Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats for Write APIs

2008-02-19 Thread gareth rushgrove
On 2/19/08, Philip Tellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18/02/2008, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that comment spammers would love that too! spammers are going to find ways to get at their targets no matter what you do to stop them. The only good way to fight spam is

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats for Write APIs

2008-02-19 Thread gareth rushgrove
On 2/19/08, Ernest Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gareth, On Feb 18, 2008, at 3:51 PM, gareth rushgrove wrote: I'm interested in the idea of using microformats to auto-discover Write API functions. So a simple case might be: Sounds like you want hAtomPub :-)

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats for Write APIs

2008-02-19 Thread John Panzer
Thom Shannon wrote: Standardisation might be interesting here as well. For instance back to blog comments. Comments from within aggregators would likely be simpler where comment form definitions can be established programmatically. The problem is that comment spammers would love that too!

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats for Write APIs

2008-02-19 Thread Thom Shannon
Standardisation might be interesting here as well. For instance back to blog comments. Comments from within aggregators would likely be simpler where comment form definitions can be established programmatically. The problem is that comment spammers would love that too! You could always add

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats for Write APIs

2008-02-19 Thread gareth rushgrove
Their seems to be a little interest in the idea anyhow. On 2/19/08, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thom Shannon wrote: Standardisation might be interesting here as well. For instance back to blog comments. Comments from within aggregators would likely be simpler where comment form

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats for Write APIs

2008-02-19 Thread Scott Reynen
On Feb 19, 2008, at 12:22 PM, gareth rushgrove wrote: Their seems to be a little interest in the idea anyhow. On 2/19/08, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thom Shannon wrote: Standardisation might be interesting here as well. For instance back to blog comments. Comments from within