[meteorite-list] Mammoth Stew, just right

2007-12-19 Thread Sterling K. Webb
[Sorry if this appears twice; it never showed up for me.]
--
Hi, EP, List,

EP wrote:

 ...the gravitational effects of the Earth+Moon system
 should draw items in, gradually changing their orbits
 from those passing near to ones which intersect.

The problem with the near miss, the close
approach, the graze is that, while they will modify
the orbit of the object passing by, they can (and will)
change that orbit but will do so in any (and every)
direction. A close pass by a little asteroid may mean
you'll never seen it again or it may come back aimed
right at you. It's even hard to predict the exact results
of a close pass when you know the approach elements.
It's really too touchy.

Look at the evolution of the predictions of what
everybody's favorite potential impactor, Apophis, is
going to do. First, it might hit us in 2029. Then, no,
it's going to miss us in 2029 and hit us in 2036. Then,
no, it all depends on the gravity keyhole and whether
Apophis goes through the keyhole in 2029, but even
then, we won't know for sure until we can observe it
after, and everybody walks away muttering More data,
more data...

So we might end up with only 6.3 years in which to
do something because we don't know if we need to
until 2030... And depending on the state the world in
2029, we might even drop the football, asteroid,
whatever. Mount a mission, fail, have 14 months left.
You write the script.

The point is, we only hear about those approach
situations where there any chance of another approach.
You don't heard about the approaches when the object
is gone for the next billion years! The number of objects
observed in approach and never seen again, even when
looked for, is quite large.

There were three different orbits proposed for the huge 
fireball object that was observed grazing the atmosphere
over Grand Teton in 1972. Now, there was a close approach!
Not only were the orbits different, but one proposed that
it would be back (now, when was that supposed to be?).

Well, there's the Internet for you! I went to Google for
orbital data on the Grand Teton fireball, and found... me!
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/2006-January/019513.html

I'll just quote myself:

The best source of information on the 1972 Grand Teton
object is this excellent page:
http://comets.amsmeteors.org/meteors/1972.html
The object was detected by an Air Force satellite, which
makes altitude determination possible: The object first became
hot enough to be detected by the Air Force satellite at a height
of 76 kilometers over Utah. Its closest distance to Earth was
58 kilometers, which occurred over Montana. As it continued
its passage through the atmosphere it finally cooled below the
satellite detection level at a height of 102 kilometers over Alberta.
The length of the luminous path was about 1500 kilometers.
In 1974, an estimate of size and mass was published in
Nature, of 1000 metric tons and about 4 meters in diameter
(if iron).
The astronomer Jacchia published an estimate of mass
based on observed luminosity of somewhere between 4000
and 1,000,000 metric tons, with a diameter of 13 to 80 meters
(if a stone, more likely). Jacchia, by the way, who was a meteor
expert at the Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts, just
happened to witness the fireball from Jackson Lake Lodge
in the Grand Tetons! You go on a vacation, but your work
just follows you...
In 1994, Ceplecha re-calculated Jacchia's orbit for the
object and predicted a return in 1997, which did not occur,
however, so it would seem the earlier orbit was correct (or
they were both wrong.)
The Ultimate Authority, the Wikipedia, says 5 to 15 meters
in diameter but declines to offer a mass estimate...
Even at the lowest mass estimate (1000 metric tons), the
object would have delivered a Hiroshima-sized punch if it had
been pointed a little differently and impacted. The plane of
its orbit's intersection with the Earth passed right through Los
Angeles, so if its earth encounter had been delayed a few
minutes, we could have had the ultimate Hollywood special
effect! (Roll'em!)

Since it did not come back in 1997 (it would have been
detected, I think), it apparently was diverged into a differing
orbit by its spectacular close pass (unless it suddenly shows
up in 2022). The point is, the result of any one close approach
does not have a preferred direction, like always causing closer
approaches.

There is one rule, though. The closer the approach, the
more energy is transferred to the smaller object, a slingshot
effect we use on spacecraft. Jupiter is renowned for kicking
things out of the solar system by this method.


Sterling K. Webb
--
- Original Message - 
From: E.P. Grondine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 

Re: [meteorite-list] Astronauts to Comb International Space Station for Meteorite Strike

2007-12-19 Thread Pete Pete


Season's Greetings, all!

Technically speaking, isn't the object hitting the ISS still a meteoroid?

It is, after all, still in outer space...


Cheers,
Pete

Apologies if this topic has been previously vented.







 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:30:13 -0800
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Astronauts to Comb International Space Station for 
 Meteorite Strike


 http://news.theage.com.au/astronauts-comb-iss-for-meteorite-strike/20071214-1h27.html
 Astronauts comb ISS for meteorite strike
 The Age (Australia)
 December 14, 2007

 Two astronauts on the International Space Station will make a spacewalk
 next week to find out if a micro-meteorite strike damaged a critical
 part of the outpost's power system, officials say.

 The station is not in any danger and is still producing enough power to
 support the arrival of Russian cargo ship later this month, said station
 deputy program manager Kirk Shireman.

 NASA has now announced the space shuttle Atlantis will not take off
 until January 10 with Europe's Columbus science module on board.

 That flight, originally planned for last week, was postponed when
 sensors in the shuttle's fuel tank failed during two launch attempts.

 Shireman said the power problem would probably not affect plans to
 attach Columbus to the station next month. But flights of Japanese
 modules in February and April could be affected.

 Without repairs, we know we can't go too much farther, he said.

 Station commander Peggy Whitson and flight engineer Dan Tani are
 scheduled for a 6.5-hour spacewalk on Tuesday to inspect two joints
 needed to position the station's right-side solar panels toward the sun.

 The primary joint, which rotates the panels 360 degrees, was locked in
 place in October after spacewalking astronauts during the last shuttle
 mission discovered metal shards inside the mechanism.

 Additional inspections were planned during Atlantis' mission, but the
 work was shifted to the station crew's schedule after the launch was
 postponed.

 An additional problem with a second joint, which lets the panels pivot
 even while the primary joint is locked, surfaced on December 8.

 It makes power generation much more difficult, Shireman said.

 Because several independent pieces of equipment were simultaneously
 affected, engineers suspect a micro-meteorite strike may be to blame.

 They also theorised a piece of debris may have worked itself free and
 floated into an area that shorted out electrical components.

 Spare parts to fix the second joint are on board the station, though if
 the problem is with the device's cables a repair would have to wait
 until supplies arrive on the next cargo ship or aboard the shuttle,
 Shireman said.

 This (spacewalk) is a fact-finding mission, he said.

 It is hoped that something the crew sees can help us narrow down the
 problem.
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

_
Discover new ways to stay in touch with Windows Live! Visit the City @ Live 
today!
http://getyourliveid.ca/?icid=LIVEIDENCA006
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Looking for 2x2x3/4 Clear plastic/acrylic cases

2007-12-19 Thread Darren Garrison
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:09:37 -0500, you wrote:

Hi List. Anyone know where I can buy the 2x2x3/4 clear plastic or acrylic 
air tight display cases. 

http://www.amacbox.com/products/mseries/index.html
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] eBay fraud - not a meteorite

2007-12-19 Thread Bob Loeffler
Hi,

Here's an eBay fraud (some of you might already know about it).  It is item
#330197565397.  The guy says it's a meteorite that was found in Maine but it
looks exactly like a bad quality beryl crystal.  Beryl crystals are
prismatic and hexagonal (they have six sides, not including their
termination sides) and Maine is very famous for their beryl mines.

Regards,

Bob

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Has Mali Been Classified?

2007-12-19 Thread info
Dean, others,

the classification of the Mali material is almost completed. NomCom submission 
will follow soon. I provided the classifying lab with samples of the commom 
lithology as well as with samples of the IMB lithologies. I do already have the 
preliminary data and will provide them as soon as the submission is official.

Svend

www.meteorite-recon.com

---

I may have missed it in all of the postings but is
there a classification?
I just got 9 kilos of the stuff (So will have a sale
posting later today or tomorrow) and this stuff is
georgous. Just look at this 1785 gram Mali:
http://www.ilovenewfoundland.com/meteoriteshop/1785mali.jpg
If anybody has classification details please let me
know
Cheers
DEAN


  


Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



-- 
www.niger-meteorite-recon.de
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - December 19, 2007

2007-12-19 Thread SPACEROCKSINC
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/December_19_2007.html 




**See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop000304)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] eBay fraud - not a meteorite

2007-12-19 Thread Ron
I collect minerals as well as meteorites, and yeah, that's a massive,
obviously not gem quality beryl crystal both of which are found in Maine. It
looks to be terminated and does have nice hexagonal crystalization, but it's
not a meteorite.
Worse part is, he has two bids on it.
To add further insult to injury is the $14.00 shipping.

