Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding

2011-03-08 Thread Shawn Alan
Hello Listers,
 
 
I have been reading this Post and another Post about about weight and 
attractiveness and I can say there is a lot of pros and cons that have been 
listed. But I think the bottom line is the way you collect meteorites is in 
your own right and no one else. This is what I like about meteorite collecting, 
is that your collection can be unique from someone else, even if you both have 
the same meteorites. Can you do that with collecting coins or baseball cards? 
 
I see that any way from collecting meteorites is your right way. If you collect 
meteorites on the micro scale, or whole specimen scale, or thin sections, or 
gram size, or historic falls to beauty, its all in the eyes of the behold, YOU. 
I can say that collecting a whole meteorite is the best way because its in its 
true natural state and looks like how it fell the day it landed on Earth. 
But on the flip side, I can say well whats the fun in collecting 
whole meteorites, you dont get to see whats in side and the outside looks the 
same. 
 
Thats the beauty with collecting meteorites, everyone of use LISTERS will 
have a meteorite collection that is unique from anyone else and that just the 
collecting side. What about presentation and how you show off your meteorites. 
Good example is a pallisite suspended in oil and put in a frame. To beat that, 
one could put an LED light panel behind the pallisite and back light it. The 
list goes on.  
 
But I do feel that there are some factors to think about when collecting and 
thats weight, which has been in question with an ebayer, the cost, where did it 
come from, is it a historic meteorite, does it have paper work, and is it 
beautiful in no particular order. But again, you might buy only historic falls 
with the actual museum labels, or meteorites that are whole specimens, or you 
might only collect slices to micros. 
 
Now I do have to say, factoring these elements in, that money has a big deal on 
how I collect and I bet on how others collect. If I had a lot of money to spend 
on meteorites, I might buy bigger or more, or might buy as much as I can and 
try to get every single meteorite out there. Or if I had a big budget and only 
wanted to get micros because I have this million dollar display case house out 
of crystals to show case my micros off, so be it.
 
The bottom line is no way is the right way to collect only your way is the 
right way and dont let anyone else say other wise. But keep in mind, the 
weight, cost, where it comes from, and if you really want to add that meteorite 
to your collection. 
 
 
Shawn Alan 
IMCA 1633 
eBaystore 
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html 

 
  
[meteorite-list] Help with Ebay biddingJason Utas meteoritekid at gmail.com 
Tue Mar 8 00:24:05 EST 2011 


Previous message: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding 
Next message: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

Hello All, 
I'd like to point out a few things. 

First and foremost is that we are meteorite collectors. Collectors. 
What does that mean? It means that for some irrational reason, we 
have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor to spend our 
hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a little 
different than the more easily available ones that have originated on 
earth. We buy them because we consider them to be 'interesting' or 
'pretty,' and that's about it. 

So when I hear collectors saying that they want to buy the thinnest 
slice possible of a given meteorite, it makes me want to stand back 
and ask...why? Such a comment does make a lot of sense. Since rarer 
types of meteorites are often very expensive (and are priced per 
gram), a thinner piece would logically be more easy to see -- if 
seeing the specimen were an issue. 

But, personally, from a collector's (my) point of view, I'd have to 
disagree. If I wanted a piece of a given meteorite, I'd gladly pay 
twice as much for the thick slab or endcut that weighed twice as much 
as a mm-thick slice of greater surface area. 

Why is that? It's because if I want a given meteorite, I don't just 
want a piece that feels like a cross between a baseball card and a 
credit card. I'd prefer a piece that has some heft to it. 
Perhaps that's not such a reasonable demand when one is talking about 
a lunar or a martian meteorite -- but there's a reason why Peter and I 
personally haven't bought very many of those. The few that we have 
purchased have been smaller complete individuals, and we prefer them 
to slices of equivalent weights. 

And since I'm a collector, and I prefer such pieces, those are the 
better ones. In my opinion. You guys should stop trying to push 
your wants on other people as common sense, because, if you prefer 
thin slices, that's your preference -- not mine. And neither one is 
better. Your desire is rational in one sense - if you're willing to 
spend only enough to buy a gram or so of the moon, then yes, I can see 

Re: [meteorite-list] Point of Diminishing returns (Slice thickness)?

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Blood
The answer is simple: if weight is important to you don't bid.
Michael

On 3/7/11 6:19 PM, Adam Hupe raremeteori...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Michael made the Comment:
 
 ***
 If you can buy high fat ground beef for $2/lb or excellent
 Ribeye  stakes  for $4/lb, which are YOU going to buy? I'll take
 The Ribeye  every stinking time.
 
 
 But if you are starving and have to feed multiple people in this poor economy,
 most would opt for the ground beef.  That is the problem, most are not willing
 or cannot afford to pay twice as much for a 1mm slice for example. This leaves
 the preparer with a tough decision.  They have to balance the needs of the
 collector with the issue of cutting/polishing loss when a buyer is not willing
 or able to pay twice as much. In this poor economy, most are looking at the
 price per gram. Michael, you illustrated this perfectly by comparing a
 commodity 
 like beef with meteorites. Same for the guy running the auction, if you want
 cheese he states go to a deli.  I do not agree at all with the guy running
 the 
 auctions without weights listed.  This is pertinent information as with
 diamonds 
 where the weight is very important.  And... Diamonds are a commodity
 
 Best Regards,
 
 Adam
  
 
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message 
 From: John L j...@hc.fdn.com
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Mon, March 7, 2011 5:33:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Point of Diminishing returns (Slice thickness)?
 
 
 Michael and All,
 
 A 2mm Ribeye, draped over a 100 watt light bulb for 43 seconds turns out
 perfect.
 Micheal's words habitual ways of thinking may just boil down to (in my
 opinion only) a natural transition from a new collector to a more seasoned
 collector. When someone decides to begin collecting meteorites, for whatever
 reason, and is trying to explain to family and friends about his/her new
 venture--it just wouldn't work to show them your newest .006gm micro (this
 is an extreme example) and expect them to look at it for more than 20
 seconds but when you hand them any iron and EVERY single time they exclaim
 wow that's heavy for it's size--now you have their interest and they want
 to see more and most important they're more prone to listening to you about
 your new hobby.
 
 In my circles, i'm trying to get everyone i know to buy the biggest Campo
 they can afford and learn  educate yourself. Hopefuly, one of them will,
 one day, have the knowledge that you guys/gals have. Everyone starts
 somewhere.
 
 Personally, i'm on the side of as aesthetics and given the choice of a 4mm
 vs a 2mm, i would probably take the 2mm-if it was a more revealing piece.
 My true love is TS's and i have about another 40+ to post to the Eom. To me
 it's like looking into the sole of the universe.
 
 And that's my 3 oz's of Ribeye fat
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Blood mlbl...@cox.net
 To: Adam Hupe raremeteori...@yahoo.com; Meteorite List
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 6:58 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Point of Diminishing returns (Slice
 thickness)?
 
