This is what Joe Andrieu said
about "RE: [uf-discuss] microformats for normal people, " on 29 Jun 2007 at 0:04
> Someone somewhere is going to name this thing. It might be a journalist.
> It might be FF. It could be a blogger.
It might be Joe Andrieu...
> The idea that there is data embedded i
Hey all,
I gave an interview to Nicola Mattina when I was in London for FOWA
back in February. He's put it online and it might be of interest ...
given that I both give a demo of hCalendar from start to finish and
talk generally about microformats concepts...
http://www.viddler.com/explore/nico
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Jonkman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Also, it is important to keep the one-to-one mapping of the VCARD
standard to hCard.
That's an unsubstantiated assertion.
--
Andy Mabbett
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
m
I think Jeremy is absolutely right. Genealogy data can already be semantically
marked up with existing
microformats. Don't forget to include the Citation microformat for
genealogical sources.
Also, it is important to keep the one-to-one mapping of the VCARD standard to
hCard. VCARD alrea
I don't believe that hCard needs to be extended to accommodate a
"date of death" field. I think that we already have a microformat to
deal with this use case; it just doesn't happen to be hCard.
The dtend field in hCalendar seems like the perfect fit for this.
Microformats are intended to b
Several editors on Wikipedia are calling for the modification of the
templates which implement microformat, to use hidden metadata.
I thought there was a prohibition on hidden metadata in the specs, or at
least somewhere on the wiki, but all I Can find now is:
visible data is much better
