This is another response to the WaSP post about screen reader issues
with the abbr pattern:
http://www.webstandards.org/2007/04/27/haccessibility/
As I pointed out in a comment on the post, their example uses the
condensed form of the datetime, e.g.:
title=20070312T17
This currently
Hi Jeremy,
On Apr 27, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Jeremy Keith wrote:
However, the datetime can also be written with dashes and colons
like this:
title=2007-03-12T17:00:00
http://microformats.org/wiki/datetime-design-pattern
Would everyone agree that, for the sake of screen reader users, we
should
On 4/27/07 10:47 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
On Apr 27, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Jeremy Keith wrote:
However, the datetime can also be written with dashes and colons
like this:
title=2007-03-12T17:00:00
http://microformats.org/wiki/datetime-design-pattern
Hi Jeremy,
Putting hyphens/dashes in between the integers sounds like a good idea
to me. I do that for most file names that need a date, so personally
I'm on board.
I'd be really interested in seeing if this does have an impact on the
screen readers output at some point.
It's definitely worth
On 4/27/07 11:11 AM, David Mead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting hyphens/dashes in between the integers sounds like a good idea
to me. I do that for most file names that need a date, so personally
I'm on board.
I'd be really interested in seeing if this does have an impact on the
screen
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
b) This still conforms with all the relevant W3C recommendations
ISO8601 is an ISO standard, not W3C.
I rather suspect that this was a reference to the WCAG-WAI
recommendations, not to any date-related format.
--
Andy
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremy
Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
title=20070312T17
[...]
can also be written with dashes and colons like this:
title=2007-03-12T17:00:00
Would everyone agree that, for the sake of screen reader users, we
should update the wiki to strongly encourage this
Both upcoming and eventful do not have dashes in their dates.
They will need to be evangelized.
Mike
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
Mike Kaply wrote:
Both upcoming and eventful do not have dashes in their dates.
They will need to be evangelized.
Mike
Wikevent.org's got it right
http://wikevent.org/en/Joan_Armatrading_2007_5_7 we don't need
evangelising ;-)
Spike
___
Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
Mike Kaply wrote:
Both upcoming and eventful do not have dashes in their dates.
They will need to be evangelized.
Mike
Wikevent.org's got it right
http://wikevent.org/en/Joan_Armatrading_2007_5_7 we don't need
evangelising ;-)
Spike
Ditto for Revish -
Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
title=2007-03-12T17:00:00
Can you confirm that:
a) This will in fact solve the screen reader problem
It will not. Though I agree with Jeremy and Tantek that this solution
is slightly better than the current recommendation. It is still far
from accessible.
Dan Champion wrote:
Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
Mike Kaply wrote:
Both upcoming and eventful do not have dashes in their dates.
They will need to be evangelized.
Wikevent.org's got it right http://wikevent.org/en/
Joan_Armatrading_2007_5_7 we don't need evangelising ;-)
Ditto for Revish -
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], James Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
You guys are missing the point. Do you talk that way?
Is anyone gonna be in thirty point three. Dash ninety-seven point
seventy-five anytime soon? I should be there at two thousand seven six
nine tee fifteen thirty zero zero
13 matches
Mail list logo
