Hello Jörn,
Since nobody in the know has answered your ponderings yet, I think
I'll add my take on this circumstance. I followed the progress of
analysis of NWA 1827 because I had seen the piece that Nelson had
acquired and I thought it had a unique and interesting appearance. The
preliminary
Joern and David,
In my first inquiry this week I mentioned NWA 1882 (not 1982 that Joern and David
touched on) as being the same material. It is my belief that NWA 1882 is the same
material as NWA 1827/1879. Stefan Ralew, who sold 1882 to me, also believes it to be
the same. NWA 1882 was not
John,
The joint abstract by NAU and UWS we referred to does also mention NWA
1882 as a probable pairing to 1827 and 1879 (as well as probable
pairings for NWA 1912, 1951, 1982, 3055, and possibly NWA 1645, plus
other material totaling at least 26.4 kg).
Read it here:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Weir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 20:03
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] metal-rich diogenite vs mesosiderite-C
John,
According to the scientists at NAU (Wittke, Bunch
Hello all,
I see there is an Ebay auction today for a metal-rich diogenite for about $30/g. I
thought with the last go around with NWA 1827, 1879 and 1882 that a metal rich
diogenite did not exist and that these were all classified as MES-C's that sell
for about $10 to $25/g, depending on the
John,
According to the scientists at NAU (Wittke, Bunch), this is a metal-rich
diogenite and not a meso. Check out their nice website:
http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~wittke/Microprobe/Probe.html
Click on NAU Meteorite Classifications and then on the diogenite
section and scroll to the bottom to read
: Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 20:03
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] metal-rich diogenite vs mesosiderite-C
John,
According to the scientists at NAU (Wittke, Bunch), this is a metal-rich
diogenite and not a meso. Check out their nice website:
http
David,
Thanx for responding and the information provided on this material.
Since you have both types, how do you see them in comparison?
Thanx in advance,
John
-- Original message from David Weir : --
John,
According to the scientists at NAU (Wittke, Bunch),
John
They're nothing alike. One is a mesosiderite with abundant opx
inclusions, and the other is a diogenite with an abundance of free
metal. (plus I believe whatever NAU says :)
David
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why do none of the photos come up?
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: David Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] metal-rich diogenite vs mesosiderite-C
John,
According
Mike,
What browser are you using? I have found that older Netscape doesn't
work, but I use Mozilla Firefox, and IE works fine too.
David
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
, September 15, 2004 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] metal-rich diogenite vs mesosiderite-C
John,
According to the scientists at NAU (Wittke, Bunch), this is a metal-rich
diogenite and not a meso. Check out their nice website:
http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~wittke/Microprobe
12 matches
Mail list logo
