Re: [mezzanine-users] Re: Do I have a basic flaw in my Mezzanine configuration?

2014-03-16 Thread Ross Laird
Actually the site is not working with my S3 settings, so I'll think I'll just move along until this pathway becomes more clear. On Friday, 14 March 2014 15:51:15 UTC-7, Ross Laird wrote: Well, my site is working now, with the S3 settings and with compression on, but I'm not sure it's

[mezzanine-users] Re: Do I have a basic flaw in my Mezzanine configuration?

2014-03-14 Thread Ross Laird
Without really knowing exactly how it happened, I got S3 file storage working. I turned compression off, for now, and will try to debug that next. As for the basic S3 setup, here are some of the things I did, in case it helps someone else: 1. I added the following two lines to my S3 settings:

Re: [mezzanine-users] Re: Do I have a basic flaw in my Mezzanine configuration?

2014-03-14 Thread Josh Cartmell
Hey Ross, I don't have experience with S3, so I don't know if this applies, but in the past I have seen the incompressible file error if I accidentally include something within the compress templatetags that isn't on the same local filesystem as the site. Someone with more experience may know how

Re: [mezzanine-users] Re: Do I have a basic flaw in my Mezzanine configuration?

2014-03-14 Thread Ross Laird
Thanks for the tip. I have also seen the incompressible error due to offsite files, but in my current situation I have not changed any templates and the compression works without errors if I deactivate S3. On Friday, 14 March 2014 14:38:57 UTC-7, Josh Cartmell wrote: Hey Ross, I don't have

Re: [mezzanine-users] Re: Do I have a basic flaw in my Mezzanine configuration?

2014-03-14 Thread Ross Laird
Well, my site is working now, with the S3 settings and with compression on, but I'm not sure it's actually loading the files from S3. (The Transfers list on S3 is empty.) I'm not sure where to take this next, but for now I'm just going to leave things alone. The site is working, at least. On