[meteorite-list] back to meteorites

2007-04-11 Thread steve arnold
Good morning list.I am a real BIG fan of mike farmer.He has done it right!He has gone out to find us all great stones and irons to have in our collections.And when he says the list has some serious problems he is sssoo right.If it is not a flame war going on between 2 or more list

[meteorite-list] Back to meteorites.. reheated rims

2006-08-28 Thread Martin Altmann
Hi Bernd, List, I fully support Bernd's words and those, who don't know him from the list for a longer time, have to be told, that such a kind of conversation is a true abhorrence for him and such outbursts happen so often to him like the outburst of a naked-eye-visible supernova in a neighbour

[meteorite-list] Back to meteorites

2006-03-12 Thread Martin Altmann
Hey the list is getting to self-referring, Let's have some fun with stones. Look what I found today! Medal ceremony. http://www.igsb.uiowa.edu/Browse/meteor/meteor.gif Miss California (Old Woman) http://siarchives.si.edu/history/exhibits/thisday/march/meteorite.jpg On the rocks - cheers!

[meteorite-list] Back to meteorites..

2003-10-16 Thread Robert Verish
-- Original Message [meteorite-list] Back to meteorites.. tracy latimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:17:50 + Back when I was first getting into collecting, I purchased a partslice of meteorite that had been labeled as Kem Kem. However, when I got

[meteorite-list] Back to meteorites..

2003-10-14 Thread tracy latimer
Back when I was first getting into collecting, I purchased a partslice of meteorite that had been labeled as Kem Kem. However, when I got it, I found that a)Kem Kem was only a provisional name and b) it had not been classified yet. Has anyone heard anything further on whether this meteorite

Re: [meteorite-list] Back to meteorites..

2003-10-14 Thread Sharkkb8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kem Kem was only a provisional name and b) it had not been classified yet. Has anyone heard anything further on whether this meteorite ever became 'legit'? Recognizing that there are twoentirely separateconsiderations - i.e. Classification vsNomCom recognition -