Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-19 Thread Jeff Kuyken
, Jeff - Original Message - From: bernd.pa...@paulinet.de To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 7:17 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites,please ? Steve wrote: Second! Bernd: Third! :-)) I've been spending

[meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread DEBORAH ANNE K. MARTIN
Hello all, I usually stay away from these protracted discussions and am quite happy to lurk on the list. A lot of good, qualified people discussing a topic I truly enjoy: meteorites. Now, I am not interested in sparring with anyone. I just published an article in the Montreal Gazette

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Thunder Stone
I Agree Greg S. From: dak_...@live.concordia.ca To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:07:21 + Subject: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ? Hello all, I usually stay away from

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Witt
Second! Steve Witt IMCA #9020 http://imca.cc/ --- On Mon, 10/18/10, Thunder Stone stanleygr...@hotmail.com wrote: From: Thunder Stone stanleygr...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ? To: dak_...@live.concordia.ca, meteorite

[meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread JoshuaTreeMuseum
I have an idea, instead of whining like a little school-girl about not being able to control the speech of others, why not just start an awesome meteorite related thread that is so interesting it totally dominates the conversation? Ever think of that? Or is it just more fun to whine? ;) :@

[meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread bernd . pauli
Steve wrote: Second! Bernd: Third! :-)) I've been spending an enjoyable evening at the microscope ogling my NWA 5507 slice (16.39 gr - see Encyclopedia if interested). Marcin's NWA 5507 is an interesting L3.2 with lots of spectacular features: - clasts (or PP chondrules?) with abundant

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Jim Strope
Finally the voice of reason! The volume of OT subjects on this METEORITE mailing list is the VERY reason I check the archives instead of receiving emails. A meteorite could have crashed through the White House and not generated the volume of emails this OT subject has generated

[meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread bernd . pauli
Steve wrote: Second! Bernd: Third! :-)) I've been spending an enjoyable evening at the microscope ogling my NWA 5507 slice (16.39 gr - see Encyclopedia if interested). Marcin's NWA 5507 is an interesting L3.2 with lots of spectacular features: - clasts (or PP chondrules?) with abundant

[meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread bernd . pauli
Oops, sorry for the double post! Best wishes, Bernd __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread e-mail ensoramanda
Hi Bernd/All, Does anyone know any more about the classification of NWA 6260 which is provisionally LL7 metachondrite...Has that been confirmed yet...Met Bulletin still says Unknown? Cheers, Graham, UK On 18 October 2010 21:19, bernd.pa...@paulinet.de wrote: Oops, sorry for the double post!

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Thunder Stone
. From: joshuatreemus...@embarqmail.com To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:09:52 -0400 Subject: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ? I have an idea, instead of whining like a little school

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Fred Bieler
-boun...@meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of bernd.pa...@paulinet.de Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 3:06 PM To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ? Steve wrote: Second

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Fowler
List, Could someone explain the meaning of the numbers in parenthesis? (n=7) and (n=11) is the analysis below? Thanks in advance. Mike Fowler NOVA 010 W2 S3, olivine Fa 14.4 ±0.5 (n=7); low-Ca pyroxene Fs13.7 ±0.6, Wo0.6 ±0.3 (n=11) List: Last year I purchased a meteorite at

[meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Charley
: JoshuaTreeMuseum joshuatreemus...@embarqmail.com Subject: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ? To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Message-ID: 764966a8adcd4a509838d10dac08a...@et Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type

Re: [meteorite-list] Could we get back to the science of meteorites, please ?

2010-10-18 Thread Greg Hupe
Fisher~Gold Bug-2 Darn good metal dowsing unit...Batteries not included! :-) Best Regards, Greg Hupe On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Charley cm...@columbus.rr.com wrote: __ Visit the Archives at