Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-28 Thread Pict
Steve,

Is N2N3 not a purely chemical reaction? In what sense is it nuclear?
Perhaps I am misinterpreting this.

Regards,
John


On 28/02/2013 00:49, Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com wrote:

Ouch!
 Imagine the extra energy released if the detonation occured inside a
thunderhead? I had a physics instructor who thought small amounts of
nuclear reactions were caused by lightning as in nitrogen converted to
ozone. He said keep your eyes open. Just because something is improbable
it doesnt make it impossible. Some detonations happen when pressures get
to high as stated by Chris Peterson but others happen when the forward
pressure suddenly drops causing expasion or instability.  most are the
result of some kind of forward pressure change be it up or down.
cheers
Steve

--- On Thu, 2/28/13, James Beauchamp falco...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 From: James Beauchamp falco...@sbcglobal.net
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic
Disruption and Charge Properties?
 To: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com,
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com, steve.dunk...@yahoo.com, drtanuki
drtan...@yahoo.com
 Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013, 4:52 AM
 Hi Dirk, 
 
 A very small amount of equivalent energy is involved with
 free electron release.  Perhaps the moving electrons
 cause localized magnetic fields, but far lower than those
 needed to have large-scale charge separation.
 
 I can see the electron clouds on the radar because free
 electrons are conductive.  But energy exchange is kept
 pretty locally.
 
 Now, posing in intriguing situation - lets say a
 russian-like event occurs over a supercell
 thunderstorm.  It could skim across the anvil.
 The line of conducting plasma would short circuit the
 heavily charge separated areas (Charges migrate due to the
 supercooled freezing process).  I think you would get a
 nice lightshow. 
 
 Kind of interesting...  CC meteortites, low
 pressure.  Volatile amino acids, carbon, and
 lightning,  Would be a nice situation for early life
 forms.
   
 
 --- On Wed, 2/27/13, drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
 Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
 To: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com,
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com,
 steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
 Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 2:15 AM
 
 Garry and Steve,  Most excellent posts and information;
 thank you.
 
   Further to my original question.  Would/should we expect
 that there may be ground-to-air electro-stactic response
 (lightning) prior to the arrival of the physical body to
 physical contact with the earth; and has this been simulated
 or captured on video?
 Dirk Ross...Tokyo
 
 --- On Wed, 2/27/13, Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
  From: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
 Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
  To: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
  Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 4:33 PM
  Hi Dirk and List,
  This link http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/nukeffct/enw77b1.html
  explains the propagation of atomic shockwaves with
  interesting pictures of shockwave propagation.  It
 can
  explain the effects on meteoric
  explosions at high altitude.  Interesting read but
 very
  long article and detailed.
  
  
  
  
  - Original Message -
   From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
   To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
   Cc: 
   Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:59 AM
   Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
  Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
   
   Dear List,
   If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and
 why
  meteoroids/asteroids
   detonate please explain for the list and
 myself.  I
  am interested 
   learning more about the
 electrical/mechanical/physical
  forces that these bodies
   undergo as they reach the earth such as in the
 latest
  Russian event. Thank you.
   Dirk Ross...Tokyo
   __
   
   Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
   http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-28 Thread James Beauchamp

In plasma situations where electrons and nuclei are freely moving about, the 
math supports a very, very tiny chance that nuclei will collide with enough 
energy to merge or break apart into other isotopes.  

Applying a rate of trillions of possibilities in a volume, over a period of 
time, the probability becomes realizable that somewhere, something happened.

There's a whole sub-culture of people who build fuzors in their garages for 
the novelty of saying there's a chance something is fusing in that glowing 
cloud.



--- On Thu, 2/28/13, Pict p...@pict.co.uk wrote:

 From: Pict p...@pict.co.uk
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption 
 and Charge Properties?
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013, 1:59 AM
 Steve,
 
 Is N2N3 not a purely chemical reaction? In what sense is
 it nuclear?
 Perhaps I am misinterpreting this.
 
 Regards,
 John
 
 
 On 28/02/2013 00:49, Steve Dunklee steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 Ouch!
  Imagine the extra energy released if the detonation
 occured inside a
 thunderhead? I had a physics instructor who thought
 small amounts of
 nuclear reactions were caused by lightning as in
 nitrogen converted to
 ozone. He said keep your eyes open. Just because
 something is improbable
 it doesnt make it impossible. Some detonations happen
 when pressures get
 to high as stated by Chris Peterson but others happen
 when the forward
 pressure suddenly drops causing expasion or
 instability.  most are the
 result of some kind of forward pressure change be it up
 or down.
 cheers
 Steve
 
 --- On Thu, 2/28/13, James Beauchamp falco...@sbcglobal.net
 wrote:
 
  From: James Beauchamp falco...@sbcglobal.net
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
 Electro-Magnetic
 Disruption and Charge Properties?
  To: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com,
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com,
 steve.dunk...@yahoo.com,
 drtanuki
 drtan...@yahoo.com
  Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013, 4:52 AM
  Hi Dirk, 
  
  A very small amount of equivalent energy is
 involved with
  free electron release.  Perhaps the moving
 electrons
  cause localized magnetic fields, but far lower than
 those
  needed to have large-scale charge separation.
  
