[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-15 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, May 15 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Grein 005

Contributed by: Matthias Baermann

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/15/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-14 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, May 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Seymchan

Contributed by: Sue Spinnato

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/14/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-13 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, May 13 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 15877

Contributed by: Younes Chaoui

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/13/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-12 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, May 12 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Viñales

Contributed by: Michael Overacker

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/12/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-11 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, May 11 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Moldavite-Indochinite 
Cousins

Contributed by: Calvin Shipbaugh

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/11/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-10 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, May 10 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Johnstown

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/10/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, May 9 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 15658

Contributed by: Sue Spinnato

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/09/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 257, Issue 18

2024-05-08 Thread mohamed aid via Meteorite-list
Hi

Envoyé de mon iPhone

> Le 19 déc. 2023 à 07:29, meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com a écrit :
> 
> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
>meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:35:55 -0700
> From: 
> To: 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
> Message-ID: <948E309BA3DE446B99798265153EC113@s10718094116>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> Monday, Dec 18 2023 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Krasnojarsk
> 
> Contributed by: Scott McGregor
> 
> http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=12/18/2023
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 
> 
> --
> 
> End of Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 257, Issue 18
> ***

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-08 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, May 8 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 15915 TS

Contributed by: Dustin Dickens

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/08/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-07 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, May 7 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Tissint

Contributed by: John Divelbiss

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/07/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-06 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, May 6 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Jbilet Winselwan

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/06/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-05 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, May 5 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 14808

Contributed by: Cal Powell

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/05/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-04 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, May 4 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 15915

Contributed by: Steve Brittenham

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/04/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-03 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, May 3 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Whale Tail

Contributed by: Murray Paulson

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/03/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-02 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, May 2 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Aguas Zarcas

Contributed by: Mike Farmer

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/02/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-05-01 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, May 1 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Vigarano

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=05/01/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-30 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Apr 30 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Pitts

Contributed by: Scott McGregor

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/30/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-29 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Apr 29 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Marsa Alam

Contributed by: Timur Kryachko

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/29/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-28 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Apr 28 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Sikhote Alin

Contributed by: Alexander Seidel

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/28/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-27 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Apr 27 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Agoudal

Contributed by: Steve Brittenham

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/27/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-26 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Apr 26 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Sierra Gorda 010

Contributed by: Timur Kryachko

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/26/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-25 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Apr 25 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Imilac

Contributed by: Peter Marmet

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/25/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-24 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Apr 24 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 14144

Contributed by: Ron Gill

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/24/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-23 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Apr 23 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 1289

Contributed by: Cal Powell

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/23/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-22 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Apr 22 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Muonionalusta

Contributed by: Luca Fenocchio

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/22/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-21 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Apr 21 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Marjalahti

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/21/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-20 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Apr 20 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 15796

Contributed by: Ron Gill

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/20/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-19 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Apr 19 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Unclassified

Contributed by: Svend Buhl

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/19/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-18 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Apr 18 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NEA 051

Contributed by: Scott McGregor

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/18/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-17 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Apr 17 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Acapulco

Contributed by: jnmczurich

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/17/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-16 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Apr 16 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: RaS 531

Contributed by: Cal Powell

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/16/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-15 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Apr 15 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: yadda

Contributed by: Steve Brittenham

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/15/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-14 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Apr 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Chupaderos

Contributed by: Hanno Strufe

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/14/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-13 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Apr 13 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Conquista

Contributed by: Heriton Rocha

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/13/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-12 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Apr 12 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 4910

Contributed by: Roving Reporter

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/12/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-11 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Apr 11 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Khor Temiki

Contributed by: jnmczurich

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/11/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-10 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Apr 10 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Tabor

Contributed by: Alexander Seidel

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/10/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-09 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Apr 9 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Nantan

Contributed by: Luca Fenocchio

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/09/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-08 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Apr 8 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Calcalong Creek

Contributed by: Radiant Point, Ltd.

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/08/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-07 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Apr 7 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Krymka

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/07/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-06 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Apr 6 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Portales Valley

Contributed by: Gourgues Denis

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/06/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-05 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Apr 5 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Charsonville

Contributed by: jnmczurich

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/05/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-04 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Apr 4 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Exhibition

Contributed by: Darryl Pitt

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/04/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-03 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Apr 3 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Forest Vale

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/03/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-02 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Apr 2 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 1099

Contributed by: Bernd Pauli

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/02/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-04-01 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Apr 1 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Rhea

Contributed by: Professor Eno Lirpa

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=04/01/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-31 Thread Swan Valley Bushcraft via Meteorite-list
Beautiful specimen Anne. And I miss buying meteorites from David. Such a
gentleman.

-Martin

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 1:36 AM Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Sunday, Mar 31 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Murray
>
> Contributed by: Anne Black
>
> http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/31/2024
> __
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
______
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-31 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Mar 31 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Murray

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/31/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-30 Thread Paul Harris via Meteorite-list
s obviously that."  You are also well
aware that I am not selling any of the obviously
Jikharra until my own classification is approved
because you were part of the discussion.

4. You don't actually know where I sourced my material
because you did not ask.  For example the
metbul mentioned many kilograms traded as Ghadamis
that was not in Marcin's possession. Since I bought
and traded Ghadamis before the name HaH 346 was
approved, how do you think I should have handled the
situation differently?

5. In regards to nwa 869 the following quote is from
the metbul "At least 2 metric tons of material
comprising thousands of individuals has been sold
under the name NWA 869 in the market places of Morocco
and around the world." along with the appropriate
caveats due to its abundance- "Scientists are advised
to confirm the classification of any specimens they
obtain before publishing results under this name." 
 So again I do not feel you are making an apples to
apples comparison with your critique of my logic.

We all obviously respect your encyclopedic
understanding of meteorites so perhaps you can share
with us your framework for best practices in these
situations.

Best regards,
Jason

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:21 PM Jason Utas
 wrote:

Hello Jason,
To be consistent, you should remove the HaH 346
and NWA 869 specimens you have listed for sale on
your website.  Those classifications were
submitted by other dealers; your stones are
unclassified individuals from DCAs with no
evidence of their find locations, etc.
On your "featured" page, you also have a specimen
listed as a "likely Jakharra 001 Pairing." 
Similar issues aside, relying on that standard, it
should be okay for Benzaki Mohamed to call his
specimens "likely NWA 15758 pairings."
Regards,
Jason

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:09 AM humboldt bay jay
via Meteorite-list
 wrote:

Thank you Benzaki Mohamed for swiftly reaching
out to me.  I appreciate your attention to
this matter.  All is good.
Best regards to everyone,
Jason Whitcomb


On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:29 PM

wrote:

Send Meteorite-list mailing list
submissions to
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Wide Web, visit

https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
or, via email, send a message with subject
or body 'help' to
meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com

When replying, please edit your Subject
line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list
digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Meteorite Picture of the Day
        (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
   2. Re: Very sad news (Ruben Garcia)
   3. Re: Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261,
Issue 14 (humboldt bay jay)



--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
From: 
To: 
Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite
Picture of the Day
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain

Thursday, Mar 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of
the D

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-30 Thread Mark Lyon via Meteorite-list
 point out when obvious fakes
>> <https://forums.arrowheads.com/forum/general-discussion-gc5/what-did-i-find-gc11/683620-tiger-tail-meteorite/page2>
>> surface.
>>
>> Mark's only been doing meteorite-related stuff for a few years and he has
>> no related background.  I'd expect some mishaps from anyone in those
>> circumstances.  I guess as long as Mark refunds people when it happens,
>> like he did with John, it's not really unethical for Mark to berate anyone
>> who points out that he's sold misrepresented material?  I don't understand
>> it, but it won't stop me.  I have no qualms about publicly posting any
>> other bad IDs I see, and insults he throws out, so that you all can see the
>> kind of guy he is, too.
>>
>> I suppose it's not really that simple, because some misrepresented
>> material is still going to get into circulation, which is a problem...
>> Maybe some of the more experienced members in the Global Meteorite
>> Association (GMA) can help Mark sort it out?  I don't know.  What's
>> supposed to happen with NWA 14743 now?  I'm seeing active listings of what
>> looks to me like at least two different meteorites, sold listings for both
>> going back at least a year...pieces for sale on websites like
>> www.meteorites-for-sale.com, sold pieces there...  It looks like a real
>> headache.  I wouldn't know where to begin.
>>
>> As Mendy said, caveat emptor.  Always.  IMCA, GMA, me, doesn't matter.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:50 PM Mark Lyon 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jason Humboldt,
>>>
>>> You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas.  He has been doing this
>>> for years.  He  isnt going to change.  You should have seen some of the
>>> messages he sent me before i blocked him.  The first time I met him he went
>>> in my display room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza
>>> (nwa 859) because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was
>>> just using it as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking
>>> dustin Dickens (a friend of mine) for pairing meteorites.  More recently,
>>> he made damaging accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin.
>>> Not caring how it affected a Russian group who had just spent months
>>> travelling and collecting the materials.  He always thinks he is right, and
>>> he very seldom is.For the record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller.
>>> You politely told him not to use your classification, which was probably a
>>> single person classification with low total known weight. Anyone with
>>> common sense can see that this is different from huge finds like hah346 and
>>> jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he complained about. I didn't
>>> read his whole message because I have heard it all before.   Collectors
>>> want to know they are getting these, and not another meteorite.  People are
>>> not using these names to be dishonest but to accurately describe what they
>>> are selling.  It would be doing the community a disservice not to use these
>>> names.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
>>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I appreciate the immense amount of time I anticipated you would spend
>>>> on your reply.
>>>>
>>>> Thinking extensively about this, I wondered why you tried to shame me
>>>> as a hypocrite, even when you have witness to me striving for best
>>>> practices.  Having autism I often struggle to understand people's
>>>> intention.  Many times I have gone wrong assuming the worst in people's
>>>> actions.  So one of my strategies is to try to think of the best possible
>>>> intention that someone could have.  I admit sometimes it is difficult with
>>>> your approach (and attempt to shame me) but since your critique was not
>>>> sound I came to reason that you saw an injustice that I perpetrated against
>>>> Benzaki Mohamed and you felt the need to "punch the bully in his face".  A
>>>> fierce sense of justice that sometimes leads me to act foolish is also part
>>>> of my condition so I was able to have sympathy with this realization.  Now
>>>> that you have responded I can more clearly see your intention.  So here is
>>>> my considered response.
>>>>
>>>> To the community:  I am happy to assist with meteoritics in any