Ron


- Original Message -
From: Bob Loeffler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 3:06 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] eBay fraud - not a meteorite


 Hi,

 Here's an eBay fraud (some of you might already know about it).  It is
item
 #330197565397.  The guy says it's a meteorite that was found in Maine but
it
 looks exactly like a bad quality beryl crystal.  Beryl crystals are
 prismatic and hexagonal (they have six sides, not including their
 termination sides) and Maine is very famous for their beryl mines.

 Regards,

 Bob

 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Tunguska-- the movie

2007-12-19 Thread Darren Garrison
Videos on the site.

http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/releases/2007/asteroid.html

Sandia supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster 
Smaller asteroids may pose greater danger than previously believed

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — The stunning amount of forest devastation at Tunguska a
century ago in Siberia may have been caused by an asteroid only a fraction as
large as previously published estimates, Sandia National Laboratories
supercomputer simulations suggest.

“The asteroid that caused the extensive damage was much smaller than we had
thought,” says Sandia principal investigator Mark Boslough of the impact that
occurred June 30, 1908. “That such a small object can do this kind of
destruction suggests that smaller asteroids are something to consider. Their
smaller size indicates such collisions are not as improbable as we had
believed.” 

Because smaller asteroids approach Earth statistically more frequently than
larger ones, he says, “We should be making more efforts at detecting the smaller
ones than we have till now.” 

The new simulation — which more closely matches the widely known facts of
destruction than earlier models — shows that the center of mass of an asteroid
exploding above the ground is transported downward at speeds faster than sound.
It takes the form of a high-temperature jet of expanding gas called a fireball.

This causes stronger blast waves and thermal radiation pulses at the surface
than would be predicted by an explosion limited to the height at which the blast
was initiated.

“Our understanding was oversimplified,” says Boslough, “We no longer have to
make the same simplifying assumptions, because present-day supercomputers allow
us to do things with high resolution in 3-D. Everything gets clearer as you look
at things with more refined tools.”

Sandia is a National Nuclear Security Administration laboratory.

The new interpretation also accounts for the fact that winds were amplified
above ridgelines where trees tended to be blown down, and that the forest at the
time of the explosion, according to foresters, was not healthy. Thus previous
scientific estimates had overstated the devastation caused by the asteroid,
since topographic and ecologic factors contributing to the result had not been
taken into account.

“There’s actually less devastation than previously thought,” says Boslough, “but
it was caused by a far smaller asteroid. Unfortunately, it’s not a complete wash
in terms of the potential hazard, because there are more smaller asteroids than
larger ones.”

Boslough and colleagues achieved fame more than a decade ago by accurately
predicting that that the fireball caused by the intersection of the comet
Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter would be observable from Earth.

Simulations show that the material of an incoming asteroid is compressed by the
increasing resistance of Earth’s atmosphere. As it penetrates deeper, the more
and more resistant atmospheric wall causes it to explode as an airburst that
precipitates the downward flow of heated gas. 

Because of the additional energy transported toward the surface by the fireball,
what scientists had thought to be an explosion between 10 and 20 megatons was
more likely only three to five megatons. The physical size of the asteroid, says
Boslough, depends upon its speed and whether it is porous or nonporous, icy or
waterless, and other material characteristics. 

“Any strategy for defense or deflection should take into consideration this
revised understanding of the mechanism of explosion,” says Boslough.

One of most prominent papers in estimating frequency of impact was published
five years ago in Nature by Sandia researcher Dick Spalding and his colleagues,
from satellite data on explosions in atmosphere. “They can count those events
and estimate frequencies of arrival through probabilistic arguments,” says
Boslough.

The work was presented at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San
Francisco on Dec. 11. A paper on the phenomenon, co-authored by Sandia
researcher Dave Crawford and entitled “Low–altitude airbursts and the impact
threat” has been accepted for publication in the International Journal of Impact
Engineering.

The research was paid for by Sandia’s Laboratory-Directed Research and
Development office.


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - Meteoritica website and auctions

2007-12-19 Thread Philippe Thomas
Hello Listees,

10 % off for all orders over $ 100 on Meteoritica website:
http://www.meteoritica.com/

We have also some auctions ending soon on eBay (Taza and NWA 4425).
http://stores.ebay.com/Meteoritica

Merry Christmas,
Philippe  Lea


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] From the really can't let it go department

2007-12-19 Thread Darren Garrison
This showed up at the top of Google News this morning.  But when you click the
link, you see no such text.

http://webpages.charter.net/garrison6328/lifeinperu.jpg
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] From the really can't let it go department

2007-12-19 Thread Michael Farmer
Hilarious, as I was in Japan, I was getting daily
threats from Randall Gregory.
Habitual liar, let's see, Doctor Gregory, Attorney at
Law Gregory, I bought4 kilos of Carancas Gregory, etc
etc etc. He has nothing more in his pathetic life to
do but to harrass me and anyone else who does not
shower him with attention.
Need I say more?
Michael Farmer




--- Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This showed up at the top of Google News this
 morning.  But when you click the
 link, you see no such text.
 

http://webpages.charter.net/garrison6328/lifeinperu.jpg
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] what is this meteorite

2007-12-19 Thread habibi abdelaziz
happy holidays and a precose merry christmas to all,
well ,we got this new meteorite unclassified that i named as an impact melt 
breccia two fantastic lithologies.
first black litho = exactly an impact melt breccia, 
segong litho= greenish with black point we could say it look like a ck, 
no aparent chondrule .and some aubritic inclusion in some part we could say 
it's an aubrite.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/azizhabibi/
impact melt breccia album.
slowly magnetic , has iron point all over.
enjoy ,
all the best
aziz habibi

habibi aziz 
box 70 erfoud 52200 morroco 
phone. 21235576145 
fax.21235576170


  
_ 
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail 
http://mail.yahoo.fr
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] mali cutter

2007-12-19 Thread mckinney trammell
looking for about a 100g mali for cutting slices.
black shape, no(little) crust, no cracks. i need a
rough looking stone and don't want to trash fine
stone. UNLESS... soembody out there has pre-cut
brecciated slices for sale?


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Phoenix desert fireball

2007-12-19 Thread M come Meteorite Meteorites
for me is a satellite

matteo

--- mexicodoug [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:

 Hello List,
 
 Surprised this unprecedented video recording of a
 Geminid (?) long lasted 
 splintering fireball imaged from the helicopter
 hasn't made it to the list 
 yet...
 

http://www.thisismereporting.com/view_video.php?viewkey=7ddef7f2c4f25dc8fa86
 
 Best wishes and Life,
 Doug 
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato
Via Triestina 126/A - 30173 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITALY
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sale Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.it 
Collection Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.info
MSN Messanger: spacerocks at hotmail.com
EBAY.COM:http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/mcomemeteorite/


  ___ 
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: 
http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Near Misses

2007-12-19 Thread Peter A Shugar

Hello list,
Stated in it's smplest terms, the near miss will preturb the oribital 
parametersof the smaller body way

more than the much larger earth. Yes !
However- 
The only way that the object will come back to haunt our placid life here on 
earth is IF the orbital parameter
dealing in TIME is precisely the same time, (or some whole number 
multiple), or a fraction of the earth's orbit.
Then and only then will we need to worry. I rather doubt the orbits of any 
near miss objects have this particular

orbital parameter.
One last thought, I do not have the computer facilites to research this, but 
a near miss by an object with an oddball
timed orbit MAY have the errors add up so that it COULD come back to haunt 
us, but I doubt we will be around

to worry about it.
So
Pete 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Imilac 2930 grams vende

2007-12-19 Thread Martinezr

Hola List Members

I wish sell my last Imilac found on december 7th, a nice complete individual 
of 2930 grams.


I accept offers over $ 17,000 USD

The closing date to receive offers will be this Sunday 23 December, mid day, 
chilean hour.


Look the short video in http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=YTgy0yHx-hE

If you are interested I can send you pictures of the meteorite in situ and 
studio...please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Saludos

Rodrigo Martinez
Atacama Desert Meteorites
www.meteorites.cl

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] FW: BEAUTIFUL AUCTIONS ENDING TODAY-SEE HIGHLIGHTS!

2007-12-19 Thread michael cottingham



From: michael cottingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:27 PM
To: 'michael cottingham'
Subject: AD: BEAUTIFUL AUCTIONS ENDING TODAY-SEE HIGHLIGHTS!





