Nice!
Are they polished? If they are, up to what grit?
Will there be any polarized pics to hope for?
Cheers,
Pete
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 011 Pairing photo
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:15:11 -0700
Here is a
Congrats Sonny,
You never cease to amaze me...Perhaps you need to go
through your rock pile again.
Looks like I may also have another possible new find
from out West. ASU has it now for classification.
It has been a busy year for you my friend!
Bill Southern
www.nuggetshooter.com
--- [EMAIL
Hi,
I forgot to mention the hunting hours and price to recover this
meteorite.
16 hours of hunting for two days.
9.5 hours of driving time.
Fuel 162.00 for two days of driving.
food 20.00
Total weight of meteorites recovered 13 grams. Look on my wifes face
when she sees this data
Well done Sonny!
You can also tell your wife that you could have found NOTHING at all! And you
were lucky and sharp enough to find some meteorite(s).
As far as the cost is concerned, you can apply a 1 multiplying coefficient
corresponding to the pleasure you had ; the higher the
pleasure was,
Hi list,
I've just updated my web site with a very rare Krasnojarsk 159 g specimen
coming from an old french collection. It was sleeping on my shelf and I
decided to put it on line.
For those who do not know what this object represents: The first object
recognized by mankind as coming from the
Very nice and interesting web page, Michel!
I'm glad that you woke this Baby up and decided to share those pictures with
us!!!
Kind regards,
Frederic Beroud
http://www.meteoriteshow.com
IMCA member # 2491 (http://www.imca.cc/)
- Original Message -
From: Michel FRANCO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sonny,
You continue to impress me with all the new finds you keep producing. Any
chance you need a few friends to help you clean-up some of those locations?
Best,
JKGwilliam
At 09:59 PM 5/16/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just finished cutting up some suspected meteorites from a
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status.html#opportunity
OPPORTUNITY UPDATE: Excellent Progress Toward 'Victoria Crater' -
sol 811-817, May 16, 2006:
Opportunity examined the crest of a ripple and drove about 200 meters
(656 feet), putting itself within about 1,100 meters (two-thirds of
MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR IMAGES
May 11-17, 2006
The following new images taken by the Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) on
the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft are now available:
o Filled Craters (Released 11 May 2006)
http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2006/05/11
o Acheron Trough (Released 12 May 2006)
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=101650
Mystery surrounds green 'comet'
ninemsn (Australia)
May 17, 2006
An unidentified green object streaked across the Queensland sky last
night, before landing on a property between Toowoomba and Warwick near
the Great Dividing Range.
Farmer Don
Somehow I think that the meteor seen by hundreds was unrelated to whatever
this guy found.
Chris
*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Original Message -
From: Ron Baalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite Mailing
Hi list sorry for that post. I have received a post from Mike and I can't
answer for some server problem that i do not understand. My reply bounces
back to me.
Could anyone pass on this mel to him, or maybe he will read it on the
list
Tks in advance.
best regards
Hi Mike,
Yes I come back
Mike;
A beautiful meteorite,Thanks for sharing the great photo.And i agree with
rob about our having the priviledge to interact with the top meteorite
hunters.researchers,collectors and dealers on this planet.I personally enjoy
hearing about yours and other peoples finds and
Astronomers are uncertain whether the object was a piece of space junk
or a meteorite, however Jim Barclay from the Maidenwell Observatory
suspects it was part of a satellite or some rocket casing.
The description that I received from phone calls was that it was of a
greeny blue colour
I don't understand why space junk, rather than a meteoric fireball, is almost
always being picked out as the most likely explanation by these observatory
spokesmen whenever a bright fireball has been sighted. The point is that
space
junk decays are relatively rare compared to meteoric
Hi All,
Regarding reentering manmade satellites or space junk, Ron
replied:
It is more common than you think. For example, in the past
month, 9 pieces of space junk have reentered into Earth's
atmosphere.