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-30 Thread Mark Lyon via Meteorite-list
28-55-n-7-36-/a/8096-72175.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515>.
>  After I let them know that the specimen was not Tissint, Heritage
> amended the listing before the auction, and I'm glad to see that they
> sorted it out ethically with the buyer afterwards.  Heritage had the
> stone analyzed, and its description shows that the stone is *not* an
> olivine-phyric basalt, and is *not* Tissint.  I've caught a number of
> issues like that for major auction houses, but they almost never wind up
> published and identifiable like that.  And I’m still curious about who
> tried to list that stone as Tissint…
>
> There are two problems in a large meteorite auction scheduled for next
> month.  I don't want to name the auction, but you can probably figure it
> out.  The specimens are 100% misidentified.  *Can you spot them? *
>
> I don't know how many of my IDs have been analytically confirmed, but I
> can say that many have been
> <https://meteoritegallery.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ashcreekzunhua.png> 
> (also
> NWA 11889, and others).  I can't quote a correct/incorrect rate, because
> it's not clear-cut; I've voiced concerns about material when I haven't been
> certain that it was misrepresented -- like this Omolon.  I don't think you
> can really be right or wrong if you say "I think this looks off, does
> anyone have any details on it?"  Asking that should be fine in a community
> like ours, where so much material gets both intentionally and
> unintentionally mislabeled.  If a specimen looks weird, or wrong, or
> whatever, people should be allowed to question it, and that should be
> okay.  And it should also be okay to point out when obvious fakes
> <https://forums.arrowheads.com/forum/general-discussion-gc5/what-did-i-find-gc11/683620-tiger-tail-meteorite/page2>
> surface.
>
> Mark's only been doing meteorite-related stuff for a few years and he has
> no related background.  I'd expect some mishaps from anyone in those
> circumstances.  I guess as long as Mark refunds people when it happens,
> like he did with John, it's not really unethical for Mark to berate anyone
> who points out that he's sold misrepresented material?  I don't understand
> it, but it won't stop me.  I have no qualms about publicly posting any
> other bad IDs I see, and insults he throws out, so that you all can see the
> kind of guy he is, too.
>
> I suppose it's not really that simple, because some misrepresented
> material is still going to get into circulation, which is a problem...
> Maybe some of the more experienced members in the Global Meteorite
> Association (GMA) can help Mark sort it out?  I don't know.  What's
> supposed to happen with NWA 14743 now?  I'm seeing active listings of what
> looks to me like at least two different meteorites, sold listings for both
> going back at least a year...pieces for sale on websites like
> www.meteorites-for-sale.com, sold pieces there...  It looks like a real
> headache.  I wouldn't know where to begin.
>
> As Mendy said, caveat emptor.  Always.  IMCA, GMA, me, doesn't matter.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:50 PM Mark Lyon 
> wrote:
>
>> Jason Humboldt,
>>
>> You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas.  He has been doing this
>> for years.  He  isnt going to change.  You should have seen some of the
>> messages he sent me before i blocked him.  The first time I met him he went
>> in my display room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza
>> (nwa 859) because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was
>> just using it as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking
>> dustin Dickens (a friend of mine) for pairing meteorites.  More recently,
>> he made damaging accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin.
>> Not caring how it affected a Russian group who had just spent months
>> travelling and collecting the materials.  He always thinks he is right, and
>> he very seldom is.For the record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller.
>> You politely told him not to use your classification, which was probably a
>> single person classification with low total known weight. Anyone with
>> common sense can see that this is different from huge finds like hah346 and
>> jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he complained about. I didn't
>> read his whole message because I have heard it all before.   Collectors
>> want to know they are getting these, and not another meteorite.  People are
>> not using these names to be dishonest but to accurately describe what they
>> are selling.  It would be doing the community a disservice not to use these
>> names.
>>
>>

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-30 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Mar 30 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Chug Chug 003

Contributed by: Timur Kryachko

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/30/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-29 Thread Mendy Ouzillou via Meteorite-list
Since the GMA <https://gmeta.org/>  and I were mentioned at the end of the post 
below, I will make the following points.

1.  Mark Lyon is a member in good standing of the Global Meteorite 
Association.
2.  The GMA’s responsibility only begins when a formal complaint 
<https://gmeta.org/community/complaints>  has been lodged against a member.

 

These are to be interpreted as two independently statement of facts and nothing 
more. 

 

Regards to all,

 

Mendy

 

From: Meteorite-list  On Behalf Of 
Jason Utas via Meteorite-list
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 2:03 PM
To: Mark Lyon 
Cc: Meteorite-list ; humboldt bay jay 

Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

 

Hello Everyone,

Sorry for the late reply - it's spring break, and the rocks don't find 
themselves.  

It's hard to disagree with common sense.  Unfortunately, Mark has already made 
at least a few pretty bad common sense pairing mistakes that I'm pretty sure 
have put misrepresented material into circulation.  Like this one 
<https://i.imgur.com/dqkqk05.jpg> , where Mark decided that an unclassified 
~CV3 was paired with another dealer's published CR2.  And this one 
<https://i.imgur.com/A0y83Tj.jpg> , where Mark decided that a CV3 was paired 
with what sure looks to me like an unpaired carbonaceous chondrite.  More on 
these meteorites below.  


Mark mentioned some of our past conversations.  I agree: they were pretty 
crazy, but I wouldn't say it's because of anything I said.  I guess it's a good 
thing I saved them all, and can share them with you.  


Let's get right to it.  

In mid-January of 2023, I let John Humphreys know, in private, that some “Erg 
Chech 003" "CR2” slices he was offering on eBay looked to be swapped with a 
~CV3.  John's one of the few dealers I would trust to handle an issue like that 
honestly and quickly.  Given the texture of the stone and its abundant CAIs, it 
couldn't have been a CR2.  Not possible.  A photo of the material speaks for 
itself <https://i.imgur.com/dqkqk05.jpg> : a real specimen of Erg Chech 003 is 
on the right.  To his credit, John immediately pulled the slices he'd listed.  
I had no way of knowing it at the time, but Mark had sold John this 
unclassified meteorite as the published CR2 Erg Chech 003 
<https://imgur.com/a/47qmQK7> .  Unfortunately, by the time I'd messaged John 
about the problem, some amount of the ~CV3 had already been sold on by a few of 
the dealers who routinely distribute Mark's material, and you can still find 
some of those unclassified ~CV3 slices in circulation as CR2s / Erg Chech 003 
<https://5dhealingcrystals.com/products/pallasite-meteorite-erg-chech> .  Not 
great. 

Had I said nothing, there's no reason to think anyone else would have caught 
the misrepresented material, and the rest of that ~CV3 would have been sold as 
the CR2.  Mark keeps telling people I'm often wrong, but...he admitted to the 
problem in private and refunded John <https://i.imgur.com/lUWiP9q.png> .  Hm. 

I would add: I don't blame John Humphreys for what happened with the fake Erg 
Chech 003.  It's not reasonable to expect everyone to be able to ID a 
carbonaceous chondrite by sight, especially based on just a few small slices.  
Someone classifying and selling new, unclassified meteorites has a greater 
burden of responsibility than someone who thinks they're buying a documented 
meteorite from a reputable dealer.  Ultimately, Mark was the one who put those 
specimens into circulation labelled as something they weren't.  It should have 
been safe for John to trust him.  

 

This "Erg Chech 003" ~CV3 is also a perfect example of Mark's ‘rules for thee 
but not for me.’  Mark argued in his email that Benzaki Mohamed's use of Jason 
Whitcomb's NWA number was different from Taza, Jikharra 001, etc., because 
Whitcomb's CK was "probably a single person classification with low total known 
weight. Anyone with common sense can see that this is different from huge 
finds." 


Well, let's look up Erg Chech 003 
<https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=74840> .  How many tonnes is 
it?  It has a TKW of...just 1.1 kilograms.  Oh.  That's...really small.  And 
it's owned by...two dealers who often collaborate with each other.  Not Mark.  
So...not only did Mark use someone else's DCA number from a small find -- he 
screwed up the pairing when doing it and put misidentified material into 
circulation.  ...I guess "common sense" rules only apply to everyone else.  Not 
Mark Lyon.  

