Hi Jeff and all,
I'm sure that everyone is thinking what I am thinking, and that is, if
this individual was caught on these items, how many other items were
not caught up to now?
If I had dealt with this individual, I'd be asking if my other
specimens were authentic. Some items are easy to
Hello,
Wondering if anyone can fill in some blanks about Begaa. It was popularly
bought and sold several years ago (and with good reason, gorgeous LL3!
Unofficially, anyways).
But I can't find any reference in the Meteoritical Bulletin. Not even as
a synonym, so I'm thinking it must
Hello Met-friends,
the race is not yet over. There are still 26 posters free available. Look at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64183034@N03/sets/72157626863843447/
and write a mail to me m42proto...@t-online.de with the number of pic you
want.
Some pictures couldn't be delivered becauce of
Hey Folks,
Just a few corrections to this original post.
1) It was Steve Farmer not Fisher who captured the video
2) It seems the end of the event was not captured by the camera, so it
may have been a little longer.
3) As pointed out by Esko on meteorobs, the video has been slowed down
2x and
I know nothing of any juicy details but I got my 17.5 gram piece from
Bruno and Carine at the Earths memory www.meteorite.fr and they still
have some pieces for sale..http://www.meteorite.fr/en/forsale/begaa.
htm
It is a lovely LL3 ,here is a link to my piece
http://is.gd/us6zjY
Jim Brady
Begaa = NWA 4910
...a long story for a fine meteorite to get an official name...
(Details are to be found elsewhere, regarding juicy gossip, and
not here, sorry :-))
Best,
Alex
Berlin/Germany
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:34:58 -1000
Von: Don Giovanni
Hello,
Good work.
Best Wishes
Michael Cottingham
On Jun 18, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Jeff Kuyken wrote:
Hi everyone,
Last weekend the IMCA Board received an official complaint in regards to an
IMCA member who sold three meteorite samples to two different IMCA members
that were not what they
Hello List,
Regarding the May 8, 2010 RFSPOD
Some weeks ago I recieved confirmation that the little iron 'meteorite'
with the hole through the center is in fact pure iron, a man made
relic. All of you out there that knew it was too good to be true were
spot on!
(Those that wanted to buy
Of course it's still early days on understanding the Mercury data
coming back from Messenger, but I think there are a few simple things
that can be said about the two geochemical graphs that were part of
the press release. The major element graph of Al/Si versus Mg/Si
clearly shows that the
Hello everybody, does anybody know if DaG 402 is paired with DaG 477 i
found lots of pictures online of DaG 477 but i cant seem to find any
any of DaG 402.. i own some DaG 477 and they look just like the
pictures i see online etc ive had them for a while.. I also have some
DaG 402.. i am uploading
G'Day Daniel
http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/meteorite.aspx?id=5950
Cheers John Cabassi
Imca2125
-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Dan
Furlan
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 12:19
Hi all on the meteorite list,
I just want to say a little off-topic, thank you for all the people
that came to my birthday party last night, It was the best birthday
party ever, and I have the best friends in the entire world!
There were many meteorite people there, and it was at a virtual museum
Hi List members
I have some auctions ending this hour.
Have a look:
http://shop.ebay.com/refamat/m.html?_dmd=1_ipg=50_sop=12_rdc=1
Thanks
Mark Ferguson
IMCA#4691
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
What is the 'standard' instrument used for classifying iron meteorites by trace
element composition and who is doing this kind of work today?
Thanks so much,
-Robert Beauford
__
Visit the Archives at
The main classifier of irons is John Wasson at UCLA who uses neutron
activation analysis to get the trace element compositions.
Quoting Robert Beauford robertbeauf...@rocketmail.com:
What is the 'standard' instrument used for classifying iron
meteorites by trace element composition and who
Sat pics of big AZ blaze:
http://hken.ibtimes.com/articles/165284/20110618/update-6-nasa-releases-satellite-images-of-arizona-wallow-fire-pictures.htm
-
Phil Whitmer
__
Visit the Archives at
Thanks, Carl. That's was what I was hoping for.
There are two Theories of Mercury --- the old one,
that Mercury formed from inner disk materials, all
iron and refractories, and the new one, that Mercury
suffered a Giant Impact' which added its iron to the
Mercurian core but blasted Mercury's
http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/CosmoSparks/June11/NASAsamples.html
Looking After and Preserving NASA's Extraterrestrial Samples
Written by Linda M. V. Martel, Hawai'i0 Institute of Geophysics and
Planetology, for PSRD
Planetary Science Research Discoveries
Cosmos Sparks
Materials from space
Mercury or not, whatever the Angrite parent body is/was is sure to be
interesting once it is figured out. The oxygen isotope analysis sure
points to a large, differentiated parent body. It makes me wonder
about the moons in the Jovian system. Ganymede, for example, is
larger than Mercury
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/ensisheim2011.html
Regards,
Michael Johnson
http://www.rocksfromspace.org
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
G'Day Michael and List
It's funny I was researching any information on Ensisheim today and you
let fly with this one. Great work. And Dave, you sure get around.
Thanks for the update Michael, looking forward to more.
Cheers
John Cabassi
IMCA # 2125
-Original Message-
From:
Hi, Sterling and All,
Here's an interesting little article I came across in Nature:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v473/n7347/full/nature10092.html
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v473/n7347/full/nature10092.html
Unbound or distant planetary mass population detected by
What they say about it:
As to what to call these newfound objects,
Wambsganss favors brevity. I think the most
intuitive name is 'free-floating planets,' but
if we decide to adopt that name then we have
to give up one of our definitions of a planet,
he says. A free-floating planet is a
23 matches
Mail list logo