Hello,


Today- A 30% off on everything in my shop… most end tonight with this sale. 
Also, many thousands of dollars worth of auctions ending tonight…ALL started
at 0.99 cents!  Have Fun and Happy Holidays!

Use This Link to Get To The Store:
http://stores.ebay.com/Voyage-Botanica-Natural-History

SEE ALL Auctions here- Click, or Copy and Paste! This is one of the largest
and varied offerings, with major reductions that I have held in a long time…
worth a serious look!

http://stores.ebay.com/VOYAGE-BOTANICA-NATURAL-HISTORY_W0QQcolZ4QQdirZ1QQfti
dZ2QQsclZ2QQtZkm



HIGHLIGHTED AUCTIONS- Worth A Look Even If You Are Not Buying… 

An EL3 (Large Beautiful Slice) One of the best, just way too cool, 462 gram!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183531019

A $300.00 specimen of Cali, Colombia, One of my last auction pieces!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183899254

One of my Last Patagonia Silicated Slices, 8.88 gram. Starts at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183907892

Djati-Pengilon, Witnessed Fall From Indonesia-Rare.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183013167

You will not find another 290 gram CV3 Endcut Like this- Reduced by 50%! 
One of my finest specimens for sale! MUSEUM GRADE+
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182788610

NEW H5, NWA 4971, 49 gram Beauty…
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182781910

NEW L/LL4-5, NWA 4952. A really Great Specimen. Started at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182777004

One of The LARGEST Slices (73 grams) of This HOWARDITE you will ever
see…started at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183915040

NWA 248 (MAIN MASS) started out at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183131135

NEW, NWA 4951, Partial Endcut, 33.19 grams! Really Pretty!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183130198

Famous COW KILLER, nice part slice, started out at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183128523

Cool Slice of Vyatka/Russia, H4/5, 39.60 gram
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183010683

NEW, NWA 4972, L4-5, Brecciated, BIG, BIG PIECE 280 gram!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182492224

Very Rare Achondrite-3.42 grams, started out at 0.99 cents.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182495732

NWA 2834, L5 Chondrite, 17.40 gram, NEW, Really Nice!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183009016

A 1200+ gram specimen of an extremely rare meteorite… take a look!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183900646

The Brazilian Fall CAMPOS SALES…nice piece.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183012214



AND, Many, Many others…. THIS IS THE SALE OF THE YEAR!


Thanks and Best Wishes

Michael Cottingham









































__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Imilac 2930 grams SALE

2007-12-19 Thread Martinezr

Hola List Members

I wish sell my last Imilac found on december 7th, a nice complete individual
of 2930 grams.

I accept offers over $ 6 USD per gram.

The closing date to receive offers will be this Sunday 23 December, mid day,
chilean hour.

Look the short video in  http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=YTgy0yHx-hE

If you are interested I can send you pictures of the meteorite in situ and
Studio...please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Saludos

Rodrigo Martinez
Atacama Desert Meteorites
www.meteorites.cl

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] near miss stuff

2007-12-19 Thread Peter A Shugar

Hello list,
Stated in it's smplest terms, the near miss will preturb the oribital
parametersof the smaller body way
more than the much larger earth. Yes !
However- 
The only way that the object will come back to haunt our placid life here on

earth is IF the orbital parameter
dealing in TIME is precisely the same time, (or some whole number
multiple), or a fraction of the earth's orbit. (The earths year and the 
objects

year or period of rotation must be the same.)
Then and only then will we need to worry but I rather doubt the orbits of 
any

near miss objects have this particular orbital parameter.
One last thought, I do not have the computer facilites to research this, but
a near miss by an object with an oddball
timed orbit MAY have the errors add up or subtract so that it COULD come 
back to haunt

us, but I doubt we will be around to worry about it.
So
Pete 
__

http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] MRO HiRISE Images - December 19, 2007

2007-12-19 Thread Ron Baalke


MARS RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER HIRISE IMAGES
December 19, 2007

o Santa Claus Craters
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_006271_2210

o Chryse Planitia Surfaces
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_006268_1995

o Exposure of Basal Section of Polar Layered Deposits
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_006262_1080

o Cerberus Fossae and Surrounding Features
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_006234_1870

o Pang Boche Crater
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_005388_1975  

All of the HiRISE images are archived here:

http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/

Information about the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter is 
online at http://www.nasa.gov/mro. The mission is 
managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division 
of the California Institute of Technology, for the NASA 
Science Mission Directorate, Washington, D.C. Lockheed 
Martin Space Systems, of Denver, is the prime contractor 
and built the spacecraft. HiRISE is operated by the 
University of Arizona. Ball Aerospace and Technologies 
Corp., of Boulder, Colo., built the HiRISE instrument.
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] what is this meteorite

2007-12-19 Thread Francisco Ocaña
Amazing! After weeks I have finally cut some Dean´s NWAs and one of them 
is very simmilar to yours. It is quite black, very homogeneus, with 
absence of chondrules or metal. It is a 75g fragment with a ,what I 
think, is a nice fusion crust ( http://asaaf.fis.ucm.es/~paco/D469.JPG ) 
. The magnetic susceptibility is 3,58 in SI units. It is quite fragile 
and has many cracks!


Any ideas? How to know its type?
Cheers,

Paco

habibi abdelaziz escribió:


happy holidays and a precose merry christmas to all,
well ,we got this new meteorite unclassified that i named as an impact melt 
breccia two fantastic lithologies.
first black litho = exactly an impact melt breccia, 
segong litho= greenish with black point we could say it look like a ck, 
no aparent chondrule .and some aubritic inclusion in some part we could say it's an aubrite.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/azizhabibi/
impact melt breccia album.
slowly magnetic , has iron point all over.
enjoy ,
all the best
aziz habibi

habibi aziz 
box 70 erfoud 52200 morroco 
phone. 21235576145 
fax.21235576170


 




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Imilac 2930 grams Sale

2007-12-19 Thread Martinezr

Hola List Members

I wish sell my last Imilac found on december 7th, a nice complete individual
of 2930 grams.

I accept offers over $ 6 USD per gram.

The closing date to receive offers will be this Sunday 23 December, mid day,
chilean hour.

Look the short video in http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=YTgy0yHx-hE

If you are interested I can send you pictures of the meteorite in situ and
Studio...please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Saludos

Rodrigo Martinez
Atacama Desert Meteorites
www.meteorites.cl

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - Ebay Auctions ending

2007-12-19 Thread M come Meteorite Meteorites
at few hours some auctions ending, take a look the low price
for the Alfianello piece, ended this after the price return
to the old price.

http://members.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPageuserid=mcomemeteorite

Matteo

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] FW: BEAUTIFUL AUCTIONS ENDING TODAY-SEE HIGHLIGHTS!

2007-12-19 Thread michael cottingham
EXCUSE IF THIS IS THE SECOND TIME I JUST DONT SEE  THE First One...

Michael


From: michael cottingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:27 PM
To: 'michael cottingham'
Subject: AD: BEAUTIFUL AUCTIONS ENDING TODAY-SEE HIGHLIGHTS!





Hello,


Today- A 30% off on everything in my shop… most end tonight with this sale. 
Also, many thousands of dollars worth of auctions ending tonight…ALL started
at 0.99 cents!  Have Fun and Happy Holidays!

Use This Link to Get To The Store:
http://stores.ebay.com/Voyage-Botanica-Natural-History

SEE ALL Auctions here- Click, or Copy and Paste! This is one of the largest
and varied offerings, with major reductions that I have held in a long time…
worth a serious look!

http://stores.ebay.com/VOYAGE-BOTANICA-NATURAL-HISTORY_W0QQcolZ4QQdirZ1QQfti
dZ2QQsclZ2QQtZkm



HIGHLIGHTED AUCTIONS- Worth A Look Even If You Are Not Buying… 

An EL3 (Large Beautiful Slice) One of the best, just way too cool, 462 gram!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183531019

A $300.00 specimen of Cali, Colombia, One of my last auction pieces!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183899254

One of my Last Patagonia Silicated Slices, 8.88 gram. Starts at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183907892

Djati-Pengilon, Witnessed Fall From Indonesia-Rare.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183013167

You will not find another 290 gram CV3 Endcut Like this- Reduced by 50%! 
One of my finest specimens for sale! MUSEUM GRADE+
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182788610

NEW H5, NWA 4971, 49 gram Beauty…
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182781910

NEW L/LL4-5, NWA 4952. A really Great Specimen. Started at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182777004

One of The LARGEST Slices (73 grams) of This HOWARDITE you will ever
see…started at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183915040

NWA 248 (MAIN MASS) started out at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183131135

NEW, NWA 4951, Partial Endcut, 33.19 grams! Really Pretty!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183130198

Famous COW KILLER, nice part slice, started out at 0.99 cents!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183128523

Cool Slice of Vyatka/Russia, H4/5, 39.60 gram
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183010683

NEW, NWA 4972, L4-5, Brecciated, BIG, BIG PIECE 280 gram!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182492224

Very Rare Achondrite-3.42 grams, started out at 0.99 cents.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200182495732

NWA 2834, L5 Chondrite, 17.40 gram, NEW, Really Nice!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183009016

A 1200+ gram specimen of an extremely rare meteorite… take a look!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183900646

The Brazilian Fall CAMPOS SALES…nice piece.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=200183012214



AND, Many, Many others…. THIS IS THE SALE OF THE YEAR!