  I can see the electron clouds on the radar because
 free
  electrons are conductive.  But energy exchange
 is kept
  pretty locally.
  
  Now, posing in intriguing situation - lets say a
  russian-like event occurs over a supercell
  thunderstorm.  It could skim across the
 anvil.
  The line of conducting plasma would short circuit
 the
  heavily charge separated areas (Charges migrate due
 to the
  supercooled freezing process).  I think you
 would get a
  nice lightshow. 
  
  Kind of interesting...  CC meteortites, low
  pressure.  Volatile amino acids, carbon, and
  lightning,  Would be a nice situation for
 early life
  forms.
    
  
  --- On Wed, 2/27/13, drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
  wrote:
  
  From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
  Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
  To: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com,
  meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com,
  steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
  Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 2:15 AM
  
  Garry and Steve,  Most excellent posts and
 information;
  thank you.
  
    Further to my original
 question.  Would/should we expect
  that there may be ground-to-air electro-stactic
 response
  (lightning) prior to the arrival of the physical
 body to
  physical contact with the earth; and has this been
 simulated
  or captured on video?
  Dirk Ross...Tokyo
  
  --- On Wed, 2/27/13, Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
  wrote:
  
   From: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list]
 Meteoroid/Asteroid
  Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
   To: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
   Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 4:33 PM
   Hi Dirk and List,
   This link http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/nukeffct/enw77b1.html
   explains the propagation of atomic shockwaves
 with
   interesting pictures of shockwave
 propagation.  It
  can
   explain the effects on meteoric
   explosions at high altitude.  Interesting
 read but
  very
   long article and detailed.
   
   
   
   
   - Original Message -
From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:59
 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list]
 Meteoroid/Asteroid
   Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge
 Properties?

Dear List,
If there is anyone willing to discuss the
 how and
  why
   meteoroids/asteroids
detonate please explain for the list
 and
  myself.  I
   am interested 
learning more about the
  electrical/mechanical/physical
   forces that these bodies
undergo as they reach the earth such as
 in the
  latest
   Russian event. Thank you.
Dirk Ross...Tokyo
   
 __

Visit

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread drtanuki
Garry and Steve,  Most excellent posts and information;  thank you.

  Further to my original question.  Would/should we expect that there may be 
ground-to-air electro-stactic response (lightning) prior to the arrival of the 
physical body to physical contact with the earth; and has this been simulated 
or captured on video?  
Dirk Ross...Tokyo

--- On Wed, 2/27/13, Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption 
 and Charge Properties?
 To: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 4:33 PM
 Hi Dirk and List,
 This link http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/nukeffct/enw77b1.html
 explains the propagation of atomic shockwaves with
 interesting pictures of shockwave propagation.  It can
 explain the effects on meteoric 
 explosions at high altitude.  Interesting read but very
 long article and detailed.
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
  From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
  To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Cc: 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:59 AM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
 Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
  
  Dear List,
  If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why
 meteoroids/asteroids 
  detonate please explain for the list and myself.  I
 am interested 
  learning more about the electrical/mechanical/physical
 forces that these bodies 
  undergo as they reach the earth such as in the latest
 Russian event. Thank you.
  Dirk Ross...Tokyo
  __
  
  Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Count Deiro
Hi Dirk and List,

Somebody with three letters after their name caused this explanation:

As a high velocity meteoroid encounters denser atmosphere, there exists an 
increasing pressure difference between its frontal and rearward areas. This 
plus the very high temperatures create the instabilities that ultimately cause 
the sudden destruction of the body. Chrondite meteoroids are more vulnerable to 
this type of destruction than iron/nickel bodies because of lesser strength.

Now, I as a layman think that what causes a perceived explosion is as above, 
but more succintly, that the the compression wave created at the leading area 
of the mass collides with the stationary refractory wave that is almost 
instantaneously being generated at the rear of the mass. Sort of like clapping 
your hands together while moving your arms rapidly in one direction.

Regards,

Guido

-Original Message-
From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
Sent: Feb 26, 2013 10:59 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and   
Charge Properties?

Dear List,
If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why meteoroids/asteroids 
detonate please explain for the list and myself.  I am interested learning 
more about the electrical/mechanical/physical forces that these bodies undergo 
as they reach the earth such as in the latest Russian event. Thank you.
Dirk Ross...Tokyo
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Garry Stewart
Hi Dirk and List,
This link http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/nukeffct/enw77b1.html explains the 
propagation of atomic shockwaves with interesting pictures of shockwave 
propagation.  It can explain the effects on meteoric 
explosions at high altitude.  Interesting read but very long article and 
detailed.




- Original Message -
 From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Cc: 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:59 AM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and 
 Charge Properties?
 
