Hi Matteo List
I just wanted to point out that you have used an amount from the first edition
of A to Z of 999 kg. It was actually 999+kg in that edition. In the second
edition I went back to 200+kg as it is listed in the 5th ed Catalogue of
Meteorites. I felt the 999+kg was a mistake and way
Thanks for the info
Matteo
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hi Matteo List
I just wanted to point out that you have used an
amount from the first edition
of A to Z of 999 kg. It was actually 999+kg in that
edition. In the second
edition I went back to 200+kg as it is listed in the
MetBase 7.1 states 250 kg (preserved in collections). Then again, this
should at best be interpreted as a lower limit and the actual figure will
surely be higher due to recent recoveries from the strewnfield alone, and
may be additional material which may have surfaced over time but was not
and we have to calculate the many pieces in the
private collections...
Matteo
--- Alexander Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
MetBase 7.1 states 250 kg (preserved in
collections). Then again, this
should at best be interpreted as a lower limit and
the actual figure will
surely be
in my collection I have a 370 gr. frag. with crust and
a 8 gr. slice. For example in the list its not present
the Milan museum have some samples from 200 grams to
50 grams
Matteo
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Matteo wrote (a scritto):
we have to calculate the many pieces in the
Regarding my recent post about MetBase 7.1 data on Pultusk one must always
be aware of the fact and keep in mind that the collection data presented
there are nothing but a mere snapshot in space and time, and very
transitory as time goes by, and very probably even insufficient even at the
time the
6 matches
Mail list logo