 
 Good points, Adam,
However, the collectors who are blind to any pricing
 Elements but weight are NOT getting the best deals at all.
I sell the same way I collect Good is good and to me
 How a specimen looks if far more important than mass.
Do I prefer a bigger specimen over a smaller specimen?
 Of course, but I do not prefer a thicker slice over a thinner
 Slice at all. If one is 4g and the other is 1.2g and the surface
 Area is larger on the 1.2g and the price is the same, I will take
 The 1.2 thinner slice with more surface area every stinking time.
If you can buy high fat ground beef for $2/lb or excellent
 Ribeye stakes  for $4/lb, which are YOU going to buy? I'll take
 The Ribeye every stinking time.
I believe collectors are STARTING to get the point that
 It is NOT the weight that is most important, but the visual
 Quality that matters. Every Tucson Show for the last several
 Years I have seen some screaming specimens sold for 4, 10 or
 100 times the normal price per gram. I have bought some of
 Them, myself.
I am always amazed that though I am certain the average
 Meteorite collector has a substantially higher IQ than the
 Public norm, so many of them are attached to narrow ways of
 Thinking. However, any smart individual will eventually overcome
 Habitual ways of thinking when repeatedly exposed to the logical
 advantages of other ways of looking at things.
Michael
 
 On 3/7/11 3:38 PM, Adam Hupe raremeteori...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 Most collectors go by the price per gram first so dealers who cut
 ultra-thin
 will take a loss when weight is the main consideration.  I know that the
 weight-to-surface area ratio is a secondary consideration for most
 collectors
 

Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Blood
Jason,
Of course you are right - it is a matter of taste.
As for a dealer withholding weight, that is not
Reasonable - unless he doesn't want to open the
Membrane box, or risk breakage or whatever. People
Should just buy what they want and some want
Weight and some want surface area.
No question, given say a 30mm X 30mm all else
Being equal (price and appearance) I would take the
Thicker one - but if the thicker one is 3 times the $,
Then I would always take the thinner one - but that
Is just me.
Michael


On 3/7/11 9:24 PM, Jason Utas meteorite...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello All,
 I'd like to point out a few things.
 
 First and foremost is that we are meteorite collectors.  Collectors.
 What does that mean?  It means that for some irrational reason, we
 have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor to spend our
 hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a little
 different than the more easily available ones that have originated on
 earth.  We buy them because we consider them to be 'interesting' or
 'pretty,' and that's about it.
 
 So when I hear collectors saying that they want to buy the thinnest
 slice possible of a given meteorite, it makes me want to stand back
 and ask...why?  Such a comment does make a lot of sense.  Since rarer
 types of meteorites are often very expensive (and are priced per
 gram), a thinner piece would logically be more easy to see -- if
 seeing the specimen were an issue.
 
 But, personally, from a collector's (my) point of view, I'd have to
 disagree.  If I wanted a piece of a given meteorite, I'd gladly pay
 twice as much for the thick slab or endcut that weighed twice as much
 as a mm-thick slice of greater  surface area.
 
 Why is that?  It's because if I want a given meteorite, I don't just
 want a piece that feels like a cross between a baseball card and a
 credit card.  I'd prefer a piece that has some heft to it.
 Perhaps that's not such a reasonable demand when one is talking about
 a lunar or a martian meteorite -- but there's a reason why Peter and I
 personally haven't bought very many of those.  The few that we have
 purchased have been smaller complete individuals, and we prefer them
 to slices of equivalent weights.
 
 And since I'm a collector, and I prefer such pieces, those are the
 better ones.  In my opinion.  You guys should stop trying to push
 your wants on other people as common sense, because, if you prefer
 thin slices, that's your preference -- not mine.  And neither one is
 better.  Your desire is rational in one sense - if you're willing to
 spend only enough to buy a gram or so of the moon, then yes, I can see
 why you would prefer a wafer with a larger surface area.  And I prefer
 specimens that have some weight and heft -- meteorites that I can see
 *and* feel.
 
 And there's much more to my rationale than just that.  Stability,
 difficulty of preservation, and the fact that the prices for such
 specimens *are* significantly inflated in general all make these less
 desirable to me.  That and the fact that I wouldn't feel comfortable
 with ever taking them out of a membrane box because I'd fear for the
 samples' safety.
 
 But, yes.  I see where you're coming from.  If visibility is your only
 criteria, then a thinner slice would logically appeal more to you.  I
 personally don't find that attractive.
 
 So, when I emailed the ebay seller that led to this thread and asked
 for specimen weights several months ago -- and they crassly declined
 -- I opted not to purchase any of their specimens.  Can I understand
 their supposed rationale for preferring thin slices with large surface
 areas?  Sure.  But they, as the seller, are obliged to give potential
 buyers the information they want about the material they're selling.
 
 Let's compare it to buying a house.  You are looking at properties and
 are told by a seller that you can see some photos of their building,
 but they won't let you actually go inside it or know how many bedrooms
 or bathrooms it has before you buy it.  The price seems fair based on
 what you know of the market, and can see from the photos.  The seller
 assures you that nothing is wrong with the house.
 Wouldn't you think it strange?  The details they are withholding are a
 good guideline for how houses are generally priced.  Wouldn't you
 think that the house *might* be flawed in some way that the seller
 didn't want you to know?  Furthermore, would you be willing to risk
 spending your money on such a deal?
 
 Meteorites are currently (generally) sold by the gram.  That system
 makes sense because weight is an easily quantifiable unit.  If people
 start selling slices by the square centimeter, unless they have some
 nifty computer programs and a scanner handy, they're not going to be
 able to judge area as accurately -- and furthermore, people wouldn't
 know how 'big' the pieces they were buying actually were.  Weight
 tells you how much you're getting, regardless of shape.  Area 

Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Blood
Right on.  Michael

On 3/8/11 12:42 AM, Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Hello Listers,
  
  
 I have been reading this Post and another Post about about weight and
 attractiveness and I can say there is a lot of pros and cons that have been
 listed. But I think the bottom line is the way you collect meteorites is in
 your own right and no one else. This is what I like about meteorite
 collecting, is that your collection can be unique from someone else, even if
 you both have the same meteorites. Can you do that with collecting coins or
 baseball cards? 
  
 I see that any way from collecting meteorites is your right way. If you
 collect meteorites on the micro scale, or whole specimen scale, or thin
 sections, or gram size, or historic falls to beauty, its all in the eyes of
 the behold, YOU. I can say that collecting a whole meteorite is the best way
 because its in its true natural state and looks like how it fell the day it
 landed on Earth. But on the flip side, I can say well whats the fun in
 collecting whole meteorites, you dont get to see whats in side and the outside
 looks the same. 
  
 Thats the beauty with collecting meteorites, everyone of use LISTERS will
 have a meteorite collection that is unique from anyone else and that just the
 collecting side. What about presentation and how you show off your meteorites.
 Good example is a pallisite suspended in oil and put in a frame. To beat that,
 one could put an LED light panel behind the pallisite and back light it. The
 list goes on.  
  
 But I do feel that there are some factors to think about when collecting and
 thats weight, which has been in question with an ebayer, the cost, where did
 it come from, is it a historic meteorite, does it have paper work, and is it
 beautiful in no particular order. But again, you might buy only historic falls
 with the actual museum labels, or meteorites that are whole specimens, or you
 might only collect slices to micros.
  
 Now I do have to say, factoring these elements in, that money has a big
 deal on how I collect and I bet on how others collect. If I had a lot of money
 to spend on meteorites, I might buy bigger or more, or might buy as much as I
 can and try to get every single meteorite out there. Or if I had a big budget
 and only wanted to get micros because I have this million dollar display case
 house out of crystals to show case my micros off, so be it.
  
 The bottom line is no way is the right way to collect only your way is the
 right way and dont let anyone else say other wise. But keep in mind, the
 weight, cost, where it comes from, and if you really want to add that
 meteorite to your collection.
  
  
 Shawn Alan 
 IMCA 1633 
 eBaystore 
 http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html
 
  
   
 [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay biddingJason Utas meteoritekid at gmail.com
 Tue Mar 8 00:24:05 EST 2011
 
 
 Previous message: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding
 Next message: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding
 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
 
 Hello All, 
 I'd like to point out a few things.
 