 Dear List,
 If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why meteoroids/asteroids 
 detonate please explain for the list and myself.  I am interested 
 learning more about the electrical/mechanical/physical forces that these 
 bodies 
 undergo as they reach the earth such as in the latest Russian event. Thank 
 you.
 Dirk Ross...Tokyo
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Chris Peterson
A body larger than about a centimeter transfers its kinetic energy to 
other forms primarily by compressing the air in front of it as it 
descends into the atmosphere. The pressure involved is typically very 
large- tens or hundreds of megapascals for meter-class bodies. Once this 
ram pressure exceeds the material strength of the body, it breaks apart 
(presumably along existing fault lines, so the material properties of 
the body are important- and generally unknown).


Before the breakup, the heat created by compressing air is melting the 
surface of the meteoroid, resulting in ablation. This ablation is 
responsible for some of the light we see (along with atmospheric 
ionization from the same heat source), but is not particularly 
disruptive to the meteoroid. Only the outer surface is affected. 
Ablation is a very efficient way of removing energy (which is why 
spacecraft heat shields prior to the shuttles were ablative). When the 
meteoroid fragments at hypersonic speeds, however, additional surface 
area is instantly exposed, resulting in a rapid heating of the 
surrounding air (which is just a fancy way of saying explosion). If a 
body breaks into just a few pieces, as is common, we may see a central 
or terminal brightening. If it completely shatters into thousands of 
pieces (as seems likely with Chelyabinsk) the energy from the suddenly 
heated air is immense- an efficient conversion of kinetic energy to 
thermal energy. The expanding hot air can produce an impressive sonic 
wave, and probably further disrupts the meteoroid itself.


I don't that there are any electrical forces of a significant size to 
affect the structure or motion of the meteoroid, although atmospheric 
electrical effects probably occur (e.g. electrophonics).


Chris

***
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On 2/26/2013 11:59 PM, drtanuki wrote:

Dear List,
If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why meteoroids/asteroids 
detonate please explain for the list and myself.  I am interested learning 
more about the electrical/mechanical/physical forces that these bodies undergo as they 
reach the earth such as in the latest Russian event. Thank you.
Dirk Ross...Tokyo


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Carl Agee
Hi Chris,

Do you have any references you could point me to for how break-up
scales with size-mass-physical properties etc. of meteoroids. I am
interested in knowing the sweet-spot for yielding meteorites on the
ground. In other words, when is a meteoroid too small or too big to
produce significant large pieces of surviving material? It seems like
Chelyabinsk is outside the sweet spot as it apparently produced mostly
fragments even though it had large mass. On the other hand much bigger
masses may also survive. Is it bimodal?

Thanks,

Carl Agee


-- 
Carl B. Agee
Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
MSC03 2050
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque NM 87131-1126

Tel: (505) 750-7172
Fax: (505) 277-3577
Email: a...@unm.edu
http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
 A body larger than about a centimeter transfers its kinetic energy to other
 forms primarily by compressing the air in front of it as it descends into
 the atmosphere. The pressure involved is typically very large- tens or
 hundreds of megapascals for meter-class bodies. Once this ram pressure
 exceeds the material strength of the body, it breaks apart (presumably along
 existing fault lines, so the material properties of the body are important-
 and generally unknown).

 Before the breakup, the heat created by compressing air is melting the
 surface of the meteoroid, resulting in ablation. This ablation is
 responsible for some of the light we see (along with atmospheric ionization
 from the same heat source), but is not particularly disruptive to the
 meteoroid. Only the outer surface is affected. Ablation is a very efficient
 way of removing energy (which is why spacecraft heat shields prior to the
 shuttles were ablative). When the meteoroid fragments at hypersonic speeds,
 however, additional surface area is instantly exposed, resulting in a rapid
 heating of the surrounding air (which is just a fancy way of saying
 explosion). If a body breaks into just a few pieces, as is common, we may
 see a central or terminal brightening. If it completely shatters into
 thousands of pieces (as seems likely with Chelyabinsk) the energy from the
 suddenly heated air is immense- an efficient conversion of kinetic energy to
 thermal energy. The expanding hot air can produce an impressive sonic wave,
 and probably further disrupts the meteoroid itself.

 I don't that there are any electrical forces of a significant size to affect
 the structure or motion of the meteoroid, although atmospheric electrical
 effects probably occur (e.g. electrophonics).

 Chris

 ***
 Chris L Peterson
 Cloudbait Observatory
 http://www.cloudbait.com

 On 2/26/2013 11:59 PM, drtanuki wrote:

 Dear List,
 If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why meteoroids/asteroids
 detonate please explain for the list and myself.  I am interested learning
 more about the electrical/mechanical/physical forces that these bodies
 undergo as they reach the earth such as in the latest Russian event. Thank
 you.
 Dirk Ross...Tokyo


 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread drtanuki
Chris and all,
  I will refine my questions a bit regarding the Russian asteroid (meteoroid) 
body:

Could resonance (differential-harmonics) within the body cause disintegration?

Can we expect to see an Earth-ground electrical discharge towards the 
meteoroid? Is it possible? 

