sources. One, the first to
mind, 
is
vents such as black smokers. But, here we have high temps, a corrosive
environment, and no discoloration of the limestone from other vent
chemicals. Not a likely source. Second to mind are some very nasty
bacteria
which excrete free metals while digesting rock for nutrient, and are a
possible source for gold and silver crystals (least thats some peoples
thoughts). Next to mind is the free iron found in basalts, not basalt
in 
the
limestone, doubtful then that is the source. Iron and nickel, which
shows a
Widmanstätten pattern, cannot be from any of these sources and is not
known
from any terrestrial souce to date. Best guess would be a impactor and
the
metal nuggets are splash ejecta which landed on a reef or in a oolitic
environment and got encapsulated as the limestone was buried.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Robert Szep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:19 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone - Example from Sweden


  Hello Paul and list...
 
 
  I have found IRON NODULES in ~500 million year old limestone and
know
where
  to find more.
  They are rather smooth and not, repeat NOT badly 'rusted'.
 
  The limestone surrounding the small pocket left behind after
removing 
the
  metal-object shows some discoloration but only in very close
proximity 
to
  where the nodule was.
  The metal in this limestone is far from abundant but then again I
didn't
  hammer my way through any major amount of host material. At the time
I
  thought the dense, roughly 1/2 inch nuggets might be meteorites but
figured
  the odds were slim.
  After reading your posting I realized the odds might not be nearly
as 
slim
  as I originally considered them to be.
 
  Here is my question to you and the 'list'...
  When a small metal object is found in ~500 million year old
limestone,
what
  are the chances of that object being a meteorite?
 
  Replies to this posting, if any, should be interesting.
  If the consensis is better than 50/50 I might collect a few
specimens 
this
  weekend.
 
 
  Best regards, Robert Szep.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:40 PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Unconventional Meteorite Hunting - Example

from
  Sweden
 
 
  
   It seems like there are some unconventional places
   that people can look for meteorites. For 

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone

2003-10-02 Thread Martin Altmann
Hi,

there were found 55 fossile meteorites in limestone in five different
quarries in South Sweden,
more than 40 of them in the Thorsberg quarry in Kinnekulle.
The quarries a distributed in an area of 300 miles and the layers in that
limstone formed in a span of 2 million years 480 million years ago, so that
the meteorites don't stem from a single event,
but surprisingly they are all of the same type. L-chondrites.
They are quite well preserved, I have a picture here and chondrules are
easily visible.

See a report here:
http://www.rice.edu/projects/reno/Newsrel/2003/20030508_meteorite.shtml

Martin


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Fw: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone

2003-10-02 Thread Robert Szep
Hmmm... Judging by the responses to this topic, Meteorites in Limestone,
roundish metallic things found in limestone and other sedimentary rock is
not extremely uncommon but worthy of further investigation. Especially when
found in layers or deposits corresponding with certain known time periods.

Yes, a simple nickel-test would obviously be a good first step to take in
determining what some of our tiny discoveries may or may not be. A test for
the presence of Iridium would be the next logical step but that is not as
easily accomplished.

In anycase, I should point out that the metal nodules I
referred to finding are not concretions. I've seen them and owned them from
up around here, from the East coast, and from various U.S. arid regions.


I stumbled upon the material in question while doing some casual fossil
hunting. Yes, there were a couple of small fossil clams in the out-crop I
was chipping-away-at and no they were not Pyritized...


No other known non-man-made-metal anywhere in any direction for atleast 75
miles.


The area I refer to is also a very similar geologic setting to the area in
which the
meteorites in limestone were found in, in Sweeden.

What I considered to be the real eye-opening statistics regarding the
Sweedish findings was the the number of real, genuine meteorites recovered
from a very low number of cubic feet of limestone-host-rock.

It would have been dilligent of the researchers to mention the number of
meteor-wrongs that turned-up in that same volume of host-rock.

I too do not get excited about finding iron-nodules, meteorites on the other
hand...
different story.


Robert Szep.


- Original Message - 
From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Edward Hodges' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:20 AM
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone


 I found some iron oxide nodules, or 'spheres' in limestone in the
 Caribbean. At a certain layer in coastal cliffs of limestone strata that
 looked different (darker, coarser material with an underlying whitish
 substance, there were iron nodules embedded in the limestone. You could
 see them exposed in the layer with a frequency of 1 or 2 every 10 feet
 or so. I dug them out, along with some of the surrounding material. The
 spheres broke in 2 pieces trying to pry them out, and they are heavy,
 with a crystalline appearance, as if they went through some kind of
 metamorphosis. I do not know the age of the strata, but there are
 Jurassic and Cretaceous outcrops in those areas.
 I have never had them analyzed.

 CharlyV.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward
 Hodges
 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:04 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone

 Dear list- I have found a few iron oxide nodules in layers of Cambrien
 age
 shale while digging trilobites in Nevada. I didn't think much of it at
 the
 time. I'll have to dig them up from the garage and do a nickel test.
 It's
 and interesting subject, and there are known meteorites recovered from
 limestone. I'll try to list specific examples, I know I read about it
 recently, but cannot recall where I read it right now.The Hoba meteorite
 was
 discovered in limestone in 1928, uncertain whether it impacted a
 limestone
 strata, or has been there since before it became limestone. The was an
 immense halo surrounding it. Is it possible given it's size that it's
 been
 there for hundreds of million of years?  I frequently find nodules of
 one
 sort or another on digs, usually mineralization similar to cave pearls.
 It
 would make sense since the Earths surface is cover by more than 75%
 water.
 I'm sure meteorites landed in coral reefs on a regular basis. Thermal
 vents
 could be another possibility. These iron- oxide nodules are quite
 similar to
 the Canyon Diablo shale, or the thick shale covering a very rusted
 Nantan. If anyone has further information, please post it. - Edward

 Edward R. Hodges
 IMCA # 4173
 www.meteoriteonline.com



 From: Mark Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Robert Szep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CC: meteoritelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone - Example from
 Sweden
 Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:11:55 -0700
 
 Hi Robert
 Not sure I have close to all the answers, but metal, free metal, in a
 limestone, can only be from a few select sources. One, the first to
 mind,
 is
 vents such as black smokers. But, here we have high temps, a corrosive
 environment, and no discoloration of the limestone from other vent
 chemicals. Not a likely source. Second to mind are some very nasty
 bacteria
 which excrete free metals while digesting rock for nutrient, and are a
 possible source for gold and silver crystals (least thats some peoples
 thoughts). Next to mind is the free iron found in basalts, not basalt
 in
 the
 limestone, doubtful then that is the source. Iron and nickel, which
 shows a
 

[meteorite-list] re: daylight fireball over Wales pictures

2003-10-02 Thread Marco Langbroek
 It looks real, but then the front end of the fireball
 looks fake

That was also my first initial reaction, untill I also looked at the second
picture and thought it all over and slightly changed my mind.

As both Rob McNaught and me have pointed out on the meteorobs mailing list,
the first picture does not show the actual fireball, but might show sunlight
reflecting on the dust trail left in the bolide wake (and in this sense the
subscript on the NASA website is incorrect). Indeed, if it IS a bolide which
caused this.

One of the meteorobs subscribers discovered that there is still info from
the camera header preserved in the picture, which suggests the picture were
taken with a few minutes time inbetween on September 24th, around 18:13 UTC.

If this date is correct, a satellite or rocket debris decay is not likely. I
checked but the NASA OIG server lists only one decay for the period Sep
23-27, and that was on the previous day, on Sep 23. It concerned a very
small piece of debris from a Thor Agena rocket, NORAD # 05226 (1970-025KH).
For security I also checked with the latest orbit for this object but even
if it had survived untill sep 24th it would not have passed over this part
of Europe around the time of this picture being taken. It would anyway have
been too small to cause something of this magnitude.