Thanks and Best Wishes

Michael Cottingham









































__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Tunguska-- the movie

2007-12-19 Thread Jerry
Right on the mark Darren. It speaks to many of the questions raised in the 
Mammoth thread in terms of frequency and potential effects of an airburst as 
well as impacts.
The footnote to Comet Levy/Shomaker may also reminds us that impactors don't 
necessarily travel alone. In tandem, some strike, some vaporize and maybe 
some or one airburst.

Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message - 
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:42 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Tunguska-- the movie


Videos on the site.

http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/releases/2007/asteroid.html

Sandia supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster
Smaller asteroids may pose greater danger than previously believed

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - The stunning amount of forest devastation at Tunguska a
century ago in Siberia may have been caused by an asteroid only a fraction 
as

large as previously published estimates, Sandia National Laboratories
supercomputer simulations suggest.

The asteroid that caused the extensive damage was much smaller than we had
thought, says Sandia principal investigator Mark Boslough of the impact 
that

occurred June 30, 1908. That such a small object can do this kind of
destruction suggests that smaller asteroids are something to consider. Their
smaller size indicates such collisions are not as improbable as we had
believed.

Because smaller asteroids approach Earth statistically more frequently than
larger ones, he says, We should be making more efforts at detecting the 
smaller

ones than we have till now.

The new simulation - which more closely matches the widely known facts of
destruction than earlier models - shows that the center of mass of an 
asteroid
exploding above the ground is transported downward at speeds faster than 
sound.
It takes the form of a high-temperature jet of expanding gas called a 
fireball.


This causes stronger blast waves and thermal radiation pulses at the surface
than would be predicted by an explosion limited to the height at which the 
blast

was initiated.

Our understanding was oversimplified, says Boslough, We no longer have to
make the same simplifying assumptions, because present-day supercomputers 
allow
us to do things with high resolution in 3-D. Everything gets clearer as you 
look

at things with more refined tools.

Sandia is a National Nuclear Security Administration laboratory.

The new interpretation also accounts for the fact that winds were amplified
above ridgelines where trees tended to be blown down, and that the forest at 
the
time of the explosion, according to foresters, was not healthy. Thus 
previous

scientific estimates had overstated the devastation caused by the asteroid,
since topographic and ecologic factors contributing to the result had not 
been

taken into account.

There's actually less devastation than previously thought, says Boslough, 
but
it was caused by a far smaller asteroid. Unfortunately, it's not a complete 
wash
in terms of the potential hazard, because there are more smaller asteroids 
than

larger ones.

Boslough and colleagues achieved fame more than a decade ago by accurately
predicting that that the fireball caused by the intersection of the comet
Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter would be observable from Earth.

Simulations show that the material of an incoming asteroid is compressed by 
the
increasing resistance of Earth's atmosphere. As it penetrates deeper, the 
more

and more resistant atmospheric wall causes it to explode as an airburst that
precipitates the downward flow of heated gas.

Because of the additional energy transported toward the surface by the 
fireball,
what scientists had thought to be an explosion between 10 and 20 megatons 
was
more likely only three to five megatons. The physical size of the asteroid, 
says
Boslough, depends upon its speed and whether it is porous or nonporous, icy 
or

waterless, and other material characteristics.

Any strategy for defense or deflection should take into consideration this
revised understanding of the mechanism of explosion, says Boslough.

One of most prominent papers in estimating frequency of impact was published
five years ago in Nature by Sandia researcher Dick Spalding and his 
colleagues,
from satellite data on explosions in atmosphere. They can count those 
events

and estimate frequencies of arrival through probabilistic arguments, says
Boslough.

The work was presented at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San
Francisco on Dec. 11. A paper on the phenomenon, co-authored by Sandia
researcher Dave Crawford and entitled Low-altitude airbursts and the impact
threat has been accepted for publication in the International Journal of 
Impact

Engineering.

The research was paid for by Sandia's Laboratory-Directed Research and
Development office.


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list

[meteorite-list] Fw: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009

2007-12-19 Thread Jerry

RECORD MARE BASALT IN KALAHARI 009
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message - 
From: PSRD [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 7:37 PM
Subject: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009



Announcement from Planetary Science Research Discoveries [PSRD]

New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009 contains fragments of basalt 
about 4.35 billion years old, a record-breaking old age for mare basalt.

-
READ: First summary paragraph for a quick overview
PRINT: pdf version
VIEW: short slide summary
-
FULL ARTICLE at:
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec07/cryptomareSample.html
-

PSRD is an educational web site supported by NASA's Cosmochemistry 
Program and the Hawaii Space Grant Consortium to share the latest 
research on meteorites, planets, moons, and other solar system bodies.


You are subscribed to our free mailing list.
We never send attachments.
For more information please see 
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/PSRDsubscribe.html


-
Jeff Taylor and Linda Martel
Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology,
University of Hawaii
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice (808) 956-3899
fax (808) 956-6322

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Phoenix desert fireball

2007-12-19 Thread mexicodoug

Hi Matteo, Listees,

Right - BTW, what's the deal on that tremendous bolide that fell near 
Trieste somewhere over Slovenia, and lit up Venice like a Christmas tree a 
month ago, during the Leonid nights?


For some reason I just received your post now in my inbox (but it has an 
older date - must have been a problem with some invisible server somewhere).


Mike F., Chris P., Larry L. and several others like Andi and Mike B. and 
Anne's favorite News channel kindly pointed out that it in fact you are 
right and it was a satellite; even possibly two similar events were included 
in the video clip (ref: Chris).  Either way, that doesn't make the sight any 
less incredible.  From an observers' point of view it was a wonderful show 
to appreciate the return of Machines from Space (please buy my new book of 
this title) as an artificial bolide that dropped (ref: Mike F.) artificial 
meteorites under provisional classification as Aztec (or should we call 
them, SATILLITITES !!!)


Best Wishes and Life,
Doug


- Original Message - 
From: M come Meteorite Meteorites [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Phoenix desert fireball



for me is a satellite

matteo

--- mexicodoug [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:


Hello List,

Surprised this unprecedented video recording of a
Geminid (?) long lasted
splintering fireball imaged from the helicopter
hasn't made it to the list
yet...



http://www.thisismereporting.com/view_video.php?viewkey=7ddef7f2c4f25dc8fa86


Best wishes and Life,
Doug

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com


http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list





M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato
Via Triestina 126/A - 30173 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITALY
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sale Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.it
Collection Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.info
MSN Messanger: spacerocks at hotmail.com
EBAY.COM:http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/mcomemeteorite/


 ___
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: 
http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] near miss

2007-12-19 Thread Peter A Shugar

Hello list,
Stated in it's smplest terms, the near miss will preturb the oribital
parametersof the smaller body way
more than the much larger earth. Yes !
However- 
The only way that the object will come back to haunt our placid life here on

earth is IF the orbital parameter
dealing in TIME is precisely the same time, (or some whole number
multiple), or a fraction of the earth's orbit. (The earths year and the 
objects

year or period of rotation must be the same.)
Then and only then will we need to worry but I rather doubt the orbits of 
any

near miss objects have this particular orbital parameter.
One last thought, I do not have the computer facilites to research this, but
a near miss by an object with an oddball
timed orbit MAY have the errors add up or subtract so that it COULD come 
back to haunt

us, but I doubt we will be around to worry about it.
So
Pete 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Chips Off an Old Lava Flow (Lunar Meteorite Kalahari 009)

2007-12-19 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec07/cryptomareSample.html

Chips Off an Old Lava Flow
Planetary Science Research Discoveries
December 19, 2007

--- Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009 contains fragments of basalt about 4.35
billion years old, a record-breaking old age for mare basalt.