And could differential electrical charges on the leading and trailing part of 
the body cause internal disruption leading to disintegration?

Thank you.  Forgive me if my questions are poorly based or asked.

Dirk Ross...Tokyo

--- On Thu, 2/28/13, Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:

 From: Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption 
 and Charge Properties?
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013, 1:21 AM
 A body larger than about a centimeter
 transfers its kinetic energy to other forms primarily by
 compressing the air in front of it as it descends into the
 atmosphere. The pressure involved is typically very large-
 tens or hundreds of megapascals for meter-class bodies. Once
 this ram pressure exceeds the material strength of the body,
 it breaks apart (presumably along existing fault lines, so
 the material properties of the body are important- and
 generally unknown).
 
 Before the breakup, the heat created by compressing air is
 melting the surface of the meteoroid, resulting in ablation.
 This ablation is responsible for some of the light we see
 (along with atmospheric ionization from the same heat
 source), but is not particularly disruptive to the
 meteoroid. Only the outer surface is affected. Ablation is a
 very efficient way of removing energy (which is why
 spacecraft heat shields prior to the shuttles were
 ablative). When the meteoroid fragments at hypersonic
 speeds, however, additional surface area is instantly
 exposed, resulting in a rapid heating of the surrounding air
 (which is just a fancy way of saying explosion). If a body
 breaks into just a few pieces, as is common, we may see a
 central or terminal brightening. If it completely shatters
 into thousands of pieces (as seems likely with Chelyabinsk)
 the energy from the suddenly heated air is immense- an
 efficient conversion of kinetic energy to thermal energy.
 The expanding hot air can produce an impressive sonic wave,
 and probably further disrupts the meteoroid itself.
 
 I don't that there are any electrical forces of a
 significant size to affect the structure or motion of the
 meteoroid, although atmospheric electrical effects probably
 occur (e.g. electrophonics).
 
 Chris
 
 ***
 Chris L Peterson
 Cloudbait Observatory
 http://www.cloudbait.com
 
 On 2/26/2013 11:59 PM, drtanuki wrote:
  Dear List,
  If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why
 meteoroids/asteroids detonate please explain for the list
 and myself.  I am interested learning more about the
 electrical/mechanical/physical forces that these bodies
 undergo as they reach the earth such as in the latest
 Russian event. Thank you.
  Dirk Ross...Tokyo
 
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Pict
Chris,

Working on oil and gas wells it is routine to test the fracture point of
the rock at the bottom of the well after having run and cemented a casing
string (leak off test). You do this by shutting in the well at surface and
pumping incremental volumes of mud into the hole and noting the rise in
surface pressure with each injection. When the rock is behaving
elastically the rise in pressure is linear with volume, but you can see
when the rock has reached its elastic limit when the pressure increase
with volume becomes less. This occurs at the onset of fracture generation,
and continued pumping typically results in extensive fracture propagation
and an actual lowering of surface pressure as it is dissipated by mud
flowing into the fractures. Same principal is employed with hydraulic
fracturing to increase production surface from low permeability
lithologies (shale etc).

Empirically testing the fracture point of the rock gives you a handle on
the maximum mud density the well can sustain when drilling the next hole
section, and the maximum pressure one could hold at surface with the BOP
in the event of encountering formation pressure in excess of the mud
hydrostatic. If you exceed the fracture pressure by increasing the mud
'weight' (density) to control formation pressure, the danger is you induce
fractures, lose height in your your mud column as it drains into the
wellbore thereby reducing hydrostatic pressure at the bottom of the well
and thereby risking falling below the formation pressure inducing the well
to flow (kick) or blowout in the worst case. Shutting a flowing well in
with the BOP when the formation pressure is higher than the mud
hydrostatic (I.e. Flowing) you ideally do not want the surface pressure
plus the mud hydrostatic to exceed the 'leak off' as then you run the risk
of an underground blowout where the high formation pressure flowing zone
breaks down a weaker zone (generally higher up) and flows formation fluid
(oil/water/gas) into it displacing the mud present between the two zones.

I apologise for the off topic background above but I am wondering if the
disintegration mechanism is analogous for a meteor. The pressures you
quote at the leading surface of the meteor are in the typical range I
would expect from the well experience. Presumably the pressure at the rear
is relatively low, and the pressure cannot dissipate around the object due
to the speed of entry exceeding the speed of flow of compressed air around
it. So if this pressure differential is applied to the front of the object
there must come a point where the elastic limit is breached, fractures are
induced, and then rapidly propagate. Once there are multiple paths of
pressure communication through the former solid object rather than around
it, there is presumably a rapid lowering of differential pressure from
front to rear occurring as air rushes through the gaps between the
fractured pieces and expands as the pressure lowers towards the rear of
the disintegrating meteor pushing everything apart (I.e. Exploding). As
Chris says this also vastly increases the surface area for incandescence
and the the luminosity might be expected to greatly increase. I am
wondering if this is at all a realistic description of what might be going
on? 