 First and foremost is that we are meteorite collectors. Collectors.
 What does that mean? It means that for some irrational reason, we
 have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor to spend our
 hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a little
 different than the more easily available ones that have originated on
 earth. We buy them because we consider them to be 'interesting' or
 'pretty,' and that's about it.
 
 So when I hear collectors saying that they want to buy the thinnest
 slice possible of a given meteorite, it makes me want to stand back
 and ask...why? Such a comment does make a lot of sense. Since rarer
 types of meteorites are often very expensive (and are priced per
 gram), a thinner piece would logically be more easy to see -- if
 seeing the specimen were an issue.
 
 But, personally, from a collector's (my) point of view, I'd have to
 disagree. If I wanted a piece of a given meteorite, I'd gladly pay
 twice as much for the thick slab or endcut that weighed twice as much
 as a mm-thick slice of greater surface area.
 
 Why is that? It's because if I want a given meteorite, I don't just
 want a piece that feels like a cross between a baseball card and a
 credit card. I'd prefer a piece that has some heft to it.
 Perhaps that's not such a reasonable demand when one is talking about
 a lunar or a martian meteorite -- but there's a reason why Peter and I
 personally haven't bought very many of those. The few that we have
 purchased have been smaller complete individuals, and we prefer them
 to slices of equivalent weights.
 
 And since I'm a collector, and I prefer such pieces, those are the
 better ones. In my opinion. You guys should stop trying to push
 your wants on other people as common sense, because, if you prefer
 thin slices, that's your preference -- not mine. And neither one is
 better. Your desire is rational 

Re: [meteorite-list] Earth Rocks! (Was: Help with Ebay bidding)

2011-03-08 Thread Meteorites USA

Hey Jason, you're forgetting something... ;)

Time.4.56 billion years worth of it.

The easily available rocks we don't collect didn't really originate 
here... All rocks on Earth, or more correctly, that *formed* Earth, were 
once meteoroids/asteroids at some point in the last 4.56+ billion years. 
The rocks from space we do collect are only interesting only because 
they've not yet been terrestrialized.


Technically, there isn't a single grain of dust or sand on this planet 
that didn't originate in space if you go far enough back in time.


Hell... Earth itself is one big rock in space. ;)

Regards,
Eric

On 3/7/2011 9:24 PM, Jason Utas wrote:

It means that for some irrational reason, we
have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor to spend our
hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a little
different than the more easily available ones that have originated on
earth.

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Earth Rocks! (Was: Help with Ebay bidding)

2011-03-08 Thread Jason Utas
Hello Eric, All,

I didn't forget it; I cut it out of my first paragraph.  Whether or
not the matter itself is the same age, if one is paying $850/g for a
thick slice of a lunar meteorite or $1000/g for a thinner one, the
prices are still relative to each other, and the fact that the atoms
themselves were created in the supernova that created our solar system
is..a moot point.  This was about the thickness of meteorite slices
and desirability/pricing, no?

I get what you're saying, and I agree with it, but I don't really get
how it pertains to this discussion.

That point would be relevant to a conversation about the irrationality
of high monetary values assigned to anything without real
practical/utilitarian value, but...that applies to all meteorites,
thick or thin.  [Perhaps modern art, most of all...something I'll
never waste money on ; ]

Regards,
Jason


On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Meteorites USA e...@meteoritesusa.com wrote:
 Hey Jason, you're forgetting something... ;)

 Time.4.56 billion years worth of it.

 The easily available rocks we don't collect didn't really originate
 here... All rocks on Earth, or more correctly, that *formed* Earth, were
 once meteoroids/asteroids at some point in the last 4.56+ billion years. The
 rocks from space we do collect are only interesting only because they've not
 yet been terrestrialized.

 Technically, there isn't a single grain of dust or sand on this planet that
 didn't originate in space if you go far enough back in time.

 Hell... Earth itself is one big rock in space. ;)

 Regards,
 Eric

 On 3/7/2011 9:24 PM, Jason Utas wrote:

 It means that for some irrational reason, we
 have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor to spend our
 hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a little
 different than the more easily available ones that have originated on
 earth.

 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of Day - March 8, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Johnson
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/March_8_2011.html

---
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Point of Diminishing returns (Slice thickness)?

2011-03-08 Thread al mitt

Greetings,

Interesting discussion on meteorite thickness, weight, value and slices etc. 
and so on. My problem with cutting slices too thin are many. While you get a 
great looking slice with good surface area there are trade offs. Number one 
is there is more breakage when trying to cut ultra thin slices. Breakage 
should cause the price of the material to rise, if you have a truly limited 
amount of that material in the first place.


Two. Thin slices that are made without breakage are also prone to breaking 
later on. It could break during shipping to the buyer. Breaking a full slice 
can reduce the value of that slice, especially if there are only a couple of 
full slices in the world of that material. Even if you don't break it if you 
sell it later there is a chance it could break in shipping. You can always 
sell the two half slices and the multiple crumbs then.


Three. Another consideration is if the surface of the slice needs 
refinishing at some point (even if it is not in your lifetime) the odds 
again are higher that it will break while being worked on. A thicker slice 
can be resurfaced multiple times assuring it survives being studied, viewed 
and appreciated in the future.


Four. Cutting specimens ultra thin causes waste of material. First you get 
more slices but at the lost of more material. One commenter mentioned 60% 
which sound right to me when cutting ultra thin. Again if the material is 
truly very limited, scientifically valuable material could be lost. I can 
appreciate cutting material where there is lots of that material and to cut 
ultra thin as there will be multiple kilos of it for sometime.


For those who collect thin slices I am not picking on you but just posting 
my thoughts of these ultra thin cut slices and the pros and cons. Please 
don't take it personal. I do have some ultra thin slices in my collection.


I coined the phrase that I am the current caretaker of the meteorite 
specimens I currently posses which will be past on to future generations. It 
is my job with that collection to try to preserve it best I can.


--AL Mitterling

Mitterling Meteorites


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD: Nininger: Out of the Sky, signed

2011-03-08 Thread Uwe Arendt
Out of the Sky An Introduction to Meteoritics

H. H. Nininger

Publisher: The University of Denver Press, Denver CO 1952
Description: Tan Cloth Hard Cover, 336 pp. 

Book has been signed, inscribed and dated Aug. 2, 1956. Soiled scratched cover 
with wear along spine. Large water stain to pages 295-back cover  small water 
stain to pages 11-148. Otherwise book is solid. DJ is missing

I am asking for 130 $ 

Shipping  Handling: Shipping is as follows $10.00 in the USA and 
international. If you are in doubt please email with questions. 

cu, Gegenschein
-- 
GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit 
gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding

2011-03-08 Thread GeoZay

JasonHello All,
I'd like to point  out a few things.

First and foremost is that we are meteorite  collectors.  Collectors.
What does that mean?  It means that for  some irrational reason, we
have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor  to spend our
hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a  little
different than the more easily available ones that have originated  on
earth.  We buy them because we consider them to be 'interesting'  or
'pretty,' and that's about it..

Everything Jason said  in the complete post I agree with. A month or two 
ago I was looking some of  these thin slices over on ebay and was immediately 
turned off by not knowing  what the weights were. I felt like I was being 
told that the naked emperor's  new clothes covered him up nicely. 
GeoZay  

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] New Mexico Fire..

2011-03-08 Thread Dennis Miller

Hello, Michael Cottingham... I see the New Mexico fire season has started. 
Sorry to see
it is in your neighborhood. I do hope that you and yours are safe and away from 
the fire.
Prayers are with the Folks of Silver City...
Dennis Miller 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Gilmer
Can someone repost a link to these deli thin slices?  I can't find a
link and I am curious to see.  Maybe the seller is using a deli
meat-slicer?

