Re: [mico-devel] Marshall exception

Please unsubscribe me from the list. Mark Glasberg On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:43 AM, "Gregory, Peter" wrote: > Hi Karel, > Yes, you are right the issue is fixed by that patch. > > Interesting comments from the GCC community members. > Whilst I agree with validation of the case values against the e

Re: [mico-devel] Marshall exception

Hi Karel, Yes, you are right the issue is fixed by that patch. Interesting comments from the GCC community members. Whilst I agree with validation of the case values against the enum, I think this really should be an error not a warning, since it results in very different behaviour when you upgrad

Re: [mico-devel] Marshall exception

Hi Peter, this looks like an issue solved by this patch on MICO HEAD, isn't it? Sun Jan 3 18:59:34 CET 2010 Karel Gardas * fix "miscompilation" of typecode.cc by GNU C++ >= 4.4 This patch fixes typecode.cc to not use TK_RECURSIVE definition since this makes GNU C++ >= 4.4 miscompilin

Re: [mico-devel] Marshall exception

Hi I have tracked this issue down and can confirm it is another problem caused by the upgrade to gcc version 4.4. A different problem with the same cause was reported in the issue "typecode assertion failed on gcc 4.4 ".

[mico-devel] Marshall exception

Hi Recently my company have upgraded the version of mico that we are using from 2.3.11 to 2.3.13. We have done this because 2.3.11 failed to build on a new version of red hat that we have moved to. (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago)) Other than making some changes to