I am unsure of the temperatures involved at the leading edge and in any
case I can't find phase properties for water at those extremes, but also
wonder if water exists as a liquid or gaseous phase at the leading edge or
is it entirely plasma?. I'm sure the pressure would take it past the
dewpoint but is the elevated temperature sufficient to prevent
condensation at some point so that a liquid 'injection' phase forms at
some point during disintegration and collapse of the initial pressure
differential? Condensed water seems evident in the trail judging by white
colour evident in some 'smoke trails'.

Are there any published properties for typical
chondrites/irons/mesosiderites available (e.g. Porosity, permeability,
Poisson's ratio etc), and have any destructive pressure experiments been
conducted to determine failure mechanisms for these materials?

I presume the ductility inherent in irons versus the brittle nature of
chondrites results in disintegration along far fewer planes of fracture,
generally resulting in larger pieces after failure.

Regards,
John


On 27/02/2013 09:21, Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:

A body larger than about a centimeter transfers its kinetic energy to
other forms primarily by compressing the air in front of it as it
descends into the atmosphere. The pressure involved is typically very
large- tens or hundreds of megapascals for meter-class bodies. Once this
ram pressure exceeds the material strength of the body, it breaks apart
(presumably along existing fault lines, so the material properties of
the body are important- and generally unknown).

Before the breakup, the heat created by compressing air is melting the
surface of the meteoroid, resulting 

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Chris Peterson

Hi John-

I don't doubt that there are analogs between the fracturing you describe 
at the bottom of a well and what happens with a meteor. However, there 
may be some fundamental material differences. The rock at the bottom of 
the well is typically very large compared with the area where pressure 
is applied, and is already under high pressure. A meteoroid may range 
from nearly monolithic (particularly in the case of an iron body) to 
something like a rubble pile. Obviously, the response to a non-isotropic 
force from ram pressure will be very different in those cases.


I'm not sure what happens to water during meteoritic flight. Most meteor 
trails are largely composed of dust, but if water trails are observed, I 
suspect they are largely produced in the same way that many airplane 
contrails are- the condensation of existing atmospheric water vapor onto 
solid particles, particularly in response to aerodynamic effects such as 
vortex production.


There is lots of published information on the material properties of 
meteoritic material, but that is only of limited value in explaining the 
behavior of meteors, since the microscopic bulk properties are largely 
unrelated to the material properties extended over a meter-class or 
larger body. This is why we don't usually know much about the class of 
material producing a large fireball until an actual recovery is made. 
The fireball observations alone simply aren't enough. In fact, the best 
information on possible material comes not from how the meteor breaks 
up, but from the deceleration profile and mass estimates.


Chris

***
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On 2/27/2013 11:52 AM, Pict wrote:

Chris,

Working on oil and gas wells it is routine to test the fracture point of
the rock at the bottom of the well after having run and cemented a casing
string (leak off test). You do this by shutting in the well at surface and
pumping incremental volumes of mud into the hole and noting the rise in
surface pressure with each injection. When the rock is behaving
elastically the rise in pressure is linear with volume, but you can see
when the rock has reached its elastic limit when the pressure increase
with volume becomes less. This occurs at the onset of fracture generation,
and continued pumping typically results in extensive fracture propagation
and an actual lowering of surface pressure as it is dissipated by mud
flowing into the fractures. Same principal is employed with hydraulic
fracturing to increase production surface from low permeability
lithologies (shale etc).

Empirically testing the fracture point of the rock gives you a handle on
the maximum mud density the well can sustain when drilling the next hole
section, and the maximum pressure one could hold at surface with the BOP
in the event of encountering formation pressure in excess of the mud
hydrostatic. If you exceed the fracture pressure by increasing the mud
'weight' (density) to control formation pressure, the danger is you induce
fractures, lose height in your your mud column as it drains into the
wellbore thereby reducing hydrostatic pressure at the bottom of the well
and thereby risking falling below the formation pressure inducing the well
to flow (kick) or blowout in the worst case. Shutting a flowing well in
with the BOP when the formation pressure is higher than the mud
hydrostatic (I.e. Flowing) you ideally do not want the surface pressure
plus the mud hydrostatic to exceed the 'leak off' as then you run the risk
of an underground blowout where the high formation pressure flowing zone
breaks down a weaker zone (generally higher up) and flows formation fluid
(oil/water/gas) into it displacing the mud present between the two zones.

I apologise for the off topic background above but I am wondering if the
disintegration mechanism is analogous for a meteor. The pressures you
quote at the leading surface of the meteor are in the typical range I
would expect from the well experience. Presumably the pressure at the rear
is relatively low, and the pressure cannot dissipate around the object due
to the speed of entry exceeding the speed of flow of compressed air around
it. So if this pressure differential is applied to the front of the object
there must come a point where the elastic limit is breached, fractures are
induced, and then rapidly propagate. Once there are multiple paths of
pressure communication through the former solid object rather than around
it, there is presumably a rapid lowering of differential pressure from
front to rear occurring as air rushes through the gaps between the
fractured pieces and expands as the pressure lowers towards the rear of
the disintegrating meteor pushing everything apart (I.e. Exploding). As
Chris says this also vastly increases the surface area for incandescence
and the the luminosity might be expected to greatly increase. I am
wondering if this is at all a realistic description of what 

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Chris Peterson

Hi Carl-

For the most part, breakup characteristics don't correlate well with 
either size or material. I think it's largely a matter of the bulk 
properties of the meteoroid- how monolithic versus faulted it is- and 
any material can exist on a wide range between those extremes.