 

Let's turn the clock back to January 2023 for a moment.  When I first notified 
John about the issue with the fake Erg Chech 003, I had no idea the material 
had even come from Mark.  How could I?  Erg Chech 003 wasn't even "his 
classification."  I didn't know it yet, but John had forwarded my messages to 
Mark, letting him know I was the one who had raised the i

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-29 Thread Jason Utas via Meteorite-list
Not caring how it affected a Russian group who had just spent months
> travelling and collecting the materials.  He always thinks he is right, and
> he very seldom is.For the record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller.
> You politely told him not to use your classification, which was probably a
> single person classification with low total known weight. Anyone with
> common sense can see that this is different from huge finds like hah346 and
> jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he complained about. I didn't
> read his whole message because I have heard it all before.   Collectors
> want to know they are getting these, and not another meteorite.  People are
> not using these names to be dishonest but to accurately describe what they
> are selling.  It would be doing the community a disservice not to use these
> names.
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>
>> I appreciate the immense amount of time I anticipated you would spend on
>> your reply.
>>
>> Thinking extensively about this, I wondered why you tried to shame me as
>> a hypocrite, even when you have witness to me striving for best practices.
>> Having autism I often struggle to understand people's intention.  Many
>> times I have gone wrong assuming the worst in people's actions.  So one of
>> my strategies is to try to think of the best possible intention that
>> someone could have.  I admit sometimes it is difficult with your approach
>> (and attempt to shame me) but since your critique was not sound I came to
>> reason that you saw an injustice that I perpetrated against Benzaki Mohamed
>> and you felt the need to "punch the bully in his face".  A fierce sense of
>> justice that sometimes leads me to act foolish is also part of my condition
>> so I was able to have sympathy with this realization.  Now that you have
>> responded I can more clearly see your intention.  So here is my considered
>> response.
>>
>> To the community:  I am happy to assist with meteoritics in any way that
>> I can.  If you have material that you feel might be paired with mine I am
>> happy to look at any information and give my honest response.  It would be
>> unethical and dirty feeling to do otherwise.  I have not made it to where I
>> am in life by acting in short term interests.  Relationships are life long.
>>
>> To Benzaki Mohamed:  I am sorry if I shamed you.  I am often blunt and
>> act quickly.  Jason's best point is that I should have reached out to you
>> in private first.  If you send me images or any supporting information I am
>> happy to give you my honest opinion.  You would then have my full support
>> marketing the material as paired if it checks out.
>>
>> To Jason: I forgive you.  I know what it is like to have conflict with
>> the world.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:50 PM Jason Utas 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Jason,
>>>
>>> As long as material is described accurately, I don't care what you do.
>>> I only butted in here because it annoyed me to see you attacking a Moroccan
>>> seller who is probably selling accurately paired material, while you’re
>>> openly doing the same thing with other meteorites.  Glass house + throwing
>>> stones, not cool.
>>>
>>> I'm saying that it *should* be fine for you to buy and sell HaH 346 and
>>> Jikharra 001 as those meteorites as long as you've accurately IDd them.
>>> But not if you're going to tell other people they can't do the same thing.
>>> That's the rub.
>>>
>>> Your points -
>>>
>>> 1 & 4)  Why does it matter where you got your HaH 346?  It didn't matter
>>> to you where Benzaki got his NWA 15758.
>>>
>>> Your posts didn't address the origin of Benzaki Mohamed's CK in any
>>> way, or whether or not his material is paired with NWA 15758.  Based on
>>> everything you've shared here, you don't know or care about whether or not
>>> Benzaki's material is paired with yours.  Your concern is "your NWA number"
>>> and protecting that investment. I can empathize with that, but your #1 and
>>> #4 bullet points don't agree with your actions:
>>>
>>> Did you ask Benzaki where his material had come from before you sent
>>> that public complaint?  No.  Did you confirm that it came from a different
>>> finder, the same place, or a different place?  N

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-29 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Mar 29 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Okano

Contributed by: Tan Jingyu

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/29/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-28 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Mar 28 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Wabar Pearls

Contributed by: Jens Bäumer

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/28/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-27 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Mar 27 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Noblesville

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/27/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-26 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Mar 26 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 13302

Contributed by: Ron Gill

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/26/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-25 Thread Mark Lyon via Meteorite-list
She could be talking about me. I was being very disrespectful.

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024, 7:00 PM John Lutzon via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Hello Anne,
>
>   In most cases, I Agree. In this case, both parties were respectful but
> had different views of
>  several implications of information divulgence. I enjoyed their points
> and the results.
>
>   Meteorite related aspects and meteorite discussions on a Meteorite-List,
> Brilliant!!
> John Lutzon
>
> > On 03/23/2024 2:19 PM EDT Anne Black via Meteorite-list <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hey Everybody,
> >
> > When you have a disagreement with somebody, did you ever consider
> resolving it PRIVATELY?
> >
> >
> > Anne Black
> > IMPACTIKA.com
> > impact...@aol.com
> >
> >
> > On Friday, March 22, 2024 at 08:27:09 PM MDT, Mendy Ouzillou via
> Meteorite-list  wrote:
> >
> >
> > I’m not getting in the middle of these discussions. I will simply make
> the following 3 statements + 1 opinion:
> >   1. Here is Mohamed’s exact statement: “Hi all members liste , I have a
> nice carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if anyone interested please
> contacte me.” Notice that he used the word “paired” making no claim it was
> part of the TKW of NWA 15758.
> >   2. This discussion about “pairing” has been going on for forever. The
> Global Meteorite Association has a policy to guide transparency:
> https://gmeta.org/standards/descriptive-terms/pair-pairings. Mohamed
> could have use better terminology to clarify the type of pairing, but I
> personally did not see his description as problematic and applauded his
> transparency.
> >   3. On a related note, when a north African (or any seller) offers
> material for sale that is unclassified, there is NO issue with doing so.
> They are under no obligation to get material classified before trying to
> sell. As long as both parties are transparent, and they agree to the terms
> of the transaction, there is no injury to either party.
> >
> > My opinion is that our community is sufficiently large that we cannot
> know every seller, much less their intent. Most of us do repeat business
> with sellers we trust, but that in no way means that all other sellers have
> ill intent. Like anything transaction in life – caveat emptor.
> >
> > My regards to the community,
> >
> > Mendy
> >
> > From:Meteorite-list  On
> Behalf OfMark Lyon via Meteorite-list
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:50 PM
> > To: humboldt bay jay 
> > Cc: Meteorite-list 
> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15
> >
> > Jason Humboldt,
> >
> > You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas. He has been doing this
> for years. He isnt going to change. You should have seen some of the
> messages he sent me before i blocked him. The first time I met him he went
> in my display room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza
> (nwa 859) because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was
> just using it as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking
> dustin Dickens (a friend of mine) for pairing meteorites. More recently, he
> made damaging accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin. Not
> caring how it affected a Russian group who had just spent months travelling
> and collecting the materials. He always thinks he is right, and he very
> seldom is. For the record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller. You
> politely told him not to use your classification, which was probably a
> single person classification with low total known weight. Anyone with
> common sense can see that this is different from huge finds like hah346 and
> jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he complained about. I didn't
> read his whole message because I have heard it all before. Collectors want
> to know they are getting these, and not another meteorite. People are not
> using these names to be dishonest but to accurately describe what they are
> selling. It would be doing the community a disservice not to use these
> names.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
> > > I appreciate the immense amount of time I anticipated you would spend
> on your reply.
> > >
> > > Thinking extensively about this, I wondered why you tried to shame me
> as a hypocrite, even when you have witness to me striving for best
> practices. Having autism I often struggle to understand people's intention.
> Many times I have gone wrong assuming the worst

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-25 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Mar 25 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Canon City

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/25/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-24 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Mar 24 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 904

Contributed by: John Divelbiss

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/24/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-23 Thread John Lutzon via Meteorite-list
  Shannon,

  And?   Don't tease us---who had more fun?--you or the kids?
Which pallasite?
   Best, John 