Written by G. Jeffrey Taylor
Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology

Photogeologic and remote sensing studies of the Moon show that many
light-colored, smooth areas in the highlands contain craters surrounded
by dark piles of excavated debris. The dark deposits resemble the dark
basalts that make up the lunar maria. They contain the same diagnostic
minerals (especially high-calcium pyroxene) and chemical compositions
(high iron oxide) as do mare basalts. The deposits formed when vast
amounts of material ejected during the formation of giant impact basins
covered pre-existing lava plains. Since the smooth plains are older than
the youngest impact basin (about 3.8 billion years old), the lavas must
have erupted before formation of the visible maria. In fact, they were
visible maria for a while eons ago, but were buried by ejecta when the
basins formed.

We have samples of these ancient mare basalts. They reside in breccias
collected from the lunar highlands. Age dating indicates that the chips
have ages of 3.9 billion years and older. The oldest dated mare basalt
in the Apollo collection is 4.23 billion years. Now Kentaro Terada
(Hiroshima University, Japan), Mahesh Anand (Open University, UK), Anna
Sokol and Addi Bischoff (Institute for Planetology, Muenster, Germany),
and Yuji Sano (The University of Tokyo, Japan) have determined the age
of pieces of an ancient lava flow in a lunar meteorite, Kalahari 009,
found in Botswana in 1999. The team dated this very low-titanium mare
basalt by using an ion microprobe to measure the isotopic composition of
lead and uranium in phosphate minerals. They found that the basalt
fragments in the rock have an age of about 4.35 (plus or minus 0.15)
billion years. This overlaps with the ages of chemically-distinct
igneous rocks from the highlands, indicating that diverse magmas were
being produced early in the history of the Moon.

Reference:

* Terada, K., Anand, M., Sokol, A. K., Bischoff, A., and Sano, Y.
  (2007) Cryptomare Magmatism 4.35 Billion Years Ago Recorded in
  Lunar Meteorite Kalahari 009. Nature, v. 450, p. 849-853.

PSRDpresents: Chips Off an Old Lava Flow --Short Slide Summary
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec07/PSRD-cryptomareSample.ppt (with accompanying 
notes).


Visible and Hidden Lava Plains

From the moment Galileo peered at the Moon through his homemade
telescope, he recognized two main areas on the Moon (see photograph):
the rugged, light-colored highlands 
(which he named terra) and the smoother, darker areas (maria). 
Maria is the Latin word for sea, which Galileo
figured them might be. We did not know for sure what they were until
Apollo 11 astronauts retrieved samples from Mare Tranquillitatis. They
are basalts--ancient lava flows that flooded low areas, many the
interiors of large impact basins.

Analyses of samples and remote sensing measurements show that the maria
are dark because the lavas contain a lot more FeO (iron oxide) than do
highland rocks. FeO inside a mineral such as pyroxene makes it darker. 
In addition, the mare basalts contain less plagioclase feldspar,
a light-colored mineral. Hence, the maria are dark. They are smooth in 
part because they are so much younger
than the highlands and so did not accumulate as many craters. However,
they are also smoother because lava flows fill up low areas, tending to
produce smooth plains.

Many areas in the highlands are smooth plains, but they are light
colored, hence low in FeO. Remote sensing shows that they are not
composed of mare basalts. However, many light plains deposits are
decorated with impact craters surrounded by dark piles of ejecta,
nicknamed dark-haloed craters. These curious features were debated for
years. Finally, Pete Schultz (now at Brown University) and Paul Spudis
(now at the Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston) assembled all the
available evidence to make a good case that the dark-haloed craters
formed when mare basalt lava flows were covered with ejecta from large
impact craters and basins, and then small craters punctured through the
ejecta to toss out mare basalt. Detailed studies during the 1980s by B.
Ray Hawke and Jeff Bell (University of Hawaii), and investigators
elsewhere, provided further evidence that many light plains in the
highlands are underlain by dark basaltic rock. In 1992, Jim Head (Brown
University) and Lionel Wilson (Lancaster University, UK) named these
widespread deposits cryptomaria, meaning hidden maria.

Clementine images of dark-haloed craters on the Moon

LEFT: Seventeen dark-haloed craters are indicated by numbers on this
image mosaic from Clementine 750 nm remote sensing 

[meteorite-list] Catastrophic Impacts Made Life Flourish

2007-12-19 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22298683/  

Catastrophic impacts made life flourish
Meteorites linked to an explosion in biodiversity millions of years ago
By Dave Mosher
MSNBC
December 17, 2007

Space rocks are blamed for a lot of rough times on Earth, from the
die-off of most marine animals some 250 million years ago to the
disappearance of the dinosaurs 65 million years in the past.

A new theory, however, suggests that catastrophic meteorite impacts
are linked to an explosion in biodiversity about 470 million years ago,
during the Ordovician Period. Within a few million years, the number of
trilobite species and scores of other creatures on Earth jumped at least
three to four times.

Birger Schmitz, a geologist at the University of Lund in Sweden who
worked for more than 10 years to help gather evidence backing up the
claim, is the first to admit that his group's findings are hard to swallow.

It seems completely at odds with anyone's expectations, Schmitz said,
but you have to remember, for example, that it was at first difficult
for many scientists to accept asteroid explanations for the
disappearance of the dinosaurs.

Schmitz and his colleagues detail their findings in the Dec. 16 advance
issue of the journal Nature Geoscience.

Smackdown

Just before the jolt to Ordovician life, Schmitz said two massive bodies
in the Asteroid Belt slammed into one another, littering the solar
system with rocks the size of Manhattan island and ranging down to
microscopic bits of dust.

Even today, more than 20 percent of the meteorites we see came from
this breakup event, Schmitz said. That makes the L-chondrite
meteorites, as they're known, the most common kind to rain down on Earth.

Such extraterrestrial rocks contain a unique form of radioactive
chromium, so Schmitz and his team were able to figure out precisely
when, how much and how often the cosmic debris slammed into Earth.

We saw a sudden jump in meteorite material around the time of increased
biodiversity, Schmitz said - greater than 100 times more material, in fact. 
That's a major event, and an incredible coincidence that I don't think we 
should ignore, he told LiveScience.com.

Schmitz cautioned that while the two events line up in an uncanny way,
there is still a lot of work left to do to connect the increased
meteorite impacts to inflating biodiversity.

It took us about 15 years to accumulate data for this finding, and it's
something that isn't just a computer model or simulation. It's real,
tactile evidence, he said of the work, which included slowly
acid-dissolving almost a ton of rock collected from around the world to
sift out bits of chromium.

The scientists compared their meteorite record to layers of fossilized
plants and animals, determining that the cosmic smashup
happened shortly before the biodiversity boost.

I expect that it will take us another 15 years of playing in the dirt
to get there, to find Ordovician impact craters and beds associated with
this breakup, he said.

Pushing their luck

Schmitz isn't certain exactly how pummeling the planet with rocks could
cause life to thrive, but he thinks it has something to do with creating
new nooks and crannies for life to adapt to in its new environment.

Before the breakup you had primitive animals adapted to rough
conditions, so you could say they were prepared for the storm, Schmitz
said.

Schmitz also explained that evolution is very much give-and-take, as
radiating into new species requires a figurative kick in the shins.

If you push an ecosystem too hard, you'll destroy it, he said. But
for the organisms living on Earth at the time, [the environment] pushed
them to adapt and fill new niches. It's like at the university: I tell
my students all the time that if we don't push you, you don't evolve.

Whether or not the cosmic smashup ultimately caused life on Earth to
thrive 470 million years ago, the connection between events in space and
life on Earth is intriguing, Schmitz said.

There's much more to be learned how the history of Earth and its life
is related to the universe, he said. We're only in the beginning of
exploring that connection.

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Fw: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009

2007-12-19 Thread Adam Hupe
It is too bad that Kalahari 009 was never officially
weighed before it was cut. It seems that the anonymous
owner could have at least given this record-breaking
stone the dignity of a certified weigh-in.  Using the
term about 13.5 kilograms will never hold water in
the record books and history will reflect on this
poorly! It seems something as important as a lunar
rock should at the very least be weighed accurately. I
have the same issue with NWA 032 which is recorded
~300 grams. Why all these even figures? Can't the
owners afford or borrow a calibrated scale? 

Official quote from the Meteortical Bulletin:

A single stone of about 13.5 kg was found in September
1999 by an anonymous finder in front of a sand dune
within the Kalahari desert, roughly 50 m apart from
Kalahari 008. 