Bolide events outnumber manmade debris reentries by thousands
to one. How many on
I think that space junk is somewhat over represented in widely witnessed
fireballs just because it tends to come in slow and flat... lots of
territory covered, lots of time.
But certainly, it is usually easy to check for and an ordinary meteor is
much more likely. Reporters typically go to
Ron Baalke wrote (about Space Junk decays):
It is more common than you think. For example,
in the past month, 9 pieces
of space junk have reentered into Earth's atmosphere.
Half of this were very tiny pieces with very small RCS values, not large enough
to cause a fireball.
Meteoric
Our cameras have caught at least four space junk reentries is five years,
all of which also produced witness reports. In that time we've recorded over
1000 fireballs and 35000 bright meteors.
I've personally seen a handful of fireballs, but no space junk.
Chris
Scientists Look to Moon for Signs of Early Earth Life by Robert Krulwich
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5410577
Morning Edition, May 17, 2006 · The first life on earth would
have left traces in our planet's infant rocks. But those early
layers have since been squeezed and
If you are refering to the SL-12 r/b 2003-060F (#28199): this reportedly
decayed on May 13th and nothing decayed since.
I believe NORAD is fairly reliable with these informations, and then again
most (if not all) of the classified near earth orbit satellites for military
purposes, for which no
Meteoric fireballs occur at a rate of more than one EVERY DAY.
That may be, but you still have to consider space junk. Some fireball
sightings in the past have been confirmed space junk reentries.
I checked. There was a SL-12 debris reentry scheduled
for May 15, which may be
a
Alexander Seidel wrote:
If you are refering to the SL-12 r/b 2003-060F (#28199): this reportedly
decayed on May 13th and nothing decayed since.
I believe NORAD is fairly reliable with these informations, and then again
most (if not all) of the classified near earth orbit satellites for
If you are refering to the SL-12 r/b 2003-060F (#28199): this reportedly
decayed on May 13th and nothing decayed since.
No, I was referring to SL-12 debris (#28763) which was forcasted to
reenter on May 15.
Ron B.
2002-037B (#28763) is still in orbit. Apart from that, it is much too
Reporters typically go to some local observatory or
university, and the astronomer interviewed probably knows
little more about meteors than any other educated person
- which isn't much.
Chris
Again: agreed, this is what probably happens.
Apart from mistaken ideas on the frequency of
If you are refering to the SL-12 r/b 2003-060F (#28199): this reportedly
decayed on May 13th and nothing decayed since.
No, I was referring to SL-12 debris (#28763) which was forcasted to
reenter on May 15.
Ron B.
2002-037B (#28763) is still in orbit.
Are you sure?
2002-037B (#28763) is still in orbit.
Are you sure? If so, then their reentry forecast
is off by a number of days.
I didn't see a new date listed for its reentry.
Ron B.
Yes I am sure :-) orbits are available from yesterday and this very morning.
(And I made a typoe, it is 2002-037BJ)
Hi list.I was hoping lighting had struck twice ,but it was not meant to
be.I had heard from my sister and brother that a meteorite had landed
about 20 miles NW of me in a far west suburb.You do not know how excited I
was to hear that.I was at my nephews baseball game when I walked up and
said
Hi everybody
No, I'm not going to try to sell you one of my
children.
I found myself pondering the prices of meteorites on
the way to work this morning whether there are things
MORE expensive than a lunarite!
We're probably all familiar with the following which I
read somewhere on someones
Sonny C. wrote:
16 hours of hunting for two days.
9.5 hours of driving time.
Fuel 162.00 for two days of driving.
food 20.00
Sonny, I don't know, the 16 hours reduces to a $1000 health benefit, toughens
you up and adds 80 hours to your lifespan, and makes sure you don't waste
your money
Hi Sonny,
One technique to make it easier to determine magnetic
attraction is to tie a string (about 2-3 feet long)to
a strong magnet (like a neodynium magnet) , hang onto
the string, target on the ground, look down the string
while drawing the magnet close to the target. You will
be able to see
31 matches
Mail list logo