> On 03/23/2024 10:32 PM EDT Hotmail  wrote:
> 
>  
> All,
> 
> I have been a member for around bit over a year— ever since I bought my first 
> meteorite, an end chunk of Pallasite.  I took that meteorite to my daughter’s 
> eight grade class and presented to the entire class, passing it around.  It 
> was a really enjoyable experience for me.
> 
> Anyway I just wanted to say that I learned a ton from that email chain over 
> the past few days!!
> 
> Shannon
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Mar 23, 2024, at 22:00, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > Hello Anne,
> > 
> >  In most cases, I Agree. In this case, both parties were respectful but had 
> > different views of
> > several implications of information divulgence. I enjoyed their points and 
> > the results.  
> > 
> >  Meteorite related aspects and meteorite discussions on a Meteorite-List, 
> > Brilliant!!
> > John Lutzon
> > 
> >> On 03/23/2024 2:19 PM EDT Anne Black via Meteorite-list 
> >>  wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hey Everybody,
> >> 
> >> When you have a disagreement with somebody, did you ever consider 
> >> resolving it PRIVATELY?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Anne Black
> >> IMPACTIKA.com
> >> impact...@aol.com
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Friday, March 22, 2024 at 08:27:09 PM MDT, Mendy Ouzillou via 
> >> Meteorite-list  wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I’m not getting in the middle of these discussions. I will simply make the 
> >> following 3 statements + 1 opinion:
> >>  1. Here is Mohamed’s exact statement: “Hi all members liste , I have a 
> >> nice carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if anyone interested please 
> >> contacte me.” Notice that he used the word “paired” making no claim it was 
> >> part of the TKW of NWA 15758.
> >>  2. This discussion about “pairing” has been going on for forever. The 
> >> Global Meteorite Association has a policy to guide transparency: 
> >> https://gmeta.org/standards/descriptive-terms/pair-pairings. Mohamed could 
> >> have use better terminology to clarify the type of pairing, but I 
> >> personally did not see his description as problematic and applauded his 
> >> transparency.
> >>  3. On a related note, when a north African (or any seller) offers 
> >> material for sale that is unclassified, there is NO issue with doing so. 
> >> They are under no obligation to get material classified before trying to 
> >> sell. As long as both parties are transparent, and they agree to the terms 
> >> of the transaction, there is no injury to either party.
> >> 
> >> My opinion is that our community is sufficiently large that we cannot know 
> >> every seller, much less their intent. Most of us do repeat business with 
> >> sellers we trust, but that in no way means that all other sellers have ill 
> >> intent. Like anything transaction in life – caveat emptor.
> >> 
> >> My regards to the community,
> >> 
> >> Mendy
> >> 
> >> From:Meteorite-list  On 
> >> Behalf OfMark Lyon via Meteorite-list
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:50 PM
> >> To: humboldt bay jay 
> >> Cc: Meteorite-list 
> >> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15
> >> 
> >> Jason Humboldt,
> >> 
> >> You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas. He has been doing this for 
> >> years. He isnt going to change. You should have seen some of the messages 
> >> he sent me before i blocked him. The first time I met him he went in my 
> >> display room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza (nwa 
> >> 859) because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was just 
> >> using it as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking dustin 
> >> Dickens (a friend of mine) for pairing meteorites. More recently, he made 
> >> damaging accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin. Not 
> >> caring how it affected a Russian group who had just spent months 
> >> travelling and collecting the materials. He always thinks he is right, and 
> >> he very seldom is. For the record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller. 
> >> You politely told him not to use your classification, which was probably a 
> >> single person classification with low tot

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-23 Thread John Lutzon via Meteorite-list
  Ha, ha,
 Mark, do not feel honored, she talks about me too. ;-)
  I'm sure, on other social meteorite platforms things are very busy, busy, and 
great for business. 
  For some not in the groove, but here, it would be great for anyone to throw 
up anything meteorite
  and we'll see where the meteorites fall. I sometime reply in an unusual 
manner--
  and then just blame it on Anne.
JL 

> On 03/23/2024 10:09 PM EDT Mark Lyon  wrote:
> 
> 
> She could be talking about me. I was being very disrespectful.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2024, 7:00 PM John Lutzon via Meteorite-list 
>  wrote:
> > Hello Anne,
> >  
> >  In most cases, I Agree. In this case, both parties were respectful but had 
> > different views of
> >  several implications of information divulgence. I enjoyed their points and 
> > the results. 
> >  
> >  Meteorite related aspects and meteorite discussions on a Meteorite-List, 
> > Brilliant!!
> >  John Lutzon 
> >  
> >  > On 03/23/2024 2:19 PM EDT Anne Black via Meteorite-list 
> >  wrote:
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > Hey Everybody,
> >  > 
> >  > When you have a disagreement with somebody, did you ever consider 
> > resolving it PRIVATELY?
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > Anne Black
> >  > IMPACTIKA.com
> >  > impact...@aol.com
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > On Friday, March 22, 2024 at 08:27:09 PM MDT, Mendy Ouzillou via 
> > Meteorite-list  wrote:
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > I’m not getting in the middle of these discussions. I will simply make 
> > the following 3 statements + 1 opinion:
> >  > 1. Here is Mohamed’s exact statement: “Hi all members liste , I have a 
> > nice carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if anyone interested please 
> > contacte me.” Notice that he used the word “paired” making no claim it was 
> > part of the TKW of NWA 15758.
> >  > 2. This discussion about “pairing” has been going on for forever. The 
> > Global Meteorite Association has a policy to guide transparency: 
> > https://gmeta.org/standards/descriptive-terms/pair-pairings. Mohamed could 
> > have use better terminology to clarify the type of pairing, but I 
> > personally did not see his description as problematic and applauded his 
> > transparency.
> >  > 3. On a related note, when a north African (or any seller) offers 
> > material for sale that is unclassified, there is NO issue with doing so. 
> > They are under no obligation to get material classified before trying to 
> > sell. As long as both parties are transparent, and they agree to the terms 
> > of the transaction, there is no injury to either party.
> >  > 
> >  > My opinion is that our community is sufficiently large that we cannot 
> > know every seller, much less their intent. Most of us do repeat business 
> > with sellers we trust, but that in no way means that all other sellers have 
> > ill intent. Like anything transaction in life – caveat emptor.
> >  > 
> >  > My regards to the community,
> >  > 
> >  > Mendy
> >  > 
> >  > From:Meteorite-list  On 
> > Behalf OfMark Lyon via Meteorite-list
> >  > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:50 PM
> >  > To: humboldt bay jay 
> >  > Cc: Meteorite-list 
> >  > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15
> >  > 
> >  > Jason Humboldt,
> >  > 
> >  > You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas. He has been doing this 
> > for years. He isnt going to change. You should have seen some of the 
> > messages he sent me before i blocked him. The first time I met him he went 
> > in my display room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza 
> > (nwa 859) because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was 
> > just using it as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking 
> > dustin Dickens (a friend of mine) for pairing meteorites. More recently, he 
> > made damaging accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin. Not 
> > caring how it affected a Russian group who had just spent months travelling 
> > and collecting the materials. He always thinks he is right, and he very 
> > seldom is. For the record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller. You 
> > politely told him not to use your classification, which was probably a 
> > single person classification with low total known weight. Anyone with 
> > common sense can see that this is different from huge finds like hah346 and 
> > jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he compl

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-23 Thread Hotmail via Meteorite-list
All,

I have been a member for around bit over a year— ever since I bought my first 
meteorite, an end chunk of Pallasite.  I took that meteorite to my daughter’s 
eight grade class and presented to the entire class, passing it around.  It was 
a really enjoyable experience for me.

Anyway I just wanted to say that I learned a ton from that email chain over the 
past few days!!

Shannon

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 23, 2024, at 22:00, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hello Anne,
> 
>  In most cases, I Agree. In this case, both parties were respectful but had 
> different views of
> several implications of information divulgence. I enjoyed their points and 
> the results.  
> 
>  Meteorite related aspects and meteorite discussions on a Meteorite-List, 
> Brilliant!!
> John Lutzon
> 
>> On 03/23/2024 2:19 PM EDT Anne Black via Meteorite-list 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hey Everybody,
>> 
>> When you have a disagreement with somebody, did you ever consider resolving 
>> it PRIVATELY?
>> 
>> 
>> Anne Black
>> IMPACTIKA.com
>> impact...@aol.com
>> 
>> 
>> On Friday, March 22, 2024 at 08:27:09 PM MDT, Mendy Ouzillou via 
>> Meteorite-list  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I’m not getting in the middle of these discussions. I will simply make the 
>> following 3 statements + 1 opinion:
>>  1. Here is Mohamed’s exact statement: “Hi all members liste , I have a nice 
>> carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if anyone interested please contacte me.” 
>> Notice that he used the word “paired” making no claim it was part of the TKW 
>> of NWA 15758.
>>  2. This discussion about “pairing” has been going on for forever. The 
>> Global Meteorite Association has a policy to guide transparency: 
>> https://gmeta.org/standards/descriptive-terms/pair-pairings. Mohamed could 
>> have use better terminology to clarify the type of pairing, but I personally 
>> did not see his description as problematic and applauded his transparency.
>>  3. On a related note, when a north African (or any seller) offers material 
>> for sale that is unclassified, there is NO issue with doing so. They are 
>> under no obligation to get material classified before trying to sell. As 
>> long as both parties are transparent, and they agree to the terms of the 
>> transaction, there is no injury to either party.
>> 
>> My opinion is that our community is sufficiently large that we cannot know 
>> every seller, much less their intent. Most of us do repeat business with 
>> sellers we trust, but that in no way means that all other sellers have ill 
>> intent. Like anything transaction in life – caveat emptor.
>> 
>> My regards to the community,
>> 
>> Mendy
>> 
>> From:Meteorite-list  On Behalf 
>> OfMark Lyon via Meteorite-list
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:50 PM
>> To: humboldt bay jay 
>> Cc: Meteorite-list 
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15
>> 
>> Jason Humboldt,
>> 
>> You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas. He has been doing this for 
>> years. He isnt going to change. You should have seen some of the messages he 
>> sent me before i blocked him. The first time I met him he went in my display 
>> room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza (nwa 859) 
>> because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was just using 
>> it as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking dustin Dickens 
>> (a friend of mine) for pairing meteorites. More recently, he made damaging 
>> accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin. Not caring how it 
>> affected a Russian group who had just spent months travelling and collecting 
>> the materials. He always thinks he is right, and he very seldom is. For the 
>> record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller. You politely told him not to 
>> use your classification, which was probably a single person classification 
>> with low total known weight. Anyone with common sense can see that this is 
>> different from huge finds like hah346 and jikhara 001 and erg chech and 
>> whatever else he complained about. I didn't read his whole message because I 
>> have heard it all before. Collectors want to know they are getting these, 
>> and not another meteorite. People are not using these names to be dishonest 
>> but to accurately describe what they are selling. It would be doing the 
>> community a disservice not to use these names.
>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list 
>>>  wrote:
>&g

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-23 Thread John Lutzon via Meteorite-list
Hello Anne,

  In most cases, I Agree. In this case, both parties were respectful but had 
different views of
 several implications of information divulgence. I enjoyed their points and the 
results.  
  