- Marco


--
Marco Langbroek

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek

What seest thou else
 In the dark backward and abysm of time?

William Shakespeare
The Tempest act I scene 2
--


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Fw: on daytime fireball photographed in Wales, UK

2003-10-02 Thread Marco Langbroek
Hello,

This (below) is what Neil Bone, director of the meteor section of the
British Astr. Assoc. just wrote on IMO-news.

- Marco

- Original Message -
From: Neil Bone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Does anyone have more data on this daylight fireball? On the above
 website, the date isn't even listed :-(

 No reports of a recent daytime fireball have been received by the BAA.
 I have to say that, a superficial resemblance to paintings of the
 Sikhote-Alin event apart, the pictures look more, to me, like an
 aircraft contrail illuminated by the setting Sun...

 Neil Bone
 Director, BAA Meteor Section



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Fw: on daytime fireball photographed in Wales, UK

2003-10-02 Thread martinh
Right away, I compared the fireball pic with the S-A painting right away to see if it 
might have been used as a template. I found almost no similarities between the two. I 
also looked at the pixels of the fireball for any obvious artifacts, deliberate 
dithering, aliasing, etc. and found none. 

But I'm sure before it wound up on APID, others who know vastly more than I about 
digital imaging would have dug around the pixel porridge as well.

Cheers,

Martin

(kind of unnerving to have two vocal Martins on the list. I'm the one without the 
exclamation point following my cheers)


- Original Message -
From: Marco Langbroek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2003 4:22 am
Subject: [meteorite-list] Fw: on daytime fireball photographed in Wales, UK

 Hello,
 
 This (below) is what Neil Bone, director of the meteor section of the
 British Astr. Assoc. just wrote on IMO-news.
 
 - Marco
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Neil Bone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
entral.susx.ac.uk
  Does anyone have more data on this daylight fireball? On the above
  website, the date isn't even listed :-(
 
  No reports of a recent daytime fireball have been received by the 
 BAA. I have to say that, a superficial resemblance to paintings of 
 the Sikhote-Alin event apart, the pictures look more, to me, like an
  aircraft contrail illuminated by the setting Sun...
 
  Neil Bone
  Director, BAA Meteor Section
 
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] pf update

2003-10-02 Thread Steve Arnold, Chicago!!!
Hi list.Just an update on our PF tour.Bob and I will be down there
tomorrow the 3rd instead of the 4th.So come down and join us if you can.I
will have my cell phone on, 1-847-804-8810.Feel free to call if you like.I
hope to see more people down there.

  steve arnold, chicago

=
Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120 
I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728 
Illinois Meteorites 
website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/illinoismeteorites/
 
 



__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120 pcs in Finland?????)

2003-10-02 Thread Martin Altmann
Hi Pekka and the list,

the fossile meteorites of Kinnekulle are very macroscopic.
I couldn't find a picture in the web, so I scanned a photo from a magazine.
(SterneWeltraum, 8/2003, p.15)
The meteorite there is about 8cm x 6cm /  3.15 x 2.36 and is looking like,
well, just as a an ordinary chondrite has to look like.
I have no place to put it online,
so if somebody interested in the picture I will mail it off list.

Martin
(from now on Martin A. to avoid confusion).


- Original Message - 
From: Pekka Savolainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120
pcs in Finland?)



Hello, Martin and the list,

we have also some fossile ???micro-meteorites??? found in Finland in
sandstone,
in Koylio, some 1,4 Ga old ???  These was found in 1960,  then  confimed as
meteorites by Geological Survey of Finland and Munster university in 1998.

Some ???120 micrometeorites??? was found. Anyway, when more material was
collected, no meteorites was found at all. So in fact at the moment nobody
knows, where those 120 ??? micrometeorites??? came from, so it´s
possible, these
Koylio ???micrometeorites??? don´t exist at all. They were discretidet
later in 1990´s.

Jarmo Moilanen has a more spesific story on his site;

http://www.netppl.fi/~jarmom/geo/met/mkoyli_e.htm

I have tried to find a clear difference between a micrometeorites and
meteorites, so
if somebody has it, please, let me know. There are several very, very
small ones
listed in cataloque, but the real micrometeorites is a different thing
anyway, so the
clear description with a micrometeorite would be more than welcome.

take care,

pekka s




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] About the swedish fossile-meteorites (from the news-group archives 1997)

2003-10-02 Thread Pekka Savolainen




Some older (1997) from the news-groups.

pekka s


From: 
Keith Littleton
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
Subject: Re: News; 17 fossil meteorites in Sweden 


  

  
  


  
  

  

 Newsgroups: 
talk.origins

Date: 1997/10/11 

In Message-Id:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Just heard on the news that a researchteam from the
university of Gvteborg found 17 meteorites buried
480 million years ago at kinekulle in Sweden.
It was mentioned at the newsprogram "Dagens Eko"
by Birger Schmitz from the researchteam.

Apparently people have been finding all sorts of
meteorites in Ordovician limestones of Sweden.
For example, in the October 3, 1997 issue of
of "Science," there is:

Schmitz, B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Lindstrom, M.,
and Tassinari, M. (1997) Accretion Rates of Meteorites 
andCosmic Dust in the Early Ordovician. Science
volume 278, number 5335, pp. 88-90.

The abstract begins, "Abundant fossil meteorites in 
marine, conde
nsed Lower Ordovician limestones..." 

Other instances of fossil meteorites are discussed in 
Hansen and Berstrom (1997).  They note that the first of
the specimens was a 4-inch in diameter meteorite discovered
middle Ordovician Limestone in 1951.  It was not
described until 1981 by Thorslund and Wickman (1981).
In 1988, another swedish meteorite, called "Osterplana 1,"
was discovered in Lower Ordovician Limestone about
5 million years older and 300 miles away from the first
(Hansen and Berstrom 1997, pp. 1).

Twelve more meteorites have been found at the Thorsberg
Limestone Quarry.  Hansen and Berstrom (1997, pp. 3) state:

  "A 10-foot-thick section of the Holen ("Orthoceratite") 
   Limestone, of Early Middle Ordovician age, is extracted
   at the Thorsberg quarry and sawed into thin slabs that
   are used for windowsills and floor tile. Quarry workers
   discarded slabs with impurities, such as the meteorites,
   until Professor Maurits Lindstrom of the University of
   S
tockholm alerted them to save such slabs. The 12
   specimens were recovered between 1992 and 1996. Ten of
   the specimens were recovered from a 2-foot-thick bed of 
   limestone and may represent a single meteorite fall. The 
   other three specimens were recovered from two separate 
   levels above this layer. Seven of the specimens, collected 
   between 1993 ant 1996, are from a quarried limestone 
   volume of no more than about 127,000 cubic feet. Most 
   of the specimens are now on display at the Stiftelsen Paleo 
   Geology Center in Lidkoping, Sweden. 
   
   The Thorsberg quarry meteorites range in size from about
   0.5 to 3.5 inches in diameter and have been almost 
   completely replaced (pseudomorphosed) by calcite and
   barite. The dark, reddish brown meteorite masses look
   like iron nodules surrounded by a zone of lighter colored
   limestone and would be mistaken by many people for
   common sedimentary features. However, they contain
   grains of ch
romite and have a high iridium content, 
   among other confirming characteristics of extraterrestrial
   origin."

Reference Cited

Hasen, M. C., and Bergstrom, S. M.. 1997, Ancient
meteorites. Ohio Geology, Spring 1997. 

Further Readings from Hansen and Berstrom (1997) about
the Swedish meteorites.

Nystrom, J. O., and Wickman, F. E. (1991) The Ordovician 
  chondrite from Brunflo, central Sweden; II, Secondary
  minerals. Lithos. volume 27, number 3, pp. 167-185.

