But nowhere does it state that it is a CV7? Bernhard
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: stan . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2005 13:29 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Betreff: RE: AW: [meteorite-list] Ad- best deal on CV7 meteorite in the galaxy! I didnt know it was ever considered an aure - but YES it was orignially classified as an L7, then NAU went back and reclassified it as a primitive achonderite and consider it to be paired with nwa 3133 you can go to: http://www4.nau.edu/meteorite/index.html for NAU's systematic description of emteorites, then click on 'primitive achonderites at the bottom of the page' the nwa 3133/1839 description is halfway down the page >From: "Bernhard Rems" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'stan .'" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> >Subject: AW: [meteorite-list] Ad- best deal on CV7 meteorite in the galaxy! >Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:54:42 +0100 > > >Just to get my records straight: > >NWA 1839 (which I am lucky enough to own a 1.5g very thin slice) was first >thought to be a L7, then an AURE - and now is officially listed as CV7? > >Bernhard > > >______________________________________________ >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list