Re: [uf-discuss] Actual research regarding usage of rel-me, rel-contact, and friends. WAS: Social Networks that use XFN and Social Networks that use FOAF

2008-03-19 Thread André Luís
What I interpreted from Chris' words was that contact and me was the only values _needed_ to achieve contact list portability. Not that the rest should be dropped altogether. I learned that from now on, I should always include the value contact, on top of all other values. XFN exists for more

Re: [uf-discuss] Actual research regarding usage of rel-me, rel-contact, and friends. WAS: Social Networks that use XFN and Social Networks that use FOAF

2008-03-19 Thread Derrick Lyndon Pallas
André Luís wrote: What I interpreted from Chris' words was that contact and me was the only values _needed_ to achieve contact list portability. Not that the rest should be dropped altogether. There isn't really any other way to interpret what he wrote: If you use Google’s new Social