Best Regards,

Adam


 
--- Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 RECORD MARE BASALT IN KALAHARI 009
 Jerry Flaherty
 - Original Message - 
 From: PSRD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 7:37 PM
 Subject: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009
 
 
  Announcement from Planetary Science Research
 Discoveries [PSRD]
  
  New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009 contains
 fragments of basalt 
  about 4.35 billion years old, a record-breaking
 old age for mare basalt.
  -
  READ: First summary paragraph for a quick overview
  PRINT: pdf version
  VIEW: short slide summary
  -
  FULL ARTICLE at:
 

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec07/cryptomareSample.html
  -
  
  PSRD is an educational web site supported by
 NASA's Cosmochemistry 
  Program and the Hawaii Space Grant Consortium to
 share the latest 
  research on meteorites, planets, moons, and other
 solar system bodies.
  
  You are subscribed to our free mailing list.
  We never send attachments.
  For more information please see 
  http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/PSRDsubscribe.html
  
  -
  Jeff Taylor and Linda Martel
  Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology,
  University of Hawaii
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  voice (808) 956-3899
  fax (808) 956-6322
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Fw: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009

2007-12-19 Thread Jerry
This rock is so uncharacteristically meteoric in appearance, so terrestrial 
looking, I'd have tossed it had I been the one to find it.


Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message - 
From: Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Meteorite Mailing List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:34 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Fw: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009



RECORD MARE BASALT IN KALAHARI 009
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message - 
From: PSRD [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 7:37 PM
Subject: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009



Announcement from Planetary Science Research Discoveries [PSRD]

New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009 contains fragments of basalt 
about 4.35 billion years old, a record-breaking old age for mare basalt.

-
READ: First summary paragraph for a quick overview
PRINT: pdf version
VIEW: short slide summary
-
FULL ARTICLE at:
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec07/cryptomareSample.html
-

PSRD is an educational web site supported by NASA's Cosmochemistry 
Program and the Hawaii Space Grant Consortium to share the latest 
research on meteorites, planets, moons, and other solar system bodies.


You are subscribed to our free mailing list.
We never send attachments.
For more information please see 
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/PSRDsubscribe.html


-
Jeff Taylor and Linda Martel
Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology,
University of Hawaii
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice (808) 956-3899
fax (808) 956-6322

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Saturn's Rings May be Old Timers

2007-12-19 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-149

Saturn's Rings May be Old Timers
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
December 12, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. - New observations by NASA's Cassini spacecraft
indicate the rings of Saturn, once thought to have formed during the age
of the dinosaurs, instead may have been created roughly 4.5 billion
years ago, when the solar system was still under construction.

Larry Esposito, principal investigator for Cassini's Ultraviolet Imaging
Spectrograph at the University of Colorado, Boulder, said data from
NASA's Voyager spacecraft in the 1970s, and later from NASA's Hubble
Space Telescope, led scientists to believe Saturn's rings were
relatively youthful and likely created by a comet that shattered a large
moon, perhaps 100 million years ago.

But ring features seen by instruments on Cassini -- which arrived at
Saturn in 2004 -- indicate the rings were not formed by a single
cataclysmic event. The ages of the different rings appear to vary
significantly, and the ring material is continually being recycled,
Esposito said.

The evidence is consistent with the picture that Saturn has had rings
all through its history, said Esposito of the University of Colorado's
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics. We see extensive, rapid
recycling of ring material, in which moons are continually shattered
into ring particles, which then gather together and re-form moons.

Esposito and colleague Miodrag Sremcevic, also with the University of
Colorado, are presenting these findings today in a news briefing at the
meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.

We have discovered that the rings probably were not created just
yesterday in cosmic time, and in this scenario, it is not just luck that
we are seeing planetary rings now, said Esposito. They probably were
always around but continually changing, and they will be around for many
billions of years.

Scientists had previously believed rings as old as Saturn itself should
be darker due to ongoing pollution by the infall of meteoric dust,
leaving telltale spectral signatures, Esposito said. But the new Cassini
observations indicate the churning mass of ice and rock within Saturn's
gigantic ring system is likely much larger than previously estimated.
This helps explain why the rings overall appear relatively bright to
ground-based telescopes and spacecraft.

The more mass there is in the rings, the more raw material there is for
recycling, which essentially spreads this cosmic pollution around, he
said. If this pollution is being shared by a much larger volume of ring
material, it becomes diluted and helps explain why the rings appear
brighter and more pristine than we expected.

Esposito, who discovered Saturn's faint F ring in 1979 using data from
NASA's Pioneer 11 spacecraft, said a paper by him and his colleagues
appearing in an upcoming issue of the journal Icarus supports the theory
that Saturn's ring material is being continually recycled. Observing the
flickering of starlight passing through the rings in a process known as
stellar occultation, the researchers discovered 13 objects in the F ring
ranging in size from 27 meters to 10 kilometers (30 yards to six miles)
across.

Since most of the objects were translucent -- indicating at least some
starlight was passing through them -- the researchers concluded they
probably are temporary clumps of icy boulders that are continually
collecting and disbanding due to the competing processes of shattering
and coming together again. The team tagged the clumpy moonlets with cat
names like Mittens and Fluffy because they appear to come and go
unexpectedly over time and have multiple lives, said Esposito.

Esposito stressed that Saturn's rings of the future won't be the same
rings we see today, likening them to great cities around the world like
San Francisco, Berlin or Beijing. While the cities themselves will go
on for centuries or millennia, the faces of people on the streets will
always be changing due to continual birth and aging of new citizens.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the
European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in
Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in
Washington, D.C.

For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission, visit:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov and http://www.nasa.gov/cassini . To listen 
to a podcast of Esposito and view a short video animation of objects in 
Saturn's F ring shattering and re-forming, visit: 
http://www.colorado.edu/news/reports/space/.



Media Contact: Carolina Martinez 818-354-9382
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jim Scott 303-492-3114
University of Colorado, Boulder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2007-149

__

Re: [meteorite-list] Tunguska-- the movie

2007-12-19 Thread lebofsky
Jerry:

SL/9 WAS one object that got too close to Jupiter and was pulled apart by
the gravity of Jupiter (probably at the same time it was being captured
into an orbit around Jupiter). It also, unfortunately for it, went into an
orbit that had perijove (closest point in orbit) INSIDE of Jupiter, hence
the wonderful show that we got to see.

This was probably not the first time this has happened to a body (comet?)
and Jupiter. There are chain craters on Ganymede and Callisto that are
thought to be due to the breakup of a bodies during close approaches to
Jupiter that then hit the satellites.

Also, the outer satellites of Jupiter are grouped and are thus thought to
have been individual objects that somehow broke up (during cpture?).

Larry

On Wed, December 19, 2007 5:46 pm, Jerry wrote:
 Right on the mark Darren. It speaks to many of the questions raised in
 the Mammoth thread in terms of frequency and potential effects of an
 airburst as well as impacts. The footnote to Comet Levy/Shomaker may also
 reminds us that impactors don't necessarily travel alone. In tandem, some
 strike, some vaporize and maybe some or one airburst. Jerry Flaherty
 - Original Message -
 From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:42 AM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Tunguska-- the movie



 Videos on the site.


 http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/releases/2007/asteroid.html


 Sandia supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster
 Smaller asteroids may pose greater danger than previously believed


 ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - The stunning amount of forest devastation at Tunguska
 a century ago in Siberia may have been caused by an asteroid only a
 fraction as large as previously published estimates, Sandia National
 Laboratories
 supercomputer simulations suggest.

 The asteroid that caused the extensive damage was much smaller than we
 had thought, says Sandia principal investigator Mark Boslough of the
 impact that occurred June 30, 1908. That such a small object can do this
 kind of destruction suggests that smaller asteroids are something to
 consider. Their smaller size indicates such collisions are not as
 improbable as we had believed.

 Because smaller asteroids approach Earth statistically more frequently
 than larger ones, he says, We should be making more efforts at detecting
 the smaller ones than we have till now.

 The new simulation - which more closely matches the widely known facts of
  destruction than earlier models - shows that the center of mass of an
 asteroid exploding above the ground is transported downward at speeds
 faster than sound. It takes the form of a high-temperature jet of expanding
 gas called a fireball.

 This causes stronger blast waves and thermal radiation pulses at the
 surface than would be predicted by an explosion limited to the height at
 which the blast was initiated.

