Re: [meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech meteorites

2012-02-22 Thread Carl Agee
Fujihara fuj...@mac.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech meteorites To: Jan Woreczko - www.meteoritica.eu e...@biol.uw.edu.pl Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Message-ID: 6e6a9f8f-96ef-43a4-bd5a-f4be936ce...@mac.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset

[meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech meteorites

2012-02-21 Thread Jan Woreczko - www.meteoritica.eu
Ha Why are these findings are not classified as a falls? Benešov (a) http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=54854 Benešov (b) http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=54855

Re: [meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech meteorites

2012-02-21 Thread Gary Fujihara
Aloha Jan, From just a cursory glance at the metbull entry for Benesov (a), I would surmise a reason for the non-fall classification is due to the fact that much time had elapsed from the witnessed fireball on May 7, 1991 and the actual recovery of material on April 9, 2011. Because almost

Re: [meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech meteorites

2012-02-21 Thread Jan Woreczko Wadi
Fujihara fuj...@mac.com To: Jan Woreczko - www.meteoritica.eu e...@biol.uw.edu.pl Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:04 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Met Bulletin Approvals - new Czech meteorites Aloha Jan, From just a cursory glance at the metbull entry