[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this is, what I was thinking of when I made that P.S. remark
about that "Begaa" stone with my last post.
If I remember correctly, Marvin Killgore classified it originally. Don't know where it went from there.
Gregory
This meteorite is also missing in the very latest update of MetBase,
version 6.0, just a few days ago released by it´s author Joern
Koblitz, who is one of the members of the NomCom of the Meteoritical
Society. In fact, there is a gap in the NWA datasets counting from NWA
780 to NWA 816, and there a
It was one of my meteorites, it was classified by
UCLA and should have been accepted.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 10:49
AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 801
NWA 801 is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not sure why this Subject keeps reoccurring on the
List. Also, not sure why we are troubling Jeff about
meteorites that haven't been submitted to his
Committee
I for one, wasn't completely ignorant of the fact that NWA 801 hadn't been submitted to his Committee, I was
This meteorite is listed in the Provisional Names page:
http://meteoriticalsociety.org/bulletin/prov-names.html
It appears to be a Farmer meteorite with type specimen at UCLA. As of last
spring, nobody had submitted a classification to the NomCom. Perhaps is
has come in since, but no vote has o
Just curious:
Is it the classifying institute´s responsibility to submit a completed
classification to the NomCom "in time" to get ready for future work,
or is it the responsibility of the dealer/finder/supplier to do so,
when he knows of any results from the analysing institute? Or is this
a sor
We consider the classifier and the owner to be a team, for all intents and
purposes. However, if a researcher wants to publish, it becomes his or her
responsibility to make sure that approval has been granted.
I'll have to look into Begaa tomorrow.
jeff
At 08:56 PM 8/10/2003 +0200, Alexander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As of last
spring, nobody had submitted a classification [NWA 801] to the NomCom. Perhaps is
has come in since, but no vote has occurred. Despite the "official"
reference, the meteorite name remains unofficial.
Jeff, is this essentially the same thing that happen
rocess would lead you to
believe. Lord, I do hope so!
Bob V.
---
meteorite-list] NWA 801 / Begaa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:37:41 EDT
Previous message: [meteorite-list] NWA 801
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As of last spring,
NWA 801 is available as a CR2, and looks like a pretty and interesting meteorite - but unless I'm missing something, it still has not been officially recognized in a MetSoc Bulletin. I did find an "official" mention of it here:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2003/pdf/5238.pdf
.b
10 matches
Mail list logo