  Meteorite related aspects and meteorite discussions on a Meteorite-List, 
Brilliant!!
John Lutzon

> On 03/23/2024 2:19 PM EDT Anne Black via Meteorite-list 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hey Everybody,
> 
> When you have a disagreement with somebody, did you ever consider resolving 
> it PRIVATELY?
> 
> 
> Anne Black
> IMPACTIKA.com
> impact...@aol.com
> 
> 
> On Friday, March 22, 2024 at 08:27:09 PM MDT, Mendy Ouzillou via 
> Meteorite-list  wrote:
> 
> 
> I’m not getting in the middle of these discussions. I will simply make the 
> following 3 statements + 1 opinion:
>   1. Here is Mohamed’s exact statement: “Hi all members liste , I have a nice 
> carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if anyone interested please contacte me.” 
> Notice that he used the word “paired” making no claim it was part of the TKW 
> of NWA 15758.
>   2. This discussion about “pairing” has been going on for forever. The 
> Global Meteorite Association has a policy to guide transparency: 
> https://gmeta.org/standards/descriptive-terms/pair-pairings. Mohamed could 
> have use better terminology to clarify the type of pairing, but I personally 
> did not see his description as problematic and applauded his transparency.
>   3. On a related note, when a north African (or any seller) offers material 
> for sale that is unclassified, there is NO issue with doing so. They are 
> under no obligation to get material classified before trying to sell. As long 
> as both parties are transparent, and they agree to the terms of the 
> transaction, there is no injury to either party.
> 
> My opinion is that our community is sufficiently large that we cannot know 
> every seller, much less their intent. Most of us do repeat business with 
> sellers we trust, but that in no way means that all other sellers have ill 
> intent. Like anything transaction in life – caveat emptor.
> 
> My regards to the community,
> 
> Mendy
> 
> From:Meteorite-list  On Behalf 
> OfMark Lyon via Meteorite-list
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:50 PM
> To: humboldt bay jay 
> Cc: Meteorite-list 
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15
> 
> Jason Humboldt,
> 
> You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas. He has been doing this for 
> years. He isnt going to change. You should have seen some of the messages he 
> sent me before i blocked him. The first time I met him he went in my display 
> room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza (nwa 859) 
> because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was just using it 
> as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking dustin Dickens (a 
> friend of mine) for pairing meteorites. More recently, he made damaging 
> accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin. Not caring how it 
> affected a Russian group who had just spent months travelling and collecting 
> the materials. He always thinks he is right, and he very seldom is. For the 
> record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller. You politely told him not to 
> use your classification, which was probably a single person classification 
> with low total known weight. Anyone with common sense can see that this is 
> different from huge finds like hah346 and jikhara 001 and erg chech and 
> whatever else he complained about. I didn't read his whole message because I 
> have heard it all before. Collectors want to know they are getting these, and 
> not another meteorite. People are not using these names to be dishonest but 
> to accurately describe what they are selling. It would be doing the community 
> a disservice not to use these names.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list 
>  wrote:
> > I appreciate the immense amount of time I anticipated you would spend on 
> > your reply.
> > 
> > Thinking extensively about this, I wondered why you tried to shame me as a 
> > hypocrite, even when you have witness to me striving for best practices. 
> > Having autism I often struggle to understand people's intention. Many times 
> > I have gone wrong assuming the worst in people's actions. So one of my 
> > strategies is to try to think of the best possible intention that someone 
> > could have. I admit sometimes it is difficult with your approach (and 
> > attempt to shame me) but since your critique was not sound I came to reason 
> > that you saw an injustice that I perpetrated against Benzaki Mohamed and 
> > you felt the need to "punch the bully in his face"

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-23 Thread Anne Black via Meteorite-list
Hey Everybody,
When you have a disagreement with somebody, did you ever consider resolving it 
PRIVATELY?   
Anne blackimpactika.comimpact...@aol.com
 

On Friday, March 22, 2024 at 08:27:09 PM MDT, Mendy Ouzillou via 
Meteorite-list  wrote:  
 
 
I’m not getting in the middle of these discussions. I will simply make the 
following 3 statements + 1 opinion:
   
   - Here is Mohamed’s exact statement: “Hi all members liste , I have a nice 
carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if anyone interested please contacte me.” 
Notice that he used the word “paired” making no claim it was part of the TKW of 
NWA 15758.
   - This discussion about “pairing” has been going on for forever. The Global 
Meteorite Association has a policy to guide transparency: 
https://gmeta.org/standards/descriptive-terms/pair-pairings. Mohamed could have 
use better terminology to clarify the type of pairing, but I personally did not 
see his description as problematic and applauded his transparency.
   - On a related note, when a north African (or any seller) offers material 
for sale that is unclassified, there is NO issue with doing so. They are under 
no obligation to get material classified before trying to sell. As long as both 
parties are transparent, and they agree to the terms of the transaction, there 
is no injury to either party. 

  

My opinion is that our community is sufficiently large that we cannot know 
every seller, much less their intent. Most of us do repeat business with 
sellers we trust, but that in no way means that all other sellers have ill 
intent. Like anything transaction in life – caveat emptor.

  

My regards to the community,

  

Mendy

  

From: Meteorite-list  On Behalf Of 
Mark Lyon via Meteorite-list
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:50 PM
To: humboldt bay jay 
Cc: Meteorite-list 
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

  

Jason Humboldt,

  

You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas.  He has been doing this for 
years.  He  isnt going to change.  You should have seen some of the messages he 
sent me before i blocked him.  The first time I met him he went in my display 
room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza (nwa 859) because 
it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was just using it as an 
example because he thought he overheard me attacking dustin Dickens (a friend 
of mine) for pairing meteorites.  More recently, he made damaging accusations 
about omolon specimens actually being brahin. Not caring how it affected a 
Russian group who had just spent months travelling and collecting the 
materials.  He always thinks he is right, and he very seldom is.    For the 
record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller. You politely told him not to use 
your classification, which was probably a single person classification with low 
total known weight. Anyone with common sense can see that this is different 
from huge finds like hah346 and jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he 
complained about. I didn't read his whole message because I have heard it all 
before.   Collectors want to know they are getting these, and not another 
meteorite.  People are not using these names to be dishonest but to accurately 
describe what they are selling.  It would be doing the community a disservice 
not to use these names.  

  

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list 
 wrote:


I appreciate the immense amount of time I anticipated you would spend on your 
reply.

Thinking extensively about this, I wondered why you tried to shame me as a 
hypocrite, even when you have witness to me striving for best practices.  
Having autism I often struggle to understand people's intention.  Many times I 
have gone wrong assuming the worst in people's actions.  So one of my 
strategies is to try to think of the best possible intention that someone could 
have.  I admit sometimes it is difficult with your approach (and attempt to 
shame me) but since your critique was not sound I came to reason that you saw 
an injustice that I perpetrated against Benzaki Mohamed and you felt the need 
to "punch the bully in his face".  A fierce sense of justice that sometimes 
leads me to act foolish is also part of my condition so I was able to have 
sympathy with this realization.  Now that you have responded I can more clearly 
see your intention.  So here is my considered response.

  

To the community:  I am happy to assist with meteoritics in any way that I can. 
 If you have material that you feel might be paired with mine I am happy to 
look at any information and give my honest response.  It would be unethical and 
dirty feeling to do otherwise.  I have not made it to where I am in life by 
acting in short term interests.  Relationships are life long.

  

To Benzaki Mohamed:  I am sorry if I shamed you.  I am often blunt and act 
quickly.  Jason's best point is that I should have reached out to you in 
private first.  If y

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-23 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Mar 23 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: McLean

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/23/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-22 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Mar 22 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 15297

Contributed by: Ron Gill

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/22/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-21 Thread Mendy Ouzillou via Meteorite-list
I’m not getting in the middle of these discussions. I will simply make the 
following 3 statements + 1 opinion:

1.  Here is Mohamed’s exact statement: “Hi all members liste , I have a 
nice carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if anyone interested please contacte 
me.” Notice that he used the word “paired” making no claim it was part of the 
TKW of NWA 15758.
2.  This discussion about “pairing” has been going on for forever. The 
Global Meteorite Association has a policy to guide transparency: 
https://gmeta.org/standards/descriptive-terms/pair-pairings. Mohamed could have 
use better terminology to clarify the type of pairing, but I personally did not 
see his description as problematic and applauded his transparency.
3.  On a related note, when a north African (or any seller) offers material 
for sale that is unclassified, there is NO issue with doing so. They are under 
no obligation to get material classified before trying to sell. As long as both 
parties are transparent, and they agree to the terms of the transaction, there 
is no injury to either party. 

 

My opinion is that our community is sufficiently large that we cannot know 
every seller, much less their intent. Most of us do repeat business with 
sellers we trust, but that in no way means that all other sellers have ill 
intent. Like anything transaction in life – caveat emptor.