Nystrom, J. O., Lindstrom, M., and Wickman, F. E.,
  (1988) Discovery of a second Ordovician meteorite
  using chromite as a tracer. Nature. volume 336, 
  pp. 572-574. 

Schmitz, B., Lindstrom, M., Asaro, F., and Tassinari, M.,
  (1996) Geochemistry of meteorite-rich marine limestone 
  strata and fossil meteorites from the Lower Ordovician 
  at Kinnekulle, Sweden. Earth and Planetary Science 
  Letters. volume 145, pp. 31-48. 

Thorslund, Per, and Wickman, F. E. (1981) Midd
le 
  Ordovician chondrite in fossiliferous limestone from 
  Brunflo, central Sweden. Nature. volume 289, 
  pp. 285-286. 

Thorslund, Per., Wickman, F. E., and Nystrom, J. O. 
  (1984) The Ordovician chondrite from Brunflo, central
  Sweden, I. General description and primary minerals.
  Lithos. volume 17, pp. 87-100.

++ Many Other Meteorites ++

For many more cases of meteorites, see,
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/

And go to "Library: Modern Documents: Dave Matson: Young 
Earth: Specific Arguments: Meteor" at:

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth
/specific_arguments/meteor.html

Dave Matson at the above URL wrote:

   "After reviewing such difficulties, geologist Davis 
   Young (1988, p.127) tells us that, 'The chances of 
   finding a fossil meteorite in sed
imentary rocks are
   remote. It is not to be expected.' G. J. McCall, in 
   Meteorites and Their Origins (1973, p.270), said, 'The 
   lack of fossil record of true meteorites is puzzling, but
   can 

[meteorite-list] Meteor Humor

2003-10-02 Thread Teresa Moss
Hi All!

I need your help once again!  I am in the process of collecting 
jokes, comic strips, etc. regarding meteors, meteorites, comets, and 
space in general.  I am wanting to use these materials in 
presentations and workshops.  If you know of any, would you please 
send them to me or tell me where I can find them.

Thanks once again!  I appreciate your help!

Teresa
--
Teresa Moss
Director, Monnig Meteorite Gallery
Texas Christian University
Box 298830
Fort Worth, Texas  76129
Phone:  817-257-MARS (6277)
FAX:  817-257-7789
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Millions Of Pennies From Heaven

2003-10-02 Thread Ron Baalke


http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/index.ssf?/base/news-0/10651051640.xml

Millions of pennies from heaven 

Meteorite may bring out-of-world payday

By Mark Schleifstein 
nola.com (Louisiana)
October 2, 2003

The ugly chunk of tan rock that crashed through the Uptown home of Roy Fausset on
Sept. 23 was an astronomical event in more ways than one. 

No sooner had Tulane University geologist Stephen Nelson declared the rock a
meteorite than offers began pouring in to buy pieces of it at sky-high prices: $25,000
to $50,000 a chunk. 

Scientists, though less readily able to bring such large sums of
money to bear, also want to study pieces of the rock to look
for clues about the beginning of the universe some 4.6 billion
years ago. 

Among collectors, however, a much younger rock would be
worth more. If examination determines it's a mere 200
million years old and contains a specific mix of minerals and
chemicals, the meteorite may have originated from Mars, said
Tracy Gregg, a geology professor at the State University of New
York-Buffalo and chair of the Geological Society of America's planetary geology
division. 

The worth of a meteorite is like any other precious stone, Gregg said. It's related
to scarcity, and the ones worth the most are those that came from Mars. 

The going rate for a Mars rock? $1,500 per gram. Fausset's weighs well over a
pound, or more than 450 grams. 

At that rate, a troy ounce of a Mars meteorite would be worth $46,500, or about 120
times the price of pure gold at Wednesday's prices on the commodities exchange. 

Even if not from Mars, the pieces could be worth a small fortune, collectors say. 

That's why Fausset's find has been moved into a secure storage facility, he said. The
idea that a rock could be that valuable got him thinking about security quickly. 

But whether it came from Mars or dates back to the beginning of our solar system,
it's a fascinating piece of rock that tells an incredible story, Gregg said. 

Trade in meteorite chunks has skyrocketed in recent years, in part thanks to the
Internet, said Matt Morgan, a full-time geologist with the Colorado Geological
Survey and a part-time trader. 

On his Mile High Meteorites Web site, Morgan is offering tiny pieces of his varied
collection for thousands of dollars. 

For instance, a 2.294-gram fragment of a meteorite found in Buenos Aires,
Argentina, in 1979 sells for $11,470. 

I always wanted a piece of a meteorite, even when I was a child, Morgan said. 

Robert Wesel of Hillsboro, Ore., got hooked after buying a meteorite fragment at the
Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. 

At the time, I had no idea that people could own such a thing, said Wesel, a
registered nurse. 

Then he went to a gem show and discovered a kiosk selling meteorites. 

I think I spent about $4,000 with that guy on the spot, and that's what really
launched it, he said. I walked away with a price list . . . and later bought more
pieces. Then I got a computer, and in 1998 I found eBay. 

Word of meteorite finds travels quickly among dealers, he said. 

You need to keep an ear to the ground, and if you hear something, you try to ally
yourself with someone in the area or go there yourself, he said. 

In March, he heard about a meteorite strike in a Chicago suburb and, learning that
pieces of the meteorite were strewn through a large neighborhood, drove there to
scavenge. 

Everybody who collects does it for a different reason, he said. Some collect on a
map, one sample from every country. Others are trying to get an A-to-Z collection of
different types of meteorites. 

Often, pieces of meteorites end up in museum collections, despite their inability to
match the prices paid by private collectors, said Denton Ebel, a curator with the new
Arthur Ross Hall of Meteorites at the American Museum of Natural History in New
York City. 

The museum has more than 120 meteorites on display, and more than 1,250 in its
collection. 

Samples in the collection are carefully analyzed to ensure they are meteorites and to
attempt to determine their origin. 

A 30-micron-thick slice, as thin as a human hair, is cut off a sample and viewed
through a scanning electron microscope to determine the texture of the rock crystals.
Then it's examined with other instruments to find out its chemical composition. 

On the outside of most meteorites is a thin layer of black material known as a fusion
crust. 

It's essentially glass, Ebel said, the result of the outer layer of the rock melting 
as
it enters Earth's atmosphere. 

On rare occasions, eyewitnesses can provide enough evidence to determine a
meteorite's probable track through space. 

Seven or eight meteorite falls on Earth have been witnessed and photographed in
such a way that their orbits could be traced backward, and they tend to come from the
asteroid belt, he said, referring to the band of rocks circling the sun in the wide 
space
between Mars and Jupiter. 

Jupiter's gravity is so intense that it ejects some of 

Re: [meteorite-list] Millions Of Pennies From Heaven

2003-10-02 Thread Michael Farmer
Here we go, the billion dollar meteorite has appeared. This meteorite is a
chondrite, not a mars rock, nothing more. Great stone, not worth millions
much less $100,000. It looks like Park Forest all over again. I spoke to the
owner just now and have arranged a specimen to be classified. He is going to
Europe and will not discuss sale until the specimen is classified in a month
or two. So at least we all have time to relax before the feeding frenzy
starts in earnest.
Mike Farmer

- Original Message - 
From: Ron Baalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Millions Of Pennies From Heaven




 http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/index.ssf?/base/news-0/10651051640.xml

 Millions of pennies from heaven

 Meteorite may bring out-of-world payday

 By Mark Schleifstein
 nola.com (Louisiana)
 October 2, 2003

 The ugly chunk of tan rock that crashed through the Uptown home of Roy
Fausset on
 Sept. 23 was an astronomical event in more ways than one.