Best regards,

MikeG

--
Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone  Ironworks Meteorites

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
---

On 3/8/11, geo...@aol.com geo...@aol.com wrote:

 JasonHello All,
 I'd like to point  out a few things.

 First and foremost is that we are meteorite  collectors.  Collectors.
 What does that mean?  It means that for  some irrational reason, we
 have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor  to spend our
 hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a  little
 different than the more easily available ones that have originated  on
 earth.  We buy them because we consider them to be 'interesting'  or
 'pretty,' and that's about it..

 Everything Jason said  in the complete post I agree with. A month or two
 ago I was looking some of  these thin slices over on ebay and was
 immediately
 turned off by not knowing  what the weights were. I felt like I was being
 told that the naked emperor's  new clothes covered him up nicely.
 GeoZay

 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding

2011-03-08 Thread Richard Montgomery
I knew going in that I wasn't going to learn the weights until I weighed 
them myself...and I was a bit taken aback by how thin they were when they 
arrived; then I realized that I still had some prizes after all.  I always 
learn something (no matter how small) when I add a piece to my 
collectionin this case, I learned the conditions of this particular 
seller's presentation and now I know what I'd be encountering if I choose to 
again in the future.


Interestingly, right after this thread started, positive feedback 
arrived.


-Richard Montgomery


- Original Message - 
From: Michael Blood mlbl...@cox.net
To: Jason Utas meteorite...@gmail.com; Richard Montgomery 
rickm...@earthlink.net
Cc: Met. Michael Gilmer meteoritem...@gmail.com; Meteorite List 
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; valpar...@aol.com

Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding



Jason,
   Of course you are right - it is a matter of taste.
   As for a dealer withholding weight, that is not
Reasonable - unless he doesn't want to open the
Membrane box, or risk breakage or whatever. People
Should just buy what they want and some want
Weight and some want surface area.
   No question, given say a 30mm X 30mm all else
Being equal (price and appearance) I would take the
Thicker one - but if the thicker one is 3 times the $,
Then I would always take the thinner one - but that
Is just me.
   Michael


On 3/7/11 9:24 PM, Jason Utas meteorite...@gmail.com wrote:


Hello All,
I'd like to point out a few things.

First and foremost is that we are meteorite collectors.  Collectors.
What does that mean?  It means that for some irrational reason, we
have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor to spend our
hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a little
different than the more easily available ones that have originated on
earth.  We buy them because we consider them to be 'interesting' or
'pretty,' and that's about it.

So when I hear collectors saying that they want to buy the thinnest
slice possible of a given meteorite, it makes me want to stand back
and ask...why?  Such a comment does make a lot of sense.  Since rarer
types of meteorites are often very expensive (and are priced per
gram), a thinner piece would logically be more easy to see -- if
seeing the specimen were an issue.

But, personally, from a collector's (my) point of view, I'd have to
disagree.  If I wanted a piece of a given meteorite, I'd gladly pay
twice as much for the thick slab or endcut that weighed twice as much
as a mm-thick slice of greater  surface area.

Why is that?  It's because if I want a given meteorite, I don't just
want a piece that feels like a cross between a baseball card and a
credit card.  I'd prefer a piece that has some heft to it.
Perhaps that's not such a reasonable demand when one is talking about
a lunar or a martian meteorite -- but there's a reason why Peter and I
personally haven't bought very many of those.  The few that we have
purchased have been smaller complete individuals, and we prefer them
to slices of equivalent weights.

And since I'm a collector, and I prefer such pieces, those are the
better ones.  In my opinion.  You guys should stop trying to push
your wants on other people as common sense, because, if you prefer
thin slices, that's your preference -- not mine.  And neither one is
better.  Your desire is rational in one sense - if you're willing to
spend only enough to buy a gram or so of the moon, then yes, I can see
why you would prefer a wafer with a larger surface area.  And I prefer
specimens that have some weight and heft -- meteorites that I can see
*and* feel.

And there's much more to my rationale than just that.  Stability,
difficulty of preservation, and the fact that the prices for such
specimens *are* significantly inflated in general all make these less
desirable to me.  That and the fact that I wouldn't feel comfortable
with ever taking them out of a membrane box because I'd fear for the
samples' safety.

But, yes.  I see where you're coming from.  If visibility is your only
criteria, then a thinner slice would logically appeal more to you.  I
personally don't find that attractive.

So, when I emailed the ebay seller that led to this thread and asked
for specimen weights several months ago -- and they crassly declined
-- I opted not to purchase any of their specimens.  Can I understand
their supposed rationale for preferring thin slices with large surface
areas?  Sure.  But they, as the seller, are obliged to give potential
buyers the information they want about the material they're selling.

Let's compare it to buying a house.  You are looking at properties and
are told by a seller that you can see some photos of their building,
but they won't let you actually go inside it or know how many bedrooms
or bathrooms it has before you buy it.  The price seems fair based on
what you know of the market, and can see from the 

Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding

2011-03-08 Thread Richard Montgomery
Ah!   I knew the brecciated deli-meats topic would rise again!   I saw some 
incredible olive inclusions in the Bologna slices the other day, (but not as 
nice as the shocked and compressed Turkey main mass.)  Thin slices, too.


-Richard Montgomery



- Original Message - 
From: Michael Gilmer meteoritem...@gmail.com

To: geo...@aol.com
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding



Can someone repost a link to these deli thin slices?  I can't find a
link and I am curious to see.  Maybe the seller is using a deli
meat-slicer?

Best regards,

MikeG

--
Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone  Ironworks Meteorites

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
---

On 3/8/11, geo...@aol.com geo...@aol.com wrote:


JasonHello All,
I'd like to point  out a few things.

First and foremost is that we are meteorite  collectors.  Collectors.
What does that mean?  It means that for  some irrational reason, we
have all decided that it is a worthwhile endeavor  to spend our
hard-earned money on chunks of rock that happen to be a  little
different than the more easily available ones that have originated  on
earth.  We buy them because we consider them to be 'interesting'  or
'pretty,' and that's about it..

Everything Jason said  in the complete post I agree with. A month or two
ago I was looking some of  these thin slices over on ebay and was
immediately
turned off by not knowing  what the weights were. I felt like I was being
told that the naked emperor's  new clothes covered him up nicely.
GeoZay

__
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




--
__
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - 54 Auctions Ending Today!

2011-03-08 Thread Adam Hupe
Dear List Members,
 
Just a quick note to let you know I have 54 auctions ending today.  All  were 
started at just 99 cents with no reserve. I have been rotating inventory as  
stock runs out on some very low TKW material so you may want to take a look if  
you can find the time.
 
Link to all auctions:
http://shop.ebay.com/raremeteorites!/m.html


Thank  you for looking and if you are bidding, good luck.


Best  Regards,

Adam Hupe
The Hupe Collection
IMCA 2185
Team Lunar  Rock
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD; My Internet site - the meteorites Pultusk Morasko and Kosice!

2011-03-08 Thread Lukasz Smula
Hello everyone,

For all interested I give the address www. where can see  my specimens
of meteorite Kosice, Pultusk and Morasko THE NEW GOOD PRICE!

For example:

1. Meteorite Pultusk 1510g -
http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=84
2. Pultusk 640g -
http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=85
3. BIG Morasko 13kg -
http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=92
4. Big Morasko 28kg -
http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=93
5. New Kosice - http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/kosicec.html


Please contact me if you have any questions: starry...@gmail.com
Thank you everyone for looking

Kind Regards,
Lukas Smula
www.artmet-meteoryty.pl
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] AD; My Internet site - the meteorites Pultusk Morasko and Kosice!

