On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:29:37 -0400, you wrote:
cancelled the effect. Direct contact with the galvanic skin response or
electrodermal conductance response, whatever you want to call it is
essential for it to work.
Before dowsing was done with bent pieces of metal, it was done with wooden
Here are kits you can use to find meteorites-- looks like they can be tuned to
any mineral!
http://simmonsscientificproducts.com/products.html
(I guess these are the fake dowsing rods, though-- not the real ones that
operate via handwavium.)
__
Visit
Hey Darren, No offense dude, but making it a point that you're making
fun of someone onlist? Shit, I'm harsh and even I don't do that. To each
his own I guess.
Eric
On 10/16/2010 11:03 PM, Darren Garrison wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:29:37 -0400, you wrote:
cancelled the effect.
Eric,
That's ok. This is all just good fun, it's nothing personal. When you're
arguing from a position of ignorance and basically don't know what you're
talking about, you have to resort to ridicule. When you have no factual
information to back up your argument, the only thing you can do is
OK, here is what needs to be done.
(1) Get 10 non see through buckets that wont even show shadows.
(2) Get ten items. A couple meteorites, toys, other crystals etc
(3) Make sure that the person with the dowsing rod knows exactly what all the
items are like so that he/she can properly view them
Darren,
How is posting some flakey links and making lame jokes an intelligent
argument? Is that really the best you got? You do know what a debate is
right? You're acting like a 12 year old. (not that there's anything wrong
with that.) I mean come on, my posts have footnotes for chrissakes!
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:02:17 -0400, you wrote:
Eric,
That's ok. This is all just good fun, it's nothing personal. When you're
arguing from a position of ignorance and basically don't know what you're
talking about, you have to resort to ridicule. When you have no factual
information to back up
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:09:09 -0400, you wrote:
Darren,
How is posting some flakey links and making lame jokes an intelligent
argument? Is that really the best you got? You do know what a debate is
right? You're acting like a 12 year old. (not that there's anything wrong
with that.) I mean come
- Original Message -
From: dean bessey deanbes...@yahoo.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] You Naysaying Denialists Are All
Wrong,Dowsing Works!
OK, here is what needs
First off, let me say that all you naysaying dowser denialists need to get
off your high horses, come down from your ivory towers and enter the realm
of simple, reproducible, empirical evidence-based experimental scientific
methodology instead of parroting dogmatic drivel and appealing to the
16, 2010 1:17 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] You Naysaying Denialists Are All Wrong,Dowsing
Works!
First off, let me say that all you naysaying dowser denialists need to get
off your high horses, come down from your ivory towers and enter the realm
of simple, reproducible, empirical evidence
Phil,
I'm a bit confused. If dowsing is so effective as you describe, why would
anyone spend all that money on a metal detector? A couple of bent coat hangers
cost a lot less, not to mention the reduction in weight makes searching a
meteorite strewnfield all day long much less tiring!
I
Hi everyone. Looks like Phil went from being a skeptic to a believer just by
trying it out. Dowsing does not work for everyone. A mine lab detector doesnt
always work in highly mineralised ground either. The million dollar test
requires trying to find over 75%non conductive or inductive
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Steve
Dunklee
Gesendet: Samstag, 16. Oktober 2010 18:46
An: mqfow...@mac.com; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] You Naysaying Denialists Are All Wrong,
Dowsing Works!
Hi everyone. Looks like Phil went
- it's how you use
it that counts ;-)
Best wishes
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Chris Peterson c...@alumni.caltech.edu
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Sat, Oct 16, 2010 10:20 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] You Naysaying Denialists Are All Wrong,
Dowsing Works!
I
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 03:17:27 -0400, you wrote:
dowser(s)
enter the realm
of simple,
dogmatic drivel and
idiots.
Yep.
this to work. They must be held loosely so they can move freely of their own
accord. If you grip them too tightly, the experiment won't work.
Yes, the reason the rods must
Darren:
You're missing the central point about dowsing. You can't remove the human
element. That's what makes it work. Someone I know already made your
argument. They put the rods is narrow glass jars to stabilize them. That
cancelled the effect. Direct contact with the galvanic skin
17 matches
Mail list logo