 No sooner had Tulane University geologist Stephen Nelson declared the rock
a
 meteorite than offers began pouring in to buy pieces of it at sky-high
prices: $25,000
 to $50,000 a chunk.

 Scientists, though less readily able to bring such large sums of
 money to bear, also want to study pieces of the rock to look
 for clues about the beginning of the universe some 4.6 billion
 years ago.

 Among collectors, however, a much younger rock would be
 worth more. If examination determines it's a mere 200
 million years old and contains a specific mix of minerals and
 chemicals, the meteorite may have originated from Mars, said
 Tracy Gregg, a geology professor at the State University of New
 York-Buffalo and chair of the Geological Society of America's planetary
geology
 division.

 The worth of a meteorite is like any other precious stone, Gregg said.
It's related
 to scarcity, and the ones worth the most are those that came from Mars.

 The going rate for a Mars rock? $1,500 per gram. Fausset's weighs well
over a
 pound, or more than 450 grams.

 At that rate, a troy ounce of a Mars meteorite would be worth $46,500, or
about 120
 times the price of pure gold at Wednesday's prices on the commodities
exchange.

 Even if not from Mars, the pieces could be worth a small fortune,
collectors say.

 That's why Fausset's find has been moved into a secure storage facility,
he said. The
 idea that a rock could be that valuable got him thinking about security
quickly.

 But whether it came from Mars or dates back to the beginning of our solar
system,
 it's a fascinating piece of rock that tells an incredible story, Gregg
said.

 Trade in meteorite chunks has skyrocketed in recent years, in part thanks
to the
 Internet, said Matt Morgan, a full-time geologist with the Colorado
Geological
 Survey and a part-time trader.

 On his Mile High Meteorites Web site, Morgan is offering tiny pieces of
his varied
 collection for thousands of dollars.

 For instance, a 2.294-gram fragment of a meteorite found in Buenos Aires,
 Argentina, in 1979 sells for $11,470.

 I always wanted a piece of a meteorite, even when I was a child, Morgan
said.

 Robert Wesel of Hillsboro, Ore., got hooked after buying a meteorite
fragment at the
 Oregon Museum of Science and Industry.

 At the time, I had no idea that people could own such a thing, said
Wesel, a
 registered nurse.

 Then he went to a gem show and discovered a kiosk selling meteorites.

 I think I spent about $4,000 with that guy on the spot, and that's what
really
 launched it, he said. I walked away with a price list . . . and later
bought more
 pieces. Then I got a computer, and in 1998 I found eBay.

 Word of meteorite finds travels quickly among dealers, he said.

 You need to keep an ear to the ground, and if you hear something, you try
to ally
 yourself with someone in the area or go there yourself, he said.

 In March, he heard about a meteorite strike in a Chicago suburb and,
learning that
 pieces of the meteorite were strewn through a large neighborhood, drove
there to
 scavenge.

 Everybody who collects does it for a different reason, he said. Some
collect on a
 map, one sample from every country. Others are trying to get an A-to-Z
collection of
 different types of meteorites.

 Often, pieces of meteorites end up in museum collections, despite their
inability to
 match the prices paid by private collectors, said Denton Ebel, a curator
with the new
 Arthur Ross Hall of Meteorites at the American Museum of Natural History
in New
 York City.

 The museum has more than 120 meteorites on display, and more than 1,250 in
its
 collection.

 Samples in the collection are carefully analyzed to ensure they are
meteorites and to
 attempt to determine their origin.

 A 30-micron-thick slice, as thin as a human hair, is cut off a sample and
viewed
 through a scanning electron microscope to determine the texture of the
rock crystals.
 Then it's examined 

[meteorite-list] new ebay auctions

2003-10-02 Thread Moritz Karl








Hi Everybody!



I have listed some new ebay auctions today.

I will be adding some more tomorrow.

Have fun with them.

Here is the link:



http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/meteoriten/



Best Regards



Moritz Karl

Gutzkowstr. 77

60594 Frankfurt

Germany



www.m3t3orites.com

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



IMCA #0818










[meteorite-list] asteroid/meteor/meteorite cartoons - a couple links

2003-10-02 Thread Matson, Robert
Hi Teresa,

A search of Google provides a few asteroid/meteor cartoons:

http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/earth/waton/f9912.html

http://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/m/meteor.asp

--Rob

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120 pcs in Finland?????)

2003-10-02 Thread Pekka Savolainen
Hello, Martin and the list,

we have also some fossile ???micro-meteorites??? found in Finland in 
sandstone,
in Koylio, some 1,4 Ga old ???  These was found in 1960,  then  confimed as
meteorites by Geological Survey of Finland and Munster university in 1998.

Some ???120 micrometeorites??? was found. Anyway, when more material was
collected, no meteorites was found at all. So in fact at the moment nobody
knows, where those 120 ??? micrometeorites??? came from, so it´s 
possible, these
Koylio ???micrometeorites??? don´t exist at all. They were discretidet 
later in 1990´s.

Jarmo Moilanen has a more spesific story on his site;

http://www.netppl.fi/~jarmom/geo/met/mkoyli_e.htm

I have tried to find a clear difference between a micrometeorites and 
meteorites, so
if somebody has it, please, let me know. There are several very, very 
small ones
listed in cataloque, but the real micrometeorites is a different thing 
anyway, so the
clear description with a micrometeorite would be more than welcome.

take care,

pekka s



Martin Altmann wrote:

Hi,

there were found 55 fossile meteorites in limestone in five different
quarries in South Sweden,
more than 40 of them in the Thorsberg quarry in Kinnekulle.
The quarries a distributed in an area of 300 miles and the layers in that
limstone formed in a span of 2 million years 480 million years ago, so that
the meteorites don't stem from a single event,
but surprisingly they are all of the same type. L-chondrites.
They are quite well preserved, I have a picture here and chondrules are
easily visible.
See a report here:
http://www.rice.edu/projects/reno/Newsrel/2003/20030508_meteorite.shtml
Martin

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
--



Pekka Savolainen
Jokiharjuntie 4
FIN-71330 Rasala
FINLAND
+ 358 400 818 912

Group Home Page: http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/eurocoin
Group Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Indian Meteorite- anyone going-Travel WARNING for the area.

2003-10-02 Thread almitt
Hi Dave and all,

I can personally vouch for Atul's sincerity and kindness and just wanting to help
anyone wanting to go over there and hunt. It never hurts to have contacts and I know
that Atul's only motivation was and is for peoples safety as well as getting them to
the fall more effectively. Every country has it protocols and customs (drinking goat
milk or was that eating goat meat, was it goat meat?? :-) and it is a good idea to
know them if you go there. Better to have friends helping you out than have something
bad happen trying to track meteorites down. It can sometimes be dangerous.

Atul is a collector/aficionado and has bought some nice specimens from me and educates
with them. I know the Calumet Astronomical Society thinks highly of him as well.

I agree Dave that if the hunters planned to go they would have had the tickets bought
but it still wouldn't be too late to contact Atul and let him help you out. Many of
the hunters check the mailing list from remote sites. All my best!

--AL


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] eBAy ad - delete if necessary

2003-10-02 Thread Dave Harris
Hullo,
Again, another eBay ad - sorry it  so non-contributary to the list... but
here we go again - a micro of rare stuff for those who collect micros!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=3239item=2194937615 



Thanks for your patience



dave



IMCA #0092

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120 pcs in Finland?????)