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Gilmer
Hi Lukasz,

Beautiful photos and specimens.  Thanks for sharing them.  :)

Do you know if this meteorite has been submitted to the Meteoritical
Society for inclusion in the Met Bulletin?

Best regards,

MikeG

--
Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone  Ironworks Meteorites

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
---
On 3/8/11, Lukasz Smula starry...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello everyone,

 For all interested I give the address www. where can see  my specimens
 of meteorite Kosice, Pultusk and Morasko THE NEW GOOD PRICE!

 For example:

 1. Meteorite Pultusk 1510g -
 http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=84
 2. Pultusk 640g -
 http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=85
 3. BIG Morasko 13kg -
 http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=92
 4. Big Morasko 28kg -
 http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/en/sklep/meteoryty/szczeguly.php?pokaz=93
 5. New Kosice - http://www.artmet-meteoryty.pl/kosicec.html


 Please contact me if you have any questions: starry...@gmail.com
 Thank you everyone for looking

 Kind Regards,
 Lukas Smula
 www.artmet-meteoryty.pl
 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison???

2011-03-08 Thread Richard Kowalski
Recently some of us had a discussion on Facebook about how rare Murchison seems 
to be. Rarely do you see as much as a gram available.

The Heritage Auction has a huge Murchison, 535.9g individual
(http://fineart.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=6061Lot_No=49046)

Maybe I've missed them, or not privy to their availability, but where is all 
the Murchison between a gram and and this largest individual?

Anyone?

--
Richard Kowalski
Full Moon Photography
IMCA #1081


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Mexico Fire..

2011-03-08 Thread michael cottingham
Hello,

Thanks. The main fires are about a mile from my house, but seem to be burning 
themselves out. We have lost about 20 homes in the area and this fire, because 
of the high winds, spread fast and furious, destroying everything in its path. 
It moved so fast that most folks in the area barley had time to leave. No 
deaths that I know of and that is good.

Thanks for the good thoughts and prayers.

Best Wishes

Michael Cottingham


On Mar 8, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Dennis Miller wrote:

 
 Hello, Michael Cottingham... I see the New Mexico fire season has started. 
 Sorry to see
 it is in your neighborhood. I do hope that you and yours are safe and away 
 from the fire.
 Prayers are with the Folks of Silver City...
 Dennis Miller   

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison???

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Gilmer
Hi Richard and List,

HOLY CARBOS BATMAN!  That is a whopper of a Murchison!

If someone wants to buy that for me for my birthday, I will buy that
person a beer and a cigar.  ;)

To answer your question - I don't know.  The majority of Murchison
that I see is broken fragments that are less than 50g and tiny crumbs
in the 1g range.  I rarely see individuals, and if I saw a complete
crusted pea of 1-2g, I would pounce on it and my cabinet would grow by
one.

Best regards,

MikeG

--
Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone  Ironworks Meteorites

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
---

On 3/8/11, Richard Kowalski damoc...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Recently some of us had a discussion on Facebook about how rare Murchison
 seems to be. Rarely do you see as much as a gram available.

 The Heritage Auction has a huge Murchison, 535.9g individual
 (http://fineart.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=6061Lot_No=49046)

 Maybe I've missed them, or not privy to their availability, but where is all
 the Murchison between a gram and and this largest individual?

 Anyone?

 --
 Richard Kowalski
 Full Moon Photography
 IMCA #1081



 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison???

2011-03-08 Thread Alexander Seidel
If nobody else publicly responds to your call, Richard, may be you better ask 
some dealers or collectors personally who are somehow known to have had some 
good pieces of Murch for sale in the past, or in their collection. If they have 
something to sell, good, else they may talk to you about sources in the more 
recent past.

I can´t give much more advice on that. My personal piece of Murchison is a nice 
cut crusted individual which I bought from Bob Haag about fifteen or more years 
ago. May be he is the one who still has some for sale in the weight ranges 
needed? I really don´t know - but: good luck! Some of the list folks here may 
also make other suggestions or offers...??? Would be glad to read more about 
this. 

Alex
Berlin/Germany
  


 Original-Nachricht 
 Datum: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:36:55 -0800 (PST)
 Von: Richard Kowalski damoc...@yahoo.com
 An: meteorite list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Betreff: [meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison???

 Recently some of us had a discussion on Facebook about how rare Murchison
 seems to be. Rarely do you see as much as a gram available.
 
 The Heritage Auction has a huge Murchison, 535.9g individual
 (http://fineart.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=6061Lot_No=49046)
 
 Maybe I've missed them, or not privy to their availability, but where is
 all the Murchison between a gram and and this largest individual?
 
 Anyone?
 
 --
 Richard Kowalski
 Full Moon Photography
 IMCA #1081
 
 
   
 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison???

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Blood
I have some on my Hammers 2 page and a piece I haven't put up yet:

http://michaelbloodmeteorites.com/Hammers2.html


Michael



On 3/8/11 11:36 AM, Richard Kowalski damoc...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Recently some of us had a discussion on Facebook about how rare Murchison
 seems to be. Rarely do you see as much as a gram available.
 
 The Heritage Auction has a huge Murchison, 535.9g individual
 (http://fineart.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=6061Lot_No=49046)
 
 Maybe I've missed them, or not privy to their availability, but where is all
 the Murchison between a gram and and this largest individual?
 
 Anyone?
 
 --
 Richard Kowalski
 Full Moon Photography
 IMCA #1081
 
 
   
 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


--
Teachin' a pig to dance is a waste of time and it irritates the pig
Mark Twain
--
1. Whenever you're wrong, admit it,
2. Whenever you're right, shut up.
Shaquille O'Neal


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison???

2011-03-08 Thread Thunder Stone

I got word that a lot of it is being sliced real' thin...
I just think it's one of the most sought after meteorites, so it's hard to 
find.  Also, I'm sure a lot of it is in institutions for study. I remember a 
few years back I try to find some on the web... very few piece available.  I 
finally got a nice piece (few grams) from Anne Black last year at Tucson.
I have to agree - a beautiful specimen; I wish I was filthy rich sometimes.
Greg S.


 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:36:55 -0800
 From: damoc...@yahoo.com
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison???

 Recently some of us had a discussion on Facebook about how rare Murchison 
 seems to be. Rarely do you see as much as a gram available.

 The Heritage Auction has a huge Murchison, 535.9g individual
 (http://fineart.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=6061Lot_No=49046)

 Maybe I've missed them, or not privy to their availability, but where is all 
 the Murchison between a gram and and this largest individual?

 Anyone?

 --
 Richard Kowalski
 Full Moon Photography
 IMCA #1081



 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Tasmania Australia Rock show announcements

2011-03-08 Thread dean bessey
My father is visiting me from Canada for a couple months and all his life has 
wanted to visit Tasmania so I have to bring him. By sheer coincidence there 
were two annual rock and mineral shows going on while we were going to be 
there. So I decided to get stalls at both shows.
I am not sure how many people who could go to this but I know that there are at 
least several list members from Tasmania and a few meteorite collectors on the 
shipwreck island but I would like to announce two Rock shows that I will be 
attending in the next few weeks. I will have  mostly gemstones and crystals but 
will have a few meteorites so drop by if you will attend. Its a perfect time of 
year to visit beautiful Tasmania.
Rock shows are:
--
Sat 19 March - Sun 20 March 2011 - Hobart Tasmania
The Hobart Gem and Mineral Spectacular 2011 - Tasmania’s  Hidden  Treasures - 
presented by The Lapidary Club of Tasmania Inc, supported by The Mineralogical 
Society of Tasmania,
Grandstand Hall, Hobart Showgrounds, Glenorchy, Tasmania
---
And the next weekend
Sat 26 March - Sun 27 March 2011 - Latrobe, northern Tasmania
'The Latrobe Gem and Mineral Fair',  organised by the Devonport Lapidary Club, 
at the Latrobe Memorial Hall, Gilbert Street, Latrobe, Tasmania


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - Last of the Orgueil with ASU provenance for sale.