 

My regards to the community,

 

Mendy

 

From: Meteorite-list  On Behalf Of 
Mark Lyon via Meteorite-list
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:50 PM
To: humboldt bay jay 
Cc: Meteorite-list 
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

 

Jason Humboldt,

 

You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas.  He has been doing this for 
years.  He  isnt going to change.  You should have seen some of the messages he 
sent me before i blocked him.  The first time I met him he went in my display 
room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza (nwa 859) because 
it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was just using it as an 
example because he thought he overheard me attacking dustin Dickens (a friend 
of mine) for pairing meteorites.  More recently, he made damaging accusations 
about omolon specimens actually being brahin. Not caring how it affected a 
Russian group who had just spent months travelling and collecting the 
materials.  He always thinks he is right, and he very seldom is.For the 
record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller. You politely told him not to use 
your classification, which was probably a single person classification with low 
total known weight. Anyone with common sense can see that this is different 
from huge finds like hah346 and jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he 
complained about. I didn't read his whole message because I have heard it all 
before.   Collectors want to know they are getting these, and not another 
meteorite.  People are not using these names to be dishonest but to accurately 
describe what they are selling.  It would be doing the community a disservice 
not to use these names.  

 

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list 
mailto:meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> > wrote:

I appreciate the immense amount of time I anticipated you would spend on your 
reply.

Thinking extensively about this, I wondered why you tried to shame me as a 
hypocrite, even when you have witness to me striving for best practices.  
Having autism I often struggle to understand people's intention.  Many times I 
have gone wrong assuming the worst in people's actions.  So one of my 
strategies is to try to think of the best possible intention that someone could 
have.  I admit sometimes it is difficult with your approach (and attempt to 
shame me) but since your critique was not sound I came to reason that you saw 
an injustice that I perpetrated against Benzaki Mohamed and you felt the need 
to "punch the bully in his face".  A fierce sense of justice that sometimes 
leads me to act foolish is also part of my condition so I was able to have 
sympathy with this realization.  Now that you have responded I can more clearly 
see your intention.  So here is my considered response.

 

To the community:  I am happy to assist with meteoritics in any way that I can. 
 If you have material that you feel might be paired with mine I am happy to 
look at any information and give my honest response.  It would be unethical and 
dirty feeling to do otherwise.  I have not made it to where I am in life by 
acting in short term interests.  Relationships are life long.

 

To Benzaki Mohamed:  I am sorry if I shamed you.  I am often blunt and act 
quickly.  Jason's best point is that I should have reached out to you in 
private first.  If you send me images or any supporting information I am happy 
to give you my honest opinion.  You would then have my full support marketing 
the material as paired if it checks out.

 

To Jason: I forgive y

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-21 Thread Mark Lyon via Meteorite-list
Jason Humboldt,

You just have to learn to tune out Jason utas.  He has been doing this for
years.  He  isnt going to change.  You should have seen some of the
messages he sent me before i blocked him.  The first time I met him he went
in my display room in tucson and started complaining about me selling taza
(nwa 859) because it was his dad's classification. Then he claimed he was
just using it as an example because he thought he overheard me attacking
dustin Dickens (a friend of mine) for pairing meteorites.  More recently,
he made damaging accusations about omolon specimens actually being brahin.
Not caring how it affected a Russian group who had just spent months
travelling and collecting the materials.  He always thinks he is right, and
he very seldom is.For the record, you did not attack a Moroccan seller.
You politely told him not to use your classification, which was probably a
single person classification with low total known weight. Anyone with
common sense can see that this is different from huge finds like hah346 and
jikhara 001 and erg chech and whatever else he complained about. I didn't
read his whole message because I have heard it all before.   Collectors
want to know they are getting these, and not another meteorite.  People are
not using these names to be dishonest but to accurately describe what they
are selling.  It would be doing the community a disservice not to use these
names.

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 9:04 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> I appreciate the immense amount of time I anticipated you would spend on
> your reply.
>
> Thinking extensively about this, I wondered why you tried to shame me as a
> hypocrite, even when you have witness to me striving for best practices.
> Having autism I often struggle to understand people's intention.  Many
> times I have gone wrong assuming the worst in people's actions.  So one of
> my strategies is to try to think of the best possible intention that
> someone could have.  I admit sometimes it is difficult with your approach
> (and attempt to shame me) but since your critique was not sound I came to
> reason that you saw an injustice that I perpetrated against Benzaki Mohamed
> and you felt the need to "punch the bully in his face".  A fierce sense of
> justice that sometimes leads me to act foolish is also part of my condition
> so I was able to have sympathy with this realization.  Now that you have
> responded I can more clearly see your intention.  So here is my considered
> response.
>
> To the community:  I am happy to assist with meteoritics in any way that I
> can.  If you have material that you feel might be paired with mine I am
> happy to look at any information and give my honest response.  It would be
> unethical and dirty feeling to do otherwise.  I have not made it to where I
> am in life by acting in short term interests.  Relationships are life long.
>
> To Benzaki Mohamed:  I am sorry if I shamed you.  I am often blunt and act
> quickly.  Jason's best point is that I should have reached out to you in
> private first.  If you send me images or any supporting information I am
> happy to give you my honest opinion.  You would then have my full support
> marketing the material as paired if it checks out.
>
> To Jason: I forgive you.  I know what it is like to have conflict with the
> world.
>
> Best regards,
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:50 PM Jason Utas  wrote:
>
>> Hello Jason,
>>
>> As long as material is described accurately, I don't care what you do.  I
>> only butted in here because it annoyed me to see you attacking a Moroccan
>> seller who is probably selling accurately paired material, while you’re
>> openly doing the same thing with other meteorites.  Glass house + throwing
>> stones, not cool.
>>
>> I'm saying that it *should* be fine for you to buy and sell HaH 346 and
>> Jikharra 001 as those meteorites as long as you've accurately IDd them.
>> But not if you're going to tell other people they can't do the same thing.
>> That's the rub.
>>
>> Your points -
>>
>> 1 & 4)  Why does it matter where you got your HaH 346?  It didn't matter
>> to you where Benzaki got his NWA 15758.
>>
>> Your posts didn't address the origin of Benzaki Mohamed's CK in any
>> way, or whether or not his material is paired with NWA 15758.  Based on
>> everything you've shared here, you don't know or care about whether or not
>> Benzaki's material is paired with yours.  Your concern is "your NWA number"
>> and protecting that investment. I can empathize with that, but your #1 and
>> #4 bullet points don't agree with your actions:
>>

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-21 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Mar 21 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 12400

Contributed by: Hanno Strufe

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/21/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-20 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Mar 20 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Chelyabinsk

Contributed by: Edwin Thompson

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/20/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-19 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Mar 19 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Djati-Pengilon

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/19/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-18 Thread humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list
ce between multi ton finds that have ample
>> documentation and a kilo find that has had little publicity.  Even then I
>> agree that best practices are to communicate leading me to
>>
>> 3. Point out that you were part of one of my conversations about this in
>> regard to the likely Jikharra specimen you are referencing.  You stated
>> that "The Jikharra’s obviously that."  You are also well aware that I am
>> not selling any of the obviously Jikharra until my own classification is
>> approved because you were part of the discussion.
>>
>> 4. You don't actually know where I sourced my material because you did
>> not ask.  For example the metbul mentioned many kilograms traded as
>> Ghadamis that was not in Marcin's possession.  Since I bought and traded
>> Ghadamis before the name HaH 346 was approved, how do you think I should
>> have handled the situation differently?
>>
>> 5. In regards to nwa 869 the following quote is from the metbul "At
>> least 2 metric tons of material comprising thousands of individuals has
>> been sold under the name NWA 869 in the market places of Morocco and around
>> the world." along with the appropriate caveats due to its abundance- 
>> "Scientists
>> are advised to confirm the classification of any specimens they obtain
>> before publishing results under this name."   So again I do not feel you
>> are making an apples to apples comparison with your critique of my logic.
>>
>> We all obviously respect your encyclopedic understanding of meteorites so
>> perhaps you can share with us your framework for best practices in these
>> situations.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jason
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:21 PM Jason Utas 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Jason,
>>> To be consistent, you should remove the HaH 346 and NWA 869 specimens
>>> you have listed for sale on your website.  Those classifications were
>>> submitted by other dealers; your stones are unclassified individuals from
>>> DCAs with no evidence of their find locations, etc.
>>> On your "featured" page, you also have a specimen listed as a "likely
>>> Jakharra 001 Pairing."  Similar issues aside, relying on that standard, it
>>> should be okay for Benzaki Mohamed to call his specimens "likely NWA 15758
>>> pairings."
>>> Regards,
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:09 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
>>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Benzaki Mohamed for swiftly reaching out to me.  I appreciate
>>>> your attention to this matter.  All is good.
>>>> Best regards to everyone,
>>>> Jason Whitcomb
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:29 PM <
>>>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
>>>>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
>>>>>
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>> meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
>>>>>
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
>>>>>2. Re: Very sad news (Ruben Garcia)
>>>>>3. Re: Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14 (humboldt bay jay)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
>>>>> From: 
>>>>> To: 
>>>>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
>>>>> Message-ID: 
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain
>>>>>
>>>>> Thursday, Mar 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: HAH 346
>>>>>
>>>>> Contributed by: J?r?me de Creymer
>>>>>
>

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-18 Thread Jason Utas via Meteorite-list
ink
one is wrong, then the other should be, too.  I don't have an issue with
folks doing that as long as there's no doubt that the ID is correct, but
I'm also not the one attacking someone else for doing it. Case in point: I
agree that your large eucrite looks to be paired with Jikharra 001.  But,
if you're going to play that card, and post it as "likely paired" on your
website, it should be fine for Benzaki to say the same thing about his CK /
NWA 15758 if he believes it.  Right?  If not, you're holding Benzaki to a
higher standard than yourself.