2003-10-02 Thread Pekka Savolainen
Hello, Martin A. and the list.

and thank you for the pic, Martin A. Well, these are really
not micrometeorites.
I put the pic on the  net;

http://www.dlc.fi/~nuuska/kinnekulle.jpg

just to save time and trouble from Martin, hope this is ok.
If not, Martin, please, let me know, and I´ll remove the pic.
I thik, this is a beaty worth to share. I also  aggree with Bjorn,
these should be listed as a real find in the cataloque.
take care,

pekka s



Martin Altmann wrote:

Hi Pekka and the list,

the fossile meteorites of Kinnekulle are very macroscopic.
I couldn't find a picture in the web, so I scanned a photo from a magazine.
(SterneWeltraum, 8/2003, p.15)
The meteorite there is about 8cm x 6cm /  3.15 x 2.36 and is looking like,
well, just as a an ordinary chondrite has to look like.
I have no place to put it online,
so if somebody interested in the picture I will mail it off list.
Martin
(from now on Martin A. to avoid confusion).
- Original Message - 
From: Pekka Savolainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120
pcs in Finland?)



Hello, Martin and the list,

we have also some fossile ???micro-meteorites??? found in Finland in
sandstone,
in Koylio, some 1,4 Ga old ???  These was found in 1960,  then  confimed as
meteorites by Geological Survey of Finland and Munster university in 1998.
Some ???120 micrometeorites??? was found. Anyway, when more material was
collected, no meteorites was found at all. So in fact at the moment nobody
knows, where those 120 ??? micrometeorites??? came from, so it´s
possible, these
Koylio ???micrometeorites??? don´t exist at all. They were discretidet
later in 1990´s.
Jarmo Moilanen has a more spesific story on his site;

http://www.netppl.fi/~jarmom/geo/met/mkoyli_e.htm

I have tried to find a clear difference between a micrometeorites and
meteorites, so
if somebody has it, please, let me know. There are several very, very
small ones
listed in cataloque, but the real micrometeorites is a different thing
anyway, so the
clear description with a micrometeorite would be more than welcome.
take care,

pekka s



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
--



Pekka Savolainen
Jokiharjuntie 4
FIN-71330 Rasala
FINLAND
+ 358 400 818 912

Group Home Page: http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/eurocoin
Group Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Large Meteorite Found In Sweden

2003-10-02 Thread Pekka Savolainen
Hello, Bjorn and the list,

well, I usually use the cataloque as a base. Just tried to get
some sense to the quantities of the swedish meteorites
published in the swedsih  and international press. Suppose,
the data was given by the swedish NHM.  

I gladly aggree with Mrs Grady and the cataloque, except
what comes to Marjalahti. It´s not a russian one.It felt to
the Grand Duchy of Finland,  to the area, which 1917 became
a part of  independent Finland. Also the finder and the
witness of the fall was pure finn, Mr Koppinen. After 2 wars
the USSR had the area, but not the meteorite, so it´s a finnish
one...;-
http://www.netppl.fi/~jarmom/geo/met/mmarja_e.htm

take care.

pekka s



Bjørn Sørheim wrote:

Pekka  The List,
I think we must use Monica Grady et. al. and the 
recent 'Catalogue of Meteorites' as the definite authority
of what constitute a meteorite fall/find or not...

--



Pekka Savolainen
Jokiharjuntie 4
FIN-71330 Rasala
FINLAND
+ 358 400 818 912

Group Home Page: http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/eurocoin
Group Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Millions Of Pennies From Heaven

2003-10-02 Thread Steve Schoner
Maybe all of the hoopla will motivate him to put on a
wet suit and a mask and dig up the rest that is, as
you say sitting in sewage water.

Steve Schoner

(Such pieces could be sold at latrine low prices,
compared to the others that are not so crappy)


--- Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Here we go, the billion dollar meteorite has
 appeared. This meteorite is a
 chondrite, not a mars rock, nothing more. Great
 stone, not worth millions
 much less $100,000. It looks like Park Forest all
 over again. I spoke to the
 owner just now and have arranged a specimen to be
 classified. He is going to
 Europe and will not discuss sale until the specimen
 is classified in a month
 or two. So at least we all have time to relax before
 the feeding frenzy
 starts in earnest.
 Mike Farmer
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Ron Baalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Meteorite Mailing List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:03 AM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Millions Of Pennies From
 Heaven
 
 
 
 
 

http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/index.ssf?/base/news-0/10651051640.xml
 
  Millions of pennies from heaven
 
  Meteorite may bring out-of-world payday
 
  By Mark Schleifstein
  nola.com (Louisiana)
  October 2, 2003
 
  The ugly chunk of tan rock that crashed through
 the Uptown home of Roy
 Fausset on
  Sept. 23 was an astronomical event in more ways
 than one.
 
  No sooner had Tulane University geologist Stephen
 Nelson declared the rock
 a
  meteorite than offers began pouring in to buy
 pieces of it at sky-high
 prices: $25,000
  to $50,000 a chunk.
 
  Scientists, though less readily able to bring such
 large sums of
  money to bear, also want to study pieces of the
 rock to look
  for clues about the beginning of the universe some
 4.6 billion
  years ago.
 
  Among collectors, however, a much younger rock
 would be
  worth more. If examination determines it's a mere
 200
  million years old and contains a specific mix of
 minerals and
  chemicals, the meteorite may have originated from
 Mars, said
  Tracy Gregg, a geology professor at the State
 University of New
  York-Buffalo and chair of the Geological Society
 of America's planetary
 geology
  division.
 
  The worth of a meteorite is like any other
 precious stone, Gregg said.
 It's related
  to scarcity, and the ones worth the most are those
 that came from Mars.
 
  The going rate for a Mars rock? $1,500 per gram.
 Fausset's weighs well
 over a
  pound, or more than 450 grams.
 
  At that rate, a troy ounce of a Mars meteorite
 would be worth $46,500, or
 about 120
  times the price of pure gold at Wednesday's prices
 on the commodities
 exchange.
 
  Even if not from Mars, the pieces could be worth a
 small fortune,
 collectors say.
 
  That's why Fausset's find has been moved into a
 secure storage facility,
 he said. The
  idea that a rock could be that valuable got him
 thinking about security
 quickly.
 
  But whether it came from Mars or dates back to
 the beginning of our solar
 system,
  it's a fascinating piece of rock that tells an
 incredible story, Gregg
 said.
 
  Trade in meteorite chunks has skyrocketed in
 recent years, in part thanks
 to the
  Internet, said Matt Morgan, a full-time geologist
 with the Colorado
 Geological
  Survey and a part-time trader.
 
  On his Mile High Meteorites Web site, Morgan is
 offering tiny pieces of
 his varied
  collection for thousands of dollars.
 
  For instance, a 2.294-gram fragment of a meteorite
 found in Buenos Aires,
  Argentina, in 1979 sells for $11,470.
 
  I always wanted a piece of a meteorite, even when
 I was a child, Morgan
 said.
 
  Robert Wesel of Hillsboro, Ore., got hooked after
 buying a meteorite
 fragment at the
  Oregon Museum of Science and Industry.
 
  At the time, I had no idea that people could own
 such a thing, said
 Wesel, a
  registered nurse.
 
  Then he went to a gem show and discovered a kiosk
 selling meteorites.
 
  I think I spent about $4,000 with that guy on the
 spot, and that's what
 really
  launched it, he said. I walked away with a price
 list . . . and later
 bought more
  pieces. Then I got a computer, and in 1998 I found
 eBay.
 
  Word of meteorite finds travels quickly among
 dealers, he said.
 
  You need to keep an ear to the ground, and if you
 hear something, you try
 to ally
  yourself with someone in the area or go there
 yourself, he said.
 
  In March, he heard about a meteorite strike in a
 Chicago suburb and,
 learning that
  pieces of the meteorite were strewn through a
 large neighborhood, drove
 there to
  scavenge.
 
  Everybody who collects does it for a different
 reason, he said. Some
 collect on a
  map, one sample from every country. Others are
 trying to get an A-to-Z
 collection of
  different types of meteorites.
 
