Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Juni 2006 08:12
An: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Kerala Red Rain Was From A Comet, Study
Suggests
This is a mystery alright.
I have just as much trouble accepting that several thousands litres of bats
blood made its way into the rain
-list] Kerala Red Rain Was From A Comet, Study
Suggests
Darren G. agreed:
How do you get a comet raining down material for three months over one
city?
It would have to be geosynchronous (revolving once around the Earth in 24
hours so that is always over the same spot). For some reason, I doubt
:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Kerala Red Rain Was From A Comet, Study
Suggests
Darren G. agreed:
How do you get a comet raining down material for three months over
one
city?
It would have to be geosynchronous (revolving once
This is a mystery alright.
I have just as much trouble accepting that several thousands litres of bats
blood made its way into the rain clouds for several months over the same
area as I do for cometary debris containing cells raining down over the
area. ?
Question, do we know what kind
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 23:09
An: 'Meteorite Mailing List'
Betreff: RE: [meteorite-list] Kerala Red Rain Was From A Comet, Study
Suggests
I have been following this story for a while now and am surprised that the
media has not had much coverage on it. Personally, I think it is a
fascinating
Darren G. agreed:
How do you get a comet raining down material for three months over one
city?
It would have to be geosynchronous (revolving once around the Earth in 24
hours so that is always over the same spot). For some reason, I doubt this.
Yeah, I had that same problem with the idea.
Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Kerala Red Rain Was From A Comet, Study
Suggests
Still an interesting puzzler!
I'm sure that this self-contradicting press release is just one
This got really good coverage a while back. I recall
that there was some lepidoptrist (I hope I spelt it
correctly) among us who believed that it was likely
bits of some mass butterfly swarm.
There was also a lot of confusion about why it had
taken them so long to come to any sort of conclusion
Hi all:
So was this like Bart's Comet (for those of you who know the Simpson's
cartoon) where Bart discovers a comet and it is always over Springfield as it
comes crashing to Earth. Actually the discovery was more accurate than any of
the disasteroid movies that come out at about the same
How do you get a comet raining down material for three months over one city?
It would have to be geosynchronous (revolving once around the Earth in 24
hours so that is always over the same spot). For some reason, I doubt this.
Excellent question!
Also, shortly after it was collected,
On Wed, 31 May 2006 20:11:54 -0700, you wrote:
Hi all:
So was this like Bart's Comet (for those of you who know the Simpson's
cartoon) where Bart discovers a comet and it is always over Springfield as it
comes crashing to Earth. Actually the discovery was more accurate than any of
the
I have been following this story for a while now and am surprised that the
media has not had much coverage on it. Personally, I think it is a
fascinating theory, though stranger things have rained from the sky like
frogs, fish, and sticky white goo, which was later determined to be bee
poop.
Here
Still an interesting puzzler!
I'm sure that this self-contradicting press release is just one more of the
usual media screw-ups/misquotes when it comes to science.
Is there somewhere else that would have more on this current statement? I
had a look, but couldn't find anything...
Cheers,
13 matches
Mail list logo