2011-03-08 Thread Greg Catterton
Been selling this on ebay and facebook since the story broke... however it 
turns out, this just adds yet another awesome story to go with this historic 
meteorite.
I have two lots left from the 371mg I made available, one is 110mg and the 
other is 15mg.
I obtained this material from The Center for Meteorite Studies at Arizona State 
University personally in a trade and will provide full provenance documentation 
and a copy of the label from them. This is this best documented material for 
sale on ebay at this time, and when buying material like this, provenance is 
everything.

110mg lot
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=390295848576ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT

15mg lot
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=390295849000ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT

Thanks for looking.

Greg Catterton
www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com
IMCA member 4682
On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites
On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WanderingStarMeteorites


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] CI1 meteorites and cyanobacteria

2011-03-08 Thread Darren Garrison
More scholarship from the Journal of Cosmology:

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/03/i_am_getting_a_very_poor_impre.php
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Collection of Meteorite Articles - For Noobies and the Curious

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Gilmer
Hi Listees!

I have put together a portal page with links to all of the
meteorite-related articles that I have written.  These articles are
written in layman's terms for newcomers and are designed to give the
reader a basic grasp of the fundamentals of collecting meteorites.
These are not meant to be authoritative or definitive (like David
Weir's excellent Meteorite Studies site), but I hope some will find
them informative and fun.

Link - http://www.galactic-stone.com/pages/learn-about-meteorites

Best regards,

MikeG

--
Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone  Ironworks Meteorites

Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
---
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] CI1 meteorites and cyanobacteria

2011-03-08 Thread Shawn Alan
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=13075522page=1

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New Mexico Fire..

2011-03-08 Thread John L


Michael,

Just got in and read the news.

Take care. Be safe.

My best
John Lutzon
IMCA# 1896


- Original Message - 
From: michael cottingham mikew...@gilanet.com

To: Dennis Miller astror...@hotmail.com
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Mexico Fire..



Hello,

Thanks. The main fires are about a mile from my house, but seem to be 
burning themselves out. We have lost about 20 homes in the area and this 
fire, because of the high winds, spread fast and furious, destroying 
everything in its path. It moved so fast that most folks in the area 
barley had time to leave. No deaths that I know of and that is good.


Thanks for the good thoughts and prayers.

Best Wishes

Michael Cottingham


On Mar 8, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Dennis Miller wrote:



Hello, Michael Cottingham... I see the New Mexico fire season has 
started. Sorry to see
it is in your neighborhood. I do hope that you and yours are safe and 
away from the fire.

Prayers are with the Folks of Silver City...
Dennis Miller


__
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Report Identifies Priority Missions for Planetary Science in the Next Decade

2011-03-08 Thread Ron Baalke


March 7, 2011

Contacts:
Molly Galvin / Luwam Yiebio
Media Relations Officer / Media Relations Assistant
Office of News and Public Information
+1 202-334-2138
n...@nas.edu

REPORT IDENTIFIES PRIORITY MISSIONS
FOR PLANETARY SCIENCE IN THE NEXT DECADE

A new report from the National Research Council recommends a suite of
planetary science flagship missions for the decade 2013-2022 that
could provide a steady stream of important new discoveries about the
solar system. However, if NASA's budget over that decade cannot
support all of these missions, the agency should preserve smaller
scale missions in its New Frontiers and Discovery programs first and
delay some or all of the recommended large-scale missions, the report
says.

Research priorities were selected through a rigorous review that
included input from five expert panels. The committee also sought
extensive input from the planetary sciences community through town
hall meetings and white papers. Recommendations are informed by NASA's
own FY 2011 projected budget scenarios for 2013-2022. In addition, the
committee hired a contractor to provide independent cost and technical
analyses of select mission proposals.

Our recommendations are science-driven, and they offer a balanced mix
of missions -- large, medium, and small -- that have the potential to
greatly expand our knowledge of the solar system, said Steven W.
Squyres, professor of astronomy at the Center for Radiophysics and
Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., and chair of the
committee that wrote the report. However, in these tough economic
times, some difficult choices may have to be made. With that in mind,
our priority missions were carefully selected based on their potential
to yield the most scientific benefit per dollar spent.

The Mars Astrobiology Explorer Cacher (MAX-C), a mission to Mars that
could help determine whether the planet ever supported life and could
also help answer questions about its geologic and climatic history,
should be NASA's highest priority large mission, the report says. This
mission will be the first step in a multipart effort to eventually
return samples from the planet. The report stresses, however, that the
mission should be conducted only if the cost to NASA is approximately
$2.5 billion -- $1 billion less than the independent estimates
provided to the committee. NASA and the European Space Agency, which
would run the mission jointly, should work together to reduce the
scope of the mission and ensure that both agencies still benefit.

A mission to Jupiter's icy moon Europa and its subsurface ocean -- one
of the most promising environments in the solar system for supporting
life -- should be the second priority for NASA's large-scale planetary
science missions. However, NASA should fly the Jupiter Europa Orbiter
(JEO) only if NASA's budget for planetary science is increased, the
report says, and JEO's mission scope is made more affordable. The
independent estimate put the price tag at $4.7 billion. The committee
concluded that unless costs could be brought down, conducting JEO
would preclude too many other important missions.

The third priority for large missions would be the Uranus Orbiter and
Probe mission to investigate that planet's interior structure,
atmosphere, and composition. The report says that this mission should
be initiated between 2013 and 2022, but it should be subjected to
rigorous, independent cost verification throughout its development and
reduced or cancelled if costs grow significantly above its assessed
$2.7 billion price tag.

For medium-size missions, the report recommends that NASA select two
new missions to be included in its New Frontiers program, which
explores the solar system with frequent, mid-size spacecraft missions.
Since its inception in 2003, the program has initiated two missions
and is in the process of selecting a third. The committee recommends
that NASA also select a fourth and fifth mission in the 2013-2023 time
frame and identifies several candidates from which NASA could choose,
but does not prioritize them. Instead, selection should be based on
competitive peer review.

Although the report does not make specific recommendations for small
missions, it notes that NASA's Discovery Program of low-cost, highly
focused planetary science investigations has made important
contributions to science and should be continued at its current level
of funding with adjustments for inflation. NASA should ensure a
regular, balanced schedule of such missions. The committee also
endorses the Mars Trace Gas Orbiter, a small mission outside of the
Discovery program due to launch in 2016, as long as current plans for
dividing responsibilities and costs between NASA and the European
Space Agency remain.