  Often, pieces of meteorites end up in museum
 collections, despite their
 inability to
  match the prices paid by private collectors, said
 Denton Ebel, a curator
 with the new
  Arthur Ross Hall 

[meteorite-list] Closest Asteroid Yet Flies Past Earth (Asteroid 2003 SQ222)

2003-10-02 Thread Ron Baalke

This object is listed on our Earth Close Approach Tables:

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/close.html

2003 SQ222 passed by the Earth at 0.2 lunar distances. It is only
about 3 to 6 meters in diameter.

Ron Baalke

--


http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns4228

Closest asteroid yet flies past Earth
Jeff Hecht
New Scientist
October 2, 2003

An asteroid about the size of a small house passed just 88,000 kilometres
from the Earth by on Saturday 27 September - the closest approach of a
natural object ever recorded. Geostationary communication satellites circle
the Earth 42,000km from the planet's centre.

The asteroid, designated 2003 SQ222, came from inside the Earth's orbit and
so was only spotted after it had whizzed by. The first sighting was on
Sunday 28 by the Lowell Observatory Near-Earth Object Search program in
Arizona, US.

Amateur astronomer Peter Birtwhistle of Great Shefford, Berkshire, UK, then
photographed it on Monday 29. This provided data that helped Brian Marsden,
of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, to calculate its orbit.

The asteroid's 1.85-year orbit is quite eccentric, indicating it cannot be a
man-made object, Marsden says. He estimates the asteroid measured less than
10 metres. This is too small to have posed a danger to Earth, although it
would have made a spectacular

The passage came at about 2300 GMT, only 10 hours after a bright fireball
streaked over the Orissa region of India. Indian villagers have found pieces
of the meteorite, which reportedly cause two house fires. However, this
event was not connected to the fly past of 2003 SQ222, says Marsden.

The previous record for closest approach of an asteroid - 108,000km measured
from the centre of the Earth - was set in 1994 by another 10m object named
1994 XM1.

But the third-closest approach - at 120,000km - was object 2002 MN, which
was about 80m in diameter. If on target, that could have exploded in the
Earth's lower atmosphere and devastated a couple of thousand square
kilometres on the ground.

Another small asteroid, 2003 SW130, missed the Earth by 160,000km on 19
September, making it a busy month for asteroid watchers.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Did Comets Make Life On Earth Possible?

2003-10-02 Thread Ron Baalke


http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/10/1002_031002_cometstudy.html

Did Comets Make Life On Earth Possible?
Stefan Lovgren
National Geographic News
October 2, 2003

An ambitious new NASA research project aims to answer perhaps
the most vexing and profound of scientific mysteries: How did life on
Earth begin? 

The multimillion-dollar undertaking, led by the NASA Goddard Space
Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, brings together an
interdisciplinary team of scientists from around the world to study
how organic molecules are created in interstellar clouds and delivered
to planets as they form. 

The research will focus on the role of comets. Many scientists believe
there is increasing evidence that comets supplied at least part of the
raw material for the origin of life on Earth. The theory is changing the
way scientists think about life in the universe and raises the
possibility of alien worlds. 

Our mission is to gain a greater understanding of the origin and
evolution of organic material on Earth, said Michael Mumma, a
comet expert and director of the Goddard Center for Astrobiology,
NASA Astrobiology Institute, who is leading the research. The key
question is: Were water and organic molecules delivered to Earth by
cometary impact and does [that process] extend to planets
elsewhere? 

Dirty Snowballs 

Astronomers believe that stars, planets, and comets form in a
massive chain reaction that begins when a cloud of interstellar
material collapses under its own gravity. Some of the material forms
the star-like our sun-and some of it gets spread out in a disk around
the nascent star. 

Some material in this disk later aggregates and forms planets. Close
to the sun, where it's warm, leftover debris (rocky material) turns
into asteroids. In the outer regions, where it's cold, icy chunks of rock
and dust turn into comets. 

It is generally believed that organic molecules, which contain carbon
atoms and are present in all life forms known to science, are trapped
in large amounts in both interstellar clouds and comets. 

We have extremely definite evidence from our radio observations
that there's quite an array of organic molecules in interstellar space,
said Bill Irvine, a professor of astronomy at the University of
Massachusetts in Amherst, who is measuring radio waves from
celestial objects as part of the research effort. 

There's other evidence that comets contain organic material. When
European spacecraft analyzed dust particles from the Halley comet in
1986, it turned out to be some of the most organic-rich material
measured in the solar system. Meteorites that have hit Earth contain
a whole suite of molecules, including amino acids, which play an
important role in terrestrial biology. 

If such material exists in meteorites, which come from a class of
asteroids, there's every reason to think it must also exist in comets,
Irvine said. 

Panspermia Goes Primordial 

Most scientists have long believed that life on Earth began as a
primordial soup in a lake or pond some four billion years ago.
According to this theory, chemicals from the atmosphere combined
with some form of energy necessary to make amino acids-the
building blocks of proteins-to create the first primitive organisms,
kicking off the evolution of Earth's species. 

But the primordial soup theory is being increasingly disputed. Many
geophysicists now say the Earth did not have enough gases, like
ammonia and methane, from which organic material like amino acids
could be produced. 

Instead, a growing cadre of scientists believes the organic material
needed to create life may not have been produced on Earth, but was
instead brought here by comets. The newly formed Earth was likely
subjected to a fierce bombardment of comets four billion years ago.
These comets may have brought with them the organic compounds
that later evolved into living matter. 

According to the most radical theory, known as panspermia, life in a
ready-made form is ubiquitous in the galaxy and is brought by comets
to new planets. Few scientists subscribe to this hypothesis,
however. 

Perhaps the main question is whether organic molecules can survive
space travel or if they break up and contribute the atoms that are
necessary to ultimately make biological material and water? 

Our museums contain examples of primitive meteorites that likely
are very similar to the material delivered by comets, said Mumma.
The key point is that small bodies deliver their organics intact to
Earth's surface. This must have been a common event on the early
Earth. 

Many scientists are now leaning toward a combination of the comet
impact theory and the primordial soup thesis. Some chemical building
blocks may have come from comets, but the assembly into life took
place on Earth. 

The comet impact theory fits in with the primordial soup theory,
Mumma said. They can be complimentary. 

Drilling Into Comets 

Scientists will measure the molecular make-up of comets to better
understand 

[meteorite-list] Fossil Meteorites

2003-10-02 Thread E.J
If memory serves, the petography of the Swedish  fossil meteorites 
(Thorsberg/Kinnekulle) (480mya) was altered/ replaced (chemically).  
Most of their original chemistry is gone, being  true fossils,  their 
physical form was retained.  Someone  noted here that while the 
meteorites had been largely replaced by calcite and barite, traces of 
chromite and iridium were found within.  Bernd has posted the studies on 
this once before (1999?).  I wonder if chondrities were found else small 
blebs of serpentine.

Lake Murray, Oklahoma, US-- at 150 million years, is the meteorite with 
oldest known terrestrial age. It was found in situ in limestone where it 
landed.  A large portion of it is meteoric shale however the core is 
still bears a remarkable amount of metal and preserved Widmanstatten 
features. The T-age is consistent with the age of the strata, I believe.

Someone mentioned Hoba,  it is resting in limestone bedrock within the 
pit it excavated upon landing.

In my days on Ebay before I was this poor even, there was an auction for 
an apparent fossil meteorite impact channel and all-- in cross section 
(offered but failed to meet reserve).  The 2-3 inch wide nugget was at 
the bottom of an apparent 10-8 inch long impact channel made while the 
very fine ooze was still mucky.  The cavity had several heart-valve 
appearing trap doors.  They looked like partial refilling of the ooze 
after the meteorite had passed.  The owner never relisted it and the 
where abouts are unknown.  The 3-D exposure  was far more dynamic than 
the any simulation ever has been.