For the most part, I'd say if there's any sweet-spot, it is largely 
determined by the same factors that have been seen as key for a long 
time- a shallow entry angle, low entry speed, and low altitude terminal 
explosion all bode well for meteorite production. Of course, larger 
bodies have more material, and might well be expected to yield more 
meteorites under equivalent entry conditions. But that's a very broad 
generalization. I think that the nature of the terminal explosion of 
Chelyabinsk resulted in such tiny fragmentation that something in excess 
of 99% of the initial mass was lost. A somewhat stronger body of the 
same size might have survived a little longer, slowing enough that the 
disruption would be less violent, and a lot more could survive. Consider 
that Sikhote-Alin was a smaller body, but much more material survived to 
the ground- both because it was materially stronger, and because it 
didn't explode until it was much lower.


Chris

***
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On 2/27/2013 10:42 AM, Carl Agee wrote:

Hi Chris,

Do you have any references you could point me to for how break-up
scales with size-mass-physical properties etc. of meteoroids. I am
interested in knowing the sweet-spot for yielding meteorites on the
ground. In other words, when is a meteoroid too small or too big to
produce significant large pieces of surviving material? It seems like
Chelyabinsk is outside the sweet spot as it apparently produced mostly
fragments even though it had large mass. On the other hand much bigger
masses may also survive. Is it bimodal?

Thanks,

Carl Agee



__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Pict
Chris,

there are indeed obvious differences. However, typically in leak-off tests
you are applying pressure to a relatively small area, maybe inside a
cylinder 6ft long and 1ft in diameter (you might typically drill 2m of new
formation below the casing shoe prior to the test). The rock is however
prestressed by the overburden load and formation pore pressure so that
needs to be overcome to an extent before 'expansional' stress is applied
to the matrix itself. Once the 'preloading' is overcome however, I think
perhaps it is an analogous situation - a small volume of rock with a
significant stress gradient across it. I really was wondering what happens
to the pressure distribution around the meteor when a multitude of
fractures rapidly propagate through a monolithic body offering additional
pathways for pressure equalisation front to rear, and if the resulting
redistribution of pressure through these fracture pathways could be a
mechanism to change a solid body into a dispersed cloud of rubble (i.e.
Blow it up) rather than a fragmented rock continuing in tight formation.
I'm sure it's a complicated scenario to model. Alternatively, the vastly
increased surface area from the near instantaneous formation of a
multitude of pieces might be the cause because of a sharp rise in drag
drastically augmenting thermal dissipation of kinetic energy. Seems an
equally plausible explanation within the confines of my imagination.

Regards,
John

On 27/02/2013 12:58, Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:

Hi John-

I don't doubt that there are analogs between the fracturing you describe
at the bottom of a well and what happens with a meteor. However, there
may be some fundamental material differences. The rock at the bottom of
the well is typically very large compared with the area where pressure
is applied, and is already under high pressure. A meteoroid may range
from nearly monolithic (particularly in the case of an iron body) to
something like a rubble pile. Obviously, the response to a non-isotropic
force from ram pressure will be very different in those cases.

I'm not sure what happens to water during meteoritic flight. Most meteor
trails are largely composed of dust, but if water trails are observed, I
suspect they are largely produced in the same way that many airplane
contrails are- the condensation of existing atmospheric water vapor onto
solid particles, particularly in response to aerodynamic effects such as
vortex production.

There is lots of published information on the material properties of
meteoritic material, but that is only of limited value in explaining the
behavior of meteors, since the microscopic bulk properties are largely
unrelated to the material properties extended over a meter-class or
larger body. This is why we don't usually know much about the class of
material producing a large fireball until an actual recovery is made.
The fireball observations alone simply aren't enough. In fact, the best
information on possible material comes not from how the meteor breaks
up, but from the deceleration profile and mass estimates.

Chris

***
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On 2/27/2013 11:52 AM, Pict wrote:
 Chris,

 Working on oil and gas wells it is routine to test the fracture point of
 the rock at the bottom of the well after having run and cemented a
casing
 string (leak off test). You do this by shutting in the well at surface
and
 pumping incremental volumes of mud into the hole and noting the rise in
 surface pressure with each injection. When the rock is behaving
 elastically the rise in pressure is linear with volume, but you can see
 when the rock has reached its elastic limit when the pressure increase
 with volume becomes less. This occurs at the onset of fracture
generation,
 and continued pumping typically results in extensive fracture
propagation
 and an actual lowering of surface pressure as it is dissipated by mud
 flowing into the fractures. Same principal is employed with hydraulic
 fracturing to increase production surface from low permeability
 lithologies (shale etc).

