Please Warren, your canned responses were expected
I mean no discredit to the dedicated scientists and professionals at NASA and
the military that worked on the project, and those that soldier on today, and
I answered you in jest off list - no need to take this public, unless you want
to.
-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
To: warren3...@hotmail.com; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Please Warren, your canned responses were expected
I mean no discredit to the dedicated scientists and professionals at NASA and
the military that worked on the project, and those that soldier
-
From: power ofunity energylightandl...@yahoo.com
To: Warren Sansoucie warren3...@hotmail.com;
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
Please Warren, your canned responses were expected
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:59:45 -0600, you wrote:
This nutjob has no place on a list whose members are dedicated to the
science of meteoritics (or dedicated to any science). He's an embarrassment.
I agree. I'm adding a name to my killfile.
__
Visit the
Hello Jessica,
With all due respect, you have not done your homework. The questions
which you pose have been discredited numerous times. And some are
just plain silly. For example, how can you claim that there was no
direct TV feed?? I don't know how old you are, but I sat in front of
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:22:08 -0700, you wrote:
I could go on, but I don't want to waste any more time on a nut job
like you.
Yeah, I was about to say you're wasting your time. If you google her mailing
address, you'll find almost nothing, but you will find that she sells
metaphysical
Dangerous ground!
I am not saying I think one way or the other on this subject of the Moon
Landing but when you seek to stop, isolate, or ostracize any one for asking
questions it quits being Science and becomes religion.
Why go right to attacking this person? Defending your position
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:54:51 EDT, you wrote:
These posts have had a disturbing smugness to them.
There are degrees of anti-scientific nutbaggery so insultingly stupid that both
the views and the view-holders deserve no respect. Especially concidering that
at least one (seldom posting but
Hello Tom,
I don't believe that my reply to Jessica (at least to begin with) was
in any way an attack. I addressed several of her questions with
facts. After stating that I take nobody at their word, and I do
research the information she provided absolutely no data and no facts
to
--- On Sat, 4/24/10, power ofunity energylightandl...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am a professional photographer, ...
Where are the stars?
I usually don't waste one minute of my time on this mindless drivel, because
those who are convinced that all the evidence is wrong or faked, but on this
one
You make my point for me! When should intolerance be tolerated? Easy!,
When you question my sacred beliefs.
Tom
In a message dated 4/24/2010 11:16:08 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
cyna...@charter.net writes:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:54:51 EDT, you wrote:
These posts have had a disturbing
*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Original Message -
From: starsinthed...@aol.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar
Why was there no direct Tv Feed -
This one I can speak to. Ever since the movie The Dish, I've 'looked into'
the Parkes Radio Telescope. The story as depicted in the movie is relatively
correct, aside from a bit of dramatic license. Parkes was supposed to be a
backup for the main video
...@alumni.caltech.edu
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Saturday, April 24, 2010, 10:35 AM
Would you also respect the right of
somebody to consume forum bandwidth to argue that the Earth
is flat? Seriously
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:45:42 +, you wrote:
Mythbusters did a fairly comprehensive debunking
Here's Penn and the other guy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWZ_LCnkE7A
__
Visit the Archives at
Didn't the Japanese Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) known as Selene,
(Kaguya) deal a death blow to the moon denialists with their photos of the
landers and footprint trails?
Btw, Apollo lunar samples prove nothing, they could have been bought from
the Russians, (remember the unmanned
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:27:29 -0400, you wrote:
Didn't the Japanese Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
Yes LRO, no Japanese.
http://lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/newsroom.html
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
...@embarqmail.com wrote:
From: JoshuaTreeMuseum joshuatreemus...@embarqmail.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Saturday, April 24, 2010, 11:27 AM
Didn't the Japanese Lunar
Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) known as Selene, (Kaguya
...@embarqmail.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:27:29 -0400
Subject: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
Didn't the Japanese Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) known as Selene,
(Kaguya) deal a death blow to the moon denialists with their photos
: starsinthed...@aol.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
You make my point for me! When should intolerance be tolerated?
Easy!,
When you question my sacred beliefs.
Tom
In a message
the surface.
Best Wishes,
Warren Sansoucie
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:45:29 -0700
From: damoc...@yahoo.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
LRO is a US mission
...@embarqmail.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Saturday, April 24, 2010, 11:27 AM
Didn't the Japanese Lunar
Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) known as Selene, (Kaguya) deal
a death blow to the moon denialists
--- On Sat, 4/24/10, Warren Sansoucie warren3...@hotmail.com wrote:
Buzz Aldrin punching someone for bringing up the hoax is
all the proof I need. A man with his composure losing his
temper shows the insult he felt when confronted with such
nonsense.
A little back story on this episode
Maybe we could send Ed Mitchell back to the moon to verify the evidence. We
could send along Lisa Nowak (along with plenty of diapers) to make sure Ed
doesn't do anything squirrelly.
Phil (Oswald didn't do it) Whitmer
__
Visit the Archives at
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:17:35 -0400
Subject: [meteorite-list] OFF-Topic-Fake Lunar Landing Response
Maybe we could send Ed Mitchell back to the moon to verify the evidence. We
could send along Lisa Nowak (along with plenty of diapers) to make sure Ed
doesn't
Sometimes in life an empty Coke bottle that conks you on your head was
just some ass that threw it out of a plane and not the gods being angry.
That was a good movie...The God's Must Be Cracy? or something like that.
GeoZay
__
Visit the Archives
: apollocollec...@q.com
To: energylightandl...@yahoo.com
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:22:08 -0700
CC: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OFF-TOPIC - Fake Lunar Landing Response
Hello Jessica,
With all due respect, you have not done your homework. The questions
which you
27 matches
Mail list logo