The National Science Foundation, which supports nearly all areas of
planetary science except space missions, should expand its funding for
existing laboratories and establish new facilities as needed, the
report says. It also 

[meteorite-list] Texas Meteor, 3UK meteors, and ISS/Space Shuttle videos

2011-03-08 Thread drtanuki
Dear List,

ISS / Space Shuttle Pass over Italy Captured 7MAR2011
http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/2011/03/iss-and-space-shuttle-pass-over-earth.html

Hawley, TX meteor 8MAR2011
http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/2011/03/hawley-texas-meteor-fireball-8mar2011.html

Other:

3 UK meteor events
http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/2011/03/3-uk-meteor-events-7mar2011-8mar2011.html

Best Always, Dirk Ross...Tokyo
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Some of Mars' Missing Carbon Dioxide May be Buried

2011-03-08 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2011-071  

Some of Mars' Missing Carbon Dioxide May be Buried
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
March 08, 2011

HOUSTON -- Rocks on Mars dug from far underground by crater-blasting
impacts are providing glimpses of one possible way Mars' atmosphere has
become much less dense than it used to be.

At several places where cratering has exposed material from depths of
about 5 kilometers (3 miles) or more beneath the surface, observations
by a mineral-mapping instrument on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
indicate carbonate minerals.

These are not the first detections of carbonates on Mars. However,
compared to earlier findings, they bear closer resemblance to what some
scientists have theorized for decades about the whereabouts of Mars'
missing carbon. If deeply buried carbonate layers are found to be
widespread, they would help answer questions about the disappearance of
most of ancient Mars' atmosphere, which is deduced to have been thick
and mostly carbon dioxide. The carbon that goes into formation of
carbonate minerals can come from atmospheric carbon dioxide.

We're looking at a pretty lucky location in terms of exposing something
that was deep beneath the surface, said planetary scientist James Wray
of Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., who reported the latest carbonate
findings today at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference near
Houston. Huygens crater, a basin 467 kilometers (290 miles) in diameter
in the southern highlands of Mars, had already hoisted material from far
underground, and then the rim of Huygens, containing the lifted
material, was drilled into by a smaller, unnamed cratering event.

Observations in the high-resolution mode of the Compact Reconnaissance
Imaging Spectrometer for Mars (CRISM) instrument on the Mars
Reconnaissance Orbiter show spectral characteristics of calcium or iron
carbonate at this site. Detections of clay minerals in lower-resolution
mapping mode by CRISM had prompted closer examination with the
spectrometer, and the carbonates are found near the clay minerals. Both
types of minerals typically form in wet environments.

The occurrence of this type of carbonate in association with the largest
impact features suggests that it was buried by a few kilometers (or
miles) of younger rocks, possibly including volcanic flows and
fragmented material ejected from other, nearby impacts.

These findings reinforce a report by other researchers five months ago
identifying the same types of carbonate and clay minerals from CRISM
observation of a site about 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) away. At that
site, a meteor impact has exposed rocks from deep underground, inside
Leighton crater. In their report of that discovery, Joseph Michalski of
the Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Ariz., and Paul Niles of NASA
Johnson Space Center, Houston, proposed that the carbonates at Leighton
might be only a small part of a much more extensive ancient sedimentary
record that has been buried by volcanic resurfacing and impact ejecta.

Carbonates found in rocks elsewhere on Mars, from orbit and by NASA's
Spirit rover, are rich in magnesium. Those could form from reaction of
volcanic deposits with moisture, Wray said. The broader compositional
range we're seeing that includes iron-rich and calcium-rich carbonates
couldn't form as easily from just a little bit of water reacting with
igneous rocks. Calcium carbonate is what you typically find on Earth's
ocean and lake floors.

He said the carbonates at Huygens and Leighton fit what would be
expected from atmospheric carbon dioxide interacting with ancient bodies
of water on Mars. Key additional evidence would be to find similar
deposits in other regions of Mars. A hunting guide for that search is
the CRISM low-resolution mapping, which has covered about three-fourths
of the planet and revealed clay-mineral deposits at thousands of locations.

A dramatic change in atmospheric density remains one of the most
intriguing possibilities about early Mars, said Mars Reconnaissance
Orbiter Project Scientist Richard Zurek, of NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Increasing evidence for liquid water on
the surface of ancient Mars for extended periods continues to suggest
that the atmosphere used to be much thicker.

Carbon dioxide makes up nearly all of today's Martian air and likely was
most of a thicker early atmosphere, too. In today's thin, cold
atmosphere, liquid water quickly freezes or boils away.

What became of that carbon dioxide? NASA will launch the Mars Atmosphere
and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN) in 2013 to investigate processes
that could have stripped the gas from the top of the atmosphere into
interplanetary space. Meanwhile, CRISM and other instruments now in
orbit continue to look for evidence that some of the carbon dioxide in
that ancient atmosphere was removed, in the presence of liquid water, by
formation of carbonate minerals now buried far beneath the present surface.


[meteorite-list] Interesting recent news stories of interest

2011-03-08 Thread drtanuki
Dear List,  

This post contains some interesting news that you may not want to miss, 
including:

Impact Crater in Congo, Croatian Meteorite Found,

Meteorite found in Israel,

Chinese article claiming the world`s largest achondrite found (photos look fake 
to me)

and several other links to stories.

http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/2011/03/recent-meteormeteorite-news-9mar2011.html

  Best Regards, Dirk Ross...Tokyo

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] CI1 meteorites and cyanobacteria

2011-03-08 Thread Sterling K. Webb

On the orther hand, the guy who owns the
Journal of Cosmology website and published
Hoover to raise money or to promote the sale
of the website, drives a really nice car*
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~rschild/morgan.html

Somehow it makes a strange kind of sense that
the owner of this website also drives a wooden
automobile... Possibly the attempt to build a car
out of cyanobacteria failed?


Sterling K. Webb
---
*Thanks to Darren Garrison for pointing out the car.
---
- Original Message - 
From: Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] CI1 meteorites and cyanobacteria



http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=13075522page=1

__
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html

Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Massive Meteor in Manitoba, Canada - Air Raid Sirens Triggered (yet unconfirmed)

2011-03-08 Thread drtanuki
Dear List,

Anyone with information please contact me;  this sounds like a major event!

Brandon, Manitoba Canada huge meteor seen last night 3:30 am 8MAR2011
Mar 9 2011, 9:09 AM Tokyo Timestamp
Guest697 (guest) wrote:
Huge, huge meteor seen last night at around 3:30 central time. Over Brandon, 
Manitoba Canada.  Air Raid sirens were briefly heard right after impact. And 
many police roaming through the streets. Enormous meteor,flash of light upon 
impact in the form of a ring of light.

http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/2011/03/breaking-news-brandon-manitoba-canada.html

Important! Anyone with more information, photos or video about this event 
please email me at:
 
lunarmeteoritehun...@gmail.com

(this story has not yet been confirmed!) Thank You!  Dirk Ross...Tokyo
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Welcome home

2011-03-08 Thread Richard Kowalski
Glad to see Mike  Robert are back home!


--
Richard Kowalski
Full Moon Photography
IMCA #1081


  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Welcome home

2011-03-08 Thread Matson, Robert D.
Hi Richard,

Wow! That's great news, and more than a month earlier than
originally expected (if I'm remember the April date correctly).
Hopefully they are both in good health.

Welcome home guys!

Rob

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of
Richard Kowalski
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 6:32 PM
To: meteorite list
Subject: [meteorite-list] Welcome home

Glad to see Mike  Robert are back home!

--
Richard Kowalski
Full Moon Photography
IMCA #1081
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Welcome home

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Blood
Richard,
Where did you hear this? I did not see it on the list
Michael

On 3/8/11 6:32 PM, Richard Kowalski damoc...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Glad to see Mike  Robert are back home!
 
 
 --
 Richard Kowalski
 Full Moon Photography
 IMCA #1081
 
 
   
 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


--
Teachin' a pig to dance is a waste of time and it irritates the pig
Mark Twain
--
1. Whenever you're wrong, admit it,
2. Whenever you're right, shut up.
Shaquille O'Neal


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Welcome home

2011-03-08 Thread Greg Stanley
That's good news.

