Cross-posting because I didn't get a reply from -dev and I'd like to
post this to my blog (but not before I get buddy-checked!)...
I've never developed a WordPress plugin before, but I thought I'd give
it a go... so if anyone wants to take a look at my code and let me
know how I can improve it,
On 5 Jul 2006, at 08:43, Chris Messina wrote:
Cross-posting because I didn't get a reply from -dev and I'd like to
post this to my blog (but not before I get buddy-checked!)...
Nothing's come through on -dev since the 29th. For me at least.
A case of cold-server rather than cold-shoulder ;)
There are a few minor issues.
1) you have dtstart in two places, dtstart can only exist once, so the
second portion would be ignored. To correct this, you can simply do away
with the first dtstart inside the h2, and on the second one you can use
the full date-time: abbr class=dtstart
I've looked at this again and here's a couple of things I don't like
in this algorithm:
* Throwing away the data in the last step. I am very unhappy about
ignoring good event information, even though it does not contain
explicit UIDs.
* No reliance on URL property of vevent. IMHO, vevent is
Hiya Folks,
Could I ask someone from the hreview spec to have a look at this review
in Blogger and validate compliance (if there's a validator out there I
didn't find it)?
I found that when coding for book reviews I took some liberties with the
spec - in particular, I founded I wanted to
I've updated our implementation.
-ryan
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:50 PM, Brian Suda wrote:
i have looked into the problem, and you are absolutely correct. I have
made the updates to the XSLT and staged them here:
http://suda.co.uk/projects/X2V/
I'll see what i can do about getting Technorati to
On Jul 3, 2006, at 7:37 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
If I read the spec correctly, yes, UID is required for the VEVENT
component, which means that UID is required for hCalendar.
Okkayy... So, here's another stab at the implied algorithm:
* if UID is specified, use it
* otherwise, if id
I'm gonna say just you.
At least, my messages go through pretty quickly.
-ryan
On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Colin D. Devroe wrote:
Sorry to go OT. But, is it just me or does this list take HOURS to
post messages. I replied to a few messages this morning at around
8am EST. It is now 11am
Ok, I got your msgs. Call me weird, but if I reply to any messages
from the list, they never make the list. I replied to Chris' WP
hCard plugin about 10 seconds after it appeared, and it has never
made it into my inbox, nor on the site archives.
However, when I create a new mail and send
Test reply.
On Jul 5, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Colin, you may want to confirm how your email client is handling
reply-to
email headers.
It is possible that when you reply, your email client is not
respecting
the reply-to header and only replying to the sender of the message
Got that one!
On 7/5/06, Colin D. Devroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Test reply.
On Jul 5, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Colin, you may want to confirm how your email client is handling
reply-to
email headers.
It is possible that when you reply, your email client is not
respecting
As many of us already know, browser support for the object element is
somewhat annoying and problematic when using the include pattern[1].
When we[2] first brainstormed this idea, we knew that using the
object element could get us in trouble.
As a result of the problems with using the
12 matches
Mail list logo