 Empirically testing the fracture point of the rock gives you a handle on
 the maximum mud density the well can sustain when drilling the next hole
 section, and the maximum pressure one could hold at surface with the BOP
 in the event of encountering formation pressure in excess of the mud
 hydrostatic. If you exceed the fracture pressure by increasing the mud
 'weight' (density) to control formation pressure, the danger is you
induce
 fractures, lose height in your your mud column as it drains into the
 wellbore thereby reducing hydrostatic pressure at the bottom of the well
 and thereby risking falling below the formation pressure inducing the
well
 to flow (kick) or blowout in the worst case. Shutting a flowing well in
 with the BOP when the formation pressure is higher than the mud
 hydrostatic (I.e. Flowing) you ideally do not want the 

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Jim Wooddell
Hi Dirk and all!

There were so many different pressures placed on this object, not sure
you could point to a single one conclusively to answer your question
about resonance.  You would have to define the causes to consider
resonance.

I suppose if we knew the air density we could SWAG the ram pressure
(which I'd guess may be the single largest contributor) as the mass
has already been determined.  I have not heard anyone give those
details yet.  Was the mass determined upon entry or when it burst?  It
did have some time to ablate.

I think the physicists have their work cut out and I look forward to
reading about it!

In regards to the strewn field.  I think it's going to take a lot of
time to determine it.  They have a great opportunity to record a
spectacular strewn field.  The frenzy probably hosed that hope up
already.  With other known strewn fields, such as JaH 073 at ~19.6km
long and Franconia at ~17km long, it may take a while to find large
fragments.  We know in both of these fields, thousands of small 0-20
gram fragments were recovered on the beginning end and middle of the
fields and much much larger fragments down field many kilometers away.
  I am hoping to hear some 40kg + frags are found!

Cheers!

Jim Wooddell




On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 AM, drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Chris and all,
   I will refine my questions a bit regarding the Russian asteroid (meteoroid) 
 body:

 Could resonance (differential-harmonics) within the body cause disintegration?

 Can we expect to see an Earth-ground electrical discharge towards the 
 meteoroid? Is it possible?

 And could differential electrical charges on the leading and trailing part of 
 the body cause internal disruption leading to disintegration?

 Thank you.  Forgive me if my questions are poorly based or asked.

 Dirk Ross...Tokyo

 --- On Thu, 2/28/13, Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:

 From: Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption 
 and Charge Properties?
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013, 1:21 AM
 A body larger than about a centimeter
 transfers its kinetic energy to other forms primarily by
 compressing the air in front of it as it descends into the
 atmosphere. The pressure involved is typically very large-
 tens or hundreds of megapascals for meter-class bodies. Once
 this ram pressure exceeds the material strength of the body,
 it breaks apart (presumably along existing fault lines, so
 the material properties of the body are important- and
 generally unknown).

 Before the breakup, the heat created by compressing air is
 melting the surface of the meteoroid, resulting in ablation.
 This ablation is responsible for some of the light we see
 (along with atmospheric ionization from the same heat
 source), but is not particularly disruptive to the
 meteoroid. Only the outer surface is affected. Ablation is a
 very efficient way of removing energy (which is why
 spacecraft heat shields prior to the shuttles were
 ablative). When the meteoroid fragments at hypersonic
 speeds, however, additional surface area is instantly
 exposed, resulting in a rapid heating of the surrounding air
 (which is just a fancy way of saying explosion). If a body
 breaks into just a few pieces, as is common, we may see a
 central or terminal brightening. If it completely shatters
 into thousands of pieces (as seems likely with Chelyabinsk)
 the energy from the suddenly heated air is immense- an
 efficient conversion of kinetic energy to thermal energy.
 The expanding hot air can produce an impressive sonic wave,
 and probably further disrupts the meteoroid itself.

 I don't that there are any electrical forces of a
 significant size to affect the structure or motion of the
 meteoroid, although atmospheric electrical effects probably
 occur (e.g. electrophonics).

 Chris

 ***
 Chris L Peterson
 Cloudbait Observatory
 http://www.cloudbait.com

 On 2/26/2013 11:59 PM, drtanuki wrote:
  Dear List,
  If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why
 meteoroids/asteroids detonate please explain for the list
 and myself.  I am interested learning more about the
 electrical/mechanical/physical forces that these bodies
 undergo as they reach the earth such as in the latest
 Russian event. Thank you.
  Dirk Ross...Tokyo

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



-- 
Jim Wooddell
jimwoodd...@gmail.com
928-247-2675
__

Visit

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread James Beauchamp
Hi Dirk, 

A very small amount of equivalent energy is involved with free electron 
release.  Perhaps the moving electrons cause localized magnetic fields, but far 
lower than those needed to have large-scale charge separation. 

I can see the electron clouds on the radar because free electrons are 
conductive.  But energy exchange is kept pretty locally.

