Hi,
(Apologies for cross posting, but wasn't sure which list this was being
discussed on)
I read on the microformats site that there are plans to develop XFN -
that's something I'd be extremely interested in as our company has
numerous clients who would benefit greatly from that. Please let
Afternoon all
Standard practice at the beeb has always been to use link urls relative to
the root:
href=/radio4/today
Clearly these are of little use in a microformat (or any attempt to use html
as an api)
So my question is - are there any problems we should be aware of in
switching to full
Hello Michael,
What's the problem with using relative URLs (in Microformats)?
Any software that looks for Microformats can figure out the absolute
URL itself (from the relative URL).
There shouldn't be any problem.
And thus... there is no need for you to switch from relative URLs to
absolute
On Apr 19, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
Afternoon all
Standard practice at the beeb has always been to use link urls
relative to
the root:
href=/radio4/today
Clearly these are of little use in a microformat (or any attempt to
use html
as an api)
It's not clear that
You might be a bit confused. XFN already exists (and has since 2004):
http://gmpg.org/xfn/ .
There has, however, also been discussion about describing more
professional relationships, that XFN doesn't cover*.
Sorry, it was a typo on my part - yes, I was referring to XPN, not XFN.
I've
Hi List,
I just threw a blog page together in my wiki pondering about additional
groupings and relationships that could be added to XFN and also some
ideas for having a way to define different types of networks (a bit like
groupings but possibly more formal?) and also adding macroscopic time