In one of my many  idle projects, I have two specimens recovered from 
the Eastern PA anthracite field which have some halmarks of  a 
meteorite.  They are stored away awaiting some researcher taking them 
on. (hint, hint)

Regards,
Elton
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Mystery Meteorite

2003-10-02 Thread MARSROX


The H.H.Nininger Collection of Meteorites(1933 version)lists a meteorite that I find no where else in the literature. It'll be obvious to many on the list why I would like to know about this.

"Ollague, Bolivia, South America. Pallasite. P. Found 1924. Known Wt. 6.66 Kgs. Specimen:146a. 376 grams."

Any information will be appreciated.

Thank you,

Kevin Kichinka


Re: [meteorite-list] About the swedish fossile-meteorites (from the news-group archives 1997)

2003-10-02 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi,

Omigod! The Nakhla Mollusk! Did anyone actually see this Mollusk
being struck by the meteorite? Or is this merely a hysterical rumor
being spread far and wide in the Mollusk community?

Sterling K. Webb


Pekka Savolainen wrote:

  If the odds were not bent enough,
it appears that the meteorite hit an
  Ordovician mollusk
which is fossilized in conjunction with the meteorite!
(Spratt and Stephens, 1992, p.53)



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Indian Meteorite- anyone going-Travel WARNING for the area.

2003-10-02 Thread Ron Hartman
The Indian government has a publication (a copy of which I obtained from
Mike Farmer) on that country's archive of meteorites for research.  In it
they state the gvt. policy that all meteorites found in that country are
property of the gvt. BY LAW and can be traded only by their research
facilities.   Anyone have an update on this policy?

Ron Hartman

- Original Message -
From: almitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Atul Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Indian Meteorite- anyone going-Travel WARNING
for the area.


 Hi Dave and all,

 I can personally vouch for Atul's sincerity and kindness and just wanting
to help
 anyone wanting to go over there and hunt. It never hurts to have contacts
and I know
 that Atul's only motivation was and is for peoples safety as well as
getting them to
 the fall more effectively. Every country has it protocols and customs
(drinking goat
 milk or was that eating goat meat, was it goat meat?? :-) and it is a good
idea to
 know them if you go there. Better to have friends helping you out than
have something
 bad happen trying to track meteorites down. It can sometimes be dangerous.

 Atul is a collector/aficionado and has bought some nice specimens from me
and educates
 with them. I know the Calumet Astronomical Society thinks highly of him as
well.

 I agree Dave that if the hunters planned to go they would have had the
tickets bought
 but it still wouldn't be too late to contact Atul and let him help you
out. Many of
 the hunters check the mailing list from remote sites. All my best!

 --AL


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120 pcs in Finland?????)

2003-10-02 Thread Martin Altmann
Hi Pekka,

many thanks for putting the picture online!
http://www.dlc.fi/~nuuska/kinnekulle.jpg

It's fascinating - I think now the problem of the conservation of meteorites
is solved:
Just throw your collections in the next ocean or lake.

Martin A.

- Original Message - 
From: Pekka Savolainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120
pcs in Finland?)



Hello, Martin A. and the list.

and thank you for the pic, Martin A. Well, these are really
not micrometeorites.

I put the pic on the  net;

http://www.dlc.fi/~nuuska/kinnekulle.jpg

just to save time and trouble from Martin, hope this is ok.
If not, Martin, please, let me know, and I´ll remove the pic.

I thik, this is a beaty worth to share. I also  aggree with Bjorn,
these should be listed as a real find in the cataloque.


take care,

pekka s



Martin Altmann wrote:

Hi Pekka and the list,

the fossile meteorites of Kinnekulle are very macroscopic.
I couldn't find a picture in the web, so I scanned a photo from a magazine.
(SterneWeltraum, 8/2003, p.15)
The meteorite there is about 8cm x 6cm /  3.15 x 2.36 and is looking
like,
well, just as a an ordinary chondrite has to look like.
I have no place to put it online,
so if somebody interested in the picture I will mail it off list.

Martin
(from now on Martin A. to avoid confusion).


- Original Message - 
From: Pekka Savolainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites in limestone (or in sandstone, 120
pcs in Finland?)



Hello, Martin and the list,

we have also some fossile ???micro-meteorites??? found in Finland in
sandstone,
in Koylio, some 1,4 Ga old ???  These was found in 1960,  then  confimed as
meteorites by Geological Survey of Finland and Munster university in 1998.

Some ???120 micrometeorites??? was found. Anyway, when more material was
collected, no meteorites was found at all. So in fact at the moment nobody
knows, where those 120 ??? micrometeorites??? came from, so it´s
possible, these
Koylio ???micrometeorites??? don´t exist at all. They were discretidet
later in 1990´s.

Jarmo Moilanen has a more spesific story on his site;

http://www.netppl.fi/~jarmom/geo/met/mkoyli_e.htm

I have tried to find a clear difference between a micrometeorites and
meteorites, so
if somebody has it, please, let me know. There are several very, very
small ones
listed in cataloque, but the real micrometeorites is a different thing
anyway, so the
clear description with a micrometeorite would be more than welcome.

take care,

pekka s




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


-- 




Pekka Savolainen
Jokiharjuntie 4
FIN-71330 Rasala
FINLAND

+ 358 400 818 912

Group Home Page: http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/eurocoin
Group Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Large Meteorite Found In Sweden

2003-10-02 Thread Bjørn Sørheim
Pekka  The List,
I think we must use Monica Grady et. al. and the 
recent 'Catalogue of Meteorites' as the definite authority
of what constitute a meteorite fall/find or not.
Brunflo and Osterplana is included in the Catalogue.
As seems to be indicated by other postings here, there are other
quarries where there are fossile meteorites in Sweden. They should 
be included as seperate entities if it is possible to indetify their
mineralogy as separate falls.
In an international discussion of meteorites, no country can choose
their own individual criteria for what is a meteorite or not.
I don't see a clear sign that Sweden has done that either...

Another thing that puzzles me is why on the page on the link to swedish
meteorites you have supplied (which I have known for some time),
http://www.nrm.se/mi/swemet.html.en
Muonionalusta is numbered I-IV...!

Why, does this mean 'Muonionalusta' is four (or now five and even more)
(totally) different iron meteorites??
The entry in the 'Catalogue of Meteorites' does in no way
indicate this:

'A mass of 7.5kg was found 2.5 miles WSW of Kitkiojärvi in Muonionalusta.
Description, with an analysis, 8.02 %Ni, A.G. Högbom (1908).
Measurements of the Widmanstätten figures on two pieces suggest tetragonal
rather than cubic symmetry, D. Malmqvist (1948).
A second mass of 15kg was found in 1946, and a third of 6.2kg in 1963,
F.E. Wickman (1964).
A fourth piece was recovered in 1988 (approx 6 kg), Lagerbäck and Wickman
(1997).
Analysis, 8.42 %Ni, 2.24 ppm.Ga, 0.133 ppm.Ge, 1.6 ppm.Ir, R. Schaudy et al.
(1972).
Description; weathered, V.F. Buchwald (1975).
Cooling rate, K.L. Rasmussen et al. (1995).'