By now, you've had some time to look into this.  Did you ask for photos of
Benzaki's CK?  Did you figure out if his lot is from the same area as
yours?  From the same finder?  Do they look like the same material?  Do you
think they're paired?  What is the real TKW of NWA 15758?  Is it just the
~1 kg in the Bulletin?  How much more is out there?  None?  Just this one
lot?  More?

You asked me what I would do.  If it were my meteorite, I'd want to know.
And I wouldn't want to hide that information from potential buyers.  I
don't think that would be honest.

If it turned out that Benzaki was right about the pairing, you attacked him
for correctly labeling a meteorite.  I'd say you should probably apologize
to him.

Sorry this got so long.

Jason

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 8:03 PM humboldt bay jay 
wrote:

> I am sending this again as I realized I only replied to you and not the
> list as well.  This turns out good for me because it offers a chance to
> better compose my thoughts.  I was running errands when I sent the first
> email.  To begin again:
>
> Jason,
> I see what you are saying, and it is a reasonable point but I disagree.
> These are the reasons:
>
> 1. I can elaborate that "since you never contacted me" means I would have
> been happy to provide assistance and the name if the vendor would have done
> so with some images of supporting information such as sourcing from the
> same finder.
>
> 2. There is a clear difference between multi ton finds that have ample
> documentation and a kilo find that has had little publicity.  Even then I
> agree that best practices are to communicate leading me to
>
> 3. Point out that you were part of one of my conversations about this in
> regard to the likely Jikharra specimen you are referencing.  You stated
> that "The Jikharra’s obviously that."  You are also well aware that I am
> not selling any of the obviously Jikharra until my own classification is
> approved because you were part of the discussion.
>
> 4. You don't actually know where I sourced my material because you did not
> ask.  For example the metbul mentioned many kilograms traded as Ghadamis
> that was not in Marcin's possession.  Since I bought and traded Ghadamis
> before the name HaH 346 was approved, how do you think I should have
> handled the situation differently?
>
> 5. In regards to nwa 869 the following quote is from the metbul "At least
> 2 metric tons of material comprising thousands of individuals has been sold
> under the name NWA 869 in the market places of Morocco and around the
> world." along with the appropriate caveats due to its abundance- "Scientists
> are advised to confirm the classification of any specimens they obtain
> before publishing results under this name."   So again I do not feel you
> are making an apples to apples comparison with your critique of my logic.
>
> We all obviously respect your encyclopedic understanding of meteorites so
> perhaps you can share with us your framework for best practices in these
> situations.
>
> Best regards,
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:21 PM Jason Utas  wrote:
>
>> Hello Jason,
>> To be consistent, you should remove the HaH 346 and NWA 869 specimens you
>> have listed for sale on your website.  Those classifications were submitted
>> by other dealers; your stones are unclassified individuals from DCAs with
>> no evidence of their find locations, etc.
>> On your "featured" page, you also have a specimen listed as a "likely
>> Jakharra 001 Pairing."  Similar issues aside, relying on that standard, it
>> should be okay for Benzaki Mohamed to call his specimens "likely NWA 15758
>> pairings."
>> Regards,
>> Jason
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:09 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Benzaki Mohamed for swiftly reaching out to me.  I appreciate
>>> your attention to this matter.  All is good.
>>> Best regards to everyone,
>>> Jason Whitcomb
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:29 PM <
>>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>&

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-18 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Mar 18 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Clareton

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/18/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-17 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Mar 17 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Seymchan

Contributed by: Matthias Baermann

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/17/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-16 Thread humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list
I am sending this again as I realized I only replied to you and not the
list as well.  This turns out good for me because it offers a chance to
better compose my thoughts.  I was running errands when I sent the first
email.  To begin again:

Jason,
I see what you are saying, and it is a reasonable point but I disagree.
These are the reasons:

1. I can elaborate that "since you never contacted me" means I would have
been happy to provide assistance and the name if the vendor would have done
so with some images of supporting information such as sourcing from the
same finder.

2. There is a clear difference between multi ton finds that have ample
documentation and a kilo find that has had little publicity.  Even then I
agree that best practices are to communicate leading me to

3. Point out that you were part of one of my conversations about this in
regard to the likely Jikharra specimen you are referencing.  You stated
that "The Jikharra’s obviously that."  You are also well aware that I am
not selling any of the obviously Jikharra until my own classification is
approved because you were part of the discussion.

4. You don't actually know where I sourced my material because you did not
ask.  For example the metbul mentioned many kilograms traded as Ghadamis
that was not in Marcin's possession.  Since I bought and traded Ghadamis
before the name HaH 346 was approved, how do you think I should have
handled the situation differently?

5. In regards to nwa 869 the following quote is from the metbul "At least 2
metric tons of material comprising thousands of individuals has been sold
under the name NWA 869 in the market places of Morocco and around the
world." along with the appropriate caveats due to its abundance- "Scientists
are advised to confirm the classification of any specimens they obtain
before publishing results under this name."   So again I do not feel you
are making an apples to apples comparison with your critique of my logic.

We all obviously respect your encyclopedic understanding of meteorites so
perhaps you can share with us your framework for best practices in these
situations.

Best regards,
Jason

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:21 PM Jason Utas  wrote:

> Hello Jason,
> To be consistent, you should remove the HaH 346 and NWA 869 specimens you
> have listed for sale on your website.  Those classifications were submitted
> by other dealers; your stones are unclassified individuals from DCAs with
> no evidence of their find locations, etc.
> On your "featured" page, you also have a specimen listed as a "likely
> Jakharra 001 Pairing."  Similar issues aside, relying on that standard, it
> should be okay for Benzaki Mohamed to call his specimens "likely NWA 15758
> pairings."
> Regards,
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:09 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Benzaki Mohamed for swiftly reaching out to me.  I appreciate
>> your attention to this matter.  All is good.
>> Best regards to everyone,
>> Jason Whitcomb
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:29 PM <
>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
>>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
>>>2. Re: Very sad news (Ruben Garcia)
>>>3. Re: Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14 (humboldt bay jay)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
>>> From: 
>>> To: 
>>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
>>> Message-ID: 
>>> Content-Type: text/plain
>>>
>>> Thursday, Mar 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: HAH 346
>>>
>>> Contributed by: J?r?me de Creymer
>>>
>>> http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/14/2024
>>>
>>>
>>> ------
>>>

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-16 Thread Jason Utas via Meteorite-list
Hello Jason,
To be consistent, you should remove the HaH 346 and NWA 869 specimens you
have listed for sale on your website.  Those classifications were submitted
by other dealers; your stones are unclassified individuals from DCAs with
no evidence of their find locations, etc.
On your "featured" page, you also have a specimen listed as a "likely
Jakharra 001 Pairing."  Similar issues aside, relying on that standard, it
should be okay for Benzaki Mohamed to call his specimens "likely NWA 15758
pairings."
Regards,
Jason

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:09 AM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Thank you Benzaki Mohamed for swiftly reaching out to me.  I appreciate
> your attention to this matter.  All is good.
> Best regards to everyone,
> Jason Whitcomb
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:29 PM <
> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>
>> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
>>2. Re: Very sad news (Ruben Garcia)
>>3. Re: Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14 (humboldt bay jay)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
>> From: 
>> To: 
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
>> Message-ID: 
>> Content-Type: text/plain
>>
>> Thursday, Mar 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: HAH 346
>>
>> Contributed by: J?r?me de Creymer
>>
>> http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/14/2024
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:17:06 -0700
>> From: Ruben Garcia 
>> To: bernd.pa...@paulinet.de
>> Cc: Meteorite Mailing List 
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Very sad news
>> Message-ID:
>> > jxhjti60uojwdgvdoreuf4jfjd7paim...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hi Bernd,
>>
>> I've know John for a very long time. This is very sad indeed. Thank you
>> for
>> posting this.
>>
>> Ruben Garcia
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 4:03?PM bernd.pauli--- via Meteorite-list <
>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear List,
>> >
>> > It is my sad duty to inform you that John Blennert has passed away :-(
>> >
>> > John, rest in peace!
>> >
>> > Bernd
>> > ______
>> > Meteorite-list mailing list
>> > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> >
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240313/55acab68/attachment-0001.htm
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:53:43 -0700
>> From: humboldt bay jay 
>> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>> caat9en4eebof8m_4p5anuoo9wo9+_qqv1e9-1mbjdnj6yvh...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Benzaki Mohamed,
>> Since you have never reached out to me about my classification, Nwa 15758
>> CK6, I politely request that you do not use this name. I invested time and
>> resources into having it analyzed and if you wish to sell your material as
>> a named meteorite I suggest you do the same. Thank you in advance.
>> Jason
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:29?PM <
>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
>> > meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-16 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Mar 16 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 13400

Contributed by: Scott McGregor

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/16/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 15