 Our understanding was oversimplified, says Boslough, We no longer have
 to make the same simplifying assumptions, because present-day
 supercomputers allow us to do things with high resolution in 3-D.
 Everything gets clearer as you
 look at things with more refined tools.

 Sandia is a National Nuclear Security Administration laboratory.


 The new interpretation also accounts for the fact that winds were
 amplified above ridgelines where trees tended to be blown down, and that
 the forest at the time of the explosion, according to foresters, was not
 healthy. Thus previous scientific estimates had overstated the devastation
 caused by the asteroid, since topographic and ecologic factors
 contributing to the result had not been taken into account.

 There's actually less devastation than previously thought, says
 Boslough,
 but
 it was caused by a far smaller asteroid. Unfortunately, it's not a
 complete wash in terms of the potential hazard, because there are more
 smaller asteroids than larger ones.

 Boslough and colleagues achieved fame more than a decade ago by
 accurately predicting that that the fireball caused by the intersection of
 the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter would be observable from Earth.


 Simulations show that the material of an incoming asteroid is compressed
 by the increasing resistance of Earth's atmosphere. As it penetrates
 deeper, the more and more resistant atmospheric wall causes it to explode
 as an airburst that precipitates the downward flow of heated gas.

 Because of the additional energy transported toward the surface by the
 fireball, what scientists had thought to be an explosion between 10 and 20
 megatons was more likely only three to five megatons. The physical size of
 the asteroid, says Boslough, depends upon its speed and whether it is
 porous or nonporous, icy or waterless, and other material characteristics.

 Any strategy for defense or deflection should take into consideration
 this revised understanding of the mechanism of explosion, says Boslough.

 One of most prominent 

Re: [meteorite-list] Fw: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009

2007-12-19 Thread Adam Hupe
It sure is not very attractive from this collector's
view but none the less, a very important stone from a
scientific standpoint and deserves the very best
consideration including a formal weigh-in. I still do
not understand all of the secrecy surrounding it and
the short recovery story sure is strange! Also, that
it spent no measurable time in space.  How many
records will this stone break before all is said and
done?  It is too bad its weight will never be
official. 

Best Regards,

Adam
 
--- Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This rock is so uncharacteristically meteoric in
 appearance, so terrestrial 
 looking, I'd have tossed it had I been the one to
 find it.
 
 Jerry Flaherty
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Meteorite Mailing List
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:34 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Fw: New Issue: Lunar
 meteorite Kalahari 009
 
 
  RECORD MARE BASALT IN KALAHARI 009
  Jerry Flaherty
  - Original Message - 
  From: PSRD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 7:37 PM
  Subject: New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009
 
 
  Announcement from Planetary Science Research
 Discoveries [PSRD]
 
  New Issue: Lunar meteorite Kalahari 009 contains
 fragments of basalt 
  about 4.35 billion years old, a record-breaking
 old age for mare basalt.
  -
  READ: First summary paragraph for a quick
 overview
  PRINT: pdf version
  VIEW: short slide summary
  -
  FULL ARTICLE at:
 

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec07/cryptomareSample.html
  -
 
  PSRD is an educational web site supported by
 NASA's Cosmochemistry 
  Program and the Hawaii Space Grant Consortium to
 share the latest 
  research on meteorites, planets, moons, and other
 solar system bodies.
 
  You are subscribed to our free mailing list.
  We never send attachments.
  For more information please see 
  http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/PSRDsubscribe.html
 
  -
  Jeff Taylor and Linda Martel
  Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology,
  University of Hawaii
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  voice (808) 956-3899
  fax (808) 956-6322
  __
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Saturn's Rings May be Old Timers

2007-12-19 Thread lebofsky
Hi All:

This idea is not new. Don Davis et al. published a similar model more than
20 years ago. It is also interesting how similar the artist concept of the
rings in the article is to one done by Bill Hartmann something like 30
years ago. It would be nice if people gave credit where credit was due.

Larry

On Wed, December 19, 2007 2:41 pm, Ron Baalke wrote:


 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-149


 Saturn's Rings May be Old Timers
 Jet Propulsion Laboratory
 December 12, 2007


 SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. - New observations by NASA's Cassini spacecraft
 indicate the rings of Saturn, once thought to have formed during the age of
 the dinosaurs, instead may have been created roughly 4.5 billion years
 ago, when the solar system was still under construction.

 Larry Esposito, principal investigator for Cassini's Ultraviolet Imaging
 Spectrograph at the University of Colorado, Boulder, said data from
 NASA's Voyager spacecraft in the 1970s, and later from NASA's Hubble
 Space Telescope, led scientists to believe Saturn's rings were
 relatively youthful and likely created by a comet that shattered a large
 moon, perhaps 100 million years ago.

 But ring features seen by instruments on Cassini -- which arrived at
 Saturn in 2004 -- indicate the rings were not formed by a single
 cataclysmic event. The ages of the different rings appear to vary
 significantly, and the ring material is continually being recycled,
 Esposito said.


 The evidence is consistent with the picture that Saturn has had rings
 all through its history, said Esposito of the University of Colorado's
 Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics. We see extensive, rapid
 recycling of ring material, in which moons are continually shattered into
 ring particles, which then gather together and re-form moons.

 Esposito and colleague Miodrag Sremcevic, also with the University of
 Colorado, are presenting these findings today in a news briefing at the
 meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.

 We have discovered that the rings probably were not created just
 yesterday in cosmic time, and in this scenario, it is not just luck that we
 are seeing planetary rings now, said Esposito. They probably were always
 around but continually changing, and they will be around for many billions
 of years.

 Scientists had previously believed rings as old as Saturn itself should
 be darker due to ongoing pollution by the infall of meteoric dust,
 leaving telltale spectral signatures, Esposito said. But the new Cassini
 observations indicate the churning mass of ice and rock within Saturn's
 gigantic ring system is likely much larger than previously estimated. This
 helps explain why the rings overall appear relatively bright to
 ground-based telescopes and spacecraft.

 The more mass there is in the rings, the more raw material there is for
 recycling, which essentially spreads this cosmic pollution around, he
 said. If this pollution is being shared by a much larger volume of ring
 material, it becomes diluted and helps explain why the rings appear
 brighter and more pristine than we expected.

 Esposito, who discovered Saturn's faint F ring in 1979 using data from
 NASA's Pioneer 11 spacecraft, said a paper by him and his colleagues
 appearing in an upcoming issue of the journal Icarus supports the theory
 that Saturn's ring material is being continually recycled. Observing the
 flickering of starlight passing through the rings in a process known as
 stellar occultation, the researchers discovered 13 objects in the F ring
 ranging in size from 27 meters to 10 kilometers (30 yards to six miles)
 across.

 Since most of the objects were translucent -- indicating at least some
 starlight was passing through them -- the researchers concluded they
 probably are temporary clumps of icy boulders that are continually
 collecting and disbanding due to the competing processes of shattering and
 coming together again. The team tagged the clumpy moonlets with cat names
 like Mittens and Fluffy because they appear to come and go
 unexpectedly over time and have multiple lives, said Esposito.

 Esposito stressed that Saturn's rings of the future won't be the same
 rings we see today, likening them to great cities around the world like San
 Francisco, Berlin or Beijing. While the cities themselves will go
 on for centuries or millennia, the faces of people on the streets will
 always be changing due to continual birth and aging of new citizens.

 The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the
 European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet Propulsion
 Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in
 Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in
 Washington, D.C.


 For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission, visit:
 http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov and http://www.nasa.gov/cassini . To listen
 to a podcast of Esposito and view a short video animation of 

Re: [meteorite-list] near miss stuff

2007-12-19 Thread lebofsky
Hi Pete:

One other possiblity: Capture! Think about SL/9. I suspect that for the
Earth/Moon system, this is not a very likely situation. Jupiter is much
larger (with greater gravity) and objects passing by Jupiter will be
going much slower than they would pass by Earth.

Larry

On Wed, December 19, 2007 2:08 pm, Peter A Shugar wrote:
 Hello list,
 Stated in it's smplest terms, the near miss will preturb the oribital
 parametersof the smaller body way more than the much larger earth. Yes
 !
 However-
 The only way that the object will come back to haunt our placid life here
 on earth is IF the orbital parameter dealing in TIME is precisely the same
 time, (or some whole number multiple), or a fraction of the earth's orbit.
 (The earths year and the
 objects year or period of rotation must be the same.) Then and only then
 will we need to worry but I rather doubt the orbits of any near miss
 objects have this particular orbital parameter. One last thought, I do not
 have the computer facilites to research this, but a near miss by an object
 with an oddball timed orbit MAY have the errors add up or subtract so that
 it COULD come back to haunt us, but I doubt we will be around to worry
 about it. So
 Pete
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Mammoth Stew - first you cut up the Mammoth

2007-12-19 Thread E.P. Grondine
Hi Sterling, Jason, all - 

Concerning recent impacts (12,000 years old), what
I've noticed over the years is that some people go
into denial, and those denial mechanisms are sometimes
really pretty bizarre. It's tough to accept on a gut
level that as things now sit you, your family, your
friends, everyone you ever knew or loved can be blown
off the face of the Earth in an instant without a
minutes warning. But that's exactly how it is, and
that's exactly what happened to some of our fellow
human beings in the recent past. 