Regards,
Bjørn Sørheim


At 01:10 02.10.03 +0300, you wrote:

Hello, Bjorn and the list,

the swedish NHM calculates all 4 Muonionalusta founds + now this as
different ones, numbered I, II, III and IV (V?). Brunflo and Österplana
are fossile-meteorites, and they are listed in another category by NHM,
so the total by them is as follows;


  1. Hessle 1869
  2. Ställdalen 1876
  3. Lundsgård 1889
  4. Hedeskoga 1922
  5. Lillaverke 1930
  6. Ekeby 1939
  7. Hallingeberg 1944
  8. Långhalsen 1947
  9. Hökmark 1954
10. Näs (1907)
11. Ultuna (1944)

12-15. Muonionalusta I-IV  first found (1906)
16. Föllinge (1932) 


Fossilisied ones;

17. Brunflo
18. Österplana (several)

So if we use this listing, we have 16 + 2. Cataloque of  Meteorites
lists all Muonionalustas as one find, so with this listing we have 13
+ 2, so in fact both are correct. If Ultuna + Hessle will be counted
as paired, we have that 9 during the last 100 years, if not, we have
10. If we count also the fossilised ones, we have 11 or 12 in case
we count Muonionalusta as one find. Just at least to ways to list
the falls and finds in Sweden.

The first link (Kuriren) was to the small newspaper from north, and
there is a mistake, no doubt.

You have right with Bjurbole, it´s more than possible, that several
tens of kg:s was taken by the local people during the recovery, so
the real total may be well over 350 kg:s. By the way, this one is the
only real trough ice -case as far as I know. Have tried to find also
others, but no luck this far.

The counting of the falls and finds may be difficult some times. In
Finland we count Marjalahti as a finnish fall, cataloque lists it as a
russian one. The fact is, the Marjalahti village was lost to USSR during
the WW II, so to me it looks clear, Marjalahti (1902) is a genuine
finnish one. That´s why the cataloque lists the total falls and finds in
Finland as 12, but the finnish NHM (and me too...;-) as 13.

It´s also more than possible, also Muonionalusta pieces can be found
in Finland. The nearest found is located some 3 km:s from the border
between Sweden and Finland. The direction of the ice during the last
Ice Age was from north-west to south-east and from north to south
on the area Muonionalustas has been found. Just wondering, if these
pieces one day will be found in Finland, how they will be listed...;-


take care,

pekka s




Bjørn Sørheim wrote:

Hello Pekka  List,
16??, Which one is the 16th, has there been one in the last years -
after Osterplana(1987) that is?
The last version of the Catalogue of Meteorites (2000) says there
are 15 meteorites found in total in Sweden (finds or falls), so does
the CD version (when choosing 'Valid' finds). When not choosing
'Valid' you get 19 items, the additional 4 are hoaxes, pseudometeorites etc. 

When you first posted about this new 158 kg find you cited the URL:
http://www.kuriren.nu/default.asp?TargetForm=/utmatningssidan.aspArticleID=
354789CategoryID=2764ArticleStateID=2ClientID=0
In this swedish newspaper article you find this statement (swedish again):
'Det tilhor ovanligheterna med meteoritfynd i Sverige. Sedan 1800-talets 
borjan har bara nio stycken hittas'.
In English this translates to:
'Findings of meteorites belongs to the unusual in Sweden. Since the start
of the 1800s only nine meteorites have been found'.
This is for sure 

[meteorite-list] Re: Possible Meteors from Mars?

2003-10-02 Thread Marco Langbroek
A recent thread on the meteorite-list suggested a possible martian
 meteoroid stream with a maximum on October 3rd. List member Steve Schoner
 suggested this, and pointed out that two famous martian meteorite falls,
 Chassigny (1815), and Zagami (1962) fell on this date. No location of a
 possible radiant was given, but maybe someone on this last can calculate
 a theoretical radiant.

I like the idea, but the point is, I cannot conceive of any kind of orbital
mechanics that would deliver Martian meteorites to earth in the form of a
concise stream. A stream results when debris is trailing a parent object in
similar orbits, e.g. trailing an (near-earth orbit) asteroid or comet.
Ordinary meteorites can have an origin in a near-earth asteroid. But Martian
meteorites by definition do not. It is debris thrown away from the Martian
surface in presumably widely varying trajectories. I cannot conceive of any
mechanism which would cause this to form a compact stream. It would require
an asteroid-sized body of SNC composition in a Near Earth orbit with debris
originating on this body (and not Mars itself) trailing it and I don't see
how that would be possible, for debris originating from an impact on Mars.
If SNC meteorites would really form a stream, then this in fact might
indicate that Mars is NOT their parent object. Unless someone from the
impact-scientists can point out the likelyness of an impact on Mars throwing
a significantly *large* body (i.e. asteroid size) into a NEA orbit. Just my
2 cents worth of thoughts on this. Comments welcome.

- Marco

PS: I fully second the call to be alert for fireballs these days. There is
something odd with these late september-early october fireballs over the
years. Only observational data can determine whether it is a stream.

--
Marco Langbroek
Leiden, the Netherlands
52.15896 N, 4.48884 E (WGS 84)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek
--



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] About the swedish fossile-meteorites (from the news-group archives 1997)

2003-10-02 Thread j . divelbiss
What rumor? We are serious about such things. It is more likely this type of 
voracious mollusk swallowed the meteoroid by mistake, and then ended up with 
a blockage in its' bowel that just wouldn't clear.  

Most of the bulky mollusk in those days probably could take a direct impact 
hit...almost like water off its' back you might say. I like the swallowing 
theory a little more.

Feeling the same pain on occasion,

John

 
 Hi,
 
 Omigod! The Nakhla Mollusk! Did anyone actually see this Mollusk
 being struck by the meteorite? Or is this merely a hysterical rumor
 being spread far and wide in the Mollusk community?
 
 Sterling K. Webb
 
 
 Pekka Savolainen wrote:
 
   If the odds were not bent enough,
 it appears that the meteorite hit an
   Ordovician mollusk
 which is fossilized in conjunction with the meteorite!
 (Spratt and Stephens, 1992, p.53)
 
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Indian Meteorite- anyone going-Travel WARNING for the area.

2003-10-02 Thread joseph_town
Yeah right. Russia has the same policy

Bill Kieskowski

 The Indian government has a publication (a copy of which I obtained from
 Mike Farmer) on that country's archive of meteorites for research.  In it
 they state the gvt. policy that all meteorites found in that country are
 property of the gvt. BY LAW and can be traded only by their research
 facilities.   Anyone have an update on this policy?
 
 Ron Hartman
 
 - Original Message -
 From: almitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: David Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Atul Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:22 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Indian Meteorite- anyone going-Travel WARNING
 for the area.
 
 
  Hi Dave and all,
 
  I can personally vouch for Atul's sincerity and kindness and just wanting
 to help
  anyone wanting to go over there and hunt. It never hurts to have contacts
 and I know
  that Atul's only motivation was and is for peoples safety as well as
 getting them to
  the fall more effectively. Every country has it protocols and customs
 (drinking goat
  milk or was that eating goat meat, was it goat meat?? :-) and it is a good
 idea to
  know them if you go there. Better to have friends helping you out than
 have something
  bad happen trying to track meteorites down. It can sometimes be dangerous.
 
  Atul is a collector/aficionado and has bought some nice specimens from me
 and educates
  with them. I know the Calumet Astronomical Society thinks highly of him as
 well.
 
  I agree Dave that if the hunters planned to go they would have had the
 tickets bought
  but it still wouldn't be too late to contact Atul and let him help you
 out. Many of
  the hunters check the mailing list from remote sites. All my best!
 
  --AL
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] October MeteoriteTimes Now Up

2003-10-02 Thread Paul Harris
Hello Everyone!

MeteoriteTimes for October is now up.
As always a big thank you to all the writers who make it possible.
Just a reminder that all previous Months are on-line under the Back Links 
link at the top of the page.
Also, all previous articles are indexed on-line under the Article Index 
link at the top of the page.  We
have 18 months of articles on-line now.

http://www.meteoritetimes.com/

Enjoy!

Paul and Jim

**
  Paul Harris   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Jim Tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  The Meteorite Exchange, Inc.  http://www.meteorite.com
  MeteoriteTimes.com http://www.meteoritetimes.com
  PMB#455 P.O. Box 7000, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 USA
***


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list