2024-03-15 Thread humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list
Thank you Benzaki Mohamed for swiftly reaching out to me.  I appreciate
your attention to this matter.  All is good.
Best regards to everyone,
Jason Whitcomb

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:29 PM <
meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
>2. Re: Very sad news (Ruben Garcia)
>3. Re: Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14 (humboldt bay jay)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
> From: 
> To: 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Thursday, Mar 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: HAH 346
>
> Contributed by: J?r?me de Creymer
>
> http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/14/2024
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:17:06 -0700
> From: Ruben Garcia 
> To: bernd.pa...@paulinet.de
> Cc: Meteorite Mailing List 
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Very sad news
> Message-ID:
>  jxhjti60uojwdgvdoreuf4jfjd7paim...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Bernd,
>
> I've know John for a very long time. This is very sad indeed. Thank you for
> posting this.
>
> Ruben Garcia
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 4:03?PM bernd.pauli--- via Meteorite-list <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear List,
> >
> > It is my sad duty to inform you that John Blennert has passed away :-(
> >
> > John, rest in peace!
> >
> > Bernd
> > __
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240313/55acab68/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:53:43 -0700
> From: humboldt bay jay 
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14
> Message-ID:
> <
> caat9en4eebof8m_4p5anuoo9wo9+_qqv1e9-1mbjdnj6yvh...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Benzaki Mohamed,
> Since you have never reached out to me about my classification, Nwa 15758
> CK6, I politely request that you do not use this name. I invested time and
> resources into having it analyzed and if you wish to sell your material as
> a named meteorite I suggest you do the same. Thank you in advance.
> Jason
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:29?PM <
> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>
> > Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
> > meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
> >2. Meteorite carbon (Benzaki Mohamed)
> >3. Very sad news (bernd.pa...@paulinet.de)
> >4. Claims of Extrasolar Spherules from Pacific Ocean Site CNEOS
> >   2014-01-08 Disputed (Paul)
> >
> >
> > ------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
> > From: 
> > To: 
> 

Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14

2024-03-15 Thread Rhett Bourland via Meteorite-list
After reading this email, I would expect Mr. Mohamed to retract his
previous email as it does not appear that his material has been
authenticated by a proper researcher.  Making claims about material that
hasn't properly been identified is not something to be taken lightly and
would be cause for concern to most collectors, self included.

Rhett Bourland

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 3:43 PM humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Benzaki Mohamed,
> Since you have never reached out to me about my classification, Nwa 15758
> CK6, I politely request that you do not use this name. I invested time and
> resources into having it analyzed and if you wish to sell your material as
> a named meteorite I suggest you do the same. Thank you in advance.
> Jason
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:29 PM <
> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>
>> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
>> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
>>2. Meteorite carbon (Benzaki Mohamed)
>>3. Very sad news (bernd.pa...@paulinet.de)
>>4. Claims of Extrasolar Spherules from Pacific Ocean Site CNEOS
>>   2014-01-08 Disputed (Paul)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
>> From: 
>> To: 
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
>> Message-ID: 
>> Content-Type: text/plain
>>
>> Wednesday, Mar 13 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Hamlet
>>
>> Contributed by: Anne Black
>>
>> http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/13/2024
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:16:15 +
>> From: Benzaki Mohamed 
>> To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite carbon
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>> cagzkz4-7hufr2n7mzy4hapufexcssju66gn+v9ajuxjkt8t...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hi all members liste  , I have a nice carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired
>> ,if
>> anyone interested please contacte me.
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240311/7131a467/attachment-0001.htm
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:48:20 +0100 (CET)
>> From: bernd.pa...@paulinet.de
>> To: "meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com"
>> 
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Very sad news
>> Message-ID: <825781290.98647.1710366500...@www.ud-mail.de>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Dear List,
>>
>> It is my sad duty to inform you that John Blennert has passed away :-(
>>
>> John, rest in peace!
>>
>> Bernd
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240313/b5109823/attachment-0001.htm
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:16:00 -0500
>> From: Paul 
>> To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Claims of Extrasolar Spherules from Pacific
>> Ocean Site CNEOS 2014-01-08 Disputed
>> Message-ID: <088038b3-ec22-4815-b8fc-d187f665a...@att.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>>
>> Recently, a preprint has been posted to the arXiv site that
>>
>> disputes proposal that Be,La,U-rich spherules recovered form
>>
>> Pacific Ocean Site CNEOS 2014-01-0 are from an extrasolar
>>
>> origin. Instead, they argued to be microtektites of terrestrial
>>
>> lateritic

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-15 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Mar 15 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 10019

Contributed by: Ron Gill

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/15/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 261, Issue 14

2024-03-14 Thread humboldt bay jay via Meteorite-list
Benzaki Mohamed,
Since you have never reached out to me about my classification, Nwa 15758
CK6, I politely request that you do not use this name. I invested time and
resources into having it analyzed and if you wish to sell your material as
a named meteorite I suggest you do the same. Thank you in advance.
Jason

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:29 PM <
meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:

> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Meteorite Picture of the Day (p...@tucsonmeteorites.com)
>2. Meteorite carbon (Benzaki Mohamed)
>3. Very sad news (bernd.pa...@paulinet.de)
>4. Claims of Extrasolar Spherules from Pacific Ocean Site CNEOS
>   2014-01-08 Disputed (Paul)
>
>
> ------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:35:54 -0700
> From: 
> To: 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Wednesday, Mar 13 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Hamlet
>
> Contributed by: Anne Black
>
> http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/13/2024
>
>
> ------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:16:15 +
> From: Benzaki Mohamed 
> To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite carbon
> Message-ID:
> <
> cagzkz4-7hufr2n7mzy4hapufexcssju66gn+v9ajuxjkt8t...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi all members liste  , I have a nice carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if
> anyone interested please contacte me.
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240311/7131a467/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:48:20 +0100 (CET)
> From: bernd.pa...@paulinet.de
> To: "meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com"
> 
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Very sad news
> Message-ID: <825781290.98647.1710366500...@www.ud-mail.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear List,
>
> It is my sad duty to inform you that John Blennert has passed away :-(
>
> John, rest in peace!
>
> Bernd
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240313/b5109823/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:16:00 -0500
> From: Paul 
> To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Claims of Extrasolar Spherules from Pacific
> Ocean Site CNEOS 2014-01-08 Disputed
> Message-ID: <088038b3-ec22-4815-b8fc-d187f665a...@att.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Recently, a preprint has been posted to the arXiv site that
>
> disputes proposal that Be,La,U-rich spherules recovered form
>
> Pacific Ocean Site CNEOS 2014-01-0 are from an extrasolar
>
> origin. Instead, they argued to be microtektites of terrestrial
>
> lateritic sandstone.
>
> The preprint is:
>
> Desch, S., 2024. Be, La, U-rich spherules as
>
> microtektites of terrestrial laterites: What goes \\
>
> up must come down. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05161.
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05161
>
> https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2403/2403.05161.pdf
>
> The proposed extrasolar spherules are discussed in:
>
> Loeb, A., Adamson, T., Bergstrom, S., Cloete, R.,
>
> Cohen, S., Conrad, K., Domine, L., Fu, H., Hoskinson,
>
> C., Hyung, E., Jacobsen, S., Kelly, M., Kohn, J., Lard,
>
> E., Lam, S., Laukien, F., Lem, J., McCallum, R.,
>
> Millsap, R., Parendo, C., Petaev, M., Peddeti, C.,
>
> Pugh, K., Samuha, S., Sasselov, D., Schlereth, M.,
>
> Siler, J.J., Siraj, A., Smith, P.M., Tagle, R., Taylor,
>
> J., Weed, R., Wright, A., and Wynn, J. 2023.,
>
> Discovery of Spherules of likely extrasolar composition
>
>

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-14 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Mar 14 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: HAH 346

Contributed by: Jérôme de Creymer

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/14/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite carbon

2024-03-13 Thread Benzaki Mohamed via Meteorite-list
Hi all members liste  , I have a nice carbonaceous Nwa 15758 CK6 paired ,if
anyone interested please contacte me.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-13 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Mar 13 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Hamlet

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/13/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-12 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Mar 12 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Sikhote Alin

Contributed by: Cosimo Gorgoglione

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/12/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-11 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Mar 11 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Sylacauga

Contributed by: Hanno Strufe

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/11/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-09 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Mar 10 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Felix

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/10/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-08 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Saturday, Mar 9 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 15299

Contributed by: Cal Powell

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/09/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-07 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Friday, Mar 8 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Ornans

Contributed by: Hanno Strufe

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/08/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-06 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Mar 7 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Eichstädt

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/07/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-05 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Mar 6 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Canyon Diablo

Contributed by: Heriton Rocha

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/06/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-03-04 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Mar 5 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Catalina 500

Contributed by: Shun-Chung Yang

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=03/05/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-02-28 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Thursday, Feb 29 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 10520

Contributed by: Randy Sinukoff

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=02/29/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-02-27 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Wednesday, Feb 28 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Murchison

Contributed by: Anne Black

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=02/28/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-02-26 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Tuesday, Feb 27 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Boutel Fil

Contributed by: Ziyao Wang

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=02/27/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-02-25 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Monday, Feb 26 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: Atacama

Contributed by: Matthias Baermann

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=02/26/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2024-02-24 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Sunday, Feb 25 2024 Meteorite Picture of the Day: NWA 16000

Contributed by: Ron Gill

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp?DD=02/25/2024
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >