Hello Manu, all
Manu I think you need to explain that RDFa is a way of expressing
semantics in html, not just a way of expressing RDF annotations in html
Manu Sporny wrote:
Ben Ward wrote:
It will take a couple of weeks to give examples of how this will all
work, but I wanted to get fee
Scott Reynen wrote:
> That, or we'd compromise RDFa.
I can almost guarantee that neither side is going to compromise their
set of beliefs. The Microformats community is too hard headed to do so,
and the RDFa community has a very long, arduous W3C process to consider
when changing anything major i
Ben Ward wrote:
>> It will take a couple of weeks to give examples of how this will all
>> work, but I wanted to get feedback from this community before
>> proceeding. We have a fantastic opportunity in front of us now - who in
>> this community thinks that we should work with the W3C on this endea
On 28 Aug 2008, at 12:24, Manu Sporny wrote:
It will take a couple of weeks to give examples of how this will all
work, but I wanted to get feedback from this community before
proceeding. We have a fantastic opportunity in front of us now - who
in
this community thinks that we should work with
Hi uFers,
RDFa is going to become an official W3C standard in the next 2-3 months.
Martin McEvoy had posted something about two weeks ago on the RDFa
mailing list stating that he'd like to use RDFa to express Microformats:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Aug/0081.h
