Hello McCartney, All,
I doubt its meteoric origin as well.
I've personally seen a number of other fresh iron falls and all that had
been recovered recently after falling had been beautifully fusion crusted,
if not on all surfaces, then all save one or two. This other side or two
have always
I vote yes - that the NJO is a meteorite
It's magnetic
The density is right
And the shape - curved and elongated - looks like it was shaped by falling
There does appear to be some Regmaglypts
The color is goldish - but that could due to be the lighting during filming
I was
I vote no. Just fell and no fusion crust? Something stinks here
Tom
(hope THIS reply gets though...)
Happy new year to all!
On Jan 4, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
No way
Darren Garrison wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:01:17 -0600, you wrote:
I propose we take a vote
Who votes
I respectfully can't agree with Mr. Pitt on the NJO (New Jersey Object).
We must all remember that new iron falls will NOT look like Sikhote
Alin, Canyon Diablo, or Campos. Those falls did not slow down to the
retardation point, they kept a significant fraction of their cosmic
velocity. They
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:01:17 -0600, you wrote:
I propose we take a vote
Who votes the NJO is a meteorite?
Judging from what I could see in that short, low-resolution video, I vote yes.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
No way
Darren Garrison wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:01:17 -0600, you wrote:
I propose we take a vote
Who votes the NJO is a meteorite?
Judging from what I could see in that short, low-resolution video, I vote
yes.
__
Meteorite-list
6 matches
Mail list logo