So, Jason, you wrote:

Right, but seeing as the effects from the event of
which we speak differ greatly from those of your
comparison, it seems an unworthy one to make.  Yes,
an unknown phenomena might create such a set of
effects
as are geologically evident, but just saying it's
possible is something that I acknowledge as well; we
all know that Tunguska events occur and that,
evidently, astronomical events that create the
geological evidence that we've found occur.  But that
still in no way ties the two together.

Fact is, Jason, the Tunsguska impactor was viewed
coming in, and spherules from it have been recovered.
Sorry to disappoint you, but it wasn't a flying
saucer.

Sterling, you wrote: 

Atmosphere not a factor in that size range. 

Yes it is. Another factor in lunar crater distribution
is later coverage by dust and removal by later
impacts.

Jason, you wrote: 

I don't know where you draw the 1km crater line, as,
in my opinion, such a body might well break up if it
entered the atmosphere at a shallow angle, but who's
to say

Well, airbursts can be more devastating then ground
hits, in terms of overall effect. We know compression
propagation in impactors, and 1 kilometer crater seems
to be a good guess as to airburst versus ground
impact. 

Jason, you wrote: 

 A thirty-degree impact is highly unlikely, 

unsupported and most likely wrong.

 and I'm thinking that an iron impactor would do a
bit  more damage than a comet.

wrong. See airburst versus ground impact, above.

Do you, by any chance, know what the composition of
the dust layer (if it would suggest such a thing)
points towards the composition of the body having
been?

You're confusing two different impacts here, the iron
one at 31,000 BCE and the cometary one at 10,900 BCE.
Why?

I just don't see much metallic residue coming from a
comet, though I suppose there would be some.

It seems to me that the cores of the cometissimals in
a comet have a nice metal content. That's where the
iridium is, after all.

Sterling, you wrote: 

 5. You say, most of the craters were formed before
 the [recent?] timeframe. Well, that's exactly what 
 the argument's about, isn't it? This is the 
 comfortable, that's all in the past argument.

You've got it: denial. Did I ever tell you the one
about Homo wushan?

Jason, you wrote: 

It's not all in the past, nor have I ever said such a
thing.  That said, there were more impacts two
billion  years ago than there are today, and you know
that as  well as I do.

Jason, if you're not in denial, then why try to make
statements about the recent impacts, and then divert
from the two impacts under discussion to the long term
impact rate?

Sterling, you wrote, most excellently:

Let's review the cratering history of the solar
system. After initial accretion, a tapering off.
Then, at 3.8 to 3.9 billion years ago, an intense
episode, the Late Bombardment, followed by an
exponential decline for more than 3 billion years.
Then, at 0.6 billion years ago, cratering rates begin
to rise dramatically, until 0.4 billion years ago,
when they have increased fourfold in 0.2 billion
years. They again decline. until 125-100 million
years ago, when they increase, roughly doubling. 

A great summary, which leaves us with significant
questions concerning meteorites and their parent
bodies - and answers which are only now gradually
being accepted.

 The role of comets, stellar encounters, Oort Cloud
 shenanigans, asteroidal family dustups is all
unclear  and yet to be pinned down. Good old
ignorance. 

Yes indeed. Lack of science budget helps in this too,
as well as the behaviour of certain individuals
(ahem!) who control those budgets.

Jason, you wrote:

What I'm trying to say is that given that there are x
number of craters on the moon, we would need to know
the age of each to determine a good number for the
rate of impacts over the past, say, 50,000 years,
which would be relevant to this discussion. 

Undoubtedly this information will be provided by the
next series of manned landings on the Moon.

Jason, you wrote:

Well, then climate change could well have been the
culprit - but what cause the climate change is, I 
think, still open to discussion.

Actually, no it is not. That discussion has finished. 
When you have a layer of extra-terrestrial material
and impactites such as has been demonstrated to exist,
fact replaces speculation.

And that those iron bits, if they are from a
meteorite, didn't come from 

[meteorite-list] Happy Holidays

2007-12-19 Thread Rob Wesel

Hello all

Happy Holidays from Nakhla Dog Meteorites.

Enjoy 10% off for the rest of 2007

A few items not on the site, prices are before the discount:

A 0.289 gram Ensisheim fragment priced at $150
Mundrabilla small irons at $2 per gram
Small cherry picked Sikhotes at $2 per gram
EL3 polished slices and endcuts up to 20 POUNDS at $0.20 per gram
Small Al Mahbas pallasite fragments at $6 per gram
Small Mali pieces for $2 per gram
NWA mesosiderite at $1.50 per gram
Brenham coins $80

...looks like somebody needs to update


Rob Wesel
http://www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
--
We are the music makers...
and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971



__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] eBay fraud - not a meteorite

2007-12-19 Thread Bob Loeffler
Hi Ron,

Yes, it's terminated on at least one end, but I still wouldn't pay a dime
for it.  (I'm a mineral collector also.)  I just sent an e-mail to eBay's
customer support.  It probably won't help, but can't hurt.

Regards,

Bob
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 6:43 AM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] eBay fraud - not a meteorite

I collect minerals as well as meteorites, and yeah, that's a massive,
obviously not gem quality beryl crystal both of which are found in Maine. It
looks to be terminated and does have nice hexagonal crystalization, but it's
not a meteorite.
Worse part is, he has two bids on it.
To add further insult to injury is the $14.00 shipping.

Ron


- Original Message -
From: Bob Loeffler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 3:06 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] eBay fraud - not a meteorite


 Hi,

 Here's an eBay fraud (some of you might already know about it).  It is
item
 #330197565397.  The guy says it's a meteorite that was found in Maine but
it
 looks exactly like a bad quality beryl crystal.  Beryl crystals are
 prismatic and hexagonal (they have six sides, not including their
 termination sides) and Maine is very famous for their beryl mines.

 Regards,

 Bob

 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] QMIG UPDATE/S

2007-12-19 Thread Bob WALKER



Listoids

Firstly a very merry XMAS and happy new year to listoids

QIG update - http://www.qmig.org

I have started to scan and webpublish some of the very olde and hard-to-find 
artikles on Queensland meteorites


First up woz an article on the Rockhampton meteorite - this was found by 
accident researching the history of Tenham...


Tenham of course is still one of my faves - many of the older Queensland 
finds cluster in and around the Tenham strewnfield - I have another 7 new 
finds from the Tenham strewnfield undergoing classification thru JCU and yet 
another 4 new finds from Windorah which aint too far from the Tenham 
strewnfield in terms of meteorite trajectories - more undoubtedly will be 
found...


More artikles to follow over the next few days - Gladstone, Glenormiston, 
Tenham - maybe a few other odds'n'sods - most of these are damn hard to 
resource so tis worthwhile to webpublish them


Its been a depressing feeling researching some of the olde artikles - you 
start to realise just how much is missing in action, lost, stolen, illegally 
exported or just plain cut into small pieces for sale with nothing at all 
left for any public institution. All you have to do is look up the 
Queensland finds on metsoc to realise which of the major players and doyens 
of the meteorite community have been involved in illegal export - you'd be 
surprised once you figure out exactly who...


I am planning a limited edition Tenham meteorite medallion - tis difficult 
to find any pictures of the Hammond family holding or with some Tenham 
stones but I have found one which I suspect will be the artwork for the 
front of the medallion


If any listoids can share similar photos would they please contact me 
off-list ? BNHM are u there ?


Any hints on how to best sacrifice a small individual for the fragments for 
the insert of the medallion would also be appreciated


Thats about it for now - I'm on holidays... tho I have to kapture a baggie 
of Tenham individuals soon (600 g total - largest = 220 g)... hopefully will 
have new accessions early in the new year - more Winton stones - more 
polished thin-sections and full-slices of some of the Queensland irons... 
lots of projects planned or underway... its been a big year and next year 
should be more exciting...


Cheers 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list