Greg S.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 8, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Richard Kowalski damoc...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Glad to see Mike  Robert are back home!
 
 
 --
 Richard Kowalski
 Full Moon Photography
 IMCA #1081
 
 
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Welcome home

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Blood
OK, sounds confirmed.
I will now talk to Rubin about releasing the video of John
Blennert's pre-auction lecture on hunting Gold Basin (John  I did
Not think it would be favorable to Mike and Rob's situation if
A formerly Oman imprisoned meteorite hunter were broadcast worldwide
At that time.
Rubin or I will let you know when it is available.
Michael

On 3/8/11 7:06 PM, Michael Blood mlbl...@cox.net wrote:

 Richard,
 Where did you hear this? I did not see it on the list
 Michael
 
 On 3/8/11 6:32 PM, Richard Kowalski damoc...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 Glad to see Mike  Robert are back home!
 
 
 --
 Richard Kowalski
 Full Moon Photography
 IMCA #1081
 
 
   
 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 --
 Teachin' a pig to dance is a waste of time and it irritates the pig
 Mark Twain
 --
 1. Whenever you're wrong, admit it,
 2. Whenever you're right, shut up.
 Shaquille O'Neal
 
 
 __
 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


--
Teachin' a pig to dance is a waste of time and it irritates the pig
Mark Twain
--
1. Whenever you're wrong, admit it,
2. Whenever you're right, shut up.
Shaquille O'Neal


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Earth Rocks! (Was: Help with Ebay bidding)

2011-03-08 Thread Shawn Alan
Hi Jason and Listers.

Jason said
[Perhaps modern art, most of all...something I'll 
never waste money on ; ]

Really? Come on JK :) I was at the Phillips de Pury  Company Under The 
Influence auction today were I got to see Stephen Colbert try to get people to 
bid more on a ink jet portrait of himself which at one time was worth nothing. 
But then Shepard Fairy and Andres Serrano went on his show and tagged up the 
inkjet print and re contextualized it and it sold for $26,000. But thats not 
the kicker whats the kicker is a painting called BIRD SHIT which looked like 
bird shit up and down the painting sold for around $50,000. Thats some shitty 
art might I add. And lastly to keep the PC for Meteorite Central there was a 
painting I saw that looked like a meteorite at the viewing house.
 
http://photos.liveauctioneers.com/houses/resize/phillipsdepury/24158/0134_1_160_180.jpg
 
and for those that want to see the BIRD SHIT painting here is the link
 
http://www.modernedition.com/art-articles/unusual-mediums/unusual-art/dan-colen-bird-shit.jpg
 
 
Shawn Alan 
IMCA 1633 
eBaystore 
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html 













[meteorite-list] Earth Rocks! (Was: Help with Ebay bidding)
Jason Utas meteoritekid at gmail.com 
Tue Mar 8 04:54:59 EST 2011 

Previous message: [meteorite-list] Earth Rocks! (Was: Help with Ebay bidding) 
Next message: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 


Hello Eric, All, 

I didn't forget it; I cut it out of my first paragraph. Whether or 
not the matter itself is the same age, if one is paying $850/g for a 
thick slice of a lunar meteorite or $1000/g for a thinner one, the 
prices are still relative to each other, and the fact that the atoms 
themselves were created in the supernova that created our solar system 
is..a moot point. This was about the thickness of meteorite slices 
and desirability/pricing, no? 

I get what you're saying, and I agree with it, but I don't really get 
how it pertains to this discussion. 

That point would be relevant to a conversation about the irrationality 
of high monetary values assigned to anything without real 
practical/utilitarian value, but...that applies to all meteorites, 
thick or thin. [meteorite-list] Earth Rocks! (Was: Help with Ebay bidding)
Jason Utas meteoritekid at gmail.com 
Tue Mar 8 04:54:59 EST 2011 

Previous message: [meteorite-list] Earth Rocks! (Was: Help with Ebay bidding) 
Next message: [meteorite-list] Help with Ebay bidding 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 


Hello Eric, All, 

I didn't forget it; I cut it out of my first paragraph. Whether or 
not the matter itself is the same age, if one is paying $850/g for a 
thick slice of a lunar meteorite or $1000/g for a thinner one, the 
prices are still relative to each other, and the fact that the atoms 
themselves were created in the supernova that created our solar system 
is..a moot point. This was about the thickness of meteorite slices 
and desirability/pricing, no? 

I get what you're saying, and I agree with it, but I don't really get 
how it pertains to this discussion. 

That point would be relevant to a conversation about the irrationality 
of high monetary values assigned to anything without real 
practical/utilitarian value, but...that applies to all meteorites, 
thick or thin. [Perhaps modern art, most of all...something I'll 
never waste money on ; ] 

Regards, 
Jason 



Regards, 
Jason 


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Where is all the Murchison - Shameless plug

2011-03-08 Thread Rob Wesel

Here's 2.3 grams

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=280640544691

Rob Wesel
www.nakhladogmeteorites.com
www.facebook.com/Nakhla.Dog.Meteorites
www.facebook.com/Rob.Wesel
--
We are the music makers...
and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] CI1 meteorites and cyanobacteria

2011-03-08 Thread Pete Pete

 
 
I see he's successfully hiding the flux capacitor with that tree.



 From: sterling_k_w...@sbcglobal.net
 To: photoph...@yahoo.com; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:14:15 -0600
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] CI1 meteorites and cyanobacteria

 On the orther hand, the guy who owns the
 Journal of Cosmology website and published
 Hoover to raise money or to promote the sale
 of the website, drives a really nice car*
 https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~rschild/morgan.html

 Somehow it makes a strange kind of sense that
 the owner of this website also drives a wooden
 automobile... Possibly the attempt to build a car
 out of cyanobacteria failed?


 Sterling K. Webb
 ---
 *Thanks to Darren Garrison for pointing out the car.
 ---
 - Original Message -
 From: Shawn Alan 
 To: 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 6:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] CI1 meteorites and cyanobacteria


  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=13075522page=1
 
  __
  Visit the Archives at
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 __
 Visit the Archives at 
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list   
   
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Welcome home

2011-03-08 Thread Mark Bowling
Great news!  Glad you guys made it home safely!



- Original Message 
From: Richard Kowalski damoc...@yahoo.com
To: meteorite list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tue, March 8, 2011 7:32:25 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Welcome home

Glad to see Mike  Robert are back home!


--
Richard Kowalski
Full Moon Photography
IMCA #1081


      
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of Day - March 9, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Michael Johnson
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/March_9_2011.html


---
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of Day - March 9, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread MEM
Your efforts to bring us these daily treasures must intrude on your regular 
life 
but let me also say the effort itself is a true treasure and wonderment for us 
all.  My profound thanks for dedicating yourself to this labor of love.  I 
admire the quality of and the dedication to your work.

Elton
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of Day - March 9, 2011

2011-03-08 Thread Count Deiro
A lovely sentiment. Be hard for anyone to put it better.

Count Deiro
IMCA 3536 


-Original Message-
From: MEM mstrema...@yahoo.com
Sent: Mar 8, 2011 11:16 PM
To: Michael Johnson mich...@rocksfromspace.org, 
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of Day - March 9, 2011

Your efforts to bring us these daily treasures must intrude on your regular 
life 
but let me also say the effort itself is a true treasure and wonderment for us 
all.  My profound thanks for dedicating yourself to this labor of love.  I 
admire the quality of and the dedication to your work.

Elton
__
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list