Now, posing in intriguing situation - lets say a russian-like event occurs over 
a supercell thunderstorm.  It could skim across the anvil.  The line of 
conducting plasma would short circuit the heavily charge separated areas 
(Charges migrate due to the supercooled freezing process).  I think you would 
get a nice lightshow.  

Kind of interesting...  CC meteortites, low pressure.  Volatile amino acids, 
carbon, and lightning,  Would be a nice situation for early life forms.
  

--- On Wed, 2/27/13, drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com wrote:

From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption 
and Charge Properties?
To: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com, 
steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 2:15 AM

Garry and Steve,  Most excellent posts and information;  thank you.

  Further to my original question.  Would/should we expect that there may be 
ground-to-air electro-stactic response (lightning) prior to the arrival of the 
physical body to physical contact with the earth; and has this been simulated 
or captured on video?  
Dirk Ross...Tokyo

--- On Wed, 2/27/13, Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption 
 and Charge Properties?
 To: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 4:33 PM
 Hi Dirk and List,
 This link http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/nukeffct/enw77b1.html
 explains the propagation of atomic shockwaves with
 interesting pictures of shockwave propagation.  It can
 explain the effects on meteoric 
 explosions at high altitude.  Interesting read but very
 long article and detailed.
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
  From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
  To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Cc: 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:59 AM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
 Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
  
  Dear List,
  If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why
 meteoroids/asteroids 
  detonate please explain for the list and myself.  I
 am interested 
  learning more about the electrical/mechanical/physical
 forces that these bodies 
  undergo as they reach the earth such as in the latest
 Russian event. Thank you.
  Dirk Ross...Tokyo
  __
  
  Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-27 Thread Steve Dunklee
Ouch!
 Imagine the extra energy released if the detonation occured inside a 
thunderhead? I had a physics instructor who thought small amounts of nuclear 
reactions were caused by lightning as in nitrogen converted to ozone. He said 
keep your eyes open. Just because something is improbable it doesnt make it 
impossible. Some detonations happen when pressures get to high as stated by 
Chris Peterson but others happen when the forward pressure suddenly drops 
causing expasion or instability.  most are the result of some kind of forward 
pressure change be it up or down.
cheers
Steve

--- On Thu, 2/28/13, James Beauchamp falco...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 From: James Beauchamp falco...@sbcglobal.net
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption 
 and Charge Properties?
 To: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com, 
 steve.dunk...@yahoo.com, drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013, 4:52 AM
 Hi Dirk, 
 
 A very small amount of equivalent energy is involved with
 free electron release.  Perhaps the moving electrons
 cause localized magnetic fields, but far lower than those
 needed to have large-scale charge separation. 
 
 I can see the electron clouds on the radar because free
 electrons are conductive.  But energy exchange is kept
 pretty locally.
 
 Now, posing in intriguing situation - lets say a
 russian-like event occurs over a supercell
 thunderstorm.  It could skim across the anvil. 
 The line of conducting plasma would short circuit the
 heavily charge separated areas (Charges migrate due to the
 supercooled freezing process).  I think you would get a
 nice lightshow.  
 
 Kind of interesting...  CC meteortites, low
 pressure.  Volatile amino acids, carbon, and
 lightning,  Would be a nice situation for early life
 forms.
   
 
 --- On Wed, 2/27/13, drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
 Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
 To: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com,
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com,
 steve.dunk...@yahoo.com
 Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 2:15 AM
 
 Garry and Steve,  Most excellent posts and information; 
 thank you.
 
   Further to my original question.  Would/should we expect
 that there may be ground-to-air electro-stactic response
 (lightning) prior to the arrival of the physical body to
 physical contact with the earth; and has this been simulated
 or captured on video?  
 Dirk Ross...Tokyo
 
 --- On Wed, 2/27/13, Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
  From: Garry Stewart xe...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
 Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
  To: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
  Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 4:33 PM
  Hi Dirk and List,
  This link http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/nukeffct/enw77b1.html
  explains the propagation of atomic shockwaves with
  interesting pictures of shockwave propagation.  It
 can
  explain the effects on meteoric 
  explosions at high altitude.  Interesting read but
 very
  long article and detailed.
  
  
  
  
  - Original Message -
   From: drtanuki drtan...@yahoo.com
   To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
   Cc: 
   Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:59 AM
   Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid
  Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?
   
   Dear List,
   If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and
 why
  meteoroids/asteroids 
   detonate please explain for the list and
 myself.  I
  am interested 
   learning more about the
 electrical/mechanical/physical
  forces that these bodies 
   undergo as they reach the earth such as in the
 latest
  Russian event. Thank you.
   Dirk Ross...Tokyo
   __
   
   Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
   http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 __
 
 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteoroid/Asteroid Electro-Magnetic Disruption and Charge Properties?

2013-02-26 Thread drtanuki
Dear List,
If there is anyone willing to discuss the how and why meteoroids/asteroids 
detonate please explain for the list and myself.  I am interested learning 
more about the electrical/mechanical/physical forces that these bodies undergo 
as they reach the earth such as in the latest Russian event. Thank you.
Dirk Ross...Tokyo
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list