[uf-discuss] Level of rel=contact

2010-04-06 Thread Sarven Capadisli
A little bit of semantics. http://gmpg.org/xfn/11#contact says contact: Someone you know how to get in touch with. Often symmetric. I'm thinking that rel=contact is generally attributed to someone that we have at least a lowest form of friendship with. It would also be someone that we don't

Re: [uf-discuss] Level of rel=contact

2010-04-06 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Somebody claiming to be Sarven Capadisli wrote: The example I had in mind was 'Subscribers list' at http://identi.ca/csarven As I said in IRC, I think followers are rev=contact I know some people don't like rev. Those people can be crazy and

Re: [uf-discuss] Level of rel=contact

2010-04-06 Thread Brian Suda
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote: I'm thinking that rel=contact is generally attributed to someone that we have at least a lowest form of friendship with. [...] Additionally, if the user doesn't have control over the declaration of such relationship,

Re: [uf-discuss] Level of rel=contact

2010-04-06 Thread Sarven Capadisli
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 22:48 +, Brian Suda wrote: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote: I'm thinking that rel=contact is generally attributed to someone that we have at least a lowest form of friendship with. [...] Additionally, if the user doesn't

Re: [uf-discuss] Level of rel=contact

2010-04-06 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote: On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 22:48 +, Brian Suda wrote: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote: I'm thinking that rel=contact is generally attributed to someone that we have